iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kelly Rigg

Kelly Rigg

Posted: March 17, 2011 02:34 PM

Battle-proof Wind Farms Survive Japan's Trial by Fire


As the world collectively holds its breath to see how the Fukushima crisis plays out (the quote of the day has got to be: "The worst-case scenario doesn't bear mentioning and the best-case scenario keeps getting worse...") there's a positive story which is not yet being reported.

Despite assertions by its detractors that wind energy would not survive an earthquake or tsunami the Japanese wind industry is still functioning and helping to keep the lights on during the Fuksuhima crisis.

2011-03-17-japanwindfarm.jpg Wind Farm in Japan by rjzii

Colleagues and I have been directly corresponding with Yoshinori Ueda leader of the International Committee of the Japan Wind Power Association & Japan Wind Energy Association, and according to Ueda there has been no wind facility damage reported by any association members, from either the earthquake or the tsunami. Even the Kamisu semi-offshore wind farm, located about 300km from the epicenter of the quake, survived. Its anti-earthquake "battle proof design" came through with flying colors.

Mr. Ueda confirms that most Japanese wind turbines are fully operational. Indeed, he says that electric companies have asked wind farm owners to step up operations as much as possible in order to make up for shortages in the eastern part of the country:

Eurus Energy Japan says that 174.9MW with eight wind farms (64% of their total capacity with 11 wind farms in eastern part of Japan) are in operation now. The residual three wind farms (Kamaishi 42.9MW, Takinekoshirai 46MW, Satomi 10.02MW) are stopped due to the grid failure caused by the earthquake and Tsunami. Satomi is to re-start operations in a few days. Kamaishi is notorious for tsunami disaster, but this wind farm is safe because it is locate in the mountains about 900m high from sea level.

The largest wind farm operator in Japan, Eurus Energy with about 22% of all wind turbines in Japan, is a subsidiary of Tokyo Electric Company (TEPCO) which operates the Fukushima nuclear facility. Right now, it is likely the company is very happy about its diversified portfolio:

While shares in the Tokyo stock market have fallen during the crisis, the stock price of Japan Wind Development Co. Ltd. has risen from 31,500 yen on 11 March to 47,800 yen on 16 March.

2011-03-17-Kamisuwindfarm.jpgKamisu Wind Farm 300 km from earthquake epicenter by Wind Power Ibaraki

The Little Engine That Could has proven itself once again. What are your thoughts on the Fukushima crisis and do you think it will impact future energy policy around the world?

 

Follow Kelly Rigg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kellyrigg

As the world collectively holds its breath to see how the Fukushima crisis plays out (the quote of the day has got to be: "The worst-case scenario doesn't bear mentioning and the best-case scenario ke...
As the world collectively holds its breath to see how the Fukushima crisis plays out (the quote of the day has got to be: "The worst-case scenario doesn't bear mentioning and the best-case scenario ke...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 126
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
08:40 AM on 04/13/2011
Japan lowers economic forecast:
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2011/0413/breaking6.html

'A loss of electricity from a crippled nuclear power plant and radiation leaks could weigh on the outlook for some time, the government warned on Wednesday, though it still expects the economy to recover later this year as reconstruction begins in the northeastern areas wrecked by the tsunami. ... "The biggest risks, or uncertain factors for the economy, are when power supplies will recover, whether the nuclear situation will keep from worsening," economics minister Kaoru Yosano said. "It will cause various indirect damage, such as dampening consumer sentiment, but the economy will pick up toward the end of this year."'

But wait a minute — doesn't he know that a majority of the country's wind turbines are still spinning!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
05:32 PM on 03/24/2011
plus look at how beautiful they are. WAAAAY prettier than a nuclear facility or a coal plant...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
09:43 AM on 03/25/2011
Greenwashing at its best? Put a wind turbine in front of it, and no one will notice that the coal and nuclear plants are still there, working away as much as ever.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EcoHustler
www.ecohustler.co.uk
07:45 AM on 03/22/2011
Nuclear risks and renewable alternatives

Terrorists will have seen the devastation, disruption and fear that can be caused by an attack on a reactor’s cooling system, which presents a much easier target for them than the containment vessel surrounding the core.

http://ecohustler.co.uk/2011/03/16/nuclear-risks-and-renewable-alternatives/
10:31 PM on 03/20/2011
It is interesting that Japan has a functioning and undamaged nuclear power plant that was right smack next to the epicenter of the magnitude 9.0 earthquake. The Tohoku Electric Power Co's (9506.T) Onagawa nuclear power plant is about as close to the epicenter as any part of Japan can be.

