iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Kristian Ramos

GET UPDATES FROM Kristian Ramos
 

President Obama's Deferred Action: A Fair Compromise on Immigration Enforcement

Posted: 08/13/2012 10:39 am

President Barack Obama's move to prioritize the deportation of criminal immigrants, while giving exemplary undocumented immigrants the ability to remain in the country through deferred action, is smart and fair enforcement policy.

In the face of increasingly clogged deportation courts, constrained budgets and pressure to fix our broken immigration system, the Department of Homeland Security and the President have come to a sensible middle ground with their Deferred Action policy. This bold policy move achieves the rarest of feats in modern politics: a compromise.

Yes, the President's action does allow a finite number of the best and brightest undocumented immigrants to remain in the country. Yes, it gives these Americans, in every sense of the word but their citizenship status, the ability to continue to contribute to the country. Deferred action also creates a streamlined system of immigration enforcement which will help unclog our deportation courts and allows this administration to better target high priority criminal immigrants.

According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS),

Deferred action is a form of prosecutorial discretion created to ensure that enforcement resources are not expended on low priority cases, such as individuals who came to the United States as children and meet other key guidelines.

Deferred action does not in any way provide lawful permanent resident status or a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. Moreover, it does not excuse undocumented immigrants on American soil of any previous or subsequent periods of unlawful presence.

According to UCSIS, to apply for deferred action immigrants must be younger than 31 as of the June 15th announcement, and must have entered the U.S. before the age of 16. Applicants must also have resided continuously in the country since June 15th, 2007, and must have been in country at the time of the June 15th announcement and when submitting their application. To be eligible, applicants must have entered the U.S. without inspection OR have lost their lawful immigration status before June 15th of this year.

In addition, candidates must be currently enrolled in or recently graduated from school. Alternately, applicants may provide a certificate of completion from high school or a general education development (GED) certificate. Honorably discharged veterans of the Coast Guard or Armed Forces of the United States are also eligible for deferred action. Immigrants who have been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, three or more other misdemeanors, or pose a threat to national security or public safety are disqualified from the program.

Individuals may request consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals for a period of two years, subject to renewal, beginning August 15th. Applicants may be eligible for employment authorization for the period of deferred action provided they can demonstrate "an economic necessity for employment."

For those wondering how deferred action can possibly strengthen and streamline the enforcement capabilities of the Department of Homeland Security, consider this: our immigration court back logs are completely overwhelmed. Today's immigration courts simply cannot focus their efforts on deporting actual criminal immigrants while also struggling to handle the deportation proceedings of low priority undocumented individuals.

According to Reuters, under the Obama Administration deportations have risen to a record 400,000 individuals each year. This increase has directly impacted our immigration courts. The University of Syracuse's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) states that more than 314,000 deportation cases awaited a resolution in the month of June, a 5.6 percent increase from 2011 and a 20 percent increase from 2010.

In light of the House GOP's recent efforts to cut DHS enforcement by $484 million, a 1.2 percent cut for the 2013 budget year, the Obama Administration has had to work to streamline DHS enforcement capabilities. While actual immigration legislation remains stalled in the House, Deferred Action is a step forward in fixing our broke immigration system. At the very least it provides a way to allow the best and brightest undocumented immigrants to remain here while enhancing the enforcement capabilities of the the federal government. In an era when partisanship is at an all-time high, Deferred Action is a compromise and that is not such a bad thing.

 

Follow Kristian Ramos on Twitter: www.twitter.com/kramos1841

FOLLOW LATINO VOICES
President Barack Obama's move to prioritize the deportation of criminal immigrants, while giving exemplary undocumented immigrants the ability to remain in the country through deferred action, is smar...
President Barack Obama's move to prioritize the deportation of criminal immigrants, while giving exemplary undocumented immigrants the ability to remain in the country through deferred action, is smar...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Huffpo user71
Micro-bio attempt #4
11:57 PM on 08/15/2012
interesting that they must show ID to qualify for this program...is this suppression too?
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
12:13 AM on 08/15/2012
"Exemplary" and "the best and brightest"? This includes high school drop outs, unwed teen mothers, drug users, criminals, and gang members, who out number the few college student by about 500 to 1.
01:49 AM on 08/15/2012
What is your point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nuyorican21
Law Clerk
09:45 AM on 08/15/2012
Not true. One must be in school to receive the deferred action. Background checks are all required. In the immortal words of a certain Republican: "You lie!"
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
01:55 PM on 08/15/2012
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f2ef2f19470f7310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=f2ef2f19470f7310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD

