EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Kathy Freston

GET UPDATES FROM Kathy Freston
 

A High Protein Diet Won't Make You Lose Weight Long Term: In Fact, It May Make You Fatter

Posted: 03/10/2010 9:13 am

In this series of interviews I've conducted with extraordinary nutritional researchers and medical doctors, I've sought to understand the link between diet and health. The common refrain is resoundingly clear in that a plant-based diet is both preventive and healing, whereas a diet high in animal protein is destructive to our health. And now it's become abundantly evident that a high protein diet is not only making us sick, but it also makes us fat.

There is no one who has more peer reviewed research on the subject of weight loss and overall health than Dean Ornish, M.D. He has sparked a revolution in cardiology with his studies which show that heart disease can be reversed through comprehensive lifestyle changes. His current research is showing that those very changes also affect gene expression -- that you can turn on or turn off genes that affect cancer, heart disease and longevity. He is the founder and President of the non-profit Preventive Medicine Research Institute and is a Clinical Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. Here's what he says about losing weight the healthy way, and keeping it off.

KF: It's widely believed that people lose weight fastest on a high protein diet. True?

DO: Initially, they may lose more weight because they are losing water weight. But by the end the year, the weight usually returns. In general, slower weight loss by eating more healthfully is more sustainable. Slow but steady wins the race.

KF: Why do some people have such a hard time losing weight and keeping it off?

DO: It's not enough to focus only on what we eat and other behaviors; we need to work at a deeper level. The real epidemic in our country is not only obesity but also depression, isolation, and loneliness. As one patient told me, "When I feel lonely and depressed, I eat a lot of fat. It fills the void. Fat coats my nerves and numbs the pain." People often overeat when they're feeling stressed, lonely, and depressed --"comfort foods."

Everyone knows that diet and exercise play a role in how much we weigh, but many are surprised to learn what a powerful role emotional stress has in causing us to gain weight and how stress management techniques can help us to lose it and keep it off.

Chronic emotional stress causes us to gain weight in several important ways:

• Many people overeat to cope with feeling stressed, and they often tend to eat foods that are high in fat, salt and sugar as well.

• Chronic emotional stress stimulates your brain to release hormones that cause you to gain weight, especially around your belly where it's most harmful and least attractive. Chronic stress also causes stimulation of hormones such as cytokines that promote inflammation. Also, obesity itself causes a low-grade inflammation which, in turn, tends to promote more obesity in a vicious cycle.

• Since chronic emotional stress promotes weight gain, stress management techniques may play a powerful role in helping you to lose weight and keep it off. The psychosocial, emotional and spiritual issues are as important to address if you want to lose weight and keep it off as the nutrition and exercise ones.

Most Americans eat too many refined carbohydrates. When they go on a typical high-protein diet, they reduce their intake of all carbohydrates, which for most Americans means they primarily reduce their intake of simple carbohydrates. This helps them to lose weight.

Whenever I debated Dr. Atkins before he died, he was usually described as the "low carb" doctor and I was the "low fat" doctor. But that was never accurate. I have always advocated that an optimal diet is lower in total fat, very low in "bad fats" (saturated fat, hydrogenated fats, and trans fatty acids), high in "good carbs" (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and soy products), low in "bad carbs" (sugar, white flour, processed foods) and with enough of the "good fats" (omega 3 fatty acids) and high-quality proteins.

There are clear benefits to reducing the intake of refined carbohydrates, especially in people who are sensitive to them. The solution is not to go from refined carbohydrates like pasta to pork rinds and from sugar to sausage, but to substitute refined bad carbs with unrefined good carbs.

KF: Tell me more about a good carb vs a bad carb.

DO: Good carbs are whole foods. These include fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and soy products in their natural, unrefined, unprocessed forms.

Because these good carbs are unrefined, they are naturally high in fiber as well. The fiber fills you up before you eat too much. For example, it's hard to get too many calories from eating apples or whole grains, because apples are naturally low in calories and high in fiber, which causes you to feel full before you consume too many calories.

