Recently, the Boston Archdiocese released a list of accused clergy.
A good first step. A move in the right direction. But also mind-boggling is the number of Catholic clergy predators in one town.
Hopefully, one day soon, we'll see more lists from all around the United States, the world. Even better would be if the Church would create one world-wide database that lists all of the accused clergy sex offenders, both living and dead.
This world-wide registry, a clergy predator site, provided by the Catholic Church and similar to the United States Department of Justice National Sex Offender Registry, would be available to the general public, assist law enforcement, give a much-needed tool to parents and communities, and provide awareness and child safety to the general populace, as well as providing the relocation information of Catholic clergy predators into unsuspecting communities.
Healing requires revealing. With the world-wide Catholic Church sex abuse scandal seemingly endemic in the Church, one wonders what screening processes the Church has put in place to insure the safety of vulnerable children and adults.
By "screening process" I mean to include the weeding out of the bad apples before they have the opportunity to become clergy. This would require the Church to hire an outside agency to conduct the background checks, and conduct the tests and report whether the applicant is or is not suitable.
In today's world, many organizations conduct thorough background checks on their applicants, including using polygraphs and drug tests, a wise move since the organization will be making a large investment in every employee.
Pre-employment screening must include interviewing the references the applicant provides, and also interviewing former teachers, neighbors and employers. What we know is that the current policies of the Church are not working. Their policies seem to allow only confirmation of employment or school attendance dates, and that's why it's all the more important to conduct thorough background checks.
I plead to the Catholic Church to keep moving in the right direction by revealing the names of predator clergy, as the Boston Archdiocese has done.
I also plead to the Church to start a registry and disclose their current screening steps to insure that history never repeats itself, so that in the future no child will ever have to suffer at the hands of those who have been placed in this most sacred and trusted position.
Follow Kim Michele Richardson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/KimMRichardson
Catholic sex abuse cases - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boston Globe / Spotlight / Abuse in the Catholic Church
Landmark study: Catholic clergy sex abuse caused in part by ...
Report on Catholic priests' sex abuse of minors finds no single ...
Roman Catholic Church Sex Abuse Cases News - The New York ...
Catholic Priest Sex Abuse Probe Suspensions: Protest at ...
BishopAccountability.org - Documenting the Catholic Sexual Abuse ...
Cardinal launches accused clergy sex offender site - BostonHerald ...
The problem is that some priests are too forceful. They should be careful to select only those whom they are certain are willing or eager to participate because some boys can and are traumatized by such acts. The traditions of the church throughout the millenium cannot be stopped. We all need to accept the truth keep and keep an open mind about these things.
The information cuts both ways.
In the 11 New Engand Diocese the number of new incidents stemming from activity in the last 11 years (since Jan. 2000) is under 15.
Given there are 1,400 parish churches in the 11 NE diocese that's a far cry from the scandal years.
Internet and computer misuse make up half the charfges. Young women 14 to 17 make up 25% of the charges and young adult men make up most of the rest.
It's common now for a priest to have 'a single victim and to be reported after a couple incidents if not the first incident with a victim.
The non-reason for a Catholic Registry: Going forward from 2000 it would be a subset of the National Registry anyway.
In cases where charges aren't filed but a priest broke protocol and was let go there are privacy concerns. Without civil legislation those names can't be legally outed. In cases where a priest complies with civivl law and the charges are wiped clean after two years there are similar concerns
I find many solutions to be solutions that look backwards rather than forward. What needs to happen going forward is an emphasis on timely reporting and quick civiil action and registration on the NationalRegistry where it applies. Education is the key--alerting children and parents to the early warning signs of abuse and procedures for rapid reporting. We need to change the culture of abuse and victimhood.
Could you imagine a list of "accused rapists" being made public, instead of convicted rapists? There is a big difference between the two.
Still, the main cause of the scandal is not the abusive priests per se, but the bishops who were more concerned about appearances than with a child's safety. I suspect that the psychological makeup of the current crop of bishops is even worse than the one that shuffled priests around.
Thanks, Ms. Richardson.
http://www.bishop-accountability.org/
Spread the good word.
Word must get out that this is not simply a crime where children are the sole victims. The only way to stop CSA/CSM is to educate congregations and make the world-wide registry of accused clergy available to everyone. This nightmare thrives in secrecy.
The organization that helped me out of the darkness is www.thehopeofsurvivors.org. Check it out and tell a friend.