iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Julie Packard

Julie Packard

Posted: March 12, 2010 03:36 PM

Will We Only Save the Cute?

What's Your Reaction:

Can we muster the will to save endangered species that aren't cute and cuddly?

It's hardly an abstract question. IUCN -- The World Conservation Union -- has more than 1,200 species on its Red List. These animals and plants are, to varying degrees, on a path toward extinction. Many are ocean animals. Few are cute or cuddly, but they all need our help.

Over the past 25 years, I've found that having people meet and fall in love with marine life is a great starting place. It's the first and most powerful experience that places like the Monterey Bay Aquarium offer to visitors. This winter a LOT of people fell in love with sea otters, thanks in part to the presence of a stranded sea otter pup named Kit that we rescued and placed on exhibit after she was separated from her mother in the wild.

California sea otters are a threatened species -- a "cute" one with devoted and vocal advocates who support efforts to save them and speed their recovery. While their population still struggles, people care about sea otters and are making a difference.

For bluefin tuna at the aquarium, it's rarely love at first sight. But for visitors who see these powerful swimmers it is a memorable experience. And it opens a door for us to tell the story of the serious threats facing Atlantic bluefin tuna today.

2010-03-12-bluefinrwilder.jpg

These fish are amazing. They are the lions and tigers of the sea. At their largest, they can weigh more than 1,500 pounds. They routinely migrate between the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Eastern Mediterranean (where new generations are born) and the cold waters of the North Atlantic where they feed.

Though they reproduce in huge numbers, they can't keep up with fishing pressure. Bluefin numbers are plummeting -- down by 90 percent over the past four decades. That's because demand for high-end sushi has skyrocketed. Today, pound for pound, they're the most valuable fish in the sea, and the price on their head has pushed them to the brink. The first ceremonial bluefin of the season sells in Japan for as much as $175,000, and routine prices of $10,000 or more per fish are common in the wholesale market.

Though they aren't cute, there is hope for the bluefin.

More than a decade of scientific study by Stanford University, the Monterey Bay Aquarium and other partners has painted a clear picture of Atlantic bluefin migrations, and documented their spawning and feeding grounds. Our work has confirmed that bluefin are being taken at an unsustainable rate. Even if fishing was stopped entirely today, bluefin would take many years to recover.

Now, those data are the basis for a proposal -- endorsed by the United States, the European Union and other nations -- that would ban global trade in Atlantic bluefin tuna under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). Fishermen could still catch and sell bluefin in their own countries, but they couldn't export their catch to Asia where high prices are fueling demand.

We fully support the ban because the international body responsible for managing -- and conserving -- bluefin tuna in the Atlantic has been unable to reduce fishing quotas to sustainable levels that the science supports.

Simply put, science has been trumped by economics, and the fate of Atlantic bluefin hangs in the balance.

Can science prevail, on behalf of an animal without the charismatic appeal of the giant panda, the tiger, the orangutan? Does the international community have the willpower to save a species with such a high price on its head? We'll find out this month, when negotiators meet in Doha, Qatar to decide the issue.

I'll be standing on the side of the un-cute, in favor of doing the right thing. If you'd like to join me, write the White House and urge the Obama Administration to negotiate the strongest possible international protection for Atlantic bluefin tuna at the CITES meeting. Send your message to the attention of Nancy Sutley, who chairs the President's Council on Environmental Quality.

 

Follow Julie Packard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MontereyAq

Can we muster the will to save endangered species that aren't cute and cuddly? It's hardly an abstract question. IUCN -- The World Conservation Union -- has more than 1,200 species on its Red List. T...
Can we muster the will to save endangered species that aren't cute and cuddly? It's hardly an abstract question. IUCN -- The World Conservation Union -- has more than 1,200 species on its Red List. T...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:49 PM on 03/16/2010
Response to Huffington Post Julie Packard Op-ED

American bluefin tuna fishermen greatly appreciate the Packard Foundation’s longstanding support for the electronic satellite tagging studies of the migration patterns of bluefin tuna by Dr. Barb Block (Professor Stanford University).
Ms. Packard is wrong to advocate a ban on international trade of Atlantic bluefin tuna under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES). The international commission responsible for conserving bluefin tuna has already taken dramatic measures to rebuild this resource to maximum sustainable yield. The steps already taken include reducing the eastern catch from an estimated 61,000 metric tons (mt) to 19,700 mt in 2009, a further reduction to below 13,000 mt in 2010 and after a new stock assessment this Fall, an agreement already established will likely reduce catches to around 5,000 mt which will rebuild the resource by 2023.
In the western Atlantic catches have been reduced from 2,700 mt to 1,800 over the last several years. This catch level is sustainable, there is no overfishing off the US and our stock is scientifically projected to be rebuilt by 2017. US fishermen have always followed the scientific advice, are not responsible for the damage to the eastern stock and a listing under CITES would produce profound negative economic losses include lost jobs all along the East Coast.
The last thing this country and President Obama needs today is unnecessary lost jobs and further coastal economy damage.
Richard Ruais
American Bluefin Tuna Association
12:01 PM on 03/15/2010
I see this as another attempt to incorporate "cuddly" sea otters, that are not endangered, to a species that truly needs help. The Packard Foundation is at the root of the corrupt MLPA process and the lie about otters. How about paying some attention to the species falling victim to otters like abalone and pismo clams. Julie knows all too well the destruction otters have caused to species at Pt. Lobos and Cojo pipeline. I can't wait till the day I can have a public debate with these so called environmentalists that are straight up lying to the public. How about you take some of the billions of dollars you make off of the otters and apply it to tuna!! Why don't you take some money from the Dolphinariums and put it towards tuna...after all...the two species do have somewhat of a symbiotic relationship.

Call me any time Julie Packard...you are a liar...I can prove it!!

Respectfully, jeff@jeffcrumley.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
04:57 AM on 03/14/2010
You're right, commercial fishing is not the only cause of depleted fish reserves but it is obvious it plays a major role. You would have to be Beckered to deny that.
12:32 PM on 03/13/2010
You make some excellent points but you ignore and attempt to have your audience stay ignorant of, far too many of the factors at work here. I agree with what you put forth as the basic premise of your post, that "cuteness" should not be a determining factor in our efforts to protect all creatures from over infringement by man, be it by hunting and fishing, loss of habitat, or careless pollution.

That said, I bristle when I see your article once again advancing the oft repeated meme of the Monterey Aquarium and its financial supporters, The Pew Foundation, that fishermen's greed has been the root cause of all the challenges sea life faces. This is simply not the case.

This response to the article is cut short by the constraints of the comment policy here. I've posted the entire response on the Opinion Blog of S.O.F.A.. It is located here:
http://southernoffshorefishingassociation.com/blog2/?p=328
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SusanElizabeth1949
My micro-bio may be empty but my head isn't.
12:32 AM on 03/15/2010
That link was an interesting link, I know Canada also allowed the Japanese fleet in their waters, to the detriment of Canadian fishermen. Those 'fishing boats' are in reality floating fish processing factories.