More

Kristen Breitweiser

Kristen Breitweiser

Posted: September 10, 2008 10:23 AM

It's Time to Ignore The Moose In the Room


If I get another email ranting about how Sarah Palin is the devil, I am going to scream. This is precisely what some people cannot stand about the Democrats. The panic in the trenches. For god sakes, with all the hysteria about Sarah Palin, you would think that Reagan himself has come back from the grave to steal this election. Chill out people. Nobody wants leaders who are desperate and hysterical. Have a little courage. Keep your heads down, breathe deep, and carry on with a smart, effective, cogent strategy as to why Americans should vote for Obama/Biden.

First, as for Palin, pick one precise and focused criticism of her and stick to it. The current shotgun approach of attacking Palin with everything under the sun is not working. It merely reinforces the sense of panic and disarray on behalf of the Dems. And while we are at it, neither Obama nor Biden should be attacking Palin. Leave those attacks to the second/third tier surrogates and other outlets. That's what they're there for.

For Obama, it is becoming increasingly (if not outright) un-Presidential for him to be seen rolling in the political mud. Specifically because his attacks of Palin run completely counter to what Obama stands for -- the politics of change. Obama needs to check his ego at the door and recognize that he is not the only person who can give a good speech and steal the spotlight. He also needs to remember that Palin is merely the Vice Presidential nominee and nothing more than that. Let her implode on her own. Just you wait and see.

As for Biden, he should keep his laser focused solely and squarely on McCain because I haven't heard a damn meaningful thing lately coming from the Dems as to why John McCain would make a lousy President. Please, just let the second/third tier surrogates compete with Palin and make the "lipstick on the pig" statements. Remember that old saying about not sinking to the level of your adversaries?

Second, get back on message as to why Americans should vote for Obama/Biden. Think cool, calm and collected statements. Leadership-quality, It's safe to follow me-type statements. Tell us specifically about how Obama/Biden will be the new blood injected to govern and fix our anemic country. Spell out how bad the economy, the war in Iraq, the environment, education, healthcare, etc. are (with no thanks to the Republicans and people like John McCain) and then tell us what we all want to hear: "We understand; We have the solutions; We can fix these problems; We are firmly rooted in reality; and most importantly, We know what we are doing."

In short, Obama/Biden need to tell us what we all want to hear after the last 8 years of Bush/Cheney, "It's OK, You Can Trust Your Government Again."

Because isn't that what we all want to hear?

For example, as someone who fought against the Bush administration for several years, I did not support laws such as the Patriot Act. To me, it was unconstitutional and placed far too much power in the hands of the President. Not to mention that the basis for needing the Patriot Act (preventing terrorist acts) was a total farce. But, as someone going up against the Executive Branch, it gave me a very uneasy feeling knowing that the administration had such sweeping power to violate my privacy. Suffice it to say that I don't think I am being ridiculous to think that somewhere there is a pretty thick file on my 9/11 activist work. How can I think that? Because I did/do not TRUST George Bush or Dick Cheney. At all.

My point is that perhaps laws like the Patriot Act might be more palatable if I had trusted the President to not abuse them. In addition, perhaps I would not be so uneasy about the continued presence of terrorist groups in countries like Afghanistan, Syria, and Pakistan if I trusted that my President knew how to properly handle such situations. Moreover, maybe I would not be so concerned about potential growing escalations in places like Iran and Russia if I trusted that my President understood the meaning of a real risk and/or a real threat. Also, maybe I would not feel so anxious about Iraq if I trusted that my President knew how to end such a complicated conflict. Finally, perhaps I would feel more comfortable buying a new home, investing in the stock market, or simply going Fall school shopping if I trusted that my President knew what he was doing when it came to our floundering economy.

For me, it all comes down to trust. I want a President and Vice President that I can trust again. I want to know that I can finally take a moment to exhale and stop worrying about what sort of havoc Bush/Cheney might unveil or unleash next. It's been 8 long years of untrustworthy leadership and I am exhausted.

So yes, we all want change, but it's got to be change we can trust. Obama/Biden ought to recognize that.

