More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kelpie Wilson

Kelpie Wilson

Posted: October 13, 2010 04:39 PM

On October 10, artists and engineers at All Power Labs, an artist work space in an industrial area of Berkeley, California, built and tested wood-chip-powered gasifiers and biochar makers as part of the Global Work Party sponsored by 350.org to take actions aimed at knocking the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere back down to 350 ppm.

The artists at All Power Labs took a skillset for building large kinetic sculptures for the Burning Man celebration and converted it to producing independent, low carbon power. While the rest of society may be content to wait for the oil to run out before they start thinking about alternatives, All Power Labs kicked into gear when the city cut off their electricity for building code violations ten years ago. Spark plug Jim Mason responded by jumping into gasifier development and construction, chipping up old shipping pallets and construction waste to keep the lights on and the artists working.

Power pallet hums along
1 of 14
Chief Scientist Bear Kaufman with the GEK Power Pallet -- a 10kw generator powered by wood chips. The only emissions are the exhaust from the gas burning in the 18 hp Kubota engine.
Total comments: 16 | Post a Comment
1 of 14
Rate This Slide
Interesting
Incredible!

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

The basic technology to gasify wood was developed during WWII by individuals who wanted to keep driving in the face of gasoline rationing, but it was always a finicky process, dependent on the time-consuming preparation of fuel into dry, one inch cubes of wood. What Jim Mason and his crew of Steampunks and Burners have done is to optimize the recovery of thermal energy -- producing a gasifier that runs on plain woodchips.

Using 21st century desktop manufacturing technologies like a computer guided plasma cutter, they perform what Mason calls "DIY power hacking." Computer modeling of combustion processes remains such a complex problem, that it is faster and easier to just cut new parts out of metal and try them in fast build and test cycles. The design advances quickly because all the information is open source, and anyone can participate and offer improvements. People can be authors of their own power systems similar to the way that desktop publishing and the Internet created the information revolution.

All Power Labs now sells what it calls the "Gasifier Experimenters Kit" or GEK. They also offer a Biochar Experimenters Kit -- biochar is a natural byproduct of gasification. On 10-10-10, about 50 GEK and BEK customers were on hand for a workshop to gain hands-on experience in construction, testing and modification of the machines. One part of the crew had stayed up until 2:30am the night before making two kinds of biochar that would be tested in a nearby community garden.

Biochar is a charcoal-based soil amendment that can dramatically increase plant growth. Biochar also sequesters carbon because plants absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as they grow. If you burn a plant or let it rot or compost, all the CO2 returns to the atmosphere. But if you bake it and burn only the gas that comes out of it, you are left with charcoal that lasts for hundreds to thousands of years without breaking down, effectively sequestering carbon from the atmosphere.

Jim Fournier, CEO of Biochar Engineering Corporation, told the 10-10-10 work party that biochar is one of the only ways we have to actually remove carbon from the atmosphere and soon we are going to feel a lot of urgency to do that. Events like the floods in Pakistan, fires in Russian and the recent extreme heat in Los Angeles are just a taste of what's in store for us. Historically, our atmosphere has had less than 300ppm of CO2. We may go to 450ppm or higher before we are able to get off of coal and oil. Because it takes about 100 years for natural processes to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, we have to find ways to help nature along. Biochar is one of those ways.

Fournier said that one ppm of atmospheric CO2 is roughly equivalent to 3 gigatons (Gt) of carbon and that biochar could remove at most 2 Gt per year. So even with help from biochar, we can only remove about a half of a ppm of CO2 from our atmosphere annually. We have dug ourselves into a very deep hole. It is past time to grab shovels and start digging ourselves back out.

On the morning of 10-10-10 we delivered two barrels of biochar to the community garden. I described my own experiments with biochar and cautioned the gardeners that because fresh biochar can act like raw compost, in the first year after adding biochar to soil it is important to add plenty of nitrogen as well -- urine being my preferred source. Immediately someone produced a stack of drink cups, and we all trooped off to the bathroom to fill the cups with liquid gold in true DIY spirit.

Kelpie Wilson works as the Communications Editor for the International Biochar Initiative, a non-profit organization that supports the community of people working to implement biochar systems.

