More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Julian Block

Julian Block

Posted: January 12, 2011 02:49 AM

Divorces can be costly, from paying fees for lawyers or expert witnesses to appraisals of homes, businesses or other assets. The expenses soar when couples take their conflicts to the courts.

Sometimes there's an added expense--finding hubby's hidden property. When wives hire private investigators to track down assets concealed by future ex-husbands, fees to find those hidden assets can add up to many thousands of dollars, as I can confirm from my work as a tax lawyer and investigator..

Fortunately, there's a no- or low-cost source of information for spouses who are compelled to litigate their divorces or for already-divorced spouses who seek to recover overdue payments of alimony or child support. And frequently the means for unearthing this information is tucked away in their file cabinets--unbeknownst to those seeking the information. This is because still-marrieds and ex-spouses can glean a good part of what they need from the separate schedules submitted with their jointly filed federal tax returns.

Indeed, a treasure trove of names and amounts that could considerably shorten searches for hidden assets can be found in the returns. Look at these forms to get your fair share.

1. Check the Schedule B: This schedule requires listing the names of mutual funds, banks and other sources of dividends and interest if the amounts involved exceed $1,500. At the bottom of Schedule B are questions about the existence of banks and financial accounts in foreign countries. When the amounts are less than $1,500, the totals for dividend and interest income are listed on the first page of Form 1040. Husbands with bank or other accounts in foreign countries and those involved in certain foreign trusts have to continue filing Schedule B, even if the amounts are under $1,500.

When there's no Schedule B, it's harder for a wife to find out where the investments or bank accounts are. But just listing totals of interest and dividend income reveals that her husband owns assets that generate interest and dividends--a starting point in her quest to find hidden assets.

2. Check the Schedule D: This schedule discloses capital gains and losses from sales of individual stocks and other assets. In other words, if the husband has listed profits from a stock sale, that establishes that he has owned--and unloaded--that stock. What was the source of the funds used for the purchase? Where did the sales proceeds wind up? What other investments might there be?.

3. Check the Schedule E: This schedule discloses income or loss from the following sources: rental real estate (including the type and location) and royalties; estates and trusts; and partnerships and S corporations (S's are companies taxed much the same way as partnerships are, passing profits or losses through to their shareholders, who pay taxes at their own individual rates).

So if Schedule E reveals rental income, it might be worthwhile to drop by the property. Ditto when there's partnership or S corporation income. Track down the outfit in question and ascertain whether it continues to generate income for the dear ex-spouse in question.

What if the husband kept the copies of returns and won't let the wife see them? The tax laws make it easy for her to get around his stonewalling.

For example, my client roster includes "Phyllis Neff," who's splitting from "Walter." Phyllis disclosed that she foolishly signed a blank 1040 when tax time rolled around each April. And this was the last time Phyllis saw or thought about her joint tax returns. When she became aware of the need for information about Walter's finances, he refused to give her copies.

True, Phyllis can hire a tax professional to get the copies for her, but the hourly fees to accomplish that task might total into the hundreds of dollars, money that would probably be unnecessarily spent. Securing the copies is one chore she can readily handle without the need for paid assistance from a tax pro or anyone else.

If the Neffs had their returns done by paid preparers, the easiest way for her to get copies is to contact the preparers. They generally have to keep copies for at least three years and provide them to any of the signers. But a preparer who wants to keep Walter as a client might make Phyllis wait a while for the copies. If that happens or there was no preparer, then Phyllis should contact the IRS for copies. She's entitled to them even if all the jointly reported income was Walter's.

Phyllis simply signs and submits Form 4506 (Request for Copy of Tax Form). To ease her burden, it needn't be signed by Walter.

She has to pay $57 for each return and should allow at least 60 days for the IRS to respond. Form 4506 cautions that the IRS usually keeps 1040s for no more than seven years. Copies of Form 4506 are available by downloading from its website, irs.gov.

With a little digging and a little paperwork, sometimes those hidden assets can come to light.


