Judith Ellis

Judith Ellis

Posted: February 8, 2010 04:04 PM

What's in a Name?

What's Your Reaction:

Glenn Beck accused President Obama of being a radical because when he transferred to Columbia he went back to using the name that his parents had given him at birth.

BECK: He chose to use his name, Barack, for a reason. To identify, not with America -- you don't take the name Barack to identify with America. You take the name Barack to identify with what? Your heritage? The heritage, maybe, of your father in Kenya, who is a radical? Really? Searching for something to give him any kind of meaning, just as he was searching later in life for religion.


Media Matters breaks Beck's comment down perfectly:

OK, let's break down the problematic parts of this, just so there isn't any room for confusion. First, the suggestion that certain names, such as the African name Barack, are un-American. Second, the idea that Obama, in embracing his African name, was doing so at the expense of his American identity, as if the two are mutually exclusive (someone relevant to this discussion once talked about the 'the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too'). And third, the implication that Obama's father's Kenyan roots are linked to his 'radical'-ness.

That's the best I can do for you, Glenn. I can't break it down any further. If you don't see why some people would get upset that you accused the president of adopting his African name in order to repudiate his American identity and connect with his father's radical Kenyan heritage, then I'm afraid you might be a lost cause.

Here is how President Obama explained why he assumed his given name after transferring to Columbia University in Newsweek in 2008: "It was not some assertion of my African roots ... not a racial assertion. It was much more of an assertion that I was coming of age. An assertion of being comfortable with the fact that I was different and that I didn't need to try to fit in in a certain way."

It is no surprise that the poll taken by an independent pollster for the Daily Kos indicates that...

* 36 percent of Republicans believe Obama was not born in the United States, 22 percent are not sure, and 42 percent think he is a natural citizen.

* 31 percent of Republicans believe Obama is a "racist who hates White people" -- the description once adopted by Fox News's Glenn Beck.

What I find really amazing about this is that Beck and his followers think that Barack Hussein Obama has chosen his name as if their names were not given to them at birth. And, with regards to names, young people assume nicknames all the time and as they grow up they go back to their given name. Do we have a country of radical would-be-presidential youths?

What's in a name? Barack means "blessed one" in Arabic and Swahili. In ancient Hebrew it means "thunder." Pretty awesome, I'd say.

 

Follow Judith Ellis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/twitter.com/jud

 
Comments
20
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   10:00 PM on 2/09/2010
One other thing, Professor MoFo. Are you suggesting that as long as there are mere facts and the ability to string them together, that wisdom, knowledge and understanding are equivalent to say... reading from the palm of your hand?
photo
clover61   09:50 AM on 2/09/2010
I admit to being absolutely stunned by Glenn Beck's comments on Barack Obama going back to his given name. How is it not American, since we are a nation of immigrants? All the children in my family were called by nicknames when we were growing up(Jamie, Katie, Timmy), and we all reverted to our given names when we were adults (James, Kathleen, Timothy). Just seemed more grown up. No one accused us of trying to shirk our American heritage by identifying with "Irish radicals".

Oh wait, I get it. Our names have a European heritage which equals American. African heritage equals "not one of us". It's amazing how Glenn Beck reveals the narrowness of his mind and yet people still flock to him. Barack IS an American name because Barack Obama is an American!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:14 PM on 2/09/2010
clover61 - Thanks for your story and relevant analysis.
seawolf77   07:30 AM on 2/09/2010
Just be thankful the country could not stomach Guihlliani. We'd all be goose stepping and zeig heiling past a hole in a gorund in New York City every year.
IWillCallYouOut   02:28 AM on 2/09/2010
So what names would identify with America?

Since AMerica does not exactly have it's own founding language..rather the English of the settlers it revolted from.

Shall we deem only those names held by the original white people in this country American? But any languages that radical Africans brought here against their free will might have spoken - names of those languages are not American.

I am actually more offended than I thought I would be by his comments.
IWillCallYouOut   02:25 AM on 2/09/2010
So...pretty much being not white is un-American. I mean we always knew this...I just didn't know Glen Beck said things this blatant on his show.