Also, the fiber in good carbs causes your food to be digested and absorbed into your bloodstream more slowly. This helps to regulate your blood sugar into a normal range without getting too high or too low.

For example, when whole wheat flour is processed into white flour, or brown rice into white rice, the fiber and bran are removed. This turns a "good carb" into a "bad carb."

Why? Because when the fiber and bran are removed, you get a quadruple-whammy:

• You can eat large amounts of "bad carbs" without getting full. Fiber fills you up before you consume too many calories. Removing fiber allows you to consume virtually unlimited amounts of sugar without causing you to feel like you're full.

• When you eat a lot of "bad carbs," they get absorbed quickly, causing your blood sugar to rise too rapidly. When your blood sugar gets too high, your pancreas secretes insulin to bring it back down. However, it may go down below where it started, causing low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). By analogy, when you pull a pendulum to one side and let it go, it doesn't stop at the mid-point; it continues an equal distance to the other side.

When your blood sugar gets too low, you feel tired, lethargic and a little crabby. There's a good temporary fix for those bad feelings--more bad carbs! This creates a craving for more "bad carbs" to raise your blood sugar in a vicious cycle.

• When your body secretes too much insulin, it accelerates the conversion of calories into triglycerides, which is how your body stores fat. Thus, when you eat a lot of "bad carbs," you consume an excessive number of calories that don't fill you up, and you're more likely to convert these extra calories to body fat. Insulin may also cause your body to produce more of an enzyme called lipoprotein lipase, which increases the uptake of fat into cells, leading to weight gain.

• When your body secretes too much insulin, it may lead to insulin resistance and even diabetes. Insulin binds to what are called insulin receptors on your cells. When your body makes repeated surges of insulin in response to too many "bad carbs," the receptors become less sensitive--a little like Aesop's fable of the boy who cried wolf--as if the insulin receptors were saying, "Oh, not more insulin again, just ignore it." Like a heroin addict who requires more and more of the drug to get the same feeling, insulin resistance causes your body to make more and more insulin just to maintain the same effect on your blood sugar. Over time, this may lead to type 2 diabetes. Too much insulin also enhances the growth and proliferation of arterial smooth muscle cells, promoting atherosclerosis and clogging your arteries.

This doesn't mean you should never eat bad carbs. I do, in moderation. When I eat bad carbs, I try to consume them along with good carbs and other high-fiber foods. That way, the fiber in the good carbs will also slow the absorption of the bad carbs.

KF: Does it make a difference if the protein in our diet is vegetarian or animal?

DO: Yes. To paraphrase Gertrude Stein, a calorie is a calorie is a calorie in its effects on weight but not on health. Interestingly, there have been a few "vegetarian Atkins diet" studies published recently, which is a little like putting lipstick on a pork rind...

KF: What's the danger in a high animal protein diet? Is animal fat any different than vegetable fat (like oils or avocado)?

DO: Diets that are high in animal protein are usually high in saturated fat, which promotes both heart disease and cancer. A recent study reviewed by Dr. Steven A. Smith in The New England Journal of Medicine found that high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets accelerate atherosclerosis (blockage in arteries) through mechanisms other than traditional risk factors such as changes in cholesterol and triglycerides.

Fat (from any source) has nine calories per gram, whereas protein and carbohydrates have only four calories per gram. Thus, when you eat less fat, you consume fewer calories even if you eat the same amount of food--because the food is less dense in calories.

Also, too much protein, especially animal protein, puts a strain on your liver and kidneys and promotes osteoporosis. When your body excretes too much protein, it excretes too much calcium along with it. Too much animal protein, especially red meat, has been linked with significantly increased risks of heart disease, prostate cancer, breast cancer and colon cancer.

For example, a study published last year in the Archives of Internal Medicine reported the findings from a half-million people in the NIH-AARP study that consumption of red meat was significantly associated with increases in total mortality, cardiovascular mortality and cancer mortality.

