iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Keith Thomson

GET UPDATES FROM Keith Thomson
 

How to Cheat in a Presidential Debate

Posted: 10/03/2012 8:30 am

During MSNBC's January 24, 2008 Republican presidential debate in Boca Raton, Florida, moderator Tim Russert asked Mitt Romney, "Will you do for Social Security what Ronald Reagan did in 1983?"

A disembodied whisper of "He raised taxes" followed.

Romney appeared to take note before answering Russert, "I'm not going to raise taxes."

Here's the video:




In another segment of the same debate, the voice seems to cue Romney to use the word support. After reviewing the tapes, MSNBC surmised that a microphone had picked up the whispers of a member of the audience. In an e-mail to Florida's Sun-Sentinel, then Romney spokesperson Kristy Campbell deferred to the network by way of comment. Speculation persisted that the audience member was a helper or handler using a covert ultrasound-based communicator. Which, technically, could work.


Holosonics of Watertown, Massachusetts, manufactures a system called the Audio Spotlight that converts ultrasound to audible sound via a narrow targeted beam heard only by its recipient, who doesn't need to wear a receiver. The transmitter can be as small as a cell phone. The catch is the helper needs the recipient in his line of sight. If the narrow beam of ultrasound grazes a microphone en route to a debater, the helper's whispers would be amplified for the world to hear.

To guard against such helpers, the Commission on Presidential Debates employs an individual known as Frequency Coordinator armed with a spectrum analyzer to detect radio communication. The spectrum analyzer wouldn't detect an Audio Spotlight. According to Joseph Pompei, founder and president of Holosonics, "The Audio Spotlight system uses only ultrasound, which is just a special kind of sound wave, so there is no specific radio frequency signature for a spectrum analyzer to see."

Another means of debate subterfuge is covert wireless radio. In the 1970s, the CIA created such a communications device, the SRR-100, for its operations officers in Moscow. The receiver was strapped under the officer's arm or onto his back, sprouting a wire that looped around his neck and was hidden by his collar. A second wire was encased in a Q-Tip-head-size earpiece placed in his actual ear, which in turn was entirely concealed by a silicone cast of the ear. Today spread-spectrum encrypted technology has been added to the audio--against it, the spectrum analyzer is essentially defenseless. And the receiver and earpiece have been miniaturized into a single earpiece so small that an inspector would need an otoscope to detect its presence in a debater's ear. Otoscopes are not used at the debates. Nor are the debaters inspected.

As Commission on Presidential Debates executive director Janet Brown told me, "You have to assume that a code of honor is being followed."

That's the extent of the Commission on Presidential Debate's rules with regard to cheating.

Infrared light beam communicators would also do the trick in the presidential debates, as I reported four years ago. At the time I investigated applicable systems costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, including the "Voice of God," which transmitted messages to terrorists so it seemed they were hearing from Allah himself. Today there's an infrared communicator that debaters can get on Amazon for $34.95, not including shipping.

Finally, no list of debate-cheating techniques would be complete without the old Get-a-Look-at-the-Test-Ahead-of-Time method. The moderators' questions aren't exactly kept under armed guard. According to a staffer at the PBS office of Jim Lehrer, moderator of tonight's presidential debate in Denver, no countermeasures were put in place beyond the premises' standard security.

Fortunately, deviation from the code of honor on the part of candidates for political office remains only a hypothetical.

 
 
 

Follow Keith Thomson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kqthomson

FOLLOW POLITICS
During MSNBC's January 24, 2008 Republican presidential debate in Boca Raton, Florida, moderator Tim Russert asked Mitt Romney, "Will you do for Social Security what Ronald Reagan did in 1983?" A di...
During MSNBC's January 24, 2008 Republican presidential debate in Boca Raton, Florida, moderator Tim Russert asked Mitt Romney, "Will you do for Social Security what Ronald Reagan did in 1983?" A di...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 192
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
rsargerod
Truth leads to enlightenment and wisdom!
12:16 PM on 10/08/2012
This guy can't think for himself, he only thinks $$$ about himself
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
need2know
Call me a Progressive not a Liberal nor a democrat
06:29 AM on 10/06/2012
hello again my fellow progressives and democrats, please stop it with these crazy conspiracy theories, Obama lost fair and square Romney did not cheat!!!!! Now he lied a whole helluva lot, but in America lying is not the same as cheating unless you are in high school then it is cheating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Judie Vc
rMONEY OUTSPENDS SICKY 6:1 ON Mi = UNELECTABLE!!!!
04:57 AM on 10/08/2012
Only to people who don't respect honor would they consider Romney's numerous lies & distortions some form of win. he's had to walk back his pre-0existing conditions comments, his attacks on green energy against Obama and he lied about 716 B$ savings to medicare that enhance the program getting seniors free drugs and free preventive care which lowers the deficit and saying he'll add the fraud back, so how will he pay for that additional 716 B$ addition? Then the Ryan budget he said was marvelous has those as actual cuts to medicare which does effect benefits & cost seniors money & does not provide free preventive care or drug coverage like Obama's. everything he said was a lie, he stated 27 myths in 38 minutes by using the Gish Gallop debate form so he doesn't win for dishonesty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
need2know
Call me a Progressive not a Liberal nor a democrat
06:10 AM on 10/08/2012
okay but all that matters is what the viewers think, now we are relying on people who think lying is bad.
photo
rsargerod
Truth leads to enlightenment and wisdom!
12:08 PM on 10/08/2012
Faved! and if I could Fan you again I would - Now if only those gullible Romney supporters would see this with an open mind instead they wouldn't even be considering this guy as if he came from Mount Olympus to save us from economic destruction! They would be running this guy out off town as it should be!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProChoiceGrandma
Proud Progressive Liberal
12:51 AM on 10/05/2012
Mitt Romney brought a CHEAT SHEET to last night's debate!! Watch Mitt sneak notes from his right pants pocket and quickly toss it on the dais!