Out of 55 nuclear power plants in Japan, only 2 declared an emergency, largely the result of tsunami following the earthquake.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
05:31 PM on 03/24/2011
yes but it only takes ONE to cause damage to the environment for more years than you and i will be here. therein lies the difference.
11:46 PM on 03/25/2011
It also only takes one to replace 256 THOUSAND acres of wind turbines. Some people might consider such a large dedicated use of land by wind turbines to be a form of environmental damage, itself.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
CB5
We do not want to repeat 2010 in 2014! VOTE:)
11:35 AM on 03/20/2011
What good news. What great timing. Ladies and gentleman, let's get going. Yip, piggybackmom, the future energy will be provided by Mother Nature and harnessed by our finest technology. Say NO to nuclear and oil ! and YES to eliminating paying 1 billion dollars a day for the oil we buy from the Middle East. What a relief that would be. American made energy. How great that would be ?
10:08 PM on 03/20/2011
Wind power won't do anything to decrease the amount of petroleum the U.S. imports. Petroleum produces about 1% of the electricity used in the U.S.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:09 AM on 03/20/2011
The future is solar and wind.
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
01:24 PM on 03/20/2011
The political winds are changing. My Republican brother-in-law (we all have at least one) spent the better part of 20 minutes explaining that he would love to see a wind farm on the mountain ridge that runs behind his house. And he was serious.

For a Republican, these moments of suspended ideology are comparatively fragile, so I stopped short of calling him a tree-hugging Communist. Later, he showed me his conversion to compact fluorescents (CFLs) around the house.

In the year 2021, Republicans will do what they've always done: claim to have been on the right side of history all along. So we can expect Republicans to add clean & renewable energy to their after-the-fact list of achievements.

Disappointing? Sure, but this progress with solar/wind/wave continues to move forward. The coming energy tsunami carries a lot of benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
05:40 PM on 03/20/2011
This shouldn't be so surprising, since Big Wind is an industrialist kleptocrat's dream: move ever more public funds into private bank accounts to pillage the heretofore protected countryside with the blessing of bought-off corporate enviros. It was, after all, designed by Enron and George W. Bush.

But just as corporatized Republicans and Democrats can come together in its support, right and left come together in opposition. When Earth First! agrees with Glenn Beck and Counterpunch shares a columnist on this issue with the Wall Street Journal, the usual team divisions no longer apply.

[I think I lost my internet connection before an earlier attempt to reply was registered, so I hope this isn't duplicative.]
09:24 PM on 03/20/2011
So, how do you explain the fact that Texas--an important Republican state--produces more wind energy than anywhere else but China, whereas California and Massachusetts has long banned offshore wind power?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:04 AM on 03/20/2011
Even if every wind turbine in Japan had been destroyed, we wouldn't have the rest of the world rushing to the aid of the Japanese, to prevent them from being killed by rogue wind turbine blades.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Guitarsandmore
devoted father, community activist, musician, reti
04:33 PM on 03/20/2011
Exactly! If wind and solar falls down, it just falls down. You only hear about grave, critical, population threatening situations when people are talking about Nuclear. There are no critical wind generator situations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
06:16 PM on 03/20/2011
So what and why bother, since wind doesn't obviate the need for, or even reduce the use of, other sources?
08:37 PM on 03/19/2011
This really sounds like a press release.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadsuch
A 70 retired construction worker/truck driver
12:24 PM on 03/20/2011
Reflecting your values on someone else, are you?
01:58 PM on 03/20/2011
Do you think I work as a PR my dear?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rucio
11:13 AM on 03/19/2011
How did Japan's 100,000 MW or so of coal, oil, gas, hydro, and most nuclear plants fare? Only one wind facility, apparently, of Japan's whopping 300 MW of wind is in or even anywhere near the hardest hit region.

