iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Justin Guay

GET UPDATES FROM Justin Guay
 

U.S. Ex-Im Bank President Fred Hochberg Underwriting Destruction of The Great Barrier Reef, Again?

Posted: 09/28/2012 11:06 am

The U.S. Ex-Im Bank, and its president Fred Hochberg, have never met a coal project they don't like. At times it's so bad we don't know what century the institution thinks it is operating in. Now despite a worldwide uproar over their interest in one of the world's largest coal 'mega-mines' in Australia they have been linked to another Australian mega mine. Underwriting the havoc this would wreak on the Great Barrier Reef is an unacceptable use of U.S. tax payer dollars and it's time Ex-Im Bank came clean on its involvement.

2012-09-28-GPReefGraphic.png

It's not surprising to hear over-eager developers link the Ex-Im Bank to these projects because the institution has a long history of supporting fossil fuel projects - and that track record is getting worse. It got so bad that the Sierra Club wrote an open letter to President Fred Hochberg because we have witnessed first hand the destruction these projects are wreaking on communities and livelihoods (check out our blog on the Sasan coal project in India).

But our pleas were callously ignored as President Hochberg ok'd a massive expansion of coal finance in every corner of the globe. From Kusile in South Africa, to Sasan in India, to Xcoal in the US, to these proposed mines in Australia, it appears that Ex-Im Bank cares little for the damage the institution is causing to communities around the world not to mention the reputation of this administration.

The problem however is that the public does. And that public stretches from Australia where the mining would take place, to India where the coal would be burned, to the U.S. where the financing would come from. This global outcry was captured in part by Avaaz's petition to #savethereef (consider taking a minute to tell Fred Hochberg personally via twitter: @fredhochberg), but also by media scrutiny in India, the US, the UK and Australia. It appears that while President Hochberg may consider designations like 'World Heritage Site' pesky obstacles, the global public considers them treasures.

Which is why Greenpeace Australia's recent report on massive coal export expansion plans that would trample the Great Barrier Reef, and the global climate, was so damning. They found that if underwritten by institutions like Ex-Im Bank the world would add emissions the size of the country of Canada while increasing traffic through one of the world's greatest natural wonders. For an excellent visual representation of this lunacy check out Greenpeace's short video:

So how did President Hochberg react? By quietly talking with another Indian company to finance another mega mine - this time with Adani group whose record of violations would give most institutions pause. Not Ex-Im though. After all, it makes sense that being linked to a scandal plagued Indian coal sector beset by 'coal-gate' investigations would be of little consequence if you are willing to finance the destruction of a global treasure like the reef.

But at the end of the day these may be over eager developers looking to increase the perception in the financial community that their projects have legs. The truth is with prices at near two year lows the Australian mining community is understandably worried that these projects are no longer viable. That is why the vociferous claims from Adani and GVK may be making their way into the press at this opportune moment.

But if that's true, it's easy enough for President Hochberg to condemn these public statements, and publicly dissociate the bank from this scandal. Instead he has been silent which leaves a huge question mark over U.S. involvement. But let's not put words in anyone's mouth. Let's let President Hochberg speak for himself.

So Mr. Hochberg, where do you stand? The world is waiting for your answer.

 

Follow Justin Guay on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Guay_JGuay

FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
10:00 AM on 09/29/2012
Thank you import export bank.

Fracking is much safer and the energy can be used much safer and cleaner.

Patented LPG gel fracturing technology: It’s waterless. It’s safe. And it stimulates much higher reservoir production.

GASFRAC’s proven, advanced gelled LPG technology replaces conventional water-reliant fracturing methods.

First, there’s no water. It’s a Liquefied Petroleum Gas gel that is as natural to a well as soil is to the earth. Soluble in formation hydrocarbons, it improves performance without using water.

Second, it's safe. We've developed a zero-oxygen, closed system and specialized equipment that protects worker safety, eliminates post-job cleanup and requires only minimal flaring that can be reduced to zero given the appropriate recapture facilities.

Third, it produces more. The ability to quickly recover 100% of the fracturing fluid results in enhanced oil and gas recovery, longer sustained production, and the ability to recapture, reuse or resell—a highly cost-effective benefit, especially for multi-stage horizontal wells.

New York property owners plan on using GAS-FRAC!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
12:20 AM on 09/29/2012
Science schmiance. Man's money is more important than life itself.
Endless industrial growth on a limited planet is fully fund-able with man's money, if not by wholesome common sense or a humane future or just basic reality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
07:45 PM on 09/28/2012
Shouldn't it be called 'Greenwar', instead of 'Greenpeace'? It only makes sense if you read it Orwell-style.