iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kenneth Thorpe

Kenneth Thorpe

Posted: November 17, 2009 09:54 AM

Put the Obesity Epidemic at the Top of the Agenda

What's Your Reaction?

If Congress wishes to control costs in health care, they must put the obesity epidemic at the top of the agenda.

Why? Because as much of a problem as obesity is today -- believe it or not, it is going to get worse -- and we will all be paying more for it.

A new study released today by the UnitedHealth Foundation, American Public Health Association and Partnership for Prevention in conjunction with their annual America's Health Rankings report shows us what the world will look like a decade from now if current trends continue. The study, which was based on my research, finds that:

• By 2018, 103 million American adults -- or 43 percent of the population -- will be considered obese;
• US spending on health care costs attributable to obesity will quadruple - to $344 billion - over that same period; and,
• By 2018, obesity will account for more than 21 percent of health care spending.

Obesity is historically linked to about one third of the increase in domestic health spending since the mid-1980s and is a key factor in the rise in private insurance premiums, Medicare and Medicaid spending. These new findings show there's no question that as a nation, we need to take action -- and fast -- to control our weight.

While health reform provides us with a great opportunity to consider the obesity epidemic from a national policy perspective, there are things we can do right away that don't necessarily require legislative action. We can meaningfully reduce costs and improve quality of life simply by changing the way we think about and treat obesity. Here are four examples of where to focus our efforts:

1. Get Americans to see being obese as a serious medical condition that significantly heightens their risk for other health problems, not as a lifestyle choice.

Obesity can kill you. It's true: Obesity is responsible for 112,000 deaths and for more than 100,000 cases of cancer annually, as well as being closely linked to the explosion of chronic disease rates in our country. Yet, Americans generally view being obese as a choice rather than a medical condition. Congress can help change this by ensuring that obesity is recognized officially as a chronic condition, qualifying obese patients for many of the care coordination and preventive care provisions being considered in current health reform legislation.

2. Ensure that fear about the stigma of obesity does not eclipse the need to combat it.

States like Arkansas have been taken to task by parents and critics for weighing and measuring school children to identify and monitor obesity, despite the fact obesity is linked to our nation's high levels of "type 2" diabetes in children and that -- given the strong association between diabetes and heart disease -- they may be at risk for heart attacks in their teens. Screenings and other monitoring tools, when administered appropriately, can be incredibly helpful in catching potentially life-threatening cases. Ultimately, efforts to identify and control obesity are not meant to point fingers or label but to improve health, avoid death and reduce costs.

3. Get employers invested in promoting wellness.

A number of employers are embracing the idea of workplace health promotion through on-site programs or incentives for gym memberships, etc. With such progress being made by the private sector, Congress should look for responsible ways to encourage it. Health care proposals would allow employers to do more to encourage "good" health behaviors among their employees as a means of reigning in rising health care premiums. Providing such incentives for health and wellness programs is a terrific start, but overall design will be the true deciding factor as to whether the programs are effective.

Congress can help by ensuring that programs must be voluntary, easy to access and have a well-designed and well-communicated structure. Most importantly, any financial incentives to participate in health risk assessments or care plans must not be related to family or genetic information. Instead, these incentives should be available to all workers -- disabled, healthy, and chronically ill -- and geared to encourage filling out a health risk appraisal and working on their care plan, not on issues related to health, disability status or family history.

4. Ensure that our health care system is oriented to help health care providers treat obesity like a preventable medical condition.

Current incentives within the health care system make it more profitable to treat disease than to prevent it. Health care incentives should instead encourage health care providers to spend time discussing preventive care and prescribing the appropriate diet and exercise regimens that can help their patients to avoid obesity. Current health reform legislation would link payments to the quality of care and improved health outcomes, which is a good start. We should also pay physicians for weight loss counseling, reimburse nutritionists and other specialists by using community health teams of providers that work with provider practices and clinics, and expand coverage of comprehensive primary care, which should, in theory, include better obesity monitoring and prevention.