Julian Block is an attorney and author based in Larchmont, N.Y. He has been cited as "a leading tax professional" (New York Times), "an accomplished writer on taxes" (Wall Street Journal) and "an authority on tax planning" (Financial Planning Magazine). His latest book is "Julian Block's Tax Tips for Marriage and Divorce: Savvy Ways for Couples to Trim Their Taxes." His Web site is julianblocktaxexpert.com.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erinaleks
Architectural Artisan, Free Thinker
08:58 AM on 01/13/2011
It,s nice watching the United States becoming
a police state. Lawyers being near the top
Of the judicial feeding chain must feel
powerful over the lives of people suffering
through divorce. This artical brought back
a lot of memories. It cost me thousands of dollar
In lawyer fee's to prove I was hiding anything.
the reason why I had run out of money and assets
and my ex-wife's attorney figures I must be hiding
money and pretending I was broke. Lol what a joke
All the money I spent on a lawyer could have been spent on my autistic son who I got custody of.
photo
mynameispaul62
Republicans are out of ideas.
05:40 AM on 01/13/2011
Thanks for reminding me why I never got married or had kids.
08:59 AM on 01/13/2011
Scary, eh?
02:10 PM on 01/15/2011
like i always said: you can't contactualize love.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erinaleks
Architectural Artisan, Free Thinker
09:28 PM on 01/12/2011
You just listed another reason NEVER to marry. Lawyers never cease to amaze me on exactly what is wrong with humanity. When I was growing up we were taught about the secret police in the Soviet Union and family members spying on their mates. Your article is chilling.
03:52 PM on 01/12/2011
I love this romantic view of marriage. It brought a tear to my eye.
11:00 AM on 01/12/2011
Here's an idea - why don't women become EQUAL partners in their marriages, instead of bystanders and allowance-receivers? Why don't they strive to have a career of their own so they don't become financially beholden to men? What is it about the fact that we possess a baby-making reproductive system that makes many of us (and the divorce lawyers, of course) think that we have earned the right to a larger share of the marital estate because we chose not to work?
03:53 PM on 01/12/2011
Why don't you get it? Equality= What's hers is hers and what's yours is hers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logic123
God Didn't Make Man; Man Made Gods.
12:47 PM on 01/13/2011
If only life was as simple as you seem to imagine it. The divorce rate actually sky rocketed once both women started working full time because both lose track of each other and the kids and fall out of love.
02:17 AM on 01/15/2011
Working full time doesn't mean that both are contributing anything approaching equally.

My wife and I both work full time, but my income pays the mortgage, utilities, car insurance, groceries, cable, phone, internet, YMCA membership, health insurance, home renovations, our retirement, daughter's music lessons and my personal expenses like my car payment.

Her income is spent on her personal expenses and our daughter's clothing. That's about it -- even though I only bring in about $1000 more per month than she does. From what I see, this is a common arrangement.

The phenomenon you point out IMO has to do more with the fact that at the same time women were entering the workforce more, divorce laws were being enacted to make the outcome of divorce much more predictable, thereby eliminating much of the risk of filing. Once women were guaranteed the kids and gov't enforced child support, and could now plan their divorce, the rates skyrocketed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moder8tion
09:55 AM on 01/12/2011
Women don't hide assets?
Is this divorce site only for women???? Look at the headlines. It appears to be a little biased.
02:22 PM on 01/12/2011
PC, man. It's all about the PC.

In our "reality" show society where everyone gets a blue ribbon for just being it's all about the New Age anti-feminist product called Equality®. Not the equality millions of women and men fought for for so long.
01:36 PM on 01/13/2011
My husband tells me his ex used to hide her "assets" and did so for years. Hence, the divorce. If ya know what I mean.
07:55 AM on 01/12/2011
As a male, reading this article affirms my belief that in the event of a pending divorce, a marriage certificate is a contrived legal document , used as a vehicle to extort monies and properties from the wealthier partner.
With such a high rate of divorce and the devastating effects on a man's finances, All Men should avoid signing a legal marriage certificate. If a woman truly loves a man, in this modern age, they can both live together.
In the event that there is a separation, at least the female partner can't contact the IRS for her boyfriends' tax documents. Why? Because girlfriend-boyfriend relationships are not legal grounds to steal properties or monies from a male partner.
Advice to Men: Don't sign that ridiculous malicious legal marriage certificate.
Oprah, Johnny Depp, and George Clooney would agree with you.
10:27 AM on 01/12/2011
"Because girlfriend­-boyfriend relationsh­ips are not legal grounds to steal properties or monies from a male partner."

At least not at the present time. You'd be surprised how many people think it should be.

If people refuse to marry, what to do? It seems we absolutely MUST have legal grounds, somewhere, somehow, to steal properties or monies from a partner!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shaun Hensley
The American Experiment has failed
12:23 PM on 01/12/2011
Better still, kick back and let the women earn the money. Keep them happy in bed and keep the house clean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickery
Gave up private vanity for public insanity
07:11 AM on 01/12/2011
This is truly a shame. I can understand wanting to keep divorce as honest and straight forward as possible, but what are men to do when the law is not on their side? The rules are seriously outdated and need to consider the modern self made woman and the underachieving man (or Mr. Mom). For far too long the modern woman has been taking care of business for herself by herself, but when she get's married to a man who is done just as well, then it's often than not that her hand is out, not his. Hiding assets may be wrong, but it's a sure way to bring balance to the courtroom.
08:59 AM on 01/13/2011
The laws need to be completely blind to the sexes, and divorces should be approached on a case by case basis. The laws, in most areas, still are designed to "protect" the woman and/or mom, even if she was an equal earner in the marriage. Great for women, devastating for men.