iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kevin Grandia

Kevin Grandia

Posted: August 13, 2009 06:24 PM

An internal memo obtained recently by Greenpeace USA details polluting interests’ plans to launch a nationwide astroturf campaign attacking climate legislation at public events scheduled throughout the final weeks of recess before the Senate returns to debate the issue in September.

The email memo (download a PDF copy), which appears to come from the desk of American Petroleum Institute president Jack Gerard, asks API’s member companies to recruit employees, retirees, vendors and contractors to attend “Energy Citizen” rallies in key Congressional districts nationwide in the closing weeks of the August recess.  The campaign plan places a special focus on 21 states picked by API for having “a significant industry presence” or “assets on the ground.”

Taking a page from the playbook of astroturf campaigners currently crashing health care town hall events across the country, API hopes to similarly sully productive communications between Congress members and their actual constituents at public events scheduled for the coming weeks.  Gerard states that API is ready to bus in company members and provide logistical support, and reveals that API has retained “a highly experienced events management company that has produced successful rallies for presidential campaigns, corporations and interest groups.”

Gerard’s email states that API is partnering on the rally campaign with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, confirming that the groups are staging a coordinated effort to attack climate legislation despite the fact that several prominent members of these groups have stated support for strong Congressional action to combat climate change.

Greenpeace sent a letter to Gerard yesterday asking him to verify the authenticity of the email, and pointing out that the plan “runs contrary to several prominent API members’ public support for climate action, namely Shell, BP America, ConocoPhillips, General Electric and Siemens.” 

The memo closes with a ‘for your eyes only’ plea: “Please treat this information as sensitive and ask those in your company to do so as well… we don’t want critics to know our game plan.”

To which Greenpeace responded to Gerard in yesterday’s letter, “Game plan known.”

Here is a list of the “tentative venues” where API plans to hold “Energy Citizen” rallies.  If you live in one of the named cities, please email any news or tips you hear about the rallies to us at desmogblog@gmail.com.

Houston TX
Perry GA
Detroit MI
Roswell NM
Greensboro NC
Farmington NM
Ohio (venue being finalized)
Greeley CO
Nashville TN
Indiana (venue being finalized)
Bismarck ND
Tampa FL
Sioux Falls SD
Greenville SC
Anchorage AK
Joliet IL
Charleston WV
Fairfax VA
Philadelphia PA
Lincoln NE
Missouri TBD
Arkansas TBD


 

Follow Kevin Grandia on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kgrandia

An internal memo obtained recently by Greenpeace USA details polluting interests’ plans to launch a nationwide astroturf campaign attacking climate legislation at public events scheduled throughout ...
An internal memo obtained recently by Greenpeace USA details polluting interests’ plans to launch a nationwide astroturf campaign attacking climate legislation at public events scheduled throughout ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
05:54 PM on 08/18/2009
Big Oil companies use these kinds of tactics all the time. Check out this video about Chevron's attempts to weazel out of a $27 billion lawsuit brought by communities affected by their polluting practices in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Even Andy Rooney hates the dirty tricks Chevron is using!

http://chevrontoxico.com/news-and-multimedia/2009/0818-60-seconds.html
06:25 PM on 08/17/2009
Cap and trade is a scheme to preserve the status quo for some of the biggest polluters. The concept of carbon credits is flawed in the fact that it simply moves the same carbon from one polluter to someone else.the wasteful activities of governments who insist on using the most polluting and largest vehicles
on the planet for there daily trips about towns worldwide and similar activities that are destroying the planet on a daily basis.

Goldman Sachs to be carbon regulator?
So does this mean that freebooting Goldman Sachs could be the de facto regulator of the carbon market?
As the global warming bubble inflates and then bursts, will Goldman
Sachs self-regulate all the way to the bank… making record profits at the expense and misery of taxpayers and consumers
12:57 PM on 08/18/2009
Agreed, ACES is a bankster trading bill, the largest in history, not a climate bill since it give the dirtiest fuel, coal 50B$, and solar and biochar nothing.