If we fail to take action to curb obesity, we face a grim future. But if we do take action, the future looks significantly brighter, according to my new study. If obesity levels are held at their current rates, I estimated that the U.S. could save over $800 per adult by 2018 -- a savings of nearly $200 billion. As Congress debates pushing health care to the early 2010 agenda, they should remember that number -- and make sure that tackling our nation's obesity epidemic and rise in obesity linked chronic illness is moved to the top of the list.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:25 AM on 11/19/2009
I think Mr. Thorpe paints a thoughtful comprehensive picture and shows us where our society is headed. Look back a generation to the 1960's. There was no obesity epidemic and our grocery stores did not offer any better options than today. We consume only 100 calories more per day now. What has changed? We no longer move as much. We burn some 600-700 calories less per day. 2-3 hour total commutes, 8-10 hour work days spent at a computer and then 500 cable channels at home on the couch. Americans walk an average 2 miles per day despite the minimum recommended 5 miles (10,000 steps). Why don't we walk or work out more? Number one reason cited by Americans is lack of time, number two is lack of motivation. We are too busy, too tired and too stressed and it is spiraling out of control. So, how do we change the dynamic? Seems logical that since the bulk of the day is spent at work and at school that we need intervention here the most. Work place measures should include movement like the TrekDesk Treadmill Desk which allow employees to walk while they work. Our diets need to be improved certainly but look a little to the past and you can see that our current situation is not the fault of any company. It is reflective of the societal changes that have led our lives to become sedentary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
02:08 PM on 11/17/2009
Why do some Americans stay fit while others grow obese? I believe it is for the exact same reasons why some drug addicts remain functional and others go off the handle. You believe a trim figure is normal behavior and I believe just the opposite. Show me studies where mammals are put under constant stress with an unlimited supply of hyper-rich, nutritionally depleted foods, with little need for exertion and see how they react. Indeed, is not the American lifestyle one big experiment with those very conditions?

Although I agree with most of the details of what this author says he paint only half a solution which ironically only contributes to the problem. Where he fails is the supply side of the picture, the 'drug pushers' if you will. The Obesity Industry loves half-story proponents like this author. Go to your average super market and analyze the amount of floor space devoted to healthy foods versus nutritional poison. While on the road go to one of these 'food marts' and see where the choice of healthy foods approach zero.

What is the cultural value of fast food restaurants on every corner? Restaurants that have scientifically designed and marketed their products to maximize the high from fats, sugars, and carbohydrates.

Perhaps all we do need is more will-power, discipline, and education advocates like this well meaning author. Just don't be shocked when it doesn't work.
12:19 PM on 11/17/2009
Not sure how this could be written without pointing a finger (or multiple fingers) at food policy and/or corporate greed in ours and other Westernized countries. CocaCola and McDonalds and Kraft and others like them may care a little about health care costs -- they have employees after all -- but those costs pale in comparison to the profits that can be made courtesy of a population immersed in cheap, crappy, and probably addicting food.

So I'm sure that Congress (or at least the food lobbyists who help draft their legislation) will be happy to misdirect attention away from industry, food cost, and choice and onto personal responsibility, but if you really want to improve chronic disease rates (and let's face it, most of the problem is not from the obesity per se, but the diet that got someone there), then the standard American diet needs a major overhaul.
10:54 AM on 11/17/2009
It may be true that obesity is connected with certain health problems to a degree. However, it is also true that stigmatizing and shaming people does not work. Giving people viable alternatives rather than calling them names or belittling them about their weight whenever they come to the doctor's office for problems unrelated to weight is not effective and only encourages people not to go to the doctor. Binge eating also needs to be recognized as an eating disorder just as anorexia and bulimia are, rather than accusing large people of having a character flaw immediately and telling them to "just eat less and exercise more" For some people, food can be just as addictive as alcohol, nicotine, or opiates is for others. The problem is, one has to eat. Once the focus is on treatment rather than shaming people for being overweight, it will help.