More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
KT Boyle

GET UPDATES FROM KT Boyle
 

Tales From the Census Trail: Sex and the Census

Posted: 05/10/10 03:59 PM ET

Virginia and Simone, Hillary and Sarah, I'm sorry. I owe you and every woman who longs for equality my sincerest apology: I'm strengthening the stereotype.

Despite efforts otherwise, I'm destroying the feminist cause by working for the Census Bureau. It never occurred to me until taking a job so far removed from academia or public relations (oh, how ironic) that I am a stereotypical female:

I can't drive.

I can't read a map.

I can't do basic arithmetic despite excelling in calculus.

I feel unsafe. Everywhere.

I'm scared of the