By Judy Patrick and Karla Rodriguez
The stripped health care "reform" bill fails to leverage the power of those who have the greatest potential to determine and maintain good health for all of us: women. We all suffer when women -- this nation's primary health care decision-makers and consumers -- do not have what they need to be healthy.
Most people agree that the health care system in the United States is in desperate need of reform. Too few people have access to quality health care. Insurance and pharmaceutical companies hold us hostage. Treatment, not prevention, is the focus of care because it helps rich companies get richer.
The current health care reform bill in the US Senate is not reform at all and, in fact, creates greater barriers for all of us. The bill offers no public option, diminishes a woman's right to choose if or when she has children, reduces consumer choice around prescription medication and requires everyone to buy health insurance.
What happened to free will in a free market economy? What does it say about our society when government requires us to purchase health insurance and fines us for not doing so yet provides no support to make this possible? And while we're asking questions, what happened to this being about health and care?
The limitations of this bill affect all of us and affect younger adults, low-wage workers, the elderly, women and immigrants the most. These groups represent the most vulnerable populations to health inequities who have the most to lose, while health insurance and pharmaceutical companies have the most to gain. If the bill passes, we will end up with a system that is based on private insurers that have no incentive to control their costs or the costs of pharmaceutical companies and medical providers. To conform to the present health care "reform" bill is to surrender our choices and to drive a deeper wedge between the "haves" and the "have-nots."
Congressional leaders have forsaken the health needs of their constituents in favor of protecting the profits of big health business. Perhaps our representatives need to be reminded of the millions of people in our country whose health rights are being denied.
While it has become widely understood that when women are healthy, their children are healthy, their families are healthy, communities are healthy and so on, low-income workers (60% of whom are women) have the least access to health care. When examining the rates of uninsured by race, 13.4% of European-American women are uninsured while nearly 40% of Latinas lack health insurance.
In California, more people are born outside the US than in any other state. Of these 9.9 million residents, 3.3 million are legal residents, who are mandated to wait a full five years before being eligible for Medicare and Medicaid coverage under the bill.
What benefits are left for low-wage workers, women, immigrants and elders in a health care reform bill that does not provide quality, affordable, health care for all of us?
After many months of debating, advocating, testifying, arm twisting, we may realize some changes to our health care system that are a mere shadow of what should be possible.
We must continue to push forward to achieve all that we can in this piece of legislation, but we should be disappointed and angry that the interests of a few of our elected officials and those of the health care industry will carry the day. We must continue to advocate for policies that definitively expand access to quality health care, abolish unjust practices of insurers and provide quality affordable health care for all people living in the US.
We were all born free in America but, soon afterwards you owe back everything you've ever acquired.
We are the new Babylon where beggars will be out on the streets seeking food and shelter while the wealthy elite live like kings.
How did this happen? It probably began during the Reagan administration with trickle down economics. Some might say it began with Nixon and Ford's pardoning of him.
One way or another, America as we knew it no longer exists.
The President went back on his campaign pledge for little benefit. Those 30 million who'll be "insured" because they have to buy expensive policies with extremely high deductibles are going to be worse off for the most part.
There's a reason insurance stocks went up today. It's not because this legislation benefited voters.
I guess President Obama gets to hang his "Mission Accomplished" banner now.
Where is the list of non-negotiable from the democrats?
There isn't one, because the DLC, new dem, blue dogs are pro corporatist anti democracy conservatives.
We are going to lose this one.
And every other battle.
Till we vote in liberals, the Progressive Caucus, Kucinich, Dean, Grayson, Sanders, Moveon picks,
We must make them all pledge to
Outlaw all political contributions and thus bring democracy to the USA,
Vote for the liberal candidates with the Least corporate contributions and sponsorship,
voet for the liberals, the MSM ridicules and marginalizes,
Vote for the Liberal Under Dogs.
2.And while we're asking questions, what happened to this being about health and care?"
1. It says the Political class of Republicans and Democrats in Washington need some "free market" competition form a third party driven by results and ideals not money and power. Call me an idealist, if you will.
2. It was never about heath and care and never will be until there is a national third party that can win seats and contend for the White House. Theres too much power and money to be had for this to be about helping the American people.
Will it be a big program? This is a big county.
How can any decent person just kiss off 49 million people?
There are more reforms in this bill than the American public has seen in a long long time. They are not finished but to act like this bill offers nothing is laughable.
And, this will probably be dropped too -- so don't get excited about it. Some people might actually think non-profit=public option like you did.
The next step has to be to push to get this passed. Then we go back and push to modify the restrictions with future legislation. The one looming negative is a comment someone posted that the subsidies will be liable to cutbacks, akin to continuous cuts of the other social service programs after they are implemented.
Voters of all stripes will need to pay attention to what is going on in the future and push to hold our representatives accountable. I see the flawed Democrats as infinitely better than the willfully blind Republicans.
Bring back progressive taxes and tax those with higher incomes and especially enormous investment income to make the system more fair.
Think ahead.