What a tool. Not to mention that being called by your birthname rather than a nickname derivative made by the same people who could not pronounce his radically African, difficult-to-pronounce-two syllable (yes I am being sarcastic it is not difficult) name is hardly changing it
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:06 AM on 2/09/2010
Thoughtful comments, I Will Call You Out. Thank you. By the way, I love your name. :-)
photo
Heartlight3   09:35 PM on 2/08/2010
I was also given an unusual name by my parents. (Actually it is a Hawaiian name and if I had grown up in Hawaii, it would not have been an issue, but I grew up in Virginia). When I was young other kids teased me about my name, so I called myself by a nickname that was easier for them to pronounce and easier for them to accept. When I grew up, I realized that who I am is who I am, and I no longer felt the need to adapt myself to be considered more acceptable to others, so I went back to going by my real name. I am quite clear that it was the same dynamic for Barack Obama. Glen Beck is the one with the problem, not Barack Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:08 AM on 2/09/2010
Thank you for your story, Heartlight3. It's appreciated.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Professor MoFo   08:56 PM on 2/08/2010
When I was born my parents named me Eric. That was back in '61 when 'I Love Lucy' was popular on TV (yes, I know I'm old). Desi and Lucy's first child, 'little Ricky', became my identity nemesis because everyone in my family thought it would be cute to use a derivative of Eric (Rick/Ricky) as a nickname for me. I was a kid, so I really didn't care back then. But when I hit my teens, and then adulthood, it became an issue.

My Birth Certificate, Social Security Card, Driver's License etc. all had 'Eric' on them. So I was (thankfully) forced to use 'Eric' instead of 'Rick/Ricky'. It turns out that growing up was a blessing; as I always preferred 'Eric' in the first place, and I finally had a chance to reclaim my 'true' identity.

Which brings me to my understanding as to why the President said, "It was much more of an assertion that I was coming of age." I can personally attest to, and sympathize with, 'Barack'. The fact that reclaiming my 'true' identity, when I became an adult, was long overdue and uniquely gratifying.

Finally being 'Eric' again (instead of what others chose to call me) was like an awakening. A rebirth, so to speak.

Even though many people from my past still call me 'Rick' (which is quite understandable, and I take no offense) I'm glad that I still 'feel' like the 'Eric' I always was and always will be.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:11 AM on 2/09/2010
Another relevant and appreciated story. Thank s, Eric. My name is Judith. I have never allowed others to call me Judy. I am sometimes called Jude. But I have always appreciated my given name and hated when other assumed that Judy was okay. Actually, I've never liked the sound of it.
photo
LMPE   08:47 PM on 2/08/2010
Who cares what Glenn Beck says?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Anne Johnson   01:54 AM on 2/09/2010
I don't even UNDERSTAND what Glenn Beck says!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:19 AM on 2/09/2010
Funny, Ann! So, what do you think his listeners are doing? Blindly following?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   07:17 AM on 2/09/2010
Yeah, LMPE, I used to feel the same way until I realized that there are millions of Americans who listen to Beck weekly and actually believe what he says. Honestly, should we not be concerned about the collective consciousness and intelligence of our citizenry? On the other hand, I guess there will always be those people who will just believe anything someone says. But I do wonder if the views that Beck believes isn't challenge will the ugliness of history and discriminatory practices repeat themselves. Beck is like Palin. Should she not be challenged or cared about either? What do you think? I don't think so.
rosiebond007   09:45 AM on 2/09/2010
I disagree with your view that we should not be concerned about the intelligence of our citizenry - I think it's really scary that people do not read (or cannot read) or care to listen to the arguments for and against really important issues. Blindly following a parent, relative or friend's views without question shows how little people really care or are interested. Perhaps the lethargy of Washington is to blame.

There are free papers of every political view at the library, social study teachers at school, friends with differing opinions - perhaps people are bored with politics, but every vote counts.

My vote doesn't count for much in this state, but my friends and I discuss, challenge, get frustrated and donate time and money for our causes just because we have a vote and we can try to make America a better place for everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Professor MoFo   11:57 AM on 2/09/2010
As a proud Independent voter I take pride in myself that I listen to both 'sides' before forming an opinion on any given political issue. To me, refusing to do so, no matter how painful some of the nonsense out there is, just doesn't make sense.

How can you intelligently comment/debate in an informed manner if you limit your resourses for partisan reasons?

Partisan political punditry has been, is, and always will exist in the MSM. It's up to us (the voters) to sift out the relevant facts from all the 'gibberish' , regardless of where said facts might have come from. Accumulation of pertinent facts, as well as proper assimilation of the same, lends one a larger measure of credibility than one less 'informed'.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Judith Ellis   09:54 PM on 2/09/2010
Professor MoFo - Hmm? Are you simply making general points on independent thinking and politics? If not, do specifically state "pertinent facts, as well as proper assimilation of the same." Looking forward to your reply.

Twitter Edition