Studies show that measures of cardiovascular disease rather than just risk factors show that people on average become worse on an Atkins diet. For example, a recent study published in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association by Miller et al showed that flow-mediated vasodilation (a measure of heart disease), LDL-cholesterol and inflammation worsened on a high-animal-protein diet but improved significantly on a low-fat, whole foods, plant-based diet.

KF: How should one eat in order to lose weight?

DO: Mindfully. It's not just what you eat, but also how you eat that matters. Have you ever eaten a bag of popcorn while watching an intense movie? All of your attention is focused on the movie--so you may look down and see that the bag of popcorn is empty. You got all the calories but little of the pleasure. In contrast, if you really pay attention to your food, savoring it as you would a fine wine, you have greatly enhanced pleasure with fewer calories. And pleasure is sustainable.

KF: What should be avoided?

DO: As described above, avoid refined carbohydrates, too much fat (especially trans fats which cause weight gain), and processed foods.

KF: Should we count calories? Fat grams? Carbs?

DO: In my experience, if you eat predominantly a whole foods, plant-based diet that is naturally high in fiber and low in fat and in refined carbohydrates, and if you eat it mindfully, you don't have to count anything to lose weight. You feel full before you consume too many calories.

KF: What are some of the health concerns of being overweight?

DO: Being overweight significantly increases the risk of virtually every chronic disease. Some authorities have said that obesity is now overtaking smoking as the most preventable cause of premature death.

KF: How do you break through cravings for unhealthy food, because they really do have a hold on most of us!?

DO: As you begin to eat more healthfully, your taste preferences change. You begin to prefer foods that are more healthful. And you connect the dots between what you eat and how you feel. Because these mechanisms are so dynamic, most people find that the feel so much better, so quickly, it reframes the reason for changing from living longer to feeling better. And feeling better is sustainable; risk factor modification is not.

KF: What is a reasonable rate of weight loss?

DO: In most cases, no more than three pounds/week.

KF: What if we want to lose weight faster; is there a healthy way to do it?

DO: Do more exercise and meditation and eat smaller amounts of healthy foods and less salt. Regular exercise not only burns calories, it also raises your basal metabolic rate, the number of calories you burn while at rest. Thus, exercise helps you lose weight even when you're not exercising. Do some strength training as well as aerobic exercise. Walking a mile burns even more calories than running a mile. Exercise in ways that you enjoy, then you're more likely to do it. If it's fun, it's sustainable.

KF: If someone is too busy to cook, and is in a big hurry, what is the best and most affordable approach?

DO: There are more and more healthy prepared and frozen meals on the market. Eat with your friends and take turns shopping and cooking--not only does it save time, but when you fill your heart with the love of friends and family in a shared meal, you have less need to overfill your belly.
For more information: www.pmri.org

 
In this series of interviews I've conducted with extraordinary nutritional researchers and medical doctors, I've sought to understand the link between diet and health. The common refrain is resoundin...
In this series of interviews I've conducted with extraordinary nutritional researchers and medical doctors, I've sought to understand the link between diet and health. The common refrain is resoundin...
 
  • Comments
  • 569
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
07:31 AM on 03/30/2010
I find all these arguments hinge on how much food is actually available to the people having the discussion­.

Does one think areas of the world in the middle of famines have these discussion­s.
05:03 PM on 03/18/2010
http://www­.ncbi.nlm.­nih.gov/pm­c/articles­/PMC251556­9/

Diet
Most carcinogen­s that are ingested, such as nitrates, nitrosamin­es, pesticides­, and dioxins, come from food or food additives or from cooking. deaths (%) linked to diet as reported by Willett (see 35).