A simple 1$ per ton carbon tax, plowed into 3 cent/KWH rooftop solar and waster biochar, would free us from fossil fuels, and provide cheaper, clean energy and fuels forever. see my profile for details and links.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:59 AM on 08/17/2009
Most hard-working Americans would applaud Big-Oil's efforts to scuttle this stinker of a bill to cap greenhouse emissions. They need powerful allies to offset Big Environment, Goldman Sachs, The Al Gore-George Soros machine, General Electric and many other well-connected special interests who are in line to benefit from this legislation. The average citizen realizes that he will be paying for the inevitable high costs with possible unemployment, higher utility and energy bills, along with the higher taxes that are hidden somewhere in the thousand plus pages of this monstrosity. And for what? To delay the onset of global warming,that may or may not be happening, by a few years and which may be a net benefit to most people living in North America. Kudos to Big OIl -- we need them! derekcrane
11:34 AM on 08/17/2009
Your comments are ridiculous.
You don't believe in Global Warming.
You have your head in the sand.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 08/17/2009
Even if there is a 100% probability that global warming was a factor in our future the cap and trade bills will do little to curb it. I am sure that you are an expert with the powerful tool of cost/benefit analysis -- please apply it to this plan and give us your results. I eagerly await your findings. derekcrane
04:30 PM on 08/17/2009
Condor, if global warming was truly the crisis people say it is, the Congress would take action that was meaningful, instead of passing this ridiculous Waxman-Markey crap. Simple conversion of coal-fired plants and cars, trucks and buses to natural gas would have an immediate impact of 20-25% reduction of CO2 and 99% particulate emissions. It would make us energy independent, create jobs at home, and the money we DON'T sent overseas for oil could stay here for R&D and infrastructure of alternative technologies.

HOw can we possibly believe what they say about global warming when their actions are designed only to increase taxes and make Goldman Sachs more wealthy? Waxman does nothing meaningful about the environment for YEARS, when we could be doing something now. This is not an environment bill, it's a government revenue bill.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ForVivi
Another button, another buttonhole.
11:00 PM on 08/17/2009
Believe it or not there are larger issues at hand such as SURVIVAL of our species!

Best said in http://11thhouraction.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:09 AM on 08/17/2009
This is the same tactic being used by the anti-health-care lobby. When you can't win a discussion on the merits of your talking points, make sure the discussion never takes place.
04:31 PM on 08/17/2009
mama, I've been trying to have meaningful discussions about this issue on this forum for months. The most common response is personal attack. I'd be more than happy to discuss this issue with you.
07:25 PM on 08/17/2009
ExxonMobil in a well publicized move a few years ago gave $100 million to Stanford University to study global warming issues.
Much of that money went to environmentalist type projects.

First, oil companies should love the rhetoric of global warming. They would be watching with glee.
If the public is conditioned to believe in alternatives such as wind at $200 per barrel of oil equivalent or solar at $1,000,
if taxes are supposed to force conservation while the public uses more and more energy, guess what gift is handed to those that manage oil and gas.
10:28 PM on 08/16/2009
Forget Biofuels.
That's a Scam to keep people PAYING for fuel at the Pump.

The best and cleanest source of energy is from the SUN and WIND. Solar and Wind is the present and future.

Power companies don't want people to think about those FREE energies because they would lose so much money if people placed small wind turbines and solar panels on their homes.

Wake Up People!
05:18 AM on 08/17/2009
Please tell me where I can get some free photovoltaic panels. I would really like some.
04:32 PM on 08/17/2009
Condor, even the most optimistic projections show that wind and solar will only be providing us with 25% of our needs by 2025.

By insisting on Waxman, you are dooming us to oil dependence and coal fired plants for decades to come. I would sincerely ask you to look at the benefits of natural gas conversion as an alternative to WAxman, and see if it doesn't make sense to you.
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
04:31 PM on 08/16/2009
What are we going to call them? Oilers? Drillers?

Luddites?

Dinos?

Morons?
02:06 PM on 08/16/2009
Oh it's fun to catch them in the act, isn't it?!

Note to all creepy industry execs: If you find yourself typing something along the lines of "don't let this memo leak, cuz golly that sure would make us look bad" you're probably sealing your fate that the memo will indeed get leaked.

P.S. This makes you look REALLY BAD!
11:56 AM on 08/16/2009
Oil companies have kept electric cars off the road for almost two decades, but they are starting to lose that battle, so their only option now is to fight the next generation of development that has the potential to undermine their profits, renewable energy.

These protest have nothing to do with halting the climate bill, I'm a hardcore enviromentalist and even I know that this is not going to happen in my life time, but what the oil companies are doing is raising question to the whole debate on renewable energy. Why are they doing this? The answer is simple if you follow the progression. Hybrids and electric cars are gaining ground and as they do, more on-site power will be needed and this type of power, which will come from either coal (enemy of big oil- believe it or not) or renewables (enemy of both oil and coal).

A world filled with plug-in hybrids will drive the demand for solar powered car ports (which are already in the hundreds across the nation) and similar technologies. If the oil companies can make a dent in the funding for solar and wind technology, they will have effectively supported their own cause and by using the cover of climate bill legislation to do this only proves how dumb the general population has become.

SOLAR MAID
10:27 PM on 08/16/2009
Unfortunately, you're wrong. The Oil companies have won. The U.S. went to war in Iraq for the Oil companies and the price of gas doubled in the last few years and now we are in a huge Recession/Depression.
The Prius does not count as a True Hybrid by the way. And how many plug-in vehicles do you see manufactured in America today? The answer is NONE.