WRONG. The bare minimum requirement is only having a GED, or being enrolled in a program to obtain a GED. It is ludicrous to refer to these people as "exemplary" or "the best and brightest".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
08:55 PM on 08/14/2012
Unfortunately it has lost him the election in November.
08:27 PM on 08/14/2012
I came from Europe to the US on a student visa (F1). I paid for my american MBA by working all summers during my college years in Europe. I completed my MBA degree in the US in the top 15% at my University. After excelling as a business graduate student and after paying about 90k of US dollars in out-of state tuitions (all money brought to the US from Europe) I had to leave the US because you need a sponsor to get a working visa that allows you to stay for a few years (not even a path to permanent residency). And good luck in finding one. Now, can you explain me WHY someone who came here illegally, received american education that was paid by others (tax payers) and even qualifies for in-state-tuition (a paradox!!), now deserves to get a work permit for free and without sponsorship? On Top of that, all these permits will be processed by the same offices (USCIS) who already process applications from LEGAL immigrants. These legal immigrants will suffer a significant slow down in their application process. Family that have been waiting for years in line, respecting current laws. Since when it's right to reward crime?
12:52 AM on 08/15/2012
This new policy benefits young people who came here at an age where they could not make decisions for themselves. What exactly do you expect a 15 year old (in most cases alot younger than that) kid will do when his parents decide they are gonna move to another country? Do you really view those kids as criminals for being brought here without any idea of what living legally or illegally even means? Obviously the parents are at fault, that is a no brainer, but those kids who basically forcefully adopted the American way of living, graduated from school here, and built there lives here are not to blame.
02:54 AM on 08/15/2012
Your are right, it's not their fault. Their parents did the mistake, so let their children pay for it. Why other people (legal immigrants) must pay the consequences but not their children? The USCIS will now have to process hundreds of thousands of applications, and legal immigrants will be delayed for this. Only legal immigrants will suffer the consequences, while this kids only get the reward: a much easier, cap-free, sponsor-free work permit. This is plain wrong. I wish I had stayed in the US illegally instead of following the rules. Are you american? I don't think you know your immigration system and how badly it penalizes people following the legal path. Do some research. Do you know you periodically send home highly educated and skilled surgeons because there are not enough working visa? And you care about keeping illegals high-schools kids?
01:53 AM on 08/15/2012
since industrial businesses need that cheap labor
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
10:38 AM on 08/15/2012
And they are getting that and more far cheaper in China than from illegals. This has fundamentally shifted our economy to a service base with more menial service jobs where more citizens now compete directly with illegals than before!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allena Tapia
Will write for food
07:05 PM on 08/14/2012
Until money and personnel rain from the clouds onto DC, it is completely and totally impossible to deal with ALL the undocumented en masse and physically. Yes, please, let's focus on the the vile ones, and let children, teens and youth who KNOW NO OTHER HOME and have DONE NO WRONG OF THEIR OWN ACCORD live in peace, especially if they're the ones who will undertake and complete training, education or service.

All the Rightsies can stop whining until the courts and system is cleaned out of the nasty ones. Come talk to me again, then.
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
12:18 AM on 08/15/2012
Don't be ridiculous. All this will do is convince millions more illegal immigrants to invade our country, hoping for the same deal. No more amnesty acts are going to pass, including the Dream Act. Sooner or later, when it is impossible for them to work, they will self deport or be removed. In the meantime, this stupid stunt will cost Obama the election.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
10:53 AM on 08/15/2012
It is absolutely possible and feasible - and actually quite necessary to deal with the problem of illegal immigration. Until we can effectively regulate immigration, ALL other discussions are moot, since unless we can shut down the influx of illegals, the problem will simply continue to propagate regardless of amnesty, deferred action or any of the other band aids "de jour" we are being told is the answer.

