iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kati Haycock

Kati Haycock

Posted: July 1, 2010 11:32 AM

Obey's Edujobs Proposal Breaks National Promise to Our Schools and Our Students

What's Your Reaction:

Early on in their education, teachers tell students that it's wrong to break your promises.

Well, it seems that House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey never learned that lesson. And in a brutal twist, he's breaking a promise made to our nation's children.

In a stealthy bit of last-minute legislation, Obey proposed an amendment to fund "Edujobs" legislation by hacking away at the budgets of three vital education reform efforts. These efforts -- Race to the Top, the Teacher Incentive Fund, and the Public Charter Schools Program -- represent long-standing promises to help fund real change in schools.

Over the past year, the Obama Administration's initiatives have breathed life into school-improvement efforts across the country. Now, instead of promising to implement true reform, the chairman proposes to spend that money on preserving the status quo.

If Obey is able to muscle in this legislation, the consequences will be dire. For instance, without proper funding for Race to the Top, fewer state lawmakers will have the political leverage to pass breakthrough reforms like the ones recently enacted in places like New York, Louisiana, Illinois, Colorado and California.

Obey's bill will deflate these programs' potential to inspire true reform at the state and local level. Yanking any of this crucial funding will represent a giant step backward in the effort to implement meaningful change in our nation's public schools.

Worse, he is fiercely resisting pressure to assure that districts receiving Edujobs money stop laying off teachers by seniority alone, a devastating practice that is depriving school districts around the country of strong, sometimes award-winning, teachers with three or four years of experience, while even the most ineffective 15-year veterans keep their jobs.

We've made real progress for our children, particularly those who need it the most. As a country, we need to go faster, not slower, if we are to realize America's promise to ensure that every student -- regardless of skin color or Zip code -- leaves high school with a top-notch education.

Breaking this promise, as Obey proposes, would be more than unfair. It would be cruel. And that's a lesson no student should have to learn.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cjaco
09:30 PM on 07/05/2010
Obey amendment is necessary as the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Something charter reformers, like Ed Trust as financed by the billionaire boys club, can not stand as they prefer to exploit young teachers and discriminate against the elder, and blame teachers for poverty, funding, and curriculum that they have no power over. Charters enrich the corrupt few while starving everyone else - and are merely test prep factories. Here's a few good reads:

The real issues of public school teachers http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65D5VW20100614

Read Get Kotter: How Teachers Became the New Lawyers http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/67031/?f=most-commented-24h-5

News on charter schools across the country - scroll down the left side to view your state http://charterschoolscandals.blogspot.com/
jjtx
living between the trees
11:10 AM on 07/02/2010
Under good circumstances, I only support one-third of the practice now (the Teacher Incentive). These are, however, not the best of circumstances.

I would rather have these programs done away with and keep teachers in the schools where they are needed. Instead of special programs, students need to stay in classrooms that are not over-crowded. For that, we need to keep our teachers working.

Don't lay off teachers; hire more qualified, certified teachers (rather than people looking for a job in teaching until their real job back in industry comes around again - some dedication to our young people they show, huh?). That is, if you want education to be better.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wendy Johnson
09:18 AM on 07/02/2010
On the contrary, I think Obey's legislation sounds like a great idea. Keeping teachers in their jobs is good. But if it takes funding away from the ill-conceived "Race to the Top", which doubles down on Bush's failed No Child Left Behind, while at the same time defunding the better, more fair, Title 1 (http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/guest-bloggers/educator-race-to-the-top-is-be.html), that makes it better in my mind. If it hurts Charter Schools, that does not seem like a tragedy to me either, considering that they do little better than public schools at educating their students, even while picking and choosing the most tractable, best-prepared students to accept (http://www.publicschoolreview.com/articles/123).