By now, we are all familiar with the conversation about American parenting and the concern with overscheduling. And there is a growing consensus that maybe our kids really are being run ragged by the pressure to perform and, to our credit, we are looking into the problem.
But at the same time, we are talking about extending the school year, hitting the same old panic button over our sinking test scores and our (in)ability to compete in the world market.
Until we see clearly what our goals are and how to meet them, we will forever be on this rollercoaster of trying to zoom ahead and then putting on the brakes -- a life of whiplash for American families.
So what can we agree on? We all know we must prepare our kids for The Future. President Obama says this:
The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation. None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be or where the new jobs will come from. Thirty years ago, we couldn't know that something called the Internet would lead to an economic revolution. What we can do -- what America does better than anyone else -- is spark the creativity and imagination of our people.Who can argue with that?
So when we hold this idea of adult innovative thinkers ready to tackle the world in our minds and when we try to roll the tape backwards and see what kind of childhood these uber adults would have needed, our own lack of creativity stumps us. We fall back on the future we were holding out for -- the stable company career where we fine-tuned our vocation, our specialty, our area of expertise, and in return received security and a pension for our old age. Adulthood like that could benefit from a childhood where we learn things from within a box, are taught to meet expectations and people-please. It's the super structured childhood we keep going back to.
But those days are over. To get a job at Google, say, a programmer needs to be able to write code on a whiteboard, on the spot, confusing their habitual way of sitting at the keyboard. This clever trick is asking the applicant to show just how well they can perform when their little world is shaken up. When looking for employees, Google says they "want to know how you've flexed different muscles in different situations; we're looking for people who have a variety of strengths and passions, not just isolated skill sets; we're less concerned about grades and transcripts and more interested in how you think."
If we rewind to a childhood that makes an adult like that, what do we see? Is it racing around from one prep course to another? From soccer to piano to Mandarin? A childhood on the clock and filling up the gaps with zoning on the iPad and obsessing about making more friends on Facebook?
I don't think so.
A movement like simplicity parenting, a way of life that promotes play and creativity and honors a kids' needs and natural rhythms, can seem so Little House on the Prairie, like a privilege for those precious few who don't need to prepare their kids for a tough road ahead. But nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the super-scheduled childhood is a throwback to Mr. Rogers, as if life is ever going to be so structured and straightforward again! When we really look at what happens for a kid when they slow down, tune in to themselves, take space and get busy in serious play, we can see that what they are learning is how to be create a kind of inner structure that will serve them (and us) well in the world ahead. After all, what future employees need is a variety of skill sets that they can apply in multiple areas. This is the very definition of play: You have a breakthrough and then you apply it in multiple areas. Ah, so this dress snaps like this! Now I can put it on all my dolls. Play provides a deep and wide-reaching domain for kids to experiment with the real work of the real world.
The world our children are moving into is rapidly deconstructing. The average stay in any one job is under three years. Many economists project that self-employment or what I think of as "blended employment" will become an increasing feature of the economic landscape. Those that have jobs experience fewer structured benefits. The world ahead is going to require people who can substantially "create" their own structure, not solely rely on others to do it for them.
Subjecting a child to a life of super structured and fast-paced activity in order to prepare him/her for the world is a well-meaning falsehood and a more than serious mistake. Simplicity Parenting is not some silly retro concept. It is a forward-looking attempt to help families get real about what we're facing. The great news is that we don't have to do that much to introduce our kids to the benefits of their own intelligence and freedom. Just relax a little bit. Give them just a bit more space than you think you can. Allow playtime to extend just a few minutes longer. It doesn't take much to bring out the innate capacities for innovation that are already there. In fact, covering it up takes a lot more effort. And all of us who need your kids' brilliance in the future will thank you for it.
I am genuinely sorry that you and others found the reference to Mr Roger disrespectful. It was a mistake to use his name in this way and I do apologize. In the context of the article I was trying to use his wonderful show as being representative of the 1950-60's. The article and the reference to Mr Rogers is meant to convey the point that I feel this era, where a more structured and straight forward path in life, has faded.
The reference sure seems to have created a distraction and I do appreciate you being able to find the deeper message despite of my clumsiness. Once again, so sorry for what came across as disrespectful to dear Mr Rogers...it was quite unintended.
Warmly,
Kim
I am genuinely sorry that you and others found the reference to Mr Roger disrespectful. It was a poor choice and I do apologize. In the context of the article I was trying to use his wonderful show to represent the 1950-60's. The article and the reference to Mr Rogers is meant to convey the point that I feel this era, where a more structured and straight forward path in life, has faded.
I agree, that the reference seems to have created a distraction and thank you and others who have looked past my clumsiness to the deeper message. Any disrespect to dear Mr Rogers was quite unintentional.
Warmly,
Kim
I do find the reference to Mr Rogers to be quite disturbing and frankly, offensive. Anyone who could accuse Fred Rogers of perpetuating the over scheduled helicopter parenting style prevalent today is questionable, at best. I have to agree with the post by Karla Helbert, who said it most appropriately, "Fred Rogers was one of the most innovative thinkers of our time in helping children thrive in creativity, being who they are, expressing themselves and growing to be the best they could be." Isn't that, in fact, what we are striving for by working so hard to keep things simple for our children??
I particularly love the Google example! A friend tells me of seeing Lee Iacocca, the legendary industry leader who saved the Chrysler Corporation, interviewed on television in the 1990s, and of his response to the reporter’s question, “When you hire a young professional, what qualities do you look for?” Iacocca answered that he did not care whether his prospective mentees had any technical expertise, because they would be taught and trained at Chrysler. He said he looked for some kind of creativity, imagination, and artistic discipline -- that he needed them to be resourceful. So these are evergreen capacities we're looking to foster -- but the new challenge is to foster them in a mind-numbing atmosphere of an information culture that produces more information every 48 hours than was generated in our entire history up till 2003!! (That from James Gleick.)
I won't belabor what others have pointed out about Fred Rogers: a true hero for children. But then again, so are you!!
Marcy Axness
author, "Parenting for Peace: Raising the Next Generation of Peacemakers"