If I get another email ranting about how Sarah Palin is the devil, I am going to scream. This is precisely what some people cannot stand about the Democrats. The panic in the trenches. For god sakes, ...
If I get another email ranting about how Sarah Palin is the devil, I am going to scream. This is precisely what some people cannot stand about the Democrats. The panic in the trenches. For god sakes, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:27 PM on 09/17/2008
Rep, or Dems it has been a very long time since the American people really had someone they could trust, and there is no way I will never vote for Barack S Obama. I wonder what the S stands for. I think the last time I was in Iraq he was hiding in a small hole. Just think if the Congress we vote in this Nov, would work together instead of working for the special interest groups that back them.
04:19 PM on 09/14/2008
Kristen, I am with you!
The leaders should present the program, not go in critics of Palin and sub-Coe.
Obama should get a Wake-Up Call to re-direct the strategy!
09:48 AM on 09/11/2008
Can you point to an Obama "attack" of Palin? I agree that it's un-Presidential of any candidate to roll around in the mud, and as far as I can see, only one candidate is doing so: McCain. I personally would be happy though if the Democrats and the punditry stopped talking about Palin because I am interested in the issues.

As far as trust goes, that's your issue to work out. I trust that an Obama/Biden administration would use its power responsibly because I trust that they understand the constitution and the role of the executive branch. One need only listen to what they are saying to understand that they do. Similarly, I trust that a McCain/Palin administration would continue with the corruption, cronyism, and all-around abuse of power that we've seen since January 20, 2001. One need only look at their records to understand that they would.
photo
HeevenSteven
20 Minutes into the future.
08:41 AM on 09/11/2008
Where and When did Obama attack Palin? I must have missed it.
06:41 PM on 09/10/2008
P.S. It is very hard not to take the "shotgun approach" of dissecting Ms. Palin's candidacy....she'gives thoughtful voters so much material to work with that it seems inadequate to use single shot!
06:32 PM on 09/10/2008
People are worried because a VP with no qualitative experience, and polarizing, divisive personal/professional beliefs, should not be near the Presidency!
Thoughtful, intelligent citizens want Congress to work together in an inclusive way. Mssrs. Obama, McCain and probably even Biden are in that group of citizens. Ms. Palin is not.

Thus moderates and Independents (who who will decide this election), dilemma:
Vote for a very qualified Prez candidate who has an extensive, readable track record, with an unqualfied, neo-conservative VP with whom I politically and personally disagree with in every way? candidates who claim that they will change the very party that they are a part of, and has taken the country to this mess?

or vote for a lesser qualified Prez candidate, with a lighter track record although "vetted" by 18 million voters, with a very qualified but possibly entrenched thinking VP? which party claims they will change the country's direction even though their party has been able to do basically nothing in the last 2 years?

The President and Vice President are the Executive Branch, not the Legislative. So, voters also to take into consideration whether they believe that Mr. McCain or Mr. Obama will be better able to work towards non-partisan goals with Congress.

I view the Prez/VP candidates as a package deal and thus this centrist Republican voter will vote Democratic in November due to the GOP's VP candidate...

...and thus the difficulty in dismissing the curent furor over Ms. Palin.
04:49 PM on 09/10/2008
Ok...let's forget Palin and discuss the issues..

2007 GOVERNMENT WASTE RATINGS (Lifetime Score / 2007 Score)
Lower Score = More Waste
Obama (D) 10% / 18%
Biden (D) 0% / 22%
McCain (R) 100% / 88%

Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is a private, non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to eliminate waste, mismanagement, and inefficiency in the federal government.
02:19 PM on 09/10/2008
The networks are NEVER going to give that Moose a rest. It would be sweet if the Obama campaign could treat her as an insignificant factor in this race, but they will not. She is in their heads and is not leaving. This is going to erode his appeal day by day, especially when he stoops to remarks as he did yesterday. If you found them humorous, you are not a woman, and oh does he need the female vote. To think this would all be mute if he had chosen clinton as a running mate....THINK ABOUT IT! I AM SURE HE IS.
11:55 AM on 09/10/2008
I think Obama is trying very hard to stay above the fray and make his case against McCain, but the media is so obsessed about the Palin story, it's difficult for his message to be heard and for Palin to be ignored. agree that Obama needs stay on message and we need to focus on the larger issues. The problem is that if he ignores the baseless attacks made every day by the Repubs, he's seen as weak. If he fights back, he's seen as sinking to their level. He's really in a Catch 22 situation.
11:48 AM on 09/10/2008
Great article. My question is simple, where are the Obama Attack Dogs??
11:23 AM on 09/10/2008
Great advice! Too bad the people in the Obama campaign only seem to be listening to each other.
11:03 AM on 09/10/2008
The Bridge to nowhere is best...because she was for then against it and then most importantly to those who are swing voters......she kept the 400 million in earmarks, ( no she kept 400 million dollars that belongs to the taxpayers) We want our money back! However, something really bad is about to go down in the McCain Campaign that will make us all forget about lipstick within the next two weeks.
10:57 AM on 09/10/2008
In any event, America and the world in general will recognize that Obama put up a gallant fight against an awesome political juggernaut.