More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Ken Gude

Ken Gude

Posted: June 18, 2010 02:12 PM

USA Robbed: Mystery Call Rules out Win

What's Your Reaction:
Read More: Usmnt , World Cup , Sports News

What a game! The best match of the World Cup so far. Day 8 has brought the tournament to life and England v Algeria still have to play. But even though the second half should give the US team a great deal of confidence, a truly bizarre refereeing decision kept this game at a draw and leaves the US plenty of work to do against Algeria on Wednesday. After the US had stormed back to draw level, the Malian referee somehow saw an infraction on one of the American players just before half-time sub Maurice Edu slotted home from Landon Donovan's perfect free kick. It has to rank as one of the most egregious mistakes in World Cup play as it was error of commission rather than omission, he saw a foul that wasn't there rather than missing a call. The US has been victim to poor and extremely consequential decisions in each of the last three World Cups - tough to view all of this as a coincidence.

For the neutral, this eighth day of the World Cup must have been amazing. For the partisan, the nerves are jangling. After watching German fall flat against Serbia - helped along by some strange officiating in that game too - opening up the second round possibilities for the two teams that advance out of Group C, the US team began play as if they had never seen each other or a soccer ball before. The Slovenes had acres of space and scored two goals from what can only be described as shocking defending. But it set up a dramatic fight back by the US in a pulsating second half that saw two goals for the US but more chances for both teams. Michael Bradley poking home from Altidore's knock down set up a remarkable finish with the US on the front foot but still looking vulnerable in defense.

And then the goal came for everyone watching except the referee. ESPN flashed that the ruling was offside. Replays not only showed no offside, the slow motion indicated that at least three Slovenean defenders had their arms wrapped around Americans as the line moved forward. If there was a foul to call it was on them not us! Unbelievable. The Everton Manager David Moyes said on BBC, "I've just seen that disallowed goal for the US again - and not only was there no foul by a US player, there are probably two penalty-kick offences being committed by the Slovenian defenders. Shocking decision."

It wasn't the first time in this game that there were odd calls - all going against the US - in and around the Slovenan box. One play Dempsey was wrestled to the ground in the box, no call. On another, he was body check as Altidore got off a snap shot. Altidore was blocked off just outside the box by the last defender that only drew a yellow card. One earlier decision saw Altidore thrown down this time near the midway line only to find the infraction whistled on the American. You might think the ref just plain didn't like the United States.

Its not as if this is the first time this has happened to the US team in a World Cup. We all remember the truly shocking no call in the 2002 quarterfinal against Germany when Torsten Frings made a brilliant save with his left hand. The only problem is that Torsten Frings is a midfielder, the German goalie was cleanly beaten. Penalty and red card. Except not that time. Flash forward four years to the final group game for the US against Ghana when we needed a win to go through. After another slow start the US had equalized when a poor clearance from Bocanegra at left back towards the top of the box. Gooch and a Ghanaian attacker go for the ball, the Ghanaian player goes down, penalty. Ghana covert, go up 2-1 and that is that.

The pattern of poor refereeing against the US needs to be reversed, and we can do something about it. Bob Bradley needs to complain, and complain loudly. The USSF needs to make some noise. Elevate this into a controversy so that everyone knows that the US team feels aggrieved. Not only will that help the psyche of the team - 'us against the world' - it will put the match officials on notice that we are watching, perhaps shading it a bit in advance of the next game. A rather successful
manager for some team in Manchester has made a career out of it. We were robbed.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 249
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
11:55 AM on 06/21/2010
Just another example of corrupt judging in international sports. Using the Olympics and the various scandals that have emerged over the last few decades there, one can only ponder what happens behind the scenes in the World Cup. Is anyone surprised that a Malian referee can be gotten to?

http://daynepost.blogspot.com/
09:36 AM on 06/22/2010
Yeah, those Malian referees. There's no real evidence for it, but they're definitely all corrupt.
11:02 AM on 06/22/2010
Supposition being that someone from a poor, obscure country suddenly thrust on an international stage might just be a little vulnerable. So the nuance escaped you.

http://daynepost.blogspot.com/
01:58 AM on 06/21/2010
The referee Koman Coulibaly whistled a foul in favor of United States forward Jozy Altidore in the 85th minute of the Americans’ 2-2 tie with Slovenia on Friday — awarding a free kick that led to a controversial disallowed goal — but replays showed that minimal contact occurred before Altidore crashed to the ground. Upon replay it was obvious that Altidore took a dive. The free kick should neer have ocured and therefore no goal would have resulted. Add to that the fact that there were many fouls commited during the free kick and the one that happened to be in front of the referee's face was an American player nearly throwing the opposing player to the ground. There is no way that that goal should have been allowed. No one "stole" a goal from the US. they stole it from themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roxy36
04:08 PM on 06/20/2010
If this would had happened to any other country they outcome would had been different. But since it was US no one cares! If this would had happened to Argentina, Mexico, omg! Riots and god knows what else.
Brazil scored with an arm and nothing happened, the goal counted and no red card.
08:05 PM on 06/21/2010
This happens all the time to all teams. Ireland were knocked out of a possible place in the finals because the referee didn't see Henry's handball goal, they were upset, but nothing came of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:39 PM on 06/20/2010
The author can be forgiven for thinking that the last game the USA team played was the best game of the match so far, but that is what one would expect any fan to say about his home team.

