We are transitioning from the modern mind of the industrial-globalization "modernity project" of the last two centuries into a life-sustaining world, an ecological-cosmological new world mind. We are fostering values that will be inherited by the world to come and thus have an obligation to rewire ourselves to a more integral, empathic world. Part of the role of our global communications has been to rewire our minds into functioning across linear relations; to become accustomed to dealing with multiple connections rather than single ones; and to become immersed in varied and diverse relations and not just local families and communities.
We are now beginning to embody a myriad of viewpoints, beliefs, and identities. As a species we are beginning to fuse; although we are still fragmented and rife with cracks and schisms. The initiation from our species infancy into adolescence will require a moral and ethical growth. We are called to respond differently to the world around us -- not in fear or with anxiety, with trepidation or apprehension; but with robustness, energy, flexibility creativity, and positive intentions. The world in which we live is an ecology of which we are a part -- we must learn to respect this, to feel it, and to develop our lives around it. The world we are moving into requires of us that we both inspire and be inspired. What we are witnessing, now for the first time as a planetary species, is a transition between world ages, from one mode of psychic reality to the next. Our scope for shared collective consciousness and intention will continue to have a greater capacity to affect our environment and our potential futures. Just as the use of electricity has altered our industrial skylines, so we can learn to use the energy of our collective psyche to transform our world into the community skylines we wish to see for the future.
Like never before our connective and communicative environments are becoming embedded with our bio-psycho-social influences. We are establishing what psychologist Daniel Siegel terms as "interpersonal neurobiology" -- how our social relationships influence and affect our nervous system. We are unable to separate the neurological functioning of the human being from the environment. Our various social and cultural impacts, influences and experiences are rewiring our neural circuitry. It is thus imperative that we have positive and constructive external stimuli in which to foster and support conscious development. The scale of adjustment to live differently may be enormous, or will be to those without adequate preparation.
Information is our current global energy and each new energy revolution stimulates also a revolution in human communications. This in turn catalyzes new patterns and organization within the human psyche. Examples of this process include the introduction of cuneiform tablets at Sumer that ushered in early city organization, and Gutenberg's printing press that helped to democratize Europe and encourage distributed information sharing. The Gutenberg printing press was a dramatic revolution in that it made information more available within the public domain. And this in turn affected the physical and physiological condition of those exposed to printed information. Not only did the general masses take up reading on a large scale but also the very act of reading (which for Latinized Western cultures was left-to-right) stimulated parts of the human brain hitherto underused. Furthermore, the sudden increase in a reading public put emphasis upon the need for greater social organization as the written word became responsible for promoting increased individualism and instances of opposition to ruling structures (as is very much the case today).
And so today our distributed digital networks of communication are rewiring and re-patterning human consciousness through their diverse and pervasive interconnections. Such international connections breach cultural and national borders and force us to self-reflect on our identity, values, and ethics. With more and more people accessing connections outside of the heavily corporate controlled mainstream media, gaining information from a social media that is more distributed, independent, and alternative, more people are being exposed to a wide range of viewpoints, beliefs, and narratives. This exposure to new patterns of information helps us to break out from rigid, narrow and myopic scenarios.
A re-patterning of the self can lead to new priorities in our lives, to be more in balance with our needs rather than swamped by our wants. Perhaps we will be compelled to orientate ourselves toward needs rather than wants in order to have a more focused path upon which to drive forward. This re-patterning and re-structuring of social relations incorporates new styles and modes of interpersonal connections and communications. It heralds a new set of shared values, understanding, empathy, and respect. As a global family we have already suffered enough from egocentric systems and a world driven by power, greed, and control. These institutions are now archaic and destructive to our continued survival. They are the dregs of an old mode of existence, one that is unsuitable for a world to come. The ideal set of relations would be that which honours the "Golden Rule": social exchanges on mutual trust and respect. We may be a long way from this, yet the seeds have been planted, and are growing in firm soil around the world -- in projects, communities, social networks and organizations.
