Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Karen Lawrence

Karen Lawrence

Posted: January 10, 2011 05:20 PM

The Cost of College: Weighing Expense With Value


If we had our choice, Sarah Lawrence College would never be listed among America's "most expensive" higher education institutions. These types of lists understandably generate media coverage, but leave the far more essential question rarely explored in depth: what value does this cost provide?

This is precisely the question that prospective students and their parents should be asking.

To provide an answer relative to Sarah Lawrence College, I want to share details of our price, why we think that investment yields the very best liberal arts education in the world that continues to offer dividends after graduation, and how we help deserving and qualified students attend -- regardless of their ability to pay.

First, as with any good or service, higher education costs are in part a function of what goes into the "product." At Sarah Lawrence College, and as generally true for other selective liberal arts colleges, that includes an outstanding faculty of scholars and researchers, heralded artists and performers, but first and foremost, master teachers. That said, there are very significant differences between us and our peer institutions.

Unlike any other college or university in the United States, we require regular one-on-one student-faculty meetings (which we term Conferences) as part of every seminar, and seminars constitute 94 percent of all our classes. As a result, Sarah Lawrence students spend twice the time in one-on-one discussion with faculty as students at even the most prestigious liberal arts schools. The product of that handcrafted and personalized education is nothing less than transformational -- both during students' on-campus years and thereafter in their graduate school or professional careers.

Each Sarah Lawrence College student is also assigned a faculty member as a "don," his or her own mentor and adviser. An exclusive offering among colleges in the United States (although dons remain a traditional feature of education at Oxford and Cambridge), this feature is obviously costly compared to typical staff advisers. But the benefits it confers - providing students with unparalleled guidance and direction and sustained one-to-one faculty interaction -- lead to a remarkable degree of maturity and self-direction as graduating seniors head out into the world. This model is all the more relevant today, in a global economic context of fewer "traditional" jobs and more urgent need for individuals who have the confidence and creativity to forge their own paths.

Admittedly, Sarah Lawrence refrains from taking advantage of "efficiencies" that allow other colleges to reduce costs. We don't, for example, use graduate students as teaching assistants even though they're far less costly than having a fully-qualified and experienced faculty member in the classroom. Nor do we offer the kind of large lectures that spread the cost of a professor over 75, 100, or more students. Instead, our average class size is 15 and our student-faculty ratio is 9:1, one of the lowest in the country. Wherever we try to find cost-savings -- and we do that continuously -- the governing principle at Sarah Lawrence College is that our educational model remains sacrosanct.

So what else accounts for the cost of an education at Sarah Lawrence? A modest endowment is one factor. Another is our location in Westchester County, which boasts one of the highest cost-of-living indexes in the United States. While the cost of doing business here adds hundreds of thousands or more to our annual utilities, maintenance, dining and other expenses, it's important to remember what our location provides -- a beautifully situated campus whose safe suburban location is just 30-minutes from midtown Manhattan. This proximity to a breadth of intellectual, cultural, internship, career and social opportunities is one few other colleges of our kind can offer.

As significant as we believe our value is, we also recognize that the greater our price, the greater our obligation to help deserving students and families afford a Sarah Lawrence education. That's why 60 percent of our students receive College financial aid, with the average financial aid package at Sarah Lawrence College being over $31,000.

Whatever a family's financial situation, if they believe Sarah Lawrence may be a good fit for their child, we always urge them not be deterred by sticker price, even if ours tops the "most expensive" lists. Direct conversations and counsel can often find a solution that enables a young person to join our community and start their own unique educational journey -- just as Rahm Emanuel, Vera Wang and Alice Walker did in years past.

It is perhaps no surprise that I hold this point of view. But after teaching and leading at the college and university level for many years -- and at a variety of different types of institutions -- there is no question in my mind: If the desired outcome is a graduate's maturity, confidence, intellectual acumen and the preparation necessary to be successful in virtually any career, then the value of an SLC education is ultimately priceless.

