Which causes more deaths in the United States: heart attacks or failure to graduate high school? Strokes or racial segregation? Lung cancer or poverty? The surprising answer is that poverty and its attendant deprivations are deadlier than disease.
For years, poverty has been cited as a contributing factor to poor health. But a recent study goes further, quantifying how many people poverty kills per year -- 133,000 in 2000 -- in the same way experts attribute deaths per year to, say, smoking. The report also quantified deaths attributable to non-income aspects of poverty, such as low levels of educational attainment, income inequality, racial segregation, and lack of social support. The new findings in the American Journal of Public Health "argue for a broader public health conceptualization of the causes of mortality and an expansive policy approach that considers how social factors can be addressed to improve the health of populations." We could not agree more.
Tackling social and economic disparities and improving the conditions in which people are born and raised hold the greatest promise for longer, healthier lives. This is not to say that health care and health-care reform are unimportant to human well-being; they are critical. Universal health coverage is vital both to saving lives and to addressing the leading cause of bankruptcy among U.S. households: medical bills. Health insurance contributes to both health security and economic security, essential foundations of a freely chosen life of value. In fact, a study this month by the National Bureau of Economic Research showed that when poor people are given medical insurance, they visit doctors more often, feel better, are less depressed, and are better able to maintain financial stability.
Though medical treatment is essential once we are sick or hurt, medicine's capacity to prevent chronic disease, the leading cause of death in the United States, pales compared to the power of social and economic factors, such as education and standard of living, to influence our health.
Education confers well-documented health advantages, making high-quality universal preschool education, quality K-12 education, and greater equity in access to and completion of college education good health policy as well as good education policy. Education enables more fulfilling work with greater stability, control, and freedom, which facilitates longer lives.
Likewise, policies that lift families out of poverty and help them build assets -- such as the Earned Income Tax Credit, childcare subsidies, food stamps, job training, and increases in the minimum wage -- are also policies that foster health resilience by reducing stress and increasing resources available for building wellness. Policies on housing and crime prevention that improve neighborhood safety and walkability, and community empowerment efforts that strengthen agency and self-determination, also improve health. For people with serious mental illnesses, supportive housing helps unlock both better health and greater participation in society.
The evidence is clear. Poverty kills. Addressing the underlying social and economic conditions that breed poverty and ill health -- in other words, better policy, not better medicine -- is the solution.
Follow Kristen Lewis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AHDP
In the Philippines, President Benigno Aquino III delivered the State of the Nation address.
It has no compelling coherent vision. In his campaign speeches during the election, Noynoy Aquino set up and built a moment of change. But he does not bring the change forward and deliver a Dream Philippines.
There is really no vision. We cannot close our eyes and dream of Philippines 2016. There are no visuals or rhetoric to hold us. This is the standard test of how effective a vision is. You close your eyes and you can see it, you can image it. Anybody who has made vision and mission statements can notice its absence.
What is painted is a framework of corruption. Why should a vision for a country be always framed by corruption?
There is no great initiative for transformational leadership and change management. There is no overarching policy.
There is a gap between the people and the president in spite of his profuse thanks. It is the peremptory salute to the house, honoring the home, but it does not hit the beaver. (I have heart for you! Do you?)
SONA 2011 is no high point. There is no rhetorical moment that galvanizes a people into action and commitment. We walk away from the speech without takeaways, nothing to bring home, no home work to do.
SONA 2011 is no "Leadership Moment". Rather, it is leadership by the seat of one's pants.
Josephine AcostaPasricha, Ph.D
Today, it appears that more and more people are interested in a "what's good for me" environment without consideration for those who might be less fortunate. I have no problem with "workfare" instead of welfare when it is appropriate. I don't believe in handouts for those who don't deserve them, but in this country, NOBODY should go without basic healthcare. NOBODY should live in a constant state of hunger.
I hope working for the “common good” becomes common and good again!
Support Fairness and the Common Good in Government. Follow One Man Roaring on Twitter: http://twitter.com/omroaring