More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kristen Houghton

Kristen Houghton

Posted: November 10, 2010 04:42 PM

A blog by Maura Kelly concerning her distaste for the heavyweight characters in the new CBS show "Mike and Molly" caused a firestorm of controversy and comments. Ms. Kelly was only exercising her right of freedom of speech and of the press when she wrote her blog for Marie Claire but that one blog may well have made her more well known than any other article she has written. Weight loss, weight gain, almost anything to do with weight will draw comment. I know: My own weight-loss adventures have given rise to a lot of humorous articles for magazines. Among them, being married to the thin man, eating tasteless good foods, ridiculous diets such as the arugula and water diet, etc. -- all tongue-in-cheek and written for amusement.

But as someone who was a diet junkie from the age of 14 until a few years ago, I do have to say that I understand both the negative and positive comments made about Ms. Kelly's blog. A serious article I wrote, "Saying Good-bye to the Fat Girl: Losing Weight Only for Myself", chronicling my own efforts to finally reach a desired weight, appeared in the Huffington Post not too long ago. I reached a goal I set for myself, not a number handed out by a weight-loss business. I lost what I wanted to lose and feel good about me. And I'm not thin, I'm healthy.

But, and here's the big but, no pun intended, I do also understand that there is a serious difference between being 20 pounds overweight and being obese. A major difference that many people who read Kelly's blog seem to have overlooked. To understand the difference we first have to define overweight and obesity by 21st century standards.

The term "overweight" simply means being over a weight that is set for your height and bone structure. I am not talking about those antiquated insurance charts from the 1930s that were unfortunately used to measure and torment us for over 60 years. In 2010 we are looking at a healthy weight range and now know that an extra 10 to 20 pounds is not considered obese by doctors. You can live just fine with the extras. It all depends on your health and agility.

Obesity is different. The medical establishment states that anyone who is more than 100 pounds overweight or who has a BMI greater than 40 kg/m2 is considered morbidly obese. Morbid obesity is a medical condition in which excess body fat has accumulated to the extent that it has an adverse effect on health. Carrying 80 to 100 pounds extra on your body causes problems in movement and ease of getting around on your own. Today we are seeing more and more people in their 20s, 30s and 40s having handicapped stickers on their cars, using canes and motorized chairs, and generally having chronic health problems due to their obesity. The health aids that were once used only by the very elderly and frail are now being used by those who truly shouldn't need them. Unless they are ill or injured, a person in those age groups should not need aids to help them get around. They are paying a high price for their weight and so is the rest of the American public in terms of skyrocketing health care costs.

Obesity is a problem and the ones suffering from it are getting younger and younger. I don't particularly like the idea that, because of a rise in childhood obesity, a child can't bring cupcakes to school for a birthday celebration but I understand the concept of not be allowed to do so. How sad that we have to have a policy limiting our choices of food! That should be something that we do of our own volition and for our own good.

While many readers take passionate issue with Kelly's blog they are not seeing the whole picture. It isn't the cute romantic story of "Mike and Molly" that is objectionable, it is the message that is being sent that obesity is normal and healthy. It isn't. It is equally as bad as the starved waif look of some models and celebrities. There's nothing healthy about either extreme.

A health care professional recently said that the two biggest enemies of the American public are "obesity and cigarettes." How interesting that both enemies are invited into our lives by us alone.

To read more from Kristen Houghton, peruse her articles at Kristen Houghton.com and visit her Keys to Happiness blog. Also, take a look inside her book, "And Then I'll Be Happy!" You may email her at
kch@kristenhoughton.com.

Copyright 2010 Kristen Houghton

 
 
 

Follow Kristen Houghton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kristenhoughton

 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:43 PM on 11/13/2010
I have read many comments related to this article, and the thing that concerns me the most, is that some of the overweight public feels as if they should be a protected class. I am in no way promoting bigotry or hatred, but obese people should not be grouped with minority groups. Obesity, in the majority of cases, is a personal choice on some level; just is the choice to abuse alcohol or drugs. Sure, there are mental health and addiction issues involved, but on some level, people make a choice to either live a healthy lifestyle, or not. Obesity should never be “accepted”; now carefully read my words, I’m not saying you should not accept people who are obese. However, an un-healthy lifestyle, that has a negative impact on our society, like to aforementioned drug and alcohol abuse, should be view as a societal problem. Obesity should be viewed as a sickness, and a public epidemic. Studies show that overweight people are less likely to get hired; would you hire a person with a drug problem? People that lack good judgment, self control, and self respect? I think not. If you are obese, as I once was, quit trying to excuse yourself. Deal with your problem.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
07:27 AM on 11/14/2010
You are absolutely right in your statement that obese people should not be grouped with minorities. It is an individual health issue.Personal responsibility needs to be taken. Thanks surfer rosa.
01:30 PM on 11/13/2010
In regard to the Maura Kelly blog, I personally am not disputing her right to free speech at all. If we're really discussing the point of assertively making strides to help the obesity problem in the country, shaming people is not an answer. Ms. Kelly simply didn't offer anything constructive, she just talked about how 'gross' it was to her to see fat people doing much of anything, from kissing to crossing a room. How does shaming and invalidating obese people help the problem? I personally don't think it helps anything.

