iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Karen Dalton-Beninato

GET UPDATES FROM Karen Dalton-Beninato
 

While Media Is Sandbagged, Is Sand Dumped Over Oil on Grand Isle? (PHOTOS)

Posted: 07/ 1/2010 7:34 pm

*Update, I'm still waiting for an official answer from BP cleanup representatives, but a commenter below speculates that the truck is a dumpster and not related to sand. If there's any chance that the 65-foot rule could be waived for our media team, it would help get cleanup the information to the very interested public.

2010-07-02-sand.JPGOn Grand Isle Monday with a NewOrleans.com crew, we were treated to a view of a relatively pristine beach. You can't actually walk on the beach without an escort, and the available escort said she was too busy to walk us to the shore, but we zoomed in on the dump truck above and noticed the well-groomed nature of the surrounding sand. There was barely a tarball to be seen. What a difference a few days and the outer bands of Hurricane Alex make.

The question of whether or not sand is being dumped on the beaches of Grand Isle to cover up the oil rather than clean it is lighting up the internet. It's a question raised in a video by Judson Parker of Save our Shores Florida. Reporter C.S. Muncy was there for still photography and was interviewed by Allison Kilkenny on HuffPost Green. He and Parker made it onto the beach, and this may be the last video of its kind since the Coast Guard has instituted a 65-foot rule between observers and cleanup efforts. It's punishable with a $40,000 fine, and if you know anything about journalists you know that very few of us have $40,000 on hand.

Muncy's video shows a different, almost asphalt-like texture to what looks like tar a few layers down. He notes that it is possible the sand is being dumped to fortify the beach, but it's also possible that there is a reason for the new 65-foot rule. Muncy told Kilkenny that a Jefferson Parish deputy who arrived at the scene to usher him off the beach confirmed that sand had been dumped. We didn't see dumping that the deputy mentioned, but my husband's photo above confirms that whatever the case, this dump truck was part of the operation. Watching the video is the best way to decide for yourself.2010-07-02-copter.JPG

This was the same week that Vice President Joe Biden, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano were touring Grand Isle, and the skies buzzed with Blackhawk Helicopters. They landed in the baseball field, and i assume they were escorted to the beach. Most locals can't get close enough to do anything but speculate. A man at the convenience store wondered aloud why when he saw cleanup workers, "Their boots are always white." The frustration lies in not knowing details of the oil spill cleanup and containment when, 72 days later, it affects the nation so deeply. BP Executive Bob Dudley, interviewed by PBS on YouTube today in a live session, said that 400 journalists are embedded into the cleanup operations. That may be the case. Perhaps I just haven't seen their articles.

2010-07-02-Peter.JPGPeter Fonda, in New Orleans for the Fuel Film clean energy rally (at right), said he was also turned away from the beach at Grand Isle on Monday:

I have to try to find out what I can about the spill. What are they doing? If they're trying to hide something, why are they trying to hide it? We're watching that terrible thing of the oil gushing out the wellhead. Why can't we see what else is happening? It occurred to me yesterday as I was at Port Fourchon, wait a second we kicked the British out twice. What is this, they're back on our beach and they're telling our Coast Guard what to tell us to do? A foreign flagship is telling our Coast Guard what orders to give our citizens? That ain't right.

It ain't. To be clear, when we were advised to stay off the beach, deputies and rangers guarding the Zone of Safety, Area of Containment and Vessels of Opportunity were perfectly nice about it. And they are just doing their jobs. But how long are we as a nation going to collectively agree that this is an acceptable job assignment?

My Full Post and Video at NewOrleans.com

 

Follow Karen Dalton-Beninato on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kbeninato

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:03 AM on 07/04/2010
You will wait for answers until you're not allowed to question anymore or you find answers by yourself.

The ice crystal saga in the beginning for instance: Why were the experts surprised by ice crystals, if they have seen them in their high resolution cams. Even I could see them in the low resoultion cam, when the gas run through the dispersant cam. On the oily side side bp switched light off later and now the cam angle is very low, that you shall not see them. Guess, that was also the reason why bp refused to serve public cams in the first place.
The whole calamity is a setup to transfer british petrol from british to chinese hands and may be to transform the region into a second Nigeria. Because of thew dumped sand oil and tar balls will show up during the next years to keep tourists away from the beaches.
I wonder why the media isn't behind it. b.o. brain washed, sounds good to me.