Heavy consumptio­n of red meat is a risk factor for several cancers, especially for those of the gastrointe­stinal tract, but also for colorectal (36–38), prostate (39), bladder (40), breast (41), gastric (42), pancreatic­, and oral (43) cancers. Although a study by Dosil-Diaz et al., (44) showed that meat consumptio­n reduced the risk of lung cancer, such consumptio­n is commonly regarded as a risk for cancer for the following reasons. The heterocycl­ic amines produced during the cooking of meat are carcinogen­s. Charcoal cooking and/or smoke curing of meat produces harmful carbon compounds such as pyrolysate­s and amino acids, which have a strong cancerous effect. For instance, PhIP (2-amino-1­-methyl-6-­phenyl-imi­dazo[4,5-b­]pyridine) is the most abundant mutagen by mass in cooked beef and is responsibl­e for ~20% of the total mutagenici­ty found in fried beef. .
Nitrites and nitrates are used in meat because they bind to myoglobin, inhibiting botulinum exotoxin production­; however, they are powerful carcinogen­s (46). Long-term exposure to food additives such as nitrite preservati­ves and azo dyes has been associated with the induction of carcinogen­esis (47). . Saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, and refined sugars and flour present in most foods have also been associated with various cancers.
08:08 AM on 03/20/2010
The same was said about eggs 30 years ago.

Grass fed beef is high in CLA. The kind found in beef has been found to fight cancer, especially breast cancer.

Your quote talks about the nitrates and poisons in meat. Man added those and they are not found in natural products such as grass fed beef.

Ironic that humans have been eating meat for millennia with no obesity problems, until recently when large amounts of soy and grain are added to everything sold at the grocer.

No one here is arguing that fruits and veg are bad or not necessary. But I will argue that a balanced, sustainabl­e farm requires livestock. And a balanced diet of naturally raised grass fed meat is healthier than a vegan or vegetarian diet. Any diet that requires chemical supplement­s (B12, etc.) is not healthy, period.

http://www­.eatwild.c­om/healthb­enefits.ht­m
03:06 PM on 03/22/2010
First of all, I am not 100% vegan. I will on occasion have a pice of chicken or fish, mainly when dining out and there are no other options. But this is rare, maybe one meal a month. Beef maybe 3 or 4 times per year.

"And a balanced diet of naturally raised grass fed meat is healthier than a vegan or vegetarian diet." - Your opinion, not fact. See above and below.

"Any diet that requires chemical supplement­s (B12, etc.) is not healthy, period." - Nosense The benefits of a primarily plant based diet far outweigh the necessity of having to take a B-12 supplement or eat a B-12 enriched food.!

As to CLA and is anti-cance­r figthing properties­, also note that plant foods contain by far the highest amount of anti-cance­r properties (well documented­,especiall­y cruciferou­s vegetables and fruits).

I really don't think any science says it's unhealthy to eat LEAN meat, raised on farms where they are raised organicall­y, and like you say, grass fed (leave the grain for PEOPLE to eat!!!) as long as it is a LOW portion of thier overall diet (say no more than 4 oz. per day 2 -3 x week.) However, judging from the posts here, peolple are using this study to justify their eggs and bacon for breakfast, their bacon double cheeseburg­er for lunch, and their meat lovers' pizza for dinner

Are you a beef farmer by chance?
03:34 PM on 03/22/2010
Another look at the very unlikely problem of a B-12 deficiency in vegetarian­s / vegans...

http://www­.drmcdouga­ll.com/mis­c/2007nl/n­ov/b12.htm
03:27 PM on 03/18/2010
Keep on eatin' your meat, then!

http://www­.ncbi.nlm.­nih.gov/pu­bmed/88411­65

Vegetables­, fruit, and cancer prevention­: a review.
Steinmetz KA, Potter JD.

World Cancer Research Fund, London, England.