But what should be most informative is the fact that 36% of the wind plant was inoperable because the rest of the grid was down. In fact, wind turbines require power from the grid to operate, but in this case it was probably transmission that was down. So the remaining 64% were still operating only because the other sources on the grid were still operating.
02:48 AM on 03/19/2011
300 km is a very long way from the epicenter. Yokohama, San Diego's sister citiy, is 318 km from Sendei, the epicenter. I'm told there was not much damage in Yokohama from the quake. Now if these windmills were off Sendei or Fukushima I'd be impressed, but this really isn't saying much about their seismic safety and it's misleading to imply that we've now proven them earthquake proof. In fact the ONLY seismic testing ever done on one of these things was a shake test in San Diego witnessed only by industry officials--who declined to release the results to media, so probably it didn't turn out so great. Given that in our area they want to build them right next to fault lines, and that they can cause fires (google wind turbine fires) please don't suggest that these 500-foot-high towers full of flammable oils are safe, especially in a major quake.
09:29 AM on 03/19/2011
Yokohama is over 400 KM from the epicenter, actually, which was out at sea (38.322N,142.369E), not at Sendei. And the Kamisu wind farm is in the ocean in a direct line from the epicenter, so itwould have gotten the full brunt of the tsunami. Yokohama has a large body of land between it and the epicenter which would have protected it from the tsunami, thankfully for the millions of people who live there and in nearby Tokyo. Japanese wind farms are rigorously designed to withstand earthquakes...someone may have done some testing in San Diego, but to suggest that it was the only test ever done is ridiculous. Japanese turbines have been tested both intentionally and through the many quakes that shake that part of the world on a regular basis.
09:48 AM on 03/19/2011
It'd have to be way better than a nuclear power plant going into meltdown spewing radiation into the surrounding area. That nuclear power plant will end up encased in tons of sand and cement. Billions of investment dollars useless forever, never able to be repaired. Workers trying to save the plant exposed to dangerous levels of radiation. "500-foot-h­igh towers full of flammable oils" seems far safer than a 1000 foot oil rig that breaks in the ocean spewing millions (or was it billions?) of gallons of oil into the ocean. BP burned a lot of that oil and told us the environmental damage was negligle. Go on just ask them. Say which industry representative are you from nuclear or petroleum?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erik Van Erne
Towards a sustainable world
01:28 AM on 03/19/2011
Yes, renewables
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
07:14 PM on 03/18/2011
Yes! This is what I have been talking about! Thanks for the information.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freevo
Hey hey NRA how many kids were shot today
05:30 PM on 03/18/2011
Wind power: while not a panacea to the world's energy needs, plays a vital role in meeting those needs.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:49 PM on 03/18/2011
Wind solar and waste ARE the panacea. Carbon negative, 24/7, clean, safe, forever, and cheaper than nukes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freevo
Hey hey NRA how many kids were shot today
01:08 AM on 03/19/2011
I agree I'll be glad to see humans wean themselves off coal and nuclear energy. I don't use any directly and try not to buy commodities produced by industries that rely on them. However my cell phone and computer have components that were made using such negative impact energies. l live for the day that every product is made and delivered with 100% clean, renewable, sustainable, earth-friendly energy.
09:31 PM on 03/20/2011
Wind and solar are not available 24/7. Solar generally is useful about 6 hours per day, in good climates. Wind availability varies by region, but rarely exceeds 12 hours per day, and usually not when it is most needed. Neither can supply baseline power.
03:27 PM on 03/18/2011
Clearly there needs to be more research in the energy production realm. All the alternatives to fossil fuels and nuclear power are just too limited to meet demand. Switching to CFL lights just aint gonna do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RRK70
07:11 PM on 03/18/2011
if all cars in the US got 40mpg or better the US wouldn't even need to import oil.  Conservation is very important.
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
08:02 PM on 03/18/2011
conservation is the #1 solution in a long list required to make any headway. Good call.
08:25 PM on 03/18/2011
Although I agree with you, this still poses a big picture problem simply due to... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
07:14 PM on 03/18/2011
Why do you claim that? It's NOT TRUE.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:51 PM on 03/18/2011
ff.
02:11 PM on 03/18/2011
Energy Generation must meet Base Load requirements to prevent brownouts and blackouts. The dependence of renewable energy on varying source energy such as the Sun and wind create problems when energy requirements are not met by renewable "fuels". Energy Storage is where the true research is at. If we can store energy produced during a hot, windy day and use it in dark, calm night, then we would have solved the greatest problem of life. Till then, we need gas, coal, oil, and nuclear to keep the lights on. We can only generate as much energy as we can use, else our power grids fail.
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
07:16 PM on 03/18/2011
There are plenty of ways to store the energy, from pressurizing liquids or gas to batteries. You people that want to be such naysayers are really not to be believed.
11:13 PM on 03/18/2011
I don't thing CZR62 is necessarily a naysayer. The point is very valid. Research into efficient and large (really massive) storage would take renewable energy sources to the next level. But the fact remains, we don't have that capacity right now which is a major detractor to renewable energy sources on a wide scale (that and subsidies to the other industries, but that is another problem).

That being said, it would be sweet if every home could afford solar panels with a backup storage system. A few houses ago, we had installed a few small solar panels and they were very beneficial but the initial cost and maintenance pretty much offset any benefit as we weren't in the house long enough...
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:52 PM on 03/18/2011
Waste bio char bio fuels can provide all the base-load backup solar and wind need. Wake up.