The Obama administration’s recent decision to require most religious-affiliated employers to cover birth control for their employees is good news for the women who work for religious employers and do not share the male hierarchy’s opposition to birth control. It is also good news for a country with one of the highest unplanned pregnancy rates in the developed world.
More Than Just Using Condoms
Contraception, as every woman knows, is a system that depends on developing the right habits and getting consistent reinforcement from partners, parents and/or friends. In other words, effective contraception takes more work than simply remembering to use condoms. As a result, many women are more devoted to their gynecologists than other doctor in their lives – and gynecologists can be expensive. One of us visited hers after the birth of a third child. By the late thirties, pregnancy becomes riskier for mother and child and few families feel they can afford a fourth even on a law professor’s income. The gynecologist explained that methods of contraception that work for young women often don’t work as well after childbirth. The solution: an IUD. There was only one problem, the doctor sheepishly explained: It cost $400 and insurance wouldn’t cover it for an employee of a Catholic university. For a professional, $400 is not out of reach; for many women it is.
Conservatives insist that women know about contraception, condoms are cheap and available, and the high rate of unplanned pregnancies reflects conscious decisions not to bother with protection. What this argument overlooks is that the use of birth control is the result of a system – a system that encourages use, makes it easy to get access, and promotes a culture that associates responsibility with contraception. Middle class communities have that. The trip to Planned Parenthood is a rite of passage in many suburban high schools. Many knowledgeable parents drive their daughters to doctors’ appointments soon after puberty explaining that the pill helps control menstrual cramps. In European countries with low teen birth and abortion rates, the government provides free birth control to anyone who wants it with information in public schools making it easy to understand and obtain. Widespread use, however, follows not just from access but from the development of a culture that says taking the pill is the right thing to do (which is why the notion that the pill alleviates menstrual cramps is even more prevalent in Holland than here) and the accidental pregnancy is a mark of failure.
In the United States, we have been doing everything we can to make sure that the system that works so well in Europe and in communities intent on their daughters’ college educations is not available to less privileged groups in the United States. The class disparities are staggering. Studies show that the unplanned birth rate of poor women is more than five to one the unplanned birth rates of better-off women – and this is growing. For college graduates and women with incomes double the poverty level, unplanned births fell 20 percent in the late nineties. For the poorest women, the rates grew by 29 percent during the same period. With the Great Recession, the number of women reporting that they cannot afford effective contraception increased substantially — and the role of abortion has shifted, with many more women who have children seeking to terminate their pregnancies because they fear that an additional child will literally take food out of the mouths of the children they already have.
Women Hit Harder By Health Care Costs
Higher health care costs and the economy have hit women, especially Hispanic and low-income women, harder than men. Slightly less than one-third of women between the ages of 19 and 64, approximately 27 million women -- did not have health insurance in 2010. Women whose incomes were under 133 percent of the poverty line were even more likely to be uninsured in 2010, and millions of women delayed or avoided health care coverage due to its costs. Almost one-third of the teens who became pregnant explained that they did not think they could get pregnant at the time that they had sex, and almost one-quarter explained that their partner did not want them to use any contraception; yet, the Obama administration refused to broaden easier access to Plan B contraception, and the new contraception coverage rules still don’t cover all American women.
The initial decision to require health insurance plans to cover birth control as preventive care for women, with no co-pays, was made last summer. The question resolved in January concerned religious employers, and the new rule resulted in vociferous complaints from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops – but here, unlike in its decision on Plan B access, the Obama administration decided to do the right thing for girls and women.
More than 90 percent of sexually active adults will use contraception during their lifetimes. On this issue, Catholics behave the same way as non-Catholics in spite of church teachings. It makes no sense to invoke the principle of religious liberty to allow a small group with religious views at odds with the vast majority of the country to impose their views on millions of women who do not agree the them. It is time to recognize the contradictions of a private health care system that exists only because of government subsidies. Avoiding unwanted pregnancies is too important to be left in the hands of a small number of men in robes.
Cross-posted from AlterNet.
Fred Rotondaro: Have Catholic Bishops Turned Their Backs on the Working Class and the Poor?
Daniela Ramirez: Hope for BC at BC?
Nancy K. Kaufman: Birth Control And Government: The Right of Refusal Should Belong to Women
James Heffernan: So Religious Liberty Now Means the Freedom to Endanger Women's Health
"Following the law" is not enough to justify this if Catholics, etc. find this law morally wrong. The Const protects them and US.
We must protect them, and all Consc.Objectors, for the time when we are the CO's.
http://news.yahoo.com/breast-cancer-charity-pulls-funds-planned-parenthood-174857680.html
As stated in a variety of other posts, the church does condone NFP - Natural Family Planning.
Even when people are "behaving responsibly" pregnancies happen, not all pregnancies can be carried to term due to a wide variety of reasons are real and compelling to the only people that these decisions affect.
It would seem that the church has a vested interest in bringing children into the world and to diverting them into their care. Their dwindling numbers are a far more motivating force for creating orphans (since Catholic bishops have stated publicly that mother's lives are worthless and it's all about the fetus/baby) and more children in need of "charity" from predatory organizations intent on brainwashing children from the cradle.
How about the Catholics pay some attention to the 98% of its female adherents and stop fighting contraception on fictitious religious grounds.
"The Obama administration’s recent decision ... is good news for the women who work for religious employers and do not share the male hierarchy’s opposition to birth control."
Bullfeathers. This is the government trying to cross the line between Church and state. It may force the Church to fire all women, or to hire only those who voluntarily waive the right to contraception. This is not subjugation to the "male hierarchy" - it is the Church practicing what it preaches.
"Contraception, as every woman knows, is a system that depends on developing the right habits and getting consistent reinforcement from partners, parents and/or friends. In other words, effective contraception takes more work than simply remembering to use condoms."
Hahahahaha. If every woman knew about the proper system of contraception, we would have far, far fewer abortions and unwanted pregnancies in America. There are scores of women who are ignorant about contraception, or simply don't care.
All of this liberal femininst flapdoodle is as about as meaningful as defecating in one's hat. THis is not about women - its about Church and State. Liberals love to separate Church and State when it suits them. Well, now you see the other side of the coin. This policy will not survive legal challenge.
See, now if you new anything about employment law, you would know that both of those options are completely illegal.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-discrimination-laws-do-not-protect-certain-employees-of-religious-groups/2012/01/11/gIQAIbO4qP_story.html
Still, you do what you're told, and only what you're told.
The Catholic Church needs to get out of the business of employing others outside the strict religious context of the Church -- the secular realm -- if the Church insists on imposing dogmatic (religious) purity amongst its employees.
If the Church wants religious conformity, then the Church must divest... otherwise the bishops need to sit down and shut their yapping pieholes.
Very powerful statement right there!
Anyone who says that money, like co-pays and deductibles, don't get in the way of health care are fooling themselves. It is a HUGE barrier, meaning that even if you have insurance, you still may not have affordable health care.
PARTICIPANTS: Catholics ( practicing)
RESULT: Correct
It's interesting HuffPo continues to reframe the question when talk about Catholics. The real question is whether Catholics think the church should have to comply and pay money for doing so. Access is aan ambiguous term..