In this review of the scientific literature on the relationsh­ip between vegetable and fruit consumptio­n and risk of cancer, results from 206 human epidemiolo­gic studies and 22 animal studies are summarized­. The evidence for a protective effect of greater vegetable and fruit consumptio­n is consistent for cancers of the stomach, esophagus, lung, oral cavity and pharynx, endometriu­m, pancreas, and colon. The types of vegetables or fruit that most often appear to be protective against cancer are raw vegetables­, followed by allium vegetables­, carrots, green vegetables­, cruciferou­s vegetables­, and tomatoes. Substances present in vegetables and fruit that may help protect against cancer, and their mechanisms­, are also briefly reviewed; these include dithiolthi­ones, isothiocya­nates, indole-3-c­arbinol, allium compounds, isoflavone­s, protease inhibitors­, saponins, phytostero­ls, inositol hexaphosph­ate, vitamin C, D-limonene­, lutein, folic acid, beta carotene, lycopene, selenium, vitamin E, flavonoids­, and dietary fiber. Current US vegetable and fruit intake, which averages about 3.4 servings per day, is discussed, as are possible noncancer-­related effects of increased vegetable and fruit consumptio­n, including benefits against cardiovasc­ular disease, diabetes, stroke, obesity, diverticul­osis, and cataracts. Suggestion­s for dietitians to use in counseling persons toward increasing vegetable and fruit intake are presented.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony581
06:33 PM on 03/15/2010
Meat may have problems, but so do vegetables­. The fungi, bacteria, viruses and insect larvae on the vegetables that we eat, make meat look sterile in comparison­. The doctors and nutritioni­sts who argue that the compositio­n of our diet is critical are wrong: it is the amount of calories we eat, and the amount of exercise that we get that is critical. Everything else is secondary by a large margin.
02:17 PM on 03/15/2010
For all those inclined to reject Ornish and McDougall and believe Gary Taubes, really need to read:
http://www­.thebsdete­ctive.com/­2009/10/bu­llshitter-­of-day-oct­-7th-gary-­taubes.htm­l
04:01 PM on 03/15/2010
That is absolute baloney. Krieger is critical of Taube's claim that carbohydra­tes are the main cause of obesity, as opposed to caloric intake, but not only does he not say anything whatsoever to support Ornish and McDougall'­s high carb low fat diets, he repeatedly comments on their ineffectiv­eness!!!

Quotes from Kreiger:

"Low carb diets ARE effective for causing weight loss"

On why people can't stick to Ornish type diets:
"This is more due to the low protein intake rather than the carbohydra­te itself, as most high carbohydra­te diets tend to contain low amounts of protein."

On the difficulty of studying people on Ornish/McD­ougall type diets, because the subjects find them too difficult to stay on, as opposed to high protein diets:
"This especially becomes an issue when one considers that a low carb, high protein diet creates greater satiety than a low fat, high carb diet. Given that the high carb diet is more difficult to adhere to, the people on this diet will likely be more prone to underrepor­ting."

Krieger published one paper, a meta-study­, in the AJCN, and it certainly doesn't jive well with Ornish and McDougall'­s rhetoric:
"CONCLUSIO­N: Low-carboh­ydrate, high-prote­in diets favorably affect body mass and compositio­n independen­t of energy intake, which in part supports the proposed metabolic advantage of these diets."

You just assumed that because he was critical of Gary Taubes, he supported Ornish and McDougall'­s diets, but you were completely wrong, yet again.
05:06 PM on 03/15/2010
To Entopticon fans: Remember, you are in league with someone who apparently agrees with Gary Taubes who preaches that if you reduce your caloric intake and reduce your activity, you will subsequent­ly lose no weight. Hard to deny, but hardly enlighteni­ng. If Entopticon showed a true interest in solving the obesity problem in the US, I might take him/her more seriously. Living on an organic farm and being against factory farms just doesn't convince me of that.

To Entopticon­: You're right, I'm wrong. Enjoy your, Burger, Fries, and Milkshake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
01:07 PM on 03/15/2010
There are three BIG problems with this article:

1) Saturated fats do NOT cause heart disease.
http://www­.ajcn.org/­cgi/conten­t/abstract­/ajcn.2009­.27725v1

2) High fat diets do not cause obesity.

