Is it any wonder that the lives of children are hanging in the balance with people like Rush Limbaugh representing the coldhearted contingent? Not long ago he went after Michael J. Fox for supposedly faking the extent of his Parkinson's disease - without an inkling of knowledge about the illness. Then there was the "phony soldiers" insult to people risking their lives for this country, and now it's a 12-year-old child who he disparagingly mimicked and accused of being incapable of formulating his own view of what George Bush and his ilk are doing to children in need of health insurance.
You know what's particularly interesting - that we're supposed to trust those cozy with GW in the federal government to determine whose telephone wires should be tapped but we're not supposed to trust state governments to determine who deserves a waiver or a green light in order to obtain healthcare coverage for their children. Even Bernadette Healy, former Director of the Red Cross, admitted that many families over the poverty level need SCHIP because of serious healthcare demands. Other families need to be included because they can barely make ends meet. It'd be interesting to watch the heartless, family values Republicans who prevented a veto override on SCHIP make it on the salaries such people bring home working at least two jobs.
Arianna described Limbaugh's controversial attacks as a classic case of projection and kill the messenger. Another reason - wildly insulting comments bring him more attention - and he's desperate for that. It's difficult for this country to have a moratorium on hatred when media creatures like him spew vile attacks and fake indignation to enhance their visibility and wealth.

Since showing the public an actual child leads to an avalanche of rebukes and attacks on his family, we might want to imagine a child whose parents are registered Independents suffering from a headache that won't subside, trouble breathing, infection, cancer or worse. We might call her "Everyone's Child." No matter where children like her live, their nationality or the circumstances that brought them to their pain, they are our collective responsibility. If we can't care for such children in America, we have no right telling other countries how they should govern. When a country abdicates responsibility to its most vulnerable and celebrates the vulgar beings attacking them, that country's credibility is surely and deservedly in peril.
Posted October 20, 2007 | 12:32 PM (EST)