iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Katie Hawkes

Katie Hawkes

GET UPDATES FROM Katie Hawkes

The Burqa Ban: Another Misguided Step Toward So-Called Equality

Posted: 10/10/10 07:45 AM ET

Oppression is in the eye of the beholder, you know. Having spent my undergrad years up to my elbows in literature on marriage and families, this is a topic that's graced my intellect on more than one occasion.

With the dawn of the feminism age in the mid-1900s, droves of women proclaimed their independence and threw off the fetters that bound them to narrow, socially acceptable roles. The message to society was simply this: "How dare you tell us what we cannot do based on gender? How dare you confine women to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen? How dare you tell us we're worth nothing more than a gaggle of children and a few loaves of homemade bread?"

But if I may interject here, let us not forget that the sword cuts both ways. While equal opportunity is all well and good, it is my opinion that we have veered much too far in the contrary direction. In an effort to proclaim their right to wear business suits and earn paychecks comparable to their male counterparts, my feminist sisters, perhaps inadvertently, knocked sexual prejudice on its little head and took things for a 180-degree spin.

Case in point: society now places a firm taboo against telling a woman that she doesn't belong in the corporate world; however, society loves to tell women like me -- women who, yes, admittedly, firmly place motherhood as our primary goal in life -- that we are aiming too low. That raising children is old-fashioned and simple-minded. That we are less intelligent, less capable and less ambitious than the female CEOs and political leaders of the world. That women who choose full-time motherhood are just stay-at-home moms.

What once again brought this double-edged topic to my attention was France's recent ban on wearing burqas in public. The burqa, traditionally worn by Muslim women in public places, is a veil that reveals little more than a woman's eyeballs, worn with a robe that reveals little more than her hands. Society, round up your cavalries and raise your red flags: how dare a religion tell a woman she must cover herself in public? How dare a culture so brutally oppress a gender?

If I may interject again, let me point out what the burqa truthfully represents: respect. Many Muslim women wear the burqa because they respect their bodies to such a degree that they do not wish to flaunt it to the world. How sad is it that society screams "oppressive and wrong" at this, while plastering billboards and media with pornographic depictions that shriek "liberating and right."

I admit that corrupted dictators and governments have tainted society's view of traditional Islam with their extremist attitudes and, yes, oppression of women. But surely it is a logical fallacy to brand a religious practice as 100-percent erroneous because it has been warped at the hands of fanatics. Perhaps we are the ones with a warped idea of what is truly beautiful.

If we ever tried to put a ban on immodesty, the world might simply implode. Heaven forbid free expression that dictates reverence and respect for a woman's body by covering it rather than revealing it.

Forgive me, but something about this doesn't sit well with me.

So if I may: France, how dare you?

 
Oppression is in the eye of the beholder, you know. Having spent my undergrad years up to my elbows in literature on marriage and families, this is a topic that's graced my intellect on more than one ...
Oppression is in the eye of the beholder, you know. Having spent my undergrad years up to my elbows in literature on marriage and families, this is a topic that's graced my intellect on more than one ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,504
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (24 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hillbilly49
Don't tell me you are a Christian; let me guess.
03:48 PM on 10/18/2010
"There's a lot of things that there's misconceptions. Evidently it's a misconceptions that Americans believe that Muslims are terrorists."

George W Bush, Aboard Air Force One, en route to Australia), Oct. 22, 2003
11:07 PM on 10/17/2010
What is the significance of the fact that ONLY Muslim women wear the burqa? Why do the men not wear it? The implication is that men can feel comfortable and safe showing their body, but women cannot and should not. I believe that the burqa is a subtle way of making women responsible for men's behavior. That is, men are not obligated to exercise self-control when they see a woman's body. Instead, it's womens' job to protect men from their baser impulses. And the woman's fault if she doesn't cover herself and is raped as a result. Isn't it time that we treat men like adults who have the ability and the responsibility to control their own behavior, instead of blaming women when they misbehave?
10:53 AM on 10/17/2010
It is true that many women wear the burqa because they are forced by men, but I'm pretty sure that this is not the case in France. It may be in Afghanistan, but in France? If there are any men in France that force their wives/daughters to wear the burqa, they are a minority. Almost every woman in France that wears it, does it out of her own free will, so I really don't see why it should be banned. It may be hard for us, westerners to understand this, but it's their choice, and it's their right to wear it if they want to. We should respect that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rory talbot
Former Dem but they r now wing of Corp. party
10:35 AM on 10/17/2010
Let me get this straight: your argument is the in order to be "equal", women should have the freedom to accept inequality (and in making this ludicrous argument, you incorrectly assume these women's misogynistic masters allow them any choice).

Hawkes, you are cracked.
07:35 PM on 10/17/2010
You should do some research before you call someone "cracked".