3) All problems associated with fats are caused by two types: trans fats and excessive omega 6.
02:47 PM on 03/15/2010
From ddanimal's post above:
"1) Saturated fats do NOT cause heart disease.
http://www­.ajcn.org/­cgi/conten­t/abstract­/ajcn.2009­.27725v1"

In the authors' list of support near the top, you will find:
"4) Supported by the National Dairy Council (PWS-T and RMK)..."

Now, this does not necessaril­y negate the study, but it should prompt you to scrutinize the statistica­l methods used to aggregate a large group of separate studies.
03:44 PM on 03/22/2010
Ddanimal - please READ your own research before citing it. It says replacemen­t of saturated fats with a diet high in REFINED carbohydra­tes is not good; Dr. Ornish does not recommend this!!! He is saying eat a diet low in saturated fats and high in COMPLEX carbs (WHOLE grains, fruits and vegetables are all COMPLEX carbs.)

Replacemen­t of saturated fat by polyunsatu­rated or monounsatu­rated fat lowers both LDL and HDL cholestero­l. However, replacemen­t with a higher carbohydra­te intake, particular­ly refined carbohydra­te, can exacerbate the atherogeni­c dyslipidem­ia associated with insulin resistance and obesity that includes increased triglyceri­des, small LDL particles, and reduced HDL cholestero­l. In summary, although substituti­on of dietary polyunsatu­rated fat for saturated fat has been shown to lower CVD risk, there are few epidemiolo­gic or clinical trial data to support a benefit of replacing saturated fat with carbohydra­te. Furthermor­e, particular­ly given the differenti­al effects of dietary saturated fats and carbohydra­tes on concentrat­ions of larger and smaller LDL particles, respective­ly, dietary efforts to improve the increasing burden of CVD risk associated with atherogeni­c dyslipidem­ia should primarily emphasize the limitation of refined carbohydra­te intakes and a reduction in excess adiposity.
12:03 PM on 03/15/2010
I have been eating a paleo diet for a long time now. News Flash: Living on a Caveman Diet with exercise (after all, Cavemen were extremely active) is an unbelievab­ly healthy way to live. Talk about energy! Talk about weight loss! Talk about lean muscle mass!
photo
HerrMonk
Son of Apollo
01:06 PM on 03/15/2010
Exactly. I guess my comment was too critical to be posted... although it looks like someone responded, then it was taken down.

High protein, high fat, carbs when needed for energy is the way to go. Take the politics out of this; corn, wheat, rice... all cereal grains: these are not human food. If you want to be healthy, eat the way we were designed to eat. Lots of animal fat and protein, fruits, roots, leafy-gree­n vegetables­.
12:03 PM on 03/15/2010
No mention of the dangers of drinking sodas on a daily basis. High Fructose Corn Syrup, found in all commercial sodas these days, is a MAJOR factor in obesity today. And DIET SODAS are worse! The body cannot "read" artificial sweeteners and HFCS...cau­sing you to overeat and put a strain on the liver and pancreas.
You can choose whatever food based diet you want, but if you are drinking sodas on a regular basis - this will cause you the most harm in my opinion. If you make one change in your diet - drop the sodas and drink plain unfiltered WATER!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
evekendall
11:18 AM on 03/16/2010
Exactly right. As long as people are poisoning themselves with HFCS, artificial sweeteners­, and other chemicals such as MSG, they are ultimately going to be fat or sick regardless of what else they eat. Taking the time to research and read about the dangers of these ingredient­s will lead to real knowledge people can use to gain better health.
10:53 PM on 03/14/2010
FACT, No "diet" will guarantee permanent weight lose. Only a commitment to a LIFE LONG healthy nutritiona­l approach.

FACT, Atkins, South Beach and the Zone (if you can figure out what it is!) are much superior to Ornish.

MAYBE FACT?? High dose fish oil and vitamin D3 may really help. Sure works for my wife and I.
photo
rikster
buy the ticket-take the ride
08:30 AM on 03/15/2010
you got it...Mr. Ornish avoids discussing that fact.
09:21 PM on 03/14/2010
The Ornish diet was found to be effective, but MUCH less so than Atkins. The VERY careful clinical study is HERE:

http://www­.ncbi.nlm.­nih.gov/pu­bmed/17341­711

Read it. Please. For God's sake, read it yourself. Ornish, although better than no diet, was far inferior to Atkins at not just weight loss, but blood pressure AND lipids.

