THE BLOG
11/26/2009 04:16 pm ET | Updated May 25, 2011

Ugly Talents: Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf

whosafraidgandmromanticcrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


Thanksgiving brought me to one of my favorite dysfunctional romances and one memorable social occasion. 


Good, better, best, bested. Many of us can understand this.


Back when I was a teenager studying movies, one of my film professors said to me, "Watch Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf every three years of your life; you'll understand and relate to it better upon each viewing." Perhaps horrifyingly (to some, not me), but ever so poignantly, he couldn't have been more correct. Mike Nichols' debut film, the adaptation of Edward Albee's searing stage play, is a blisteringly real, and though mostly stage-bound, a wonderfully, living, breathing depiction of the destructive and at times, psychotic battles between an aging alcoholic couple intent on outdoing each other with clever, though wickedly malicious verbal gymnastics.


whosafraidburtonnicholscrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


A shocking picture for 1966, the film was an expletive-ridden salvo that frightened some and impressed many. So notable was Woolf that the picture that was the first to use the words "goddamn" and "bugger" went on to Oscars galore, earning Elizabeth Taylor a greatly deserved second Academy Award. It also garnered Sandy Dennis a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, a win for Haskell Wexler's gorgeous cinematography (he was the last to win for a category that doesn't exist anymore -- best Black and White cinematography). On top of those accolades, the movie was nominated for Best Picture, Best Actor (Richard Burton), Best Supporting Actor (George Segal), Best Director (Mike Nichols), Best Screenplay (Ernest Lehman), Best Sound, Best Original Music Score (for Alex North's at times gentle, haunting score), and Best Film Editing. Though Oscars are no barometer of greatness, they can point out a certain zeitgeist. This one? Mr. Burton referring to Miss Dennis as "monkey nipples."


whosafraidguncrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


Though Bonnie and Clyde helped kick-start the emerging '70s cinema, Virginia Woolf was a formidable front runner and, in a few ways, more disturbingly violent. In it, words and deeds are doled out with a ferocious vitriol that's remains unmatched, at least in terms of eloquence. Nothing so nasty has ever been so sickly beautiful.


whosafraidgandmclosercrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


And dammit if Liz's dumpy, yet oddly sexy drunk and Burton's broke-down "bog" aren't beautiful losers. Never mind how toxic they make their lives. Beginning with a gorgeous title sequence during which we watch History Professor George (Burton) and his saucy and sauced wife Martha (Taylor) walking back from a function drunk and cackling, the movie immediately places us in their dark, disconsolate universe -- one of shattered hopes, nihilism, and dipsomaniacal game playing. To George's surprise, Martha is expecting guests (at such a late hour) and, after their return home where she famously utters the Bette Davis line "what a dump" while harping on George about a movie: "What's the name of the picture?" (I'm always happy I know the name of the picture. It was the misunderstood, borderline brilliant King Vidor camp-fest Beyond the Forest). She eats chicken (she really eats that drumstick -- and it's kind of beautiful), calls George a "cluck," and they booze it up. And booze it up. And booze it up. And then come the guests. Opening the door to a couple of young, unsuspecting colleagues, well, oh my. These two have no idea what they're in for.


whosafraidbreakingcrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


Nick (Segal) and Honey (Dennis) are attempting to be cordial, but since Martha's father holds weight in the university, Nick's going to sit this one out, no matter how weird, no matter how sexual, no matter how "Georgie Boy!" it gets. And the two-hour party (in movie time, the picture takes the group into the wee hours) goes beyond weird -- it enters a vortex of nasty, though sometimes wistful, revelations for both parties. The two couples become increasingly sauced, and move their action to a nighttime bar where a vulgar dance breaks out between Nick and Martha (Oh how I love this dance). Things fall apart. The center cannot hold -- just the way George and Martha like it. Nervous Honey admits she yearns for a baby. "Well built" Nick admits his wife (whom George calls "slim hipped") had a hysterical pregnancy. George recalls a tragic story of a child killing his parents that's probably about him. And Martha, well, she pulls out the big guns by bringing up the "blue-haired, blonde-eyed" kid (the game, "Bringing up Baby"). And that is quite enough -- George digs in his claws once and for all.


whosafraidsandyandgeorgecrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


With such substantial, fearless performances, and Nichols' active, observing camera, the picture attains a visceral power that leaves the viewer both raw and transfixed. There is little respite from these character's actions, and even moments of humor are soon met with yet another discomforting bout of disgrace, cruelty, or sadness. But it never becomes sickening; on the contrary, there's a sense of nobility to this movie that's unusual for its often-crass subject matter. And once we make it through this harrowing night, we learn that there's a lot of love between dueling G and M. George and Martha may be poster children for extreme dysfunction, but dammit if they're not meant to be. And there's something oddly romantic about that. By film end, I am firmly on their side. All these inane romantic comedies are supposed to make you feel inspired by love. Not me. I'm pro-George and Martha. I want them to never lose each other -- ever. Have another drink and stick it out with your "quietly noisy relaxed intensity."


whosafraidfisheyecrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


So professor was right. Watching the movie every three years does deepen the experience. And in my perhaps, perverse case (I've been watching the thing about once a year since then), I feel a sadness, nostalgia and fondness for G and M. Again, there's something heroic about their dissipation. When Martha sticks up for George after her indiscretion with Segal ("Him can't. Him too drunk.") and the broken-down couple take to calling Segal "houseboy, well, at that point, I get it. Quite simply, I love George and Martha.


whosafraidlizandrichardcrop.jpg picture by BrandoBardot


Find yourself a healthy relationship, fine. Good luck. But if not, and if you've found your soulmate, even in the bottom of a liquor bottle, then, I say, "Get the Guests," get your booze, get your dreams, get your nightmares, get your monkey nipples, and hold on to each other. Even if you have to cradle a bottle of gin in the process. After all, Martha's "thirsty." 

 



Read more Kim Morgan at Sunset Gun.