Watching the France-Mexico game, I thought that one had the worst refereeing of any soccer game I have ever seen.
11:04 PM on 06/19/2010
It's Bush's fault. ..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:47 PM on 06/20/2010
If he could have, he would have messed that up too.
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
11:25 AM on 06/21/2010
LOL!
07:13 PM on 06/19/2010
As somebody alluded to earlier, Bob Bradley made the most intelligent statement on the matter already. The referee appears to have changed his mind about the original free kick (Altidore clearly dived) and blew as soon as the ball was kicked. It's impossible to know if Edu would have scored had the whistle not been blown because the defender's first instinct upon hearing the whistle is to stop.

There is no conspiracy against the US - you have been on the end of the some high-profile decisions, but so have Italy, Spain, England, Australia and loads of other countries. Believe it or not, but there are fans in all of those countries who believe there is a worldwide conspiracy against their team. It's nothing new or different.
photo
jokamachi
Dog on roof? Check. Scissors? Check.
04:26 PM on 06/19/2010
The U.S. mounted one of the best comebacks in modern soccer and should have won that game.

We'll take out our frustration on Algeria.
03:45 PM on 06/19/2010
I bet though, if U.S soccer team is funded very well like basketball, American football and baseball as well as it has more fans as the other games, U.S no doubt will take the World Cup easily!
03:11 PM on 06/19/2010
Bob Bradley, US head coach, made a comment about the ref deciding to blow the whistle on the free kick, regardless, because he changed his mind about the call that resulted in the free kick in the first place. This seems to make the most sense because, watching the replay, he has the whistle in his mouth at the time of the kick and blew it right when the ball was kicked. The rest of the game he was very hesitant, and even late, in making a call so this wasn't his style the rest of the time. 99 out of 100 times, there isn't a one touch (absolutely beautiful, btw) goal like that and he would've been fine. Not condoning the bone head call since it was incredibly stupid but I feel he was planning to do a "make up" call before the ball was even kicked.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:53 AM on 06/20/2010
maybe, I could not understand why the free kick was given. Altador had no play, and looked like acting,

But

The ref did call a foul for the time "Dempsey was wrestled to the ground in the box"

against Dempsey, which, given that he put a face/stranglehold on the defender seemed right to me, this and the fact that this guy wanted a red card instead of a yellow for the tackle on altador earlier, makes no mention of Dempsey lying about the elbow he threw, and did not get called on shows he does not actually watch the games, and just makes stuff up to play the USA political victim card which is popular for americans who do not follow soccer.

the USA team keeps getting better every year, but if this attitude becomes the norm as the team gains in popularity, its going to be tough to be a fan,
11:57 AM on 06/19/2010
Why isn't Soccer big in the US. Go figure how many commericals a network can sell during a game (match) compared to American football and whala there's your answer/
09:52 PM on 06/19/2010
Very good point, as long as you haven't watched any of the games. But uninformed certainty is what the Internet is for, right?
photo
kapalabhati
Lokah Samasta Sukhino Bhavantu
11:28 AM on 06/21/2010
Uninformed certainty. You should trademark that phrase. So true....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
diverssant
"I wanna go outside, in the rain..."
10:38 AM on 06/19/2010
What are you talking about? The US has been actively promoted by FIFA forever for the simple reason that it is a rich market still relatively untapped... and it is all about the money as everything these days! Starting from the fact that the CONCACAF is by far the weakest conference so the US qualifies easily, giving the World CUP to the US at a time when the country did not even have a professional league (unheard of), to rating the US ridiculously high in the rankings thus allowing them to get better seeding...

Willy-nilly goofy refereeing decisions are a part of the game and many times they benefit the US-even against Slovenia, and I agree that the goal was unjustly disallowed, the US got away with escaping a clear Red Card and a penalty before... Bad referee, I agree... but beyond that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 PM on 06/19/2010
the us is ranked no 14 going in. they beat spain(2) in a meaningful tournament last year and almost took Brasil(1). they have a tendency to allow early goals but have now come back from those early deficits against 2 qualifying european teams. no 14 is not ridiculously high. it is probably about right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Courtney250
10:10 AM on 06/19/2010
I have no idea why everyone is attacking you, because reviews of the call and play clearly show it was a good goal and if anything, we were fouled by Slovenia. This ridiculous notion that we played poorly in the first half so deserve to have a goal taken away is absurd.

I can't help but think back to the last WC when we were called for obstruction during the Italy match when we were just defending.