I definitely agree with you that there is a big difference between 'obese' and 'overweight', but with our 'beauty culture' being what it is these differences are so skewed in the minds of many. Women especially. In reality, there are plenty of women carrying an extra 10-20lbs who are the picture of health but they are not represented in media. It's uber-thin or nothing. I find that discouraging. I understand the desire to approach severe obesity on screen with honesty about the health problems (the program in question features two people who meet a overeaters anonymous which in and of itself is a positive thing to put out there), but usually the criticism about obesity on-screen revolves strictly around appearances. Which I don't think helps anything. I think that is why Ms. Kelly has received such backlash.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
09:17 AM on 11/14/2010
Your statement,"It's uber-thin or nothing", has really struck a chord with me, GlorianaLaurBeans. A very good friend of mine, who runs a clinic for girls and women with eating disorders, has told me first hand stories about how the strive to be unbelieveably thin can become a life-threatening tragedy for many of her patients. A healthy woman for some very strange reason, is never truly represented in the visual media. I think it's about time that the media looked at real women and made an effort to feature them prominently. Thanks for your comment.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
11:03 AM on 11/12/2010
To my readers: The following link shows an apology by Maura Kelly. It is an update at the end of her original blog. Please take a few minutes to read it. ~ KH

http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/dating-blog/overweight-couples-on-television
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BarbNYSE
08:46 AM on 11/12/2010
Kristen believe me when I say that obesity is already costing the American public billions in healthcare and accomodations, and products. The pharmaceutical business thrives in federal funding for anti-obesity drugs, facilities, and weight centers. We here at NYSE see the amount of money that is made on obesity related problems. Sorry to upset your readers but morbid obesity is a major problem and is not being addressed by the individuals themselves. Your tax dollars are funding an individual's personal problems.

Barb & the crew
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
11:00 AM on 11/12/2010
Thanks Barb & the crew. Morbid obesity is big business in many ways. How sad that this health problem becomes a money-maker for companies and pahraceuticals.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
11:08 AM on 11/12/2010
I apologize for the terrible spelling error in "pharmaceuticals". Typing too fast in order to respond to comments in a timely manner. ~KH
07:01 PM on 11/11/2010
I feel like you missed something about the reason people were upset over Maura Kelly's article.
She said watching fat people disgusted her for no other reason that it was aesthetically displeasing to her. She did go on to mention obesity being unhealthy (and cheerily reccomended ways for overweight people to loose weight) but that wasn't the point of her article.
It was purely, fat people gross her out. While I agree with what you are saying, and that normalising morbid obesity is not how to help people deal with it - I don't agree with the defensive tone that comes across here. If I'm mistaken, forgive me. But I still think it was incredibly inappropriate for her to post that blog, free speech or no. She and her editors isolated thousands of their own readers and they did not do it in a way that encouraged anybody to be healthy, which is what you seem to be suggesting. Your article certainly does this. Hers does not.
There is a big difference between discussing weight loss benefits and telling readers that fat people sicken you.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
08:35 AM on 11/12/2010
It is true that the article I referenced addressed the issue aesthetically and visually rather than from the aspect of health. Unfortunately we live in a society where anyone not "of the norm" becomes a target. I tried to make my article fair and in no way derogatory. I remember all too well the unkind comments from "those who wanted to help" addressed to me when I was carrying an extra 27 pounds on my frame. Thank you for taking the time to make this insightful comment, moblahblah.
03:04 AM on 11/11/2010
Obesity not only has an impact on health care, but on the whole economy. E.g. chairs in airplanes and trains, beds in hotels, but also employers costs; absence and sick leave. Obesity isn't a real disease. It's a hormonal disorder leading to excessive fat accumulation. It increases risk on diseases of civilization like diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular disease. It shortens lifespan by more than 6 years. Obesity was rare before the 20th century. When nothing is done, by 2015, in the US, 75% of the adults will be overweight and 41% obese. This video http://bit.ly/duSiUK shows how we can easily overcome the obesity epidemic.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
08:46 AM on 11/11/2010
Many thanksCut The Carb. Again we are not talking about a few extra pounds but an epidemic of morbid obesity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterMelzer
06:22 PM on 11/10/2010
Our BMI should not exceed 25 to play it safe.

Read more here:
http://brainmindinstrev.blogspot.com/2009/02/reduced-calorie-diet-body-mass-index.html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
06:46 PM on 11/10/2010
Thank you PeterMelzer.
05:23 AM on 11/12/2010
BMI is a good tool for assessing obesity on a large scale, for public health purposes, but it's not that good on an individual scale. For instance, my BMI is around 28 but I'm not overweight. I exercise 3-5 times a week, swimming 5-10 km an practising martial arts. I also walk a lot, and eat healthy foods (which is quite easy as I live in Europe). It might seem anecdotic, but I know a lot of bulky, athletic people who are not at all overweight but whose BMI exceeds 25 and even 30.For individual evaluation there are more precise indicators than BMI.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeterMelzer
06:33 AM on 11/12/2010
The number is statistically derived from empirical studies, and thus uncertainty is attached. Such values may be useful as rough guidance. In my case, the 25 seems quite correct.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Kristen Houghton
Author, Lifestyle Journalist, Humorist
11:06 AM on 11/12/2010
You are right on with this comment mpetitfrere. A good example is two women who both fit into a size ten but have different BMIs and a possible weight difference of twenty pounds.