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/04/1140213/-Did-Romney-Cheat-Vid-You-Decide
11:27 PM on 10/04/2012
Were prepared notes allowed at this debate? I find rules regarding format but none on this restriction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:43 PM on 10/04/2012
A question:
Were the candidates allowed to bring in notes?
Because did anyone else see it when the camera, located behind the podiums, showed the candidates walking to their podiums and Romney, glancing quickly at the camera, pulled a sheet out from his pocket and put it quickly on his podium?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melton244
07:16 AM on 10/05/2012
I saw it too, also saw him go back to his podium at the end and retrieve the "alleged" paper. Something was definitely off, he either has something big to hold over big bird or the moderator because he was given way too much control.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
07:36 PM on 10/04/2012
Would ignoring the rules and the moderator be considered cheating?

It's certainly dishonorable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlueKansas
Stop calling us 'ordinary Americans'!
06:58 PM on 10/04/2012
Wow. Just wow.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RQ83
03:37 PM on 10/04/2012
How to cheat in a debate: Lie.

Can you get caught? Sure, but that's only a problem if the media calls you on it and the audience cares. Neither appears to be much of a risk.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
10:14 AM on 10/04/2012
I want that debt reduction plan, hold the waffles and syrup.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldStory
Southern hippy man dreaming on
09:23 AM on 10/04/2012
This wasn't a multiple choice test, a quiz with essays, or the defense of an phd. doctorate, it was debate brought down to the level of mud wrestling and the president refuse to play this game. The world beyond our borders was watching too. A man doesn't need to cheat when he can lie.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
08:10 AM on 10/04/2012
Like I said already, Gary Johnson would mop the floor with both of them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
urfree2speak
Justice though the heavens fall
07:50 AM on 10/04/2012
Well, I don't know.....BUT, I have not ever seen a "debate" so incompetent..............it looked sad.
Romney has no plan...moderator had no clue?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabbaciv
So it goes.
07:07 AM on 10/04/2012
No need to cheat when the moderator's goal is to throw the debate for you, so that the challenger "wins" this one, the incumbent "wins" the next one, and then we have a big ratings-friendly showdown for the third.
07:18 AM on 10/05/2012
Exactly!
06:46 AM on 10/04/2012
It is quite clear that Romney has no code of honor. The man will look you in the eye and say whatever he thinks you want to hear. His 'plan' is to get elected President. That's as far as it goes. As hard as it was to look at him and listen to him lie repeatedly, I did watch the whole debate. I find him appalling. Did he win the debate? He was loud. He was aggressive. He was an obnoxious liar. He says he has better plans for this, that, and the other thing, but he won't tell us what they are. Did he win the debate? No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peter Leary
So long and thanks for all the fish.
07:18 AM on 10/04/2012
You're right, no question. But we have to face facts... for those who don't analyse or dig for truths - let's call them the 'hard of thinking' - Romney came across as a winner. It was a hammy but competent performance, two-dimensional but quite vivid. Romney knows how much of the US electorate is just plain gullible and he knows how to win their attention.
07:19 AM on 10/05/2012
Unfortunately, a lot of people are too naive to research facts or don't want to take the time to do so. People need to start paying attention....
08:18 AM on 10/04/2012
Romney is the worst kind of liar ,one that believes his own bullshite !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Babsbo
Be nice.
11:13 PM on 10/05/2012
Yes-it's pathological. Frightening to think of such a person having his finger on the button, so to speak.
photo
GregandJeff
Equality: Coming to a neighborhood near you!
06:08 AM on 10/04/2012
Why would we be using "the honor system" for the most powerful job in the world? Why would we assume that someone wouldn't cheat in their lust for power? BTW, anyone dismissing the possibility of Romney cheating on things needs to look into his history more. Retroactive retirement? Living in his son's basement (yeah right)? His problems with tax returns before? This man has a long list of questionable practices. And his running mate blatently lies about even his running times. Two people not to be trusted if there ever were any.