 
 
 

Follow Kelpie Wilson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@kelpiew

On October 10, artists and engineers at All Power Labs, an artist work space in an industrial area of Berkeley, California, built and tested wood-chip-powered gasifiers and biochar makers as part of t...
On October 10, artists and engineers at All Power Labs, an artist work space in an industrial area of Berkeley, California, built and tested wood-chip-powered gasifiers and biochar makers as part of t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:49 PM on 10/15/2010
Trees sequester carbon whereas Biochar is a forest product that's manufactured by killing a tree and preventing it from sequestering carbon. Yet you imply that rather than trees that do the sequestering you say:

"biochar is one of the only ways we have to actually remove carbon from the atmosphere and soon we are going to feel a lot of urgency to do that. Events like the floods in Pakistan, fires in Russian and the recent extreme heat in Los Angeles are just a taste of what's in store for us."

Excuse me, but floods in Pakistan have every thing to do with deforestation. Some of the highest deforestation rates in that particular region are where those floods came from!

Also fires in Russia were primarily fueled by local climatic change due to draining of vast peat bogs and other wetlands in order to grow millions of hectares of highly flammable tree farms.

And 200 years ago the mountains around the LA Basin were surrounded by vast pine and fir forests, oak woodlands too... Through evapotranspiration and other processes these vast forests not only limited the burn off of the marine layer / fog, they also created their own precipitation. Of course it's not tree that do all that right, it's biochar?

A global charcoal trade for cooking fuel is turning arid forest all over the world into deserts, especially Africa. And now Biochar wants to increase competition for these rapidly depleting resources? Really?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kelpie Wilson
12:22 AM on 10/18/2010
Deane, I would like you to know that biochar does not have to be made from wood. It can be made from any kind of waste biomass like nut shells, rice hulls, straw or corn cobs. There are places in the Phillipines where big mountains of rice hulls are burned just to get rid of them. These could be pyrolysed instead and provide both energy and biochar. Where I live in Oregon we burn wood for heat in the winter and we also have to thin the forest around the house all the time to reduce fuel loading in the urban-forest interface. If I had the right kind of stove I could be making biochar at the same time I heat my house. Biochar is made through pyrolysis which is a process of heating biomass in the absence of air. Baking biomass releases gas and you burn the gas, not the biomass. Burning the gas instead of the biomass also means that you have very low emissions of particulates. What's left is biochar. Yes you burn a little bit of biomass to get the process started, but once it's going, it produces its own heat when you start burning the gas. Biochar is about doing more with less. Please try to keep an open mind and take a closer look at biochar. It's not the answer to every problem but I think it is an important tool that can do a lot of good.
05:28 AM on 10/18/2010
Thanks for letting me know... It wasn't mentioned in your article? Is there a reason that essential info was left out?

Also it seems to me that skipping the biochar process entirely and simply mixing organic matter into the soil does the eq...uivalent as biochar does but with far less CO2 production?

I don't understand why biochar is purported to be "sequestering carbon from the air" when in truth the process of Gassification process burns fuel that in turn puts CO2 into the air. Some say that Gassification burns far dirtier than natural gas....

Lastly, green growing things absorb carbon and biochar, or that which is manufactured from once green growing things does not
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spread the wealth
05:56 PM on 10/15/2010
"MIT Warmist Throws in the Towel! 'Global warming not worth the fight; 'Costs of mitigating climate exceed benefits' -- 'There is little point in surrendering our national economy to green adventures'"

http://tech.mit.edu/V130/N45/yost.html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kelpie Wilson
07:11 PM on 10/18/2010
Hey - don't forget about Peak Oil. Even if you feel complacent about the ravages of global warming, don't you get a bit worried about what happens when the oil runs out?
05:33 PM on 10/15/2010
Great idea! But to scale up the process of turning plant matter into biochar, we need to find a kind of large plant that grows very fast and absorbs carbon very fast, and grow lots of that plant.

My candidate for this is bamboo. There is a species of bamboo which grows so fast that you can almost see it grow, and you can actually HEAR it grow.

To really use biochar well for carbon sequestration and as a new fuel source, we need as much plant matter as we can possible get. So to me the answer is to use the fastest growing plant on the planet- Bamboo.
08:09 AM on 10/14/2010
Interesting stuff. But why would you want to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere? We know that its impact on climate is so small that it has so far defied reliable detection. On the other hand, we do know that more CO2 means a greener planet as it boosts plant growth.
02:06 PM on 10/14/2010
Why don't you have a conversation with some of the climatologists and meteorologists who are working directly with the climate, recording the data, examining the changes, etc. etc.? I come across a lot of people who are getting their info from FOX News, political think tanks, politicized blogs, etc. instead of directly from the source.

