iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kathy Freston

GET UPDATES FROM Kathy Freston
 

An Earth Day Reflection On The Breathtaking Effects Of Cutting Back On Meat

Posted: 04/22/09 11:23 AM ET

My first post on the effect of eating meat on the environment provoked quite a bit of discussion, so in honor of Earth Day, I thought I should follow up with more information about how our natural resources (e.g., air, water, and soil) are depleted and devastated by animal agriculture.

Of course, Earth Day is also a good time to remember that animal agriculture only exists at these levels because people are purchasing vast quantities of chicken, beef, pork, and fish. The market for meat (i.e., we, the consumers) drives the depletion and destruction.

* Excrement produced by chickens, pigs, and other farm animals: 16.6 billion tons per year - more than a million pounds per second (that's 60 times as much as is produced by the world's human population - farmed animals produce more waste in one day than the U.S. human population produces in 3½ years). This excrement is a major cause of air and water pollution. According to the United Nations: "The livestock sector is... the largest sectoral source of water pollution, contributing to eutrophication, 'dead' zones in coastal areas, degradation of coral reefs, human health problems, emergence of antibiotic resistance and many others."

* Water used for farmed animals and irrigating feed crops: 240 trillion gallons per year- 7.5 million gallons per second (that's enough for every human to take 8 showers a day, or as much as is used by Europe, Africa, and South America combined). According to the UN: "[t]he water used by the sector exceeds 8 percent of the global human water use." As just one example, "[O]n average 990 litres of water are required to produce one litre of milk." So drinking milk instead of tap water requires almost 1,000 times as much water.

* Emissions of greenhouse gases from raising animals for food: The equivalent of 7.8 billion tons of carbon dioxide per year, according to the UN report. Concludes the UN: "The livestock sector is... responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions." That's about 40 percent more than all the cars, trucks, planes, trains, and ships in the world combined (transport is 13%). And "The sector emits 37% of anthropogenic methane (with 23 times the global warming potential--or GWP--of CO2)... It emits 65% of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (with 296 times the GWP of CO2). These figures are based on the power of these gases over 100 years; in fact, over 20 years--a more important timeframe for dealing with global warming--methane and nitrous oxide are 72 times and 289 times more warming than CO2. And Dr. Rajendra Pachauri, Chair of the IPCC (which shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore) has been saying that the 18% figure is probably an underestimate.

* It takes more than 11 times as much fossil fuel to make one calorie of animal protein as it does to make one calorie of plant protein.

* Soil erosion due to growing livestock feed: 40 billion tons per year (or 6 tons/year for every human being on the planet--of course if you don't eat meat, none of this is attributed to you; if you're in the U.S. where we eat lots more meat than most of the world, your contribution is many times greater than 6 tons/year). About 60% of soil that is washed away ends up in rivers, streams and lakes, making waterways more prone to flooding and to contamination from soil's fertilizers and pesticides. Erosion increases the amount of dust carried by wind, polluting the air and carrying infection and disease.

* Land used to raise animals for food: 10 billion acres. According to the UN: "In all, livestock production accounts for 70 percent of all agricultural land and 30 percent of the land surface of the planet." And "70 percent of previous forested land in the Amazon is occupied by pastures, and feedcrops cover a large part of the remainder." And "About 20 percent of the world's pastures and rangelands, with 73 percent of rangelands in dry areas, have been degraded to some extent, mostly through overgrazing, compaction and erosion created by livestock action."

* According to the UN, animal agriculture is a leading case of water pollution. The main water pollutants in the US are sediments and nutrients. Animal agriculture is responsible for 55 percent of the erosion that causes sedimentation, and for a third of the main nutrient pollutants, nitrogen and phosphorous. On top of that, animal agriculture is the source of more than a third of the United States' water pollution from pesticides, and half of its water pollution from antibiotics.

* Livestock are also responsible for almost two-thirds of anthropogenic ammonia emissions, which contribute significantly to acid rain and acidification of ecosystems.