The world systems for a new era will not emerge from the centre, like the Renaissance that sprung up in Medici-funded Florence in the Late Middle Ages. The new "renaissance" will come from the periphery or from the bottom-up, a distributed and networked emergence of conscious individuals and groupings. Like ink dots on blotting paper, these conscious and creative centres will spread their influence through decentralized channels and processes until a time will come when the ink dots begin to fill the blotting paper. The social changes of the future are likely to come from revolutionary movements from the people, a shift catalyzed within the hearts, spirit, and minds of the people. Movements for social and spiritual change are already growing, adding more pressure to the older institutions, which will be forced to adapt or die-off. Paul Hawken's Blessed Unrest details some of these activist/actionist movements with over one million of such groups worldwide. More and more people are already insisting on increased social responsibility from business, as people become more choosy and selective according to their values. The old mind/old world energy systems of scarcity and control are ripe for change. The new revolutions in psyche and action to occur on this planet will be more in tune with the new energies, and no longer tolerant of the old systems.
Follow Kingsley Dennis, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@kingsleydennis
Krista Tippett: Reconciling Science and Religion: How Did These Great Minds Do It?
Barbara Marx Hubbard: Conscious Evolution and the Integration of Science and Spirituality
Soren Gordhamer: Wisdom 2.0 Conference Blends Technology and Spirituality (VIDEO)
Soren Gordhamer: The Primary And Secondary Questions: Spirituality And Technology
YouTube - Technology of Spirituality - Part 1 of 7
Cyberpunk, Spirituality and Technology - The Voidspace Blogspot
we have nowhere to go but up.
From compassion also comes all good things like better physical and emotional health, better well-being and better self-esteem. Compassion can't be used up, in fact, the more you create the more of it you are able to create in the future, the supply is inexhaustible and always renewable.Compassion creation and transferrence will improve your relationships, improve your life, improve our society and make for a better world for all of us.
And, as I type on the Internet (because that's where I get most of my news), I wonder, should I renew my paper subscriptions and sit in the park and read?
http://www.getlittleye.com
"The initiation from our species infancy into adolescence will require a moral and ethical growth." If that means we are collectively becoming teenagers, you just shot my optimism in the foot.
The left brain had its day(s) since Gutenberg. I'm thinkin' "social organization" promoting "individualism" basically only transferred ruling structures to more boxes. I don't think the process is analogous to "the case today." That era was one of fracturing centralized power into different shinier compartments – still separate, still not equal.
The current shift appears to be more of a refuting of the "individualist" deification and moving towards a more open minded acceptance of collective involvement. I think you said about the same thing. Are we agreeing there? We all have to keep the boat afloat.
Perhaps our views vary in perspective. I see the present process as being more of a "for" dynamic than as a movement "against". For a collectivism, more than against "rigid, narrow and myopic scenarios." The revolution varies because of the motivation even if the means appear familiar, in my opinion.
Yes, I also believe that the shift is due to the dissolving of the barriers that either disallowed, inhibited or were previously logistically unavailable.
So, no! It is not rewiring our soul. It is, ironically, defusing the static that block our perception of It.
I think he would say that it doesn't liberate man from power, it only serves to control him in new ways. How is power exercised in this new regime? Who are the new power brokers?
I'm inclined to believe that this new communications regime creates intermediaries: entities that link two or more people together that wouldn't otherwise be linked together. As a result, it is a connection that is only as good and as strong as the intermediary allows it to be.
I don't see this new technological regime that is based on the power of inclusion. I see it as based on the power of exclusion: or the ability to exclude people from the relations and information everyone else has. The very power that entities like Google, YouTube, and Facebook have to CREATE relations is also the same power that they can wield to CRAFT relations to fit a preconceived notion or SUBVERT relations entirely.
And that's why I don't think technology of the sort we have now creates community. It creates new power relations, but these power relations need not necessarily lead to a more enlightened consciousness. They could lead (and perhaps will lead) to a hardening of conciousness, as people now have new ways to tailor make their own personal echo chamber (and are encouraged to do so) without having to think about any view outside of it.
F&F
What's that tell ya?