You've been misinformed. CO2 is a greenhouse gas that has had a measurable, significant impact on our climate. It's easy to detect reliably; how do you think your local gas station detects the carbon emissions from your car when you get it smogged?

More CO2 does not necessarily mean a greener planet, any more than being force fed five pounds of food every hour means you will live a long healthy life.
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
04:57 PM on 10/15/2010
Your lack of knowledge on this subject is truly breath taking.
12:51 AM on 10/16/2010
What makes you think so?
01:24 AM on 10/14/2010
NATURE STUDY;
Sustainable biochar mitigate global climate change
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n5/full/ncomms1053.html

Not talked about in this otherwise comprehensive study are the whole ecological implications of new , higher value, char applications

The in situ remediation of a vast variety of toxic agents in soils and sediments.
Biochar Sorption of Contaminants;
http://www.biorenew.iastate.edu/events/biochar2010/conference-agenda/agenda-overview/breakout-session-5/agriculture-forestry-soil-science-and-environment.html

The uses as a feed ration for livestock to reduce GHG emissions and increase disease resistance.

Recent work showing a 52% reduction of NH3 loss when char is used as a composting accelerator. This will have profound value added consequences for the commercial composting industry

Every 1 ton of Biomass yields 1/3 ton Charcoal for soil Sequestration (= to 1 Ton CO2e) + Bio-Gas & Bio-oil fuels = to 1MWh exported electricity, so is a totally virtuous, carbon negative energy cycle.

Biochar viewed as soil Infrastructure; The old saw;
Feed the Soil Not the Plants becomes;
Feed, Cloth and House the Soil, utilities included .
Free Carbon Condominiums with carboxyl group fats in the pantry and hydroxyl alcohol in the mini bar.
Build it and the Wee-Beasties will come.
Microbes like to sit down when they eat.
By setting this table we expand husbandry to whole new orders & Kingdoms of life

US BiocharConference, at ISU
http://www.biorenew.iastate.edu/events/biochar2010/conference-agenda/agenda-overview.html
02:17 PM on 10/14/2010
Not to mention we have 2000 years of study already done for us with biochar. We have the biochar made by the South Americans over 2000 years ago, known as Terra Preta. From that we can understand the long-term behavior of biochar. (Google "Terra Preta" for more info.) The high fertility rates are sustainable over very long term periods.
11:58 PM on 10/13/2010
This is excellent work! Not as robust or flexible as thermal depolymerization via hydrous pyrolysis, but could be readily adaptable for agricultural wastes on a reasonably small scale.

The trouble is that production farmers will need a more substantial source of nitrogen fertilizer than can be supplied by their own urine. Although syngas can be used to manufacture urea via the Bosch-Meiser process, I doubt that this will ever be economical on a sufficiently small scale.

The most efficient practical method for farmers to produce nitrogen fertilizer from their waste biomass is via worm bins. Like any other composting process, the majority of the carbon content in the waste biomass will be released back into the atmosphere.

In order to biochar the majority of our waste biomass without increasing our dependence on fossil fuels for nitrogen fixation, the gas generators have to be integrated with Haber-Bosch reactors, and therefore small private units are less appropriate than larger municipal facilities.

Finally, if the biochar systems are developed at the municipal scale, then thermal depolymerization is a more attractive solution. It can handle sewage, plastics, and other municipal wastes, and it is more easily tuned to produce liquid fuels in addition to gases and biochar.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:23 PM on 10/13/2010
No other comments? sad, Bio Char is the answer to a many of the most pressing environmental questions. Amory Lovins say that Bio Char is the ONLY HOPE FOR MANKIND( shouting yes, I know...) . Waste Bio char can empty our dumps, stop the evasive methane release, provide the gaseous and liquid fuels our carbon fuel infrastructure needs, double to productively of poor soils and do it all carbon negative. No other technology comes close. Add Solar and wind and you have the complete 24/7 solution to replace fossil and nukes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
01:50 PM on 10/15/2010
Excellent comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!