* Grain and corn raised for livestock feed that could otherwise feed people, according to the UN: 836 million tons per year (note that the more commonly used figure, 758 million tons, is metric). That's more than 7 times the amount used for biofuels and is much more than enough to adequately feed the 1.4 billion humans who are living in dire poverty, and the number doesn't even include the fact that almost all of the global soy crop (about 240 million tons of soy) is also fed to chickens, pigs, and other farmed animals.

* An American saves more global warming pollution by going vegan than by switching their car to a hybrid Prius.

* Razing the Amazon rainforest for pasture and feed crops: 5 million acres of Amazon per year. Former Amazon rainforest converted to raising animals for food since 1970 is more than 90% of all Amazon deforestation since 1970.

* According to the UN: "Indeed, the livestock sector may well be the leading player in the reduction of biodiversity..." And "[l]ivestock now account for about 20 percent of the total terrestrial animal biomass, and the 30 percent of the earth's land surface that they now pre-empt was once habitat for wildlife." And "Conservation International has identified 35 global hotspots for biodiversity, characterized by exceptional levels of plant endemism and serious levels of habitat loss. Of these, 23 are reported to be affected by livestock production. An analysis of the authoritative World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species shows that most of the world's threatened species are suffering habitat loss where livestock are a factor."

United Nations scientists, in their 408-page indictment of the meat industry, sum up these statistics, pointing out that the meat industry is "one of the ... most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global," including "problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity."

Perhaps it's time to explore vegetarianism. Click here for tips. Happy Eating!

United Nations statistics and quotes come from the FAO report "Livestock's Long Shadow." Other statistics come from the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Pimentel & Pimentel, 2003); the World Bank (Marglis, "Causes of Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon," 2004); and Earth Interactions Journal (Eshel & Martin, "Diet, Energy, and Global Warming," 2006). Other non-attributed statistics were calculated by Noam Mohr, a physicist at New York University Polytechnic Institute.

 
 
 
My first post on the effect of eating meat on the environment provoked quite a bit of discussion, so in honor of Earth Day, I thought I should follow up with more information about how our natural res...
My first post on the effect of eating meat on the environment provoked quite a bit of discussion, so in honor of Earth Day, I thought I should follow up with more information about how our natural res...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 122
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:43 PM on 04/25/2009
Kathy Freston is a clear voice of sanity in the environmental cause. Long may she write and may her voice get louder and louder.
12:23 AM on 04/25/2009
follow a raw vegan diet, but don't care what other people eat. still, i'm struck by the comments that are in the vein of eat meat, am proud, so there! who is likely to suffer the most from their actions? cutting off their nose to spite their face, it seems.
08:47 PM on 04/24/2009
I could never be a vegetarian or vegan. I love Big Macs too much. Fortunately, my "footprint" is still lower than most as I don't own a car and haven't for over 25 years. It's a good thing too...I'd be 500 pounds if I didn't walk or ride my bike everywhere.
09:19 PM on 04/24/2009
O.k. But in general you'd be doing more if you drove a car and were vegan, than being a car-driving meat eater. That's even if you had your vegan food shipped in (look up the tiny percentage of "footprint" that food miles have vs. meat eating, on the web).

People can do what they want, but it's good to face the facts.
07:39 PM on 04/24/2009
I never thought I could be a vegetarian, but I've cut way back on my meat consumption and I've seen great health results after only a few months (the biggest plus being that I've lost weight). I don't think I could ever go back to eating the way I did previously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
odyssey58
06:56 PM on 04/23/2009
Can we just put an end to posting articles about eating meat vs. not eating meat? It brings out the worst in too many people. We have to agree to disagree.
07:25 PM on 04/23/2009
Can we just put an end to posting articles about human caused climate change and pollution vs. not human caused climate change and pollution? It brings out the worst in too many people. We have to agree to disagree.

Let's all close our eyes and ignore this fact:
"Concludes the UN: "The livestock sector is... responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions." That's about 40 percent more than all the cars, trucks, planes, trains, and ships in the world combined (transport is 13%)."