You said that Hawkes "incorrectly assume these women's misogynistic masters allow them any choice"
You are incorrectly assume that covering the body represents inequality and that all women who cover are doing so because they are forced by "misogynistic masters".
Extremely poor arguement because you are only basing this off the mainstream propaganda you hear.
You need to realize that Muslim women who cover some or all of their body are doing this by choice and because of what Islam tells them to do, not because of their husbands or fathers. I am not going to be biased and say that all cases are like that, but from my personal experience, I do not know of anyone forced to wear the veil. I have actually witnessed the opposite where some muslim men tell their wives not to wear it in order to fit into the culture.

With regards to France, they absolutely have no right to tell someone what to wear. If they are concerned about certain Muslim womens rights they need to investigate it on a case by case basis. Also one should not assume that wearing a veil and covering the body is a form of torture or abuse. So even if a women were forced to wear it, it does not have any physical affect on her what so ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
11:42 PM on 10/16/2010
Well, where I live, working moms and stay at home moms accept each other pretty well. Maybe you should try some other places. I live in a so-called liberal bastion, and many people are anti-corporate. There aren't any jobs in the area, anyhow, so it's hard to hold not having work against anyone, around here. I also think you took only particular ideas of the feminist movement and raised them to a higher level of acceptance than they truly have or ever had. There has been discussion by feminists throughout the years since they were really starting up. I don't buy that it has swung back to another point of view because of "feminists" backlash. I see it much more that Corporate Overlords prefer that all humans of the lower castes become their slaves and that includes mommy. And the CO's really hate when you have a good public education. NOtice how schools have been defunded everywhere? Look further, I think.
02:35 PM on 10/16/2010
A lot of women wear this garb because they are forced to by their men. Outlawing it relieves these women of this unwanted burden.

On teh other hand, there are those women who earnestly want to wear it.

It's a weighing of interests. Which interest should prevail?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plaidsportcoat
11:48 PM on 10/16/2010
I think Ayaan Hirsi Ali's latest book Nomad has some interesting ideas from a woman who was brought up Islamic in Somalia, Saudi and Kenya until adulthood, but then rejected the oppression she felt and belived she had formerly embraced, including having her genitals mutilated, which is not practiced by all Islamic peoples at all - but it IS certainly considered a necessary part of Islam for girls in SOME "sects" of Islam - and now she has death threats from "radicals" and can't go anyplace at all without bodyguards that you and I sometimes pay for. I think that will be too expensive for the taxpayers, in the long run, if people who dare to speak out are stalked by religious fanatic murderers for freely speaking. Of course, Christians have the same kind of fanatics, they don't want to talk about it though.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Butterfly M
01:29 PM on 10/17/2010
Yes..I used to like her..but then she has now been coopted by the christian evangelicals... so I don't care for her.. he agenda is now political. She is not kosher. she is suspect. Her motive is corrupt.
07:40 PM on 10/17/2010
I would say a majority of women wear the veil by choice. I think that if France is seriously worried about the Muslim women there, then they should investigate households on a case by case basis for abuse. This law is based on assumptions that the veil is oppressive. True Muslims do not see covering up as oppressive at all and love to wear it as a sign of faith.
01:39 PM on 10/16/2010
IMHO, for a woman to wear a Burqua in modern times and especially in modern societies, she has to be ignorant or she must have a lack in self esteem. Its ban will not help these women. The only way to help these poor women is to love them truly and show them our love. Laws, jokes and mockeries will push these women to clung very tightly to their clothes.

"As a test of strength," said the sun, "Let us see which of us can take the coat off of that man."

Love is warm and bright, one can hardly resists.

I love you all.
07:44 PM on 10/17/2010
I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you just insulted a lot of my friends. I know women who cover their face and they are extremely educated, confident, and lovely women. They love covering their body and not one person has forced them to do so. I think before holding such a strong opinion you should go talk to a woman who covers her entire body. I guarantee you that she will not be ignorant or lack any self-esteem. I have found that women who cover have a higher self-esteem. I myself cover my hair and always wear pants and long sleeves. Before I used to do this, my self-esteem was low as I always worried what people thought about my hair and my looks, now I do not worry and am more confident.
11:46 AM on 10/16/2010
Excuse me. but how do you happen to know that "burqa truthfully represents: respect. Many Muslim women wear the burqa because they respect their bodies to such a degree that they do not wish to flaunt it to the world." ? ? ?

I happen to belong to the [[religion]] of Islam and NO. burqa DOES NOT truthfully represents: respect. and guess whatI! many women and even men wear it to hide their sins and criminal wills and backgrounds. !

I think the debatable word here is "MANY" as you said "Many Muslim women wear the burqa because they respect their bodies...." any statistics please ?

