iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kimberly Abbott

GET UPDATES FROM Kimberly Abbott

Turkey: Ending the PKK Insurgency (AUDIO)

Posted: 10/06/11 06:27 PM ET

Clashes between the Turkish government and the Kurdish insurgent group PKK have killed more than 150 people since Turkey's mid-June elections, and this new cycle of tension and violence shows signs of spiraling out of control. For many, the current climate recalls the worst stages of the Kurdish insurgency in the 1980s and 90s, which eventually claimed more than 30,000 lives.

Underpinning this sudden bloodshed are escalations of force and rhetoric on both sides, even as the prospect of a new Turkish constitution raises questions about the place of Turkish Kurds and their nationalist leadership within the Turkish state. The Turkish government has taken a tougher line against the Turkish Kurd insurgents of the PKK, while the Turkish PKK has resurrected tactics of kidnapping and killing civilians and off-duty Turkish officers and policemen. A pro-PKK faction has also resumed bombing tourist resorts and cities.

The current escalation ends a protracted period of relative calm and hope of a new social and political contract between the Turkish state and its fifteen percent Kurdish community. Broad swathes of Southeastern Turkey, once no-go zones where Kurdish insurgents clashed weekly with state forces, have undergone extraordinary normalization and economic growth over the past ten years.

Moreover, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), has implemented several small reforms to create a parallel "normalization" of Kurdish culture in Turkey. The new 24-hour Kurdish television and legalizing the use of Kurdish language in political campaigns may seem a small step on the road to full universal rights for Turkish Kurds, but these reforms are vital components of an influential yet incomplete effort to win over the Kurdish population.

The PKK has also evolved over the past two decades, with its leadership abandoning the goal of an independent sovereign Kurdistan in favor of what they call "democratic autonomy". However their demands -- mother language education, an end to all legal ethnic discrimination, and decentralization that would lend greater power to municipalities in Kurdish areas -- are sometimes couched in vague and ambivalent language that seems separatist to western Turkish public opinion. Kurds themselves are split roughly equally between support for the Turkish Kurd nationalist party, which shares many of these goals with the leftist PKK, and support for the more conservative, religious-minded, pro-business Justice and Development Party.

Both the Turkish PKK and the Turkish state should desist from violence, and both should temper their rhetoric in order to avoid further escalation. The Turkish government must take immediate steps to end formalized discrimination against Kurds, including jump-starting the process of constitutional reform. Now that the legal Turkish Kurd nationalist party has agreed to take up 30 of the seats it won in the June elections, the ruling party must engage them in their reform efforts. The hard-line Kurdish leadership has already run into considerable Kurdish criticism for its attacks of the past three month, but a settlement can only be reached when reasonable Kurdish claims for equality are recognized, and the program of Kurdish "normalization" revitalized.

I spoke with Hugh Pope, Crisis Group's Project Director for Turkey and Cyprus. He is based in Istanbul. You can listen to our conversation below.

 

Follow Kimberly Abbott on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kimberlymabbott

 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:50 AM on 10/07/2011
VIVA KURDISTINA!
10:56 AM on 10/07/2011
Turkey had a female, a Kurdish premier/president years ago.. When did the USA had a women president? or a Native American president. just 3 years ago America chose a half black president..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
12:06 PM on 10/07/2011
So the Kurds should do what?
12:59 PM on 10/07/2011
Kurdish premier you are talking about never publicly announced that he was Kurdish. In fact the public had no idea that he was Kurdish (part Kurdish) and he was actually a pro-Turkic leader that strengthen the bonds between Turkey and other Turkic states. Not to mention he was the founder and the leader of the most conservative party back then. On top of all this, he did nothing for Kurds and during his time PKK was much more active than it is today.

Almost forgot, how his presidency ended. He supposedly died of a heart attack while he was working out, but even today many people do not believe this. One common "rumor" back then was that someone poisoned him but the state refused to disclose an autopsy report.