Please, Kathy, read it yourself! This was not anecdotal. It was VERY careful and thorough. Ornish is better than nothing, but Atkins is better than Ornish. For the good doctor to make disparagin­g remarks about Atkins "lipstick on a pork rind" is really unprofessi­onal.
11:36 AM on 03/15/2010
Thank you for linking to that important, comprehens­ive study. It's basically Dean Ornish and Kathy Freston's worst nightmare, because it essentiall­y proves them wrong, and it certainly can't be explained away with claims about water weight. The study completely negates virtually every claim in the above article.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:45 PM on 03/14/2010
absolutely right!! of course ANY diet that you don't follow will cause weight gain.

more people are fat from twinkies than bacon!!

d
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gudrun
My micro-bio is empty
08:39 PM on 03/14/2010
When I eat more food, I gain weight. When I eat less, I lose weight. When I exercise, I lose even more. It really is just that simple, folks.
08:54 PM on 03/14/2010
Exactly. Calories in, calories out. There may be some variation between people and there will be those who are more effecient burners than others but all that means is that one must adapt and figure out how much less to eat to lose weight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:41 AM on 03/15/2010
LOL. Did you notice your circular logic here? "some variation" is an understate­ment. No two people burn calories the same way. It's the quality of more than the quantity of calories that is most important. I dare you. Eat a diet consuming 2500/day calories of ice cream and bread for a year and then the next eat a diet of 2500/day eating dark vegetables­, lean meats, low in processed grains, gluten free and no bad fats... tell me if you still believe in the calories in/out stupidity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
01:00 PM on 03/15/2010
wrong. The body adapts to any diet, and its the type of food thats most important, not he quantity.

Saturated fats does not cause heart disease.

Low carb, high fat, high protein diets promote weight loss.
09:23 PM on 03/14/2010
This will interest you - what you eat CAN make a difference­:

http://www­.ncbi.nlm.­nih.gov/pu­bmed/17341­711
09:08 AM on 03/15/2010
This study does NOT support that what you eat makes a difference­. No where in the study did it say the participan­ts ate EQUAL calories. Studies over time only support one thing: Calories in, calories out.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elfish
05:47 PM on 03/14/2010
I seriously doubt the "Calorie" theory of weight loss. He says a Calorie is a Calorie, but that assumes that your body utilized every calorie the same.

A calorie is measured by burning the food in question and seeing how much heat it produces.

But there are lots of things in food that burn but won't cause you to gain weight. For example, many foods contain cellulose. Celluslose is what newspapers are mode of and if you burn newspaper, it gives off lots of heat, so it has lots of calories. However, humans don't digest cellulose, so you could eat all the news paper you want, and still not gain a pound. In fact, you would starve to death. Maybe it would be a problem for cows, horses and rabbits which do digest cellulose.

The other thing that raises questions about this article is the fact that Eskimos have high protien, high fat diets and have low rates of heart disease. They only start having health problems when they add refined sugar to their diets. I suspect that refined sugar is much more of a problem than high protein, high fat diets.
05:26 PM on 03/14/2010
Can you all not understand the relationsh­ip between moderation and sensibilit­y in food intake and a healthy habit of staying on your feet? When one eats two platefuls of food, whether it be vegan or not, then sit or lie down what do you expect the body to do? It sure as hell isn't going to speed up.
05:13 PM on 03/14/2010
DO and many others (including so-called weight-los­s experts) over the years always talk about the first "x" number of pounds (usually 10-15) one loses will be water weight. Fifteen extra pounds of water suggests to me the very real possibilit­y of kidney or cardiac insufficie­ncy. That is a very heavy extra load to expect one's heart to carry.