custom in Islam is part of a much bigger system of values and concepts. with so many dimensions and priorities and levels. i.e. there are many statement/versus in Muslims Book (Koran/Coran) that forbids showing or saying what you don't believe in. at least and i am saying at least with this sense of belief and logic one should not wear what she is claiming to be an Islamic custom when she is not following the basic Islamic teachings amongst which is to obey the law which should stem from the will of a the majority (equal to democracy in today's terms). Thus, if the law of the states or Palestine or Turkey or Syria or France asks people to reveal their identities for security purposes or whatever, women should follow and obey the law. The elected law.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
06:37 AM on 10/16/2010
`Misguided steps towards so-called equality'. The horror!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyberfringe
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
05:51 AM on 10/16/2010
The Burqua ban is not about sexism, it is about racism. Like the other ethnocentric nation-states of old Europe, the French are fighting a losing battle about what it means to be French. The tides of global culture, immigration, multi-ethnic families, and aspirations for political and social equality are against French ethnocentrism as well as the others. Choosing and mixing is the new global reality. Get used to it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gappedtoothgodwarrior
12:15 PM on 10/16/2010
"Choosing and mixing is the new global reality. Get used to it."
Indeed it is, so let's stop clinging to horrible oppressive customs that have no basis, except in misogyny, just because we can't accept that other people think forcing a woman to cover up completely might be a wee bit oppressive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyberfringe
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
11:19 AM on 10/17/2010
Agreed. Burqua as fashion I can handle, but as an oppressive "uniform" for women, no way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andres64
Religion is a sectually transmitted disease.
04:25 PM on 10/20/2010
What are you babbling about? Why do you have to bring race into it? Guess what? Nobody has any idea what race you are. Quit whining about strawmen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:51 PM on 10/15/2010
Ok ... I just read your bio and now I get it ... you're incredibly young ... you, yourself, will be embarrassed in a few years when you remember this .. (cough, cough) "argument" for wearing of the burqa.
Again ... don't stretch so hard to sound tolerant and reasonable. It just doesn't work for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:49 PM on 10/15/2010
Katie, Katie, Katie ... most women wears burqas because the men in their lives won't allow them out of the house unless they do.
Please, Katie, don't make such a stretch to sound reasonable and tolerant. This is one of the most absurd arguments I've ever heard ... really embarrassing.
07:49 PM on 10/17/2010
Where are you getting that from? What makes you say that most women wear burqas because a man makes them? I bet if you did a poll of these women you would find they wear them of their own choosing and if they are not, you will find that they don't mind wearing it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:54 PM on 10/17/2010
You can't be serious!! Please ... it may be true that there are some devoted Muslim women who wear the Burqa voluntarily but MOST women are forced to wear it or pay the price. You must know this ... it's a fact. Please - don't be so naive.
photo
stettin
lux et veritas
06:03 PM on 10/15/2010
hawkins needs about 5 years of sessions with a very good psychiatrist to resolve her problems with
being a woman.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barbara Graham
Comin at u from Area 5150
04:20 PM on 10/15/2010
It is certainly possible to dress modestly without standing out as an icon of 12th century fashion.

And, would you really want your children to share the road with burqa-clad drivers? That little eye slit offers so much in the way of peripheral vision. Lawd help us if the clip holding back the "privacy curtain" accidentally deploys!
03:17 PM on 10/15/2010
Approaching burqa's as specifically a women's issues issue misses a more comprehensive problem with them, and with any covering that hides identity. With live in an egalitarian society and that quality is the basis of our society and cannot be lost without endangering all of the ideals that are the basis of our form of republic and democracy. Egalitarian society requires a equal basis for relationships. I go out into public and you can see me, hear me, and I can see you and hear you. We engage on an equal footing. No one is hidden from the other. A burqa is a denial of that fundamental principle. It exists to hide one party from another, and deny equal relationships in public. That is the principle I cannot support. From that one can argue other points, and argue based on a principle of social relations that affects all members of our society in the same way, without particularizing the question to anyone's personal rights. Those arguing in favor of the burqa must respond to the precedents in customs that an open society requires. Personal rights do not extend to a dismissal of the basic philosophical principles of our society. That at least is why we have a rule of precedents in our law, isn't it? We look to the past to chart a course forward, knowing we will change, but wanting to retain the most cogent defining aspects of our culture. Openess is one of the those.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyberfringe
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
05:55 AM on 10/16/2010
I see your words and ideas here, and that is good. I do not see a person of a certain sex or age or ethnicity or disability. It doesn't bother me one bit because I judge you on the merits of your arguments. Your ideas stand for themselves. So it is for anyone who obscures their "identity" in the real-world or online. You get to decide what to share and what not to share. I respect that right of privacy.
10:57 PM on 10/16/2010
Of course you bring up a good question that can cut several ways. When do we respect anonymity or even require it, and when do we disallow or discourage it? Online we have come to expect anonymity, but then we can hardly all put our names and addresses on every blog post comment. And we'd lose all the flamers who would have to defend their their real selves, not just their disposable online user names. Well, big loss... Anonymous lawsuits are not allowed. We get to face our accusers in court. Important matters require disclosure. What newspaper prints anonymous letters to the editor? But what journalist won't protect an anonymous source, using his/her own reputation in place of the sources reputation. I think the anonymity the burqa provides needs to be weighed against the openness our society requires to maintain individual freedoms. The freedom to be anonymous can lead to a loss of freedom to engage, confront, and share public space on an equal basis. There is no singe correct approach only a balancing of public v private. On this issue I favor the argument that supports a healthy public space by encouraging unfettered interaction wherein no one needs to fear an open identity. So here's my money where my mouth is: Peter Lewis, Stratford, CT