More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kristen Breitweiser

Kristen Breitweiser

Posted: August 31, 2010 09:49 AM

Three Mosque Questions

What's Your Reaction:

Quick question 1: Who hired the Democrats to do PR work for the Muslims?

Quick question 2: In the 1400 years of the Islamic faith did Muslims ever need anyone -- let alone a group of goat-rodeo-herding Democrats -- to secure them their religious freedom?

Quick question 3: Don't Democrats already have enough to do, worry about, talk about, and/or fix right now than to be worried about getting the Muslim's proverbial back on the mosque "issue?"

Democrats have mid-term elections this Fall. Obama's numbers are getting lower by the hour. The economy is teetering on the brink. We've officially ended "combat" in Iraq yet thousands of our troops remain there as sitting ducks. Afghanistan is a downright debacle. Our infrastructure, schools, and healthcare system are in shambles...etc.

Yes, the list of complex issues facing this country and its "leaders" is long and dismal. Yet it would seem that Democrats prefer to only comment about the more simplistic wisdom of building a mosque in downtown Manhattan. Fancy that.

Admittedly, Republicans are damn good at creating false flags; sitting back and watching Democrats swallow the bait and chase their own tales ad infinitum while Rome burns is how the Republicans win most elections. But this time around, do Democrats really have the luxury of reaching for the ripe red herring served up on the Republican's shiny platter? I don't think so.

Let's cut to the chase. Here are two cold facts as to why mosques in general (and located anywhere) should make anyone and everyone nervous. First, they can serve as a convenient venue for radical groups like al-Qaeda to recruit potential terrorists. And second, they can also serve as a potential conduit for funding terrorist activities.

Yet has any Republican used these facts as to why he or she is against the mosque in lower Manhattan? Likewise, has any Democrat discussed these facts and appropriately dismissed them because they don't pertain to this particular Imam and his mosque? Has anyone asked the Director of the FBI, Treasury's TFFC, NYC's JTTF, or NYPD's Counter Terrorism Division what he thinks? What are the statistics? Where's the empirical (not emotional) evidence as to any real risk posed by this mosque?

To me, first and foremost, it should always come down to a question of national security: Are lives genuinely in danger by placing a mosque in downtown Manhattan?

Sadly, nobody seems to be asking or answering that question.

The Republicans' shameless hypocrisy of race-baiting under the guise of national security is laughable given the fact that if Republicans really gave a damn about keeping downtown Manhattan safe they'd have insisted that Senator Susan Collins drop her obstructionist wand last month when chemical and water treatment plant security legislation was up for a vote in the Senate. But they didn't.

Now, thanks to Senator Collins and her Republican cohorts, the Kuehne Chemical Plant in South Kearny, NJ (along with more than one hundred other plants across the country) remain woefully unsafe--placing millions, including those in lower Manhattan, instantly at risk should any type of accident or terrorist attack take place. Picture lungs melting just like the steel in the Twin Towers on 9/11. Not a pretty picture.

Next, we have the breathless Democrats, with Constitution gripped tightly in hand, who remain simplistically concerned with their vexing need to stamp out the growing anti-Muslim sentiment (only) they perceive as dangerously sweeping across our country. They're riding to the rescue of the Muslims!

But how about riding to the rescue of Americans who have real tangible problems, are actually desperately seeking help and have nobody getting their backs?

Now admittedly, Democrats are correct in their sensing of an undercurrent of growing emotion washing across the U.S. It's just not any emotion directed towards Muslims. It's the subtle slow burn of despondency, growing frustration, and downright anger about the absolute vacuum of genuine, solid, clear, and unabated leadership -- Republican or Democrat -- plaguing this country.