Yes, the Oil companies have won and they are still winning.
When I see plug-in hybrids as common as gas engines are today, then I'll know we made Real change. Otherwise, it's all just lies and more of the same BS.
05:20 AM on 08/17/2009
We should pray for high gasoline prices since that will make stupid Americans use less gasoline! They don't know what we know and won't be smart like we are otherwise.
04:34 PM on 08/17/2009
Again, ifyou want to doom us to oil use for decades, support wAxman. It will cripple the independent oil and gas companies that employ thousands in this country; the big oil firms, who are all multinational, will just import more foreign oil and sell it to us at a higher price to cover the cost of the carbon taxes imposed on them. They don't care at all.... We need to look at solutions that keep our money and our jobs at home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:14 AM on 08/17/2009
The American oil and auto industries succeeded in keeping American manufacturers from making hybrids and EVs, so the market share they could have had went to foreign companies. Even tiny Norway, population less than 5 million, makes an electric car (for urban use), while the USA, population over 300 million, can't do it.
10:02 AM on 08/16/2009
The anti-health care shout-downs are working. We will not see a government component in the so-called reform bill. The oil companies are learning a valuable lesson from this. They will, as usual, prevail.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 AM on 08/16/2009
The tone of the Greenpeace letter is surprising considering they should want $4 a gallon gasoline. A high price is the only way to get people to conserve and use less.
Gasoline should be $8 a gallon, or more.

I respect Greenpeace, but many environmental groups just want business as usual. The cap and trade bil is so full of faults and loopholes it would be better if it failed and something else that put a price on carbon and simply taxed it replaced it. Cap and trade won't stop climate change.
04:36 PM on 08/17/2009
Linaya, do you have any idea what $8 per gallon gasoine would do to YOUR cost of living? Agriculture, transportation, shipping, manufacture, all would be affected. Be careful what you wish for.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wingnutgator
04:46 PM on 08/15/2009
we have enough domesstic coal, oil and natural gas to run this country for 300 years and create millions of high paying jobs, yet due to the persistent belief in the myth of man made global warming, we are reduced to putting up windmills and solar panes which are inefficient and economically unsustainable without massive govt. subsidies. The whole time our economic competitors, China, India and Russia are laughing at our stupidity as they move ahead with more coal and nuclear power plants. I hope I live long enough to see the so-called "environmentalist" exposed for the ignoramuses they truly are.
10:38 PM on 08/15/2009
wingnutgator is a strange nickname for a Saudi Prince. You and your 4,000 fellow Princes would be the ones laughing at our continued addiction to oil. Nice try, Prince.
04:40 PM on 08/17/2009
Wilder, please keep an open mind. Natural gas could allow us to truly become energy independent. We have so much in this country that we are having storage problems. Don't make the mistake of lumping every argument other than yours into the "Big Oil" category. I'm passionate about this because my state is highly dependent on revenue from small mom and pop independent oil and gas producers. It employs thousands of people here. The small companies will be destroyed by waxman; it will only enrich foreign suppliers. We could convert to NG, same money, benefit the environment, keep jobs, and transition to alternatives: WHY IS NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THIS? Because "Big Oil" WANTS us to keep using oil for decades, which Waxman will guarantee. Because "Big Coal" WANTS us to keep using coal for decades, which Waxman will guarantee.

Look at natural gas. Do some research.... you might be surprised at what you find.
02:12 AM on 08/16/2009
What is it with the wea lthy corp orations that they will pour everything they have into keeping us sub.serv.ient to them? The race for renewable energy is really no different than the race to the moon and those who block our progress in this are dooming the whole country and future generations for a long time to come.

Sadly it will probably be the same people that are crying for the insur ance execs that will be screaming how we will hurt the b@st@rds if we try to move forward to stem global warming and pursue alternative, renewal energy.

Oh wait, I forgot, then they can blame it on the prez.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
live by the golden rule
04:28 PM on 08/15/2009
Even though it's been announced ahead of time, the media is likely to fall into their trap and cover it. The teabag protests clearly were put together as media opportunities by Fox news, yet other networks actually covered them as if they were protests. Similarly, the Republicans announced in advance that they would go after the health care bill as a way to destroy Obama and replay their 1994 game plan, yet the media covered the "death panels" as if they were part of a serious discussion about health care.
The press has pretty much failed to perform the informative role that earned them their "free press" place in our democracy a long time.
04:45 PM on 08/17/2009
Live, have you attended either a tea party or a town hall meeting? I think you might be surprised if you had. it's really too bad that so many people here allow others to tell them what is happening without experiencing it for themselves.
06:15 PM on 08/14/2009
Hemp would certainly help. Right now, Ron Paul (R) is the ONLY Congressman attempting to legalize, or even bring up the subject.
02:18 PM on 08/14/2009
Looks like winning our country back has many large battles to come.

The sad thing is that these are fellow humans, fellow citizens of Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinns17
TEAMSTER
12:56 PM on 08/14/2009
wonder why .lol http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912