I don't think USA is the right comparison...
02:04 PM on 10/07/2011
Premier Turgut Ozal did not need to mention he was half kurdish. Because it does not matter in Turkey. Turks and Kurds are angry to violence, and some angry to each other because of disinformation by army, connected bureaucracy, media and extremist idiots (both sides). This conflict brings lots of money to Army, Drug dealers, etc. Premier was killed while he was trying to fix this problem, he was not killed because of his racial identity. He is the one who brought utilities and services to those kurdish and turkish rural areas. His party was secularist. Whatever u are writing sounds like from a bogus propaganda manual, You either know nothing about turkey or you are a blind nationalist which translates to ignorant racist. Unlike America, in Turkey, You never ever fill any 'race' portion in any document. The Laws may have defects, but unlike America the law does not change according to what color you are, which police you are talking to. Do not compare Turkey to one of the most racist society on earth about Race (no offense to many nice people in USA, I am talking about law and how it is applied) . Did you ever see any Tea-party in Turkey when Ozal elected? Those BDP members came to senate: to campaign outside of Turkey for PKK so they can be called 'Turkish senate members' when they call their masters in Europe. It won't help. Turks do not like Cowards who kill woman and children.
05:55 PM on 10/07/2011
Did Obama publicly announce he was African-American? Also, no, people in Turkey knew president was Kurdish. For your information Ozal was not the first president of Kurdish origin, and because Turks lack racist feelings you shelter in the U.S. the majority of Turkish presidents were not racially Turk. How many non-White American presidents do you have? I also don't understand what you try to say, PKK was more active in his days than today, so is that supposed to be something negative. You are aware that PKK is an international drug dealer terror organization, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
09:21 AM on 10/07/2011
Free free Kurdistan!
10:53 AM on 10/07/2011
There is already a de facto kurdistan in Northern Iraq..
photo
Marcus047
given up on HP
11:46 AM on 10/07/2011
don't the kurds deserve a free and independent homeland on all their historic lands, in iraq, turkey, syria and iran? haven't they been subject to the oppression and whims of foreign oppressors for long enough?
11:40 PM on 10/06/2011
I have two questions, but I know they won't be answered since it's easier to smear lies than answer questions. First: how did you manage to not to call PKK as terrorist even for once. Second: what is full universal rights that Kurds should get? As far as I am aware of, Kurdish citizens of Turkey have any right Turks have. They are over-represented in senate, there is a bunch of Kurdish millionaires and celebrities, they are free to live wherever they want, long story short they got any right any citizen have... Could you tell me how many black and Hispanic senators are there in your country? I think you people should stop throwing stones to others while you live in a glass house.
photo
Marcus047
given up on HP
11:47 AM on 10/07/2011
"they are free to live wherever they want"

Except in their own free and independent homeland, free of foreign interference and oppression, with their right to self-determination recognized.
05:45 PM on 10/07/2011
Your rant is not an answer to my point. The author implied that Kurds lack rights that are "universal," that implied Kurds lack basic human rights. Which is simply a lie. What you talk about is not an issue of human rights but rather a political one. And for your information when Turks conquer Anatolia they took it from East Roman Empire. If Romans want their self-determination right they have right to do so. However, the homeland of Kurds is not Anatolia, rather it is North Iraq according to written history. Meanwhile your country still refuses to give self-determination rights to Native Americans whose lands stolen by you. I also urge you to defend rights of Hispanics in California, and recognize their rights to self-determination as well.
04:37 PM on 10/31/2011
Last I checked that region is part of the Turkish Republic which is by far the freest and obviously most independent minded nation in the region. Fairly free from foreign interference except for the foreigner interference put in by the notorious PKK (your best pals).

Self determination? Most certainly. There are 20 million Kurds in Turkey. The BDP (PKK's) political wing was only able to garner just over 3 million votes. Which means nearly 6 out of every 7 Kurds does not want separation from the Turkish republic.

Obviously you do not care for the "right" of "self determination of 6 out of every 7 Kurds. You're more interested in the violent minority suppressing the rights out of the other 85% of Kurds.

So with your own logic in your above post, you favor the tyranny of 15% over the god given rights of the 85%.

Terrible when facts don't back up ideological preferences isn't it? Get a clue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackhawk78
11:18 PM on 10/06/2011
Free the Kurds,Turkey you robbed the kurds of there land.
10:55 AM on 10/07/2011
no not really. there wasnt a kurdistan for the past 2000 years. The Kurds have always been a part of a nation or empire.... However the natives in North America, the Siouxs, cherokee, Iroquis had...
photo
Marcus047
given up on HP
11:48 AM on 10/07/2011
"The Kurds have always been a part of a nation or empire...."

Like the palestinian arabs.