That's the growing wave of rage they all should be worrying about.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LondonTownNY
Lawyer, Photographer, Social Commentator
07:19 PM on 08/31/2010
Ms. Breitweiser makes some valid points. Our political leadership in both parties is consumed with a left vs.right ping-pong game with one side defending obsessively the building of Mosques by Political Islamists in strategic locations throughout America without persuasively justifying to the American public who is troubled by this why they should not be so worried and the other side consumed with scoring cheap political points for the coming elections. Why not an enlightened dialogue about the necessity of rebuilding American Infrastructure and getting the wheels of Capitalism rolling again? If only our leadership were more consumed with the economic fate of individual citizens, the health of American business as they are with the Ground Zero Mosque and the rights of Muslims, we might stand a chance. Consider New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg's passionate rhetoric about the Mosque and you can think of nothing else he has pontificated about with equal vigor. It is truly disturbing.
05:54 PM on 08/31/2010
How does it curtail anyone’s religious freedom to ensure that the money building this center is not connected to a global criminal enterprise? Are people who are concerned by that very real possibility supposed to ignore their misgivings? Why?

It does not pass the smell test that organizations tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas sponsored and distributed a version of Rauf's book -- "What's Right With Islam is What's Right With America" – under the provocative Islamic title of "A Call to Prayer from the World Trade Center Rubble: Islamic Dawa in the Heart of America Post-9/11."

Dawa means to invite non-Muslims to accept the truth of Islam. Muslims are free to proselytize in Lower Manhattan and the American people are free to object to the very real possibility that this center could be funded by a person or persons who backed the 9/11 attacks.

If the organizers truly wanted to build bridges, they could show their good will by proactively opening their books, instead of writing off all the justifiable concerns as politically motivated.

This is not about religion. The whole rationale for trying the 9/11 conspirators in criminal court is that they are criminals. Does anyone seriously doubt that the thugs who financed them are still bent on mayhem and dream of turning the US Constitution to rubble as well?
12:37 PM on 08/31/2010
Anything that brings perspective to the antics of partisans on the left and the right is a public service. But what most threatens our future is the know-it-all "Your Mother Wears Army Boots" mentality that has degraded the way we "communicate" these days.

As the Twin Towers Alliance piece on "A More Perfect Union" (www.twintowersalliance.com/petition/union) points out: "The current 'Ground Zero Mosque' controversy is a prime example of how our society seems to have abandoned the quest for a meeting of minds, let alone a joining of hearts, in favor of bashing the opposition into submission. If we do not arrest that trend, the outlook for the Divided States of America is not bright."

An entire generation has been raised watching the anything goes “food-fight†that has filled the airwaves since the 1990s. Lincoln said that “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.†The surest way to do that is the partisan bickering that erodes our unity.

What we fight about is far less significant than how we fight. We will always see things differently from our unique vantage points. That should be the basis of our strength. To villify differing points of view makes a mockery of the country we inherited. The Bin Ladens of the world are counting on us to forget that “United We Stand, Divided We Fall†is written in our DNA.
11:22 AM on 08/31/2010
What you don't seem to understand, Kristen, is that you and those like you opposing the mosque are helping Osama Bin Laden and his cause far more than any suicide bomb or collapsing building ever could.
11:02 AM on 08/31/2010
I am sorry for your lost Mrs. Breitweiser and I am also sorry to heard how you express yourself about our fellow americans, muslims americans. I rarely log on in huff anymore it is hard to heard the liberales wining about everything and anything. but this note is not for that it is for my husband who had serve this Country, the Country he loves, the United States of america, for 14 years, with two tours on the war. He is a very proud soldier in the U. S. ARMY and a proud muslim. So everytime you talk or heard someone to disrepect the muslim religion think about him. Like he thinks about you when is serving you.
11:33 AM on 08/31/2010
There is nothing anti-Muslim about recognizing that there are legitimate questions being ignored that every American, Muslim or not, needs to know about the center.
12:11 PM on 08/31/2010
Well there wouldn't be if there were in fact legitmate questions being ignored about the center. In the real world it is hard to imagine a topic which has received discussion on every issue legitimate or not. And the questions raised here border on the silly side. If radical muslims were looking to expand their recruiting operations is there anything sillier they could do then dump all of their money into a well publicized community center open to the public?