The UN is a vegan propaganda group.
11:58 PM on 04/23/2009
All animals emit carbon which is absorbed by plants. It's a cycle; i.e., animal eats plants (or another animal who ate plants), then produces the carbon that feeds plants. Fossil fuels, on the other hand, release carbons that were stored underground for millions of years. This is why the "cow farts contribute to global warming" claim is flawed. Not that I'm in favor of the status quo, mind you. Modern agriculture, including the production of vegetables and grains, is contributing to some serious problems.

As for the UN, one of it's weaknesses is that it can be used to promote propaganda put forth by any group with the means to control a committee. I'm not saying that was the case in this report, but it has been known to happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StrayTalk
Keep the old comment format.
02:07 PM on 04/25/2009
Nice try Odyssey but you know that ain't gonna happen!
But can we at least come to some agreements? How about the idea that this planet WOULD be better off if most people did cut down on their meat and dairy consumption? On the vegan side: recognize that most people will never become vegan for many reasons so why not at least focus more on getting people to REDUCE their animal food consumption? Stop using guilt trips and questionable data to get everyone to become a True Believer. I think in many cases you have created a backlash against Veggies which is completely unnecessary. Also, take your time before you claim someone is a vegan. Take celebrities as an example.
You know Hollywood can be a fickle place. One month someone's a vegan--the next month they on the Atkins diet with all the turkey legs and beef jerky they want!
11:58 PM on 04/26/2009
The problem is factory farming, be it plants or animals.
03:33 PM on 04/23/2009
I eat meat and while a lot of my friends are vegetarian, I don't feel the need to try to force them to taste my food or eat meat. I'm happy that they are just as free as I am to eat what they prefer or think suits them best. They on the other hand, are always trying to force me to become a vegetarian and there are no depths to which they will not sink in this pursuit. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes not. The question I have is, are my freedoms only applicable when they agree with my choices? There are so many different aspects of our lives in which we can make a difference. I studiously recycle and most of my vegetarian friends readily admit that they do not. Most of the reasons cited revolve around being too busy, yet they readily ignore this in their rush to condemn me for eating meat. To me this is just as bad as people who will vote against every other interest just so long as the candidate agrees with them on abortion. Isn't there some common ground we can find on this issue that doesn't impinge on the freedoms of those on either side of this debate? Isn't saving our planet our common goal? Then why the insults and animosity? I respect anyone's right to choose a vegetarian or vegan lifestyle. I will eat what I like. That is my right.
04:57 PM on 04/24/2009
Fairness is good. And you've got the right attitude. I totally agree with you that calming down is the first step most people should take.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:23 PM on 04/23/2009
All things in moderation, so I don't eat red meat every day.

But there's plenty of meat on this planet for humans .... the problem is that there are simply WAY too many humans on the planet to accommodate a First World lifestyle, whether the resource is food, fuel, or fresh water. There are many strategies for dealing with this, mine is to not breed a bunch of new mouths for the planet to support.
11:42 AM on 04/23/2009
For all sorts of reasons, eating whole, once living animals is simply not in the future. There will be a group of super rich that may have the opportunity at first, but for 99% of the rest of folks it's gonna be test tube flesh. But, there will always be vegans!
10:29 AM on 04/23/2009
Meat eaters are intellectually inferior humans.
03:53 PM on 04/23/2009
Oh really? Tell that to BOTH of my PhDs!
10:40 PM on 04/23/2009
You'll always have that flaw.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wallyone
09:12 AM on 04/23/2009
I think the environmental degradation figures often cited in regard to livestock farming are based on false assumptions, as virtually all writers on the subject (including Mr. Pollan) are not actually farmers. They think that a superficial few months visiting a few farms in a limited area give them the knowledge required to generalize about the whole of American agriculture. Of course they do get some things right, and point out some real failures, but they have no idea of their lack of understanding. Nor do they know much about the economics of farming. No writer should be listened to if he or she cannot tell you the yield per acre of corn silage, or other basic facts of crop yield. And no nutritionist should be listened to unless he or she can draw a glucose molecule on their napkin during lunch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FrictionSoul
02:52 PM on 04/23/2009
Glucose is a manmade chemical meant to mimic a real one.
Yield per acre of corn silage is meaningless.