According to GAO, border apprehension rates are around 28%. Extrapolating the current rate of border apprehensions shows us that last year more than a million illegals entered the US.

Yet we are being told that the illegal population is static!?

The ONLY way that this is remotely possible is if an equal number of illegals left of their own accord. So self deportation is not only possible but happening as we speak on a grand scale - at the illegal's own expense, so costs us very little.

And if by nasty ones you mean those criminals that commit felonies like fraud and perjury, (which is what got Bernie Madoff put in jail) why would we want them? But then entering the country on a non resident visa with the intent to stay is visa fraud, using false ID is fraud, any illegal who signs an I-9 is committing perjury and anyone working as an independent contractor to get around the fact that they do not have permission to work is in violation of federal immigration law!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
10:24 AM on 08/14/2012
Yet to read any illegal DREAMers post on HP touting their happiness & appreciation to Obama for his insourcing of 1.4 million illegals into the U.S. Workforce

While 12.8 million Americans are out of work ~ While the National Debt reaches $16 trillion

1.4 million illegals added to Unemployment lines ~ $585 million, first year, costs of ObamaDREAMer tomato picker work permits added to the $16 trillion Nat'l Debt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Youlielol
What we "see" with human eyes, is not reality!
10:11 AM on 08/15/2012
I agree with you. How is this going to help those legal American Citizens???
08:50 PM on 08/13/2012
He let the so called dream act go under the table. How do you figure that is a "fair" compromise? I dream of an advocate for the taxpayer in the White House, one who believes in the law.
07:55 PM on 08/13/2012
"This bold policy move achieves the rarest of feats in modern politics: a compromise."

Compromise? A political compromise is an agreement reached by adjustment of conflicting or opposing positions, principles, etc., by reciprocal modification of demands. It is, by definition, mutual. In this case, Obama acted unilaterally and, some constitutional scholars say, in violation of the Constitution's separation of powers doctrine.

"our immigration court back logs are completely overwhelmed"

How about deterring a lot of the illegal presence through deterrent policies like E-Verify rather than throwing the baby out with the bathwater and, in effect, going to de facto unlimited immigration? Obama is against deterring illegal immigration--his Morton memo guideline is literally an invitation for even more unlawful presence (so long as you are not a terrorist, gangbanger, etc.)
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
10:06 AM on 08/14/2012
It is totally a one way street. What says it all to me is that they all want amnesty but nobody wants to actually shut down the flow of illegals!

A fair compromise would be offering amnesty to every non-criminal illegal in the country today and give them 30 days to physically present themselves to register at any police station or federal facility, but to automatically deport, without questions or reprieve ANY illegal found anywhere in the country thereafter.

All the bitching and moaning from the ACLU, MALDEF or especially not La Raza about the plight of illegals in the US have not ever included any plan to shut the door even part way.

Intent is judged by actions not words and from that their intention is clear. They have absolutely no interest in laws or justice - just open borders and then it seems only for Hispanics. And they have the bald faced audacity to call everyone else bigots?
photo
Snake1994
Snakebite!
03:45 PM on 08/13/2012
Why do you keep saying our immigration system is broken? The 15-20 million illegal aliens in this country are breaking the system and clogging up our courts. That's the reality of it all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtairtime
It is what it is
03:32 PM on 08/13/2012
Kristian - Please pick a new title. The one you picked is a massive lie.

Compromise indicates a decision that both sides agree on and can live with. This was a one sided, ramed through (possibly unconstitutional) edict by a president who was not happy with the other branch of government.

A better title would be "President Obama's Deferred Action: An Unfair & Costly Mandate by a President Which Will Allow the Next Republican President Carte Blanche to do ANYTHING they Want to Irregardless of Congress."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wigglwagons
02:26 PM on 08/13/2012
He made the offer only good for 2 years so they would be forced to take whatever slight risk might be involved in registering to vote. Both Obama and the illegals know that the game is up if he loses in November.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
10:58 AM on 08/15/2012
If we look at history, outgoing presidents always make unpopular moves like pardons to murders just before they leave office so they do not have to deal with the backlash.

I think the mere fact that he is making these moves now is a Hail Mary move to try to drum up some votes and a tacit admission that his reign is over.
12:01 PM on 08/13/2012
A good step forward. It bears repeating that "deferred action" does not constitute amnesty nor grant status.