It is the complete lack of thought behind the challenges to the center which make so clear the anti-muslim bias behind them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LondonTownNY
Lawyer, Photographer, Social Commentator
09:28 PM on 08/31/2010
In America, it is rather fascinating that while our citizens as well as the media have often questioned the motives of Christian and Jewish leaders for issues regarding the perceived imposition or intrusion of their faith into our lives and have called them on it, we should impose a double standard and free up the Islamic Movement from inquiry or examination. Why is subjecting it to the same level of critical inquiry labeled Islamophobia?. Keep in mind that Islamic Terrorism is a very real problem. Must we give the agenda of Political Islamists a free ride? Truth is that all religion is in fact a moral check on the unbridled spirit and individual liberty of man. There remain legitimate questions about the willingness of Islamic leadership to peacefully co-exist with the American way of life. As a movement it ought to be examined more closely, especially considering the efforts to erect political symbols in America at places of tragedy inflicted in the name of said religion by its more radical adherents. The debate about the Ground Zero Mosque was improperly framed from the get go as First Amendment freedom of religion vs. bigotry and intolerance in order to stifle debate and put off legitimate inquiry. A nuanced view, that is in fact held by many American Muslims is that this location is in effect a provocation, designed less to breed interfaith cultural understanding. That it sets off alarm bells is no surprise.
10:49 AM on 08/31/2010
Why Kristen keeps forgetting that upon completion of this proposed building, it will also contain a small worship area and devoting a large area for community use, welcoming everyone, Muslim or not. As a muslim, i know that this mosque is being built to serve the needs of people who work in downtown Manhattan area. Muslims generally use friday lunch hour to pray (apprx 40 minutes). That means, a mosque should be nearby to save time.

Also, she flashes her bigotry by falsely implying that democrats should only steer clear of this issue becuase Muslim community is not part of America.
10:37 AM on 08/31/2010
One of the founding principles of this country is freedom of religion. So the Dems are trying to support that ideal. I'm proud of them for that. And plenty of Americans are Muslim.

The Republicans live for distractions this. Ignore the big stuff and play up the little stuff. The press rides merrily along. Unfortunately, ignoring it as Kerry did with the Swift Boaters proved a disaster for the Dems.

Ultimately, the problems lie mainly with what's being covered on the cable news channels. And that ain't much. Thanks for the heads-up on the chemical and water treatment plant security legislation. Now that's something I'll have to read about. Maybe Huffington Post should have featured the article below more prominently:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/philip-radford/a-firefighter-speaks-out_b_657297.html

Loved your book, btw.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stormy7
10:35 AM on 08/31/2010
Religions are the root of all that is evil in this world.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charlietuna11
11:38 AM on 08/31/2010
i believe its what people do with religion that is root of all that is evil in this world....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hatty
A Billy Jack liberal
10:32 AM on 08/31/2010
I have been wondering what your take on this is. I still see it as a New York problem...specifically a zoning board problem. I agree that the building can be a resource for radicals, but then I am from the midwest, where nearly any religious building can be seen in that light.....just ask anyone who deals with women's choice issues. We may be at a point where we have to live with such a risk.

But you are absolutely right about how the larger issues continue to be ignored because our eyes are on the shiny, noisy stuff....just like kittens. The challenge given to Barack Obama was to at least TRY to focus on the big stuff and exert a little common sense. It hasn't happened.
10:19 AM on 08/31/2010
It is not really true that nobody is asking these questions, it seems more likely that you are not listening.

There is nothing about building a 13 story community center near Ground Zero that makes recruiting dangerous. It is not a taller building than its surrounding so it would not provide some kind of military advantage. And given that it will be a magnet for attention, it is probably the single worst place that Muslims could choose to do their fundraising and recruiting from. And given that the Imam has a history of opposing such activity it seems unlikely on ideological grounds as well.

The 9/11 attack was not planned blocks from Ground Zero. It was planned in Hamburg.

There has been some discussion on the right about the dangers that this mosque would present. But there has not been much discussion anywhere else primarily because there are none. It is hard to say too much about the issue besides the fact that it is completely inane to think that the purpose of a high profile community center/with a prayer room is to do terrorist recruiting.
10:06 AM on 08/31/2010
Democrats aren't riding to rescue Muslims. Those who support the community center ARE riding to rescue Americans that have real tangible problems--namely that they are being treated as second class citizens, if citizens at all. Why is it that you distinguish "Americans" from "Muslims" as if you can only be one or the other?