btw. "Oil is lighter than sand."
11:24 PM on 07/03/2010
There is/are a LOT more important question(s) that, for some reason, the news media have avoided like the plague (or more oil), and that has to do with what happened to all those 13,000+ ideas submitted over two months ago to the private, proprietary, British-owned BP website DeepWaterHorizon."COM" (note - NOT ".gov", NOT ".org"). A website that the President INSTRUCTED average citizens and backyard tinkerers, together with some of our leading scientists, engineers and inventors to submit their ideas to, to be "locked up" in a closed database, controlled and overseen entirely by BP. BP admitted to the Coast Guard that it found about 230 ideas related to either cleanup or stopping the leak, that were scientifically worthy of further evaluation, yet none appears to have been done. BP stated that about 20-25 of these potentially viable ideas, related specifically to stopping the leak - yet none were ever described or evaluated further. Supposedly it has now turned over the entire (still secret and closed) database, to the Coast Guard, so that they can start ALL OVER again "evaluating" these ideas from scratch (why would you have to do that, if you trusted BP???). I estimate this Coast Evaluation should be completed sometime next year, or right after most of the spill is cleaned up - which ever is later!
11:32 PM on 07/03/2010
So I ask, why hasn't ANYONE in the news media asked to have the entire database of, citizen-originated ideas opened up for public inspection and indepedent scientific scrutiny? Why haven't they even asked to see the 200-230 most promising ideas??? It defies explanation!!! What has happened to journalism in this country??? Who are they protecting and why?? I want to see those 200 ideas!!! All the law firms who are going to be suing BP and the government should be loudly asking and DEMANDING to see these ideas - all of them!! We should also find out who ordered the database to kept secret in the first place. Was it Obama who ordered this? Thad Allen?? We also need to know "who knew what and when" as far as possible scientific and technical solutions to this catastrophy - from wherever or whoever proposed them. I don't care if a good idea came from Osama Bin Laden - the American people deserve to know if there were OTHER GOOD OPTIONS being proposed but ignored! Doesn't anyone else care about this question out there??? Seems like a simple and reasonable request to me!
04:25 PM on 07/02/2010
Of course they are dumping sand to cover it up. That's all they have managed to do effectively in this entire ordeal is cover things up - their efforts in actually cleaning it up and addressing the problems have been pathetic.
01:37 PM on 07/02/2010
From looking at the photo, I'd say the blue "dump truck" is actually a truck unloading a dumpster, which will very likely be used as a depository for bags full of tar balls. I'm trying to calculate the number of dump trucks it would take to cover a mile of shoreline with a foot of sand, but it's for sure that such a project wouldn't go unnoticed. I've lived on both Florida coasts, and I can assure you that after a good rain, that beautiful, soft, white sand, is stone hard, because it's made of finely ground Appalachian quartz (you can drive cars on Daytona Beach), not beige colored ground up sea shells (think Ft. Lauderdale)
Please understand that the reason they're trying to keep people off the beaches isn't because there's some sort of conspiracy theory, but because crude oil is a volatile, toxic substance, and you can absorb its poisons directly through your skin and lungs, and it can damage every part of your body, including your skin, give you cancer, destroy your brain...and the dispersants are pretty nasty, too. Why do you think the clean-up crews are dressed in Hazmats?
Also, many beaches along both Florida coasts and the Gulf States are regularly "replenished" with sand dredged up out of the Gulf of Mexico. What you're looking at could simply be a replenishment demarkation.
FYI I don't work for an oil company or the media
whitebeach
Hey, buddy, can you spare a micro-bio?
12:25 PM on 07/07/2010
Exactly. And the sand in the Muncy piece showed only the typical erosion that follows offshore storms on every sand beach on the Gulf. I know because I've seen it many times. As for the "dumptruck," I really don't have much patience with a supposed reporter who can't tell the difference between a flatbed hauling dumpsters and a dumptruck. The whole "sanding the beach" thing in this case is very hard to buy: Grand Isle is accessible only by a little road that regularly gets clogged on a busy weekend. The idea that fifty or a hundred dumptrucks full of sand could go down it without every local resident knowing about it is ridiculous. And of course you're also right that sand beaches along much of the Gulf are regularly cleaned and/or replenished in any case. Many people, even Mississipians, are unaware that their entire mainland beachline is artificial, built by that awful federal government back during the Depression.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judson Parker
11:22 AM on 07/02/2010
Great article, but one important correction. Judson Parker, the activist and investigative journalist, is with Save Our Shores! FLORIDA, which has a different web sit than the one you posted. The correct web site is actually http://sosfla.org
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Karen Dalton-Beninato
New Orleans Writer
05:34 PM on 07/02/2010
Fixed, thanks for the heads up! It's correction day - I've added an update that to find out what the trucks contain, a tour of the beach from BP's cleanup director could clear it all up. If CNN, AP and Allison can't get responses, I'm not holding my breath.
09:47 AM on 07/02/2010
It's not a clean-up, it's a cover-up!!
04:27 PM on 07/02/2010
That's exactly what it is. You can barely get public health information about how this could be affecting residents even if you reside here. They are terrified of the public finding out just how dangerous this whole situation has become. I live in fear of a hurricane of category 3 or higher hitting us this year - one of that strength will blow all of this mess inland.
08:49 AM on 07/02/2010
Get 10 million angry people down there and see how long they're able to keep them off the beach.
08:38 AM on 07/02/2010
Wow. Talk about a cover-up -- LITERALLY.

I'm amazed that we didn't see this coming. And I'm also sort of happy we didn't see it coming: we still have enough faith in humanity that we just assumed "we're cleaning it up" actually meant that they were cleaning it up, not covering it up with clean sand. But now that we know better, we can't let it continue.
05:16 AM on 07/02/2010
Why on earth has the government now implemented a "65 foot" rule for the media keeping them 65 feet from coverage of vessels, booms, skimmers, wildlife, etc?

Are they trying to censor the coverage?
04:28 PM on 07/02/2010
Yes. They don't want the public to know how dangerous this situation has become, especially now that we are in hurricane season. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what will happen if we get hit with one of even moderate strength, and what it will do to public safety.
11:46 PM on 07/01/2010
Karen, you are what Arrianna is talking about, when she talks about what HP is about. You are an excellent exemplar. Please keep it up.