Those who would decry it should appreciate and understand that both budget and bed-space limit the government from removing more than 400K a year.
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
12:23 AM on 08/15/2012
Passing laws that will result in self deportation is not particularly expensive. Allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the country - whether by statute or by memo - is AMNESTY.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jweider
I know where my towel is
11:53 AM on 08/13/2012
"Yes, it gives these Americans, in every sense of the word but their citizenship status, the ability to continue to contribute to the country."

Yes, they are Americans in every sense of the word except for their citizenship status in much the same way that the majority of Americans are millionaires except for their financial status.
Why would we possibly want people in our country who have demonstrated on a daily basis that they have absolutely no respect for our laws and our government?
They should all be forced to leave.
02:26 PM on 08/13/2012
are you going based on stereotypes or actual stuff you know about?

"Why would we possibly want people in our country who have demonstrated on a daily basis that they have absolutely no respect for our laws and our government?"

sounds like you blame 100% of all immigrants! not all of them are the same. think about it...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jweider
I know where my towel is
05:32 PM on 08/13/2012
Actually no, I don't blame 100% of all immigrants because a great many of them actually do immigrate to this country legally. They respect and obey our laws and our government.
Illegal aliens on the other have clearly have no respect for our laws or our government otherwise they would not be here.
08:53 PM on 08/13/2012
CK - I believe jw is talking about the illegal ones, not all immigrants. If they are here illegally, they are not "just" immigrants.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allena Tapia
Will write for food
06:59 PM on 08/14/2012
So illogical, and cruel- yes, let's force one million young people to "return" to a place they often don't even know, to a language they often don't even speak, leave their family, leave their homes, leave the place where they grew up FOR THE SIMPLE FACT THAT their parents did something over which they had NO CONTROL.

Illogical, impossible, and downright evil- which is easy when you choose to see someone as an "other."

I hope these commentors are just blowing hot air, else how the heck do you get through a day with such illogical, impossible thinking?
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
12:28 AM on 08/15/2012
Their PARENTS came to a place they didn't even know, to a language they didn't speak, left their family, their homes, and the places where they grew up. Their children can certainly do the same, and since the parents don't belong here either, they can all return together.
03:26 AM on 08/15/2012
I think you need to dig deeper. We all know it's their parents fault. But if you make their children pay the consequences then maybe in the future, other parents will think twice before going to the US illegally and taking their children with them. On contrary, if you reward them, if you offer them a way out, illegal immigration will never stop. I would take it further....since these people will apply for a work permit and give their personal data, let's find their other family members and deport them. Sounds cruel? I'll tell you what's cruel.. did you know that LEGAL immigrants can be denied entrance at the port of entry by the immigration officer, even if all their papers are ok? Did you know that it is the equivalent of deportation, meaning that you are not allowed to reenter the US and you must leave your car, furniture, clothes and other personal belonging in the US? That happened to a former coworker of mine. He left 20,000$ value in the US. He was here legally, but the officer at the airport was having a bad day. So please, before showing mercy to illegals, reestablish fairness for Legals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lascaft
Working Title
11:52 AM on 08/13/2012
The Obama immigration policy is sound in that persons here without citizenship papers who contribute to our society in a positive way should remain if they so choose. And yes, the courts are clogged with the criminals - murderers, rapists, thieves, drug smugglers - who are here illegally and who should be incarcerated then deported. So give the courts a break and let them focus on the true bad guys.
photo
Karissa36
Saving lost boys and fighting pirates.
12:37 AM on 08/15/2012
Since when is a high school drop out gang member, (who hasn't been convicted of a felony yet), contributing in a positive way? All he needs is a GED, according to Obama, to jump the line ahead of all the people trying to legally immigrate. Americans are not buying the BS that every illegal immigrant under age 31 is somehow a benefit to our country. Nearly fifty percent are high school drop outs, and the teen pregnancy rates are astounding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lascaft
Working Title
12:51 PM on 08/15/2012
You are making assumptions.
01:58 AM on 08/15/2012
why deport them when the privatized prisons can hold them as long as they want and continue to collect subsidies