 

Follow Karen Lawrence on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sarahlawrence

If we had our choice, Sarah Lawrence College would never be listed among America's "most expensive" higher education institutions. These types of lists understandably generate media coverage, but lea...
If we had our choice, Sarah Lawrence College would never be listed among America's "most expensive" higher education institutions. These types of lists understandably generate media coverage, but lea...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:41 PM on 01/31/2011
i went to SLC before leaving, due to it being expensive. it's true that SLC tries its best to help students and provides a wonderful education (if you are not interested in one that is structured and degree oriented). My Don was an internationally known political commentator, and spending one on one time with him was a great experience. At the end of the day, however, the majority of my peers were wealthy, jet-set elite. They have good hearts at that school, and there is a distinctly liberal, progressive outlook that is pervasive on the campus, but the fact is SLC is trying to offer a top-notch education in a country that does not value this. If you are smart enough to go to Cambridge, you go to Cambridge; you can afford Cambridge. It doesn't work like that in America, however, and we can't pretend otherwise. This is in no way the fault of SLC. I urge people not to resent schools like Sarah lawrence because they are doing the best that they can; I can promise you that the students, faculty and alumni of SLC are generally the sort of people who vote to subsidize higher education. Sadly, most Americans don't. Karen Lawrence, I loved your school, during the brief glimpse I as a lower-middle-class citizen was able to afford. yes, I'm a little bitter, but my bitterness is directed at the American education system, not Sarah Lawrence College.
12:01 PM on 02/10/2011
My heart breaks for you, as it does for my daughter who deferred a year because of finances only to find herself at the bottom of the financial aid pile again. Your right about the American education system being elitist but we as Americans have let our educational assets, health systems and our financial systems transferred to the top 10%. I hope your generation can take back America from the corporate counterfeits who have made us disposable, and truly embark on a journey of value, creativity, and care of our planet, our children and our cultures. I do believe schools like Sarah Lawrence will be a part of that, even if we are unable to afford its design, we can all benefit from the discoveries. You sound like a true gift and its SLC loss that you are no longer a member of their community. SLC will never define you, but gifts like you have defined SLC, they have a very keen eye on talent, and creativity.Please never be bitter, they recognized your talents... you do not need them to prove them right. This can't be about money it has to be about will.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
11:21 AM on 01/17/2011
I'm not going to harp too much on SL because I went to George Washington which, at the time, was even more expensive than SL.  That being said, if I had to do it all over again, I would shun the outlandishly expensive private university experience in favor of a better value education. First, you really aren't getting anywhere near the benefit  the author suggests you are getting.  You need to consider the source and to suggest a degree of bias here is really to downplay the situation.  Second, you need to consider your alternatives. Going to either a community college and a public college or to a public college outright will save you a substantial sum that will likely be in the $30k/year range.  I know that doesn't sound like a lot right now, but that's $45k once you factor in finance charges for every year you don't go to these private colleges.  Third, for the price of private tuition, you could easily go to a great public school and get both an undergraduate and a graduate degree.  Trust me, people will prefer to hire a University of X graduate who has both a BS and a MBA over a person who has a BA/BS every single time.

I get that SL has financial aid that's very generous, but that's what every private school says. What ultimately happens is that basically half the school is there for almost nothing and the other half pays nearly full rate.  It's time to make cost-benefit a real part of the equation for college expenses and once that happens, few will keep funding the industry of private education.
04:43 PM on 01/12/2011
You can pay for that kind of attention, or you can rise above your classmates and seek it out for yourself by approaching instructors and developing those relationships on your own (see also: survival of the fittest). Not that I think what SL is doing for each student is a bad thing to do ... but you can have one-on-one guidance at much more affordable universities where it isn't mandated if you are proactive about what kind of experience you want to have by *gasp* doing it yourself!!!
09:39 PM on 01/11/2011
I knew I wanted to go to a small liberal arts college but being from New England and attending a private high school made me disgusted with the the superiority complex, lack of diversity and inflated prices of most East Coast liberal arts schools, and I looked to the Midwest and the West Coast.