What matters is composting, closing the waste cycle to keep the soil fertile, the way unspoiled places have done it for millions of years.

I'm not sure about the future of meat. I'm much more sure about the future of vegetables: it will collapse sooner than later unless people start growing their own food.
10:43 PM on 04/24/2009
Glucose is not man-made. Are you thinking of high fructose corn syrup?

Your body breaks down more complex carbohydrates into glucose, which the cells then use as energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anjushri
Veganism = Ahimsa
06:41 AM on 04/23/2009
Go vegan for peace, for yourself, for all sentient beings and for climate change.

Check out these vids:

Watch the vid: "Vegan. For Humans. For Non-Humans. For the Planet."
http://www.veganvideo.org

Link between meat eating and climate change
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_1cE0x5z7c

You can't be a meat eating environmentalist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWWNLvgU4MI

World Food Crisis: Is Meat Consumption a Major Cause
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGFjo62LdI

World Food Crisis: Another Major Cause
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJCK7AKjaoM

What's the best action to take on Earth Day?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-T0RDZMJgM

Earthlings (download)
http://veg-tv.info/Earthlings
or view here http://www.earthlings.com
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
09:19 AM on 04/23/2009
Veganism is fascism. Go Omivore!
12:28 AM on 04/24/2009
I can't be a meat-eating environmentalist, huh? Well, let's see. I've been raising dairy goats since 1983. And since goats have to birth before they can produce milk, we tend to eat a lot of goat meat. I also barter my goat cheese for eggs, as well as the occasional chicken or turkey, and raise a lamb every year for slaughter (mmm, rack of lamb). Then there's the venison my husband brings home in November. For the record, I also raise most of my herbs and vegetables. So let's be honest for a moment. Livestock didn't cause the Dust Bowl and California is running out of water because most of the produce found in American grocery stores is grown in that arid state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isis
Job 39:5 - Who has sent out the wild ass free?
11:32 PM on 04/22/2009
A great article. I have cut down on my meat eating quite a bit because I live in a hog lot state. You can smell a hog lot ever so slightly but distinctly when you eat pork. Hogs get sick a lot so they need a lot of antibiotics. And the anthropogenic ammonia you mention, it can react and form fine particulates that diminish lung function.
12:40 AM on 04/24/2009
Ah, the smell of pig poop. My sister raised hogs one year to make some extra money. Never again. Pig poop is stinky. That said, hogs (and other livestock) raised on small farms don't have as many illnesses as those animals raised on factory farms (CAFO).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LemonMeringue
Happy Birthday, Steve Jobs - Feb. 24th
11:04 PM on 04/22/2009
When you cut back on meat, you discover new delicious foods and cuisines. The American meat-and-2-sides meal is so boring!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FrictionSoul
02:53 PM on 04/23/2009
You apparently haven't tried locally grown, organic meat butchered within a few hours of where you live, kept cold (not frozen).
03:20 PM on 04/24/2009
New and delicious foods and cuisine?! Honestly, I've never heard anyone with an even remotely discerning palate talk about bean curd that way! Only teasing. :-)
10:40 PM on 04/22/2009
I have one question about your analysis (or for anyone who can answer)....How much CO2 does decaying vegetation give off? I hear that is quite a significant contributor to greenhouse gas.....
10:27 PM on 04/22/2009
To celebrate Earth Day I made 8 big, thick, juicy beef tenderloin steaks wrapped each in big slabs of bacon.

Yum.

Wish Every Day Was Earth Day.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LemonMeringue
Happy Birthday, Steve Jobs - Feb. 24th
11:04 PM on 04/22/2009
You sound too young and immature to be posting here.
09:19 AM on 04/23/2009
"You sound too young and immature to be posting here."

And you sound too sour and sarcasm-challenged to be posting here.

Ain't it a great website?