I am also a MUFC fan and Sir Alex is a maetsro at not only making sure the ref is on point that protests will be made if any funny business goes on, but I have also seen him negotiating added time. With all of the corruption problems with refereeing, Italy and more recently Germany, I am surprised the comments on here seem to be weighted against US interests! I for one, am on a lifetime ban of buying any products from Mali since I am helpless to do anything else.

For those of you shouting "whiner" I wish you would shout USA and support our Team USA who worked so hard in the 2nd half and won that match!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spartanladkenny
is amazing at predicting the future on HP
12:28 PM on 06/19/2010
Sir Alex is a documented whiner. He cries for anything that goes against ManU because in his head, the entire world is hatching conspiracy against one of the biggest clubs in the world. I wouldn't want anybody to follow Alex Fergusson's lead on complaining about bad decisions!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Courtney250
06:54 PM on 06/19/2010
I see by the "ManU" that you do not like the club, which is fine. My point about Sir Alex is that he does not stand for funny business, of which there has been much documented. And I would also like to point out that Rafa Benitez, Guus Hiddink, Ancelotti, and many other high profile managers in Serie A, La Liga, and Ligue 1 do the same. It is a part of the game, no different than the chatter and gamesmanship that goes on prior to the match.

I think making our(USA's) point known, i.e., we were robbed and are stating that in public on the world stage is a good idea. FIFA needs to deal with this issue as well as players from nations declaring their affiliation with a completely different nation simply because they cannot qualify for their own nation's squad. At this rate, there will be 5 or 6 Brazilians for every WC squad in the world soon.

btw, who is your club?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheKurgan
Prof Musician,Socialist,Bridge Life Master
01:20 PM on 06/20/2010
The crap call in 2006 was the disallowed goal scored by Beasley when McBride lifted his foot to get out of the way....you know the one....the one where Italy would have been eliminated since the US would then have won the game 2-1 instead of the ludicrous 1-1 tie. That was the shocking decision....

Then again, Italy benefitted TWICE from shocking decisions in that tournament. In the 81st minute against Germany, Podolski was fouled INSIDE THE BOX, which is a clear penalty. Not only did the ref keep the foul call, he moved the spot of the kick OUTSIDE THE BOX, when replays CLEARLY showed the foul occurred inside. To be fair, it was a ticky tack foul, but if called, it had to be a penalty. I can't believe the DFB didn't scream bloody murder about the change of the spot of the foul.

USA gets hosed by bad decisions. Germany gets hosed by bad decisions (this WC, too). Italy benefit from bad decisions (like the same ticky tack foul that led to their penalty against New Zealand...same kind of foul that should have resulted in a penalty for Germany four years ago)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gutenmorgen
a.k.a. poopdeck
08:29 AM on 06/19/2010
Like other teams the U.S. team has scored numerous "offside" goals throughout its history but has never vilified referees for it. I am greatly amused by this blatant hypocrisy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
throwndown
10:30 AM on 06/19/2010
This referee deserves to be villified, then banned from the WC. Missing an offside call is one thing, sometimes those calls are too close to argue, even with slow motion replay. This ref didn't miss a call, he made one up. Why doesn't the ref or FIFA just come out and explain where the "foul" was? Shenanigans.
10:44 AM on 06/19/2010
The foul must have been an obstruction called on a USA player right on the center of the goal box. Views on the field are different than outside the playing area. The ref probably made the right call.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spartanladkenny
is amazing at predicting the future on HP
12:38 PM on 06/19/2010
The offside ruling is such that its extremely difficult for the linesman to spot close situations. Hence, many teams benefit from wrong offside calls. In this case however, there is nothing to be called. He can't spot a foul on American player because all of them were being held by Slovenia while they were trying to get away to the ball. In such free kicks, its hard to be offside because most attackers start from behind the offside line to gain momentum. The only time offside is called in a dead ball situation like this is when an attacker touches the ball further and another teammate ends up at the end after crossing the offside line.

I firmly believe he was anticipating a foul and blew his whistle in error and wouldn't retract it.
07:29 AM on 06/19/2010
1. If the Americans had played decently in the first half, they wouldn't have been hurt by the bad call. When you leave your fate in the hands of the officials, it's your own fault if things don't go your way.

2. I'm an American and this whiner is embarrassing me. No, the refs aren't picking on us. Watch a few other games, nitwit. And stop blowing on that vuvuzela -- hyperventilation is making you dizzy.
photo
dim
one in a can
02:23 PM on 06/19/2010
You shouldn't have to win by a big margin because of crappy officiating.
09:55 PM on 06/19/2010
Right. Absolutely. And if you want to lose games, keep to that philosophy and strut about over your conceptual purity. If, on the other hand, you want to win, put the ball in the net often enough that you aren't at the mercy of the officials.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:32 AM on 06/19/2010
the whistle was blown before the ball was kicked,

so yellow card for crying wolf.