My school has everything that you mentioned and more. There is NO REASON why colleges have inflated their prices so much except to be competitive with each other.
06:11 PM on 01/17/2011
They've inflated their prices because they could.First,student loans helped postpone costs.Secondly,parents thought getting their kids an outstanding education would guarantee financial success in life.It seems as if the education bubble is imploding.It will be very interesting
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
07:07 PM on 01/11/2011
Hmmm. I'd be far more inclined to take this post seriously if I didn't know that most private colleges, regardless of where they rank and which ranking system you use, have tuition prices within $5K of each other. If we're talking "value for money" here, then it seems like other market factors--e.g. supply, demand, and overhead-- should be at work when coming up with tuition pricing. Does it make sense that SL, Mt. Holyoke, and the like have the same fixed and variable costs? Of course not. And yet, their pricing is nearly identical. Selective colleges must keep their pricing within spitting distance of their competitors unless they want to lose qualified applicants to the least expensive among them.

Leaving aside room and board for the sake of argument, check out the following listed tuition prices for Sarah Lawrence and comparable schools:

Sarah Lawrence $42,600
Mt. Holyoke $40,200
Skidmore $41,184
Vassar $43,190
Williams $41,160

I could go on, but I think you get the idea. Why our government looks the other way when it comes to this clear case of price fixing is beyond me.
07:29 PM on 01/11/2011
University of Richmond (where I attend) $41,610

You have been fanned by me for being an intellectual and for providing me with a smart post that I can discuss with my friends at lunch. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inmyhumbleopinion
Vote third party.
10:53 PM on 01/11/2011
Glad to be of service. Oh, and did I mention that, theoretically, a place like Harvard with an endowment in the billions should have the lowest pricing of them all?

Food for thought.
08:45 AM on 01/11/2011
Money should not only be the definitive criteria to value, those chosen by this institution are the unpolished diamonds whose luster and brilliance will come forward through the care and attention that close detail and attention can bring forth. Money might not be their goal; the cure for cancer, the design of a peaceful universe, unlocking the code behind autoimmune diseases in the blood, finding the earth and nature as the ultimate value, a play that restores the soul, a book that calms the mind, a poem that inspires a dream, redesigning public education into an active systemic journey of discovery instead of the content filled dribble it has become, teaching uniformity and allegiance to the all mighty dollar. I wish I could send my child to become that enlightened, I hope I can.
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
11:23 AM on 01/17/2011
"Money might not be their goal;"

Yeah, but that shouldn't mean that the college ought to endeavor to ensure that the student lives in a mud hut under a freeway overpass for the rest of his/her life.  Kids might not really care about money, but they will in 10 years when they have kids of their own.
photo
Cawgrrl
Bird-watching beach bum and former businessperson
06:43 PM on 01/10/2011
I'm sure many a person has obtained a fine education at Sarah Lawrence, and the individual attention afforded students at private colleges is invaluable to many. However, I was educated at one of this country's lowest-rated 2 year community colleges, was able to earn back the cost of my education in about one month after graduation, and then actually went on to earn quite a bit more than the average Harvard graduate throughout most of my career. IMHO, if you are an intelligent and motivated person, exactly where you go to school matters little, so long as you graduate generally prepared for the type of career you seek. Don't be fooled into thinking that a school with a big name is always a requirement and that your parents must impoverish themselves getting you an education. (31K in student financial aid sounds great, but isn't really when the total is well into 6 figures.) There are many ways to succeed in life without unnecessarily succumbing to the lure of expensive prestige schools.
04:42 PM on 01/11/2011
There are also many ways to succeed in life that are not measured by money earned. My undergraduate education may not make the most possible money over my lifetime, but for me the value beyond salary has been immense and immeasurable.
07:51 PM on 01/14/2011
Thank you Maggie, I agree. Anyone who is interested in following the legacy of the Sarah Lawrence College philosophy should read "A Student is Not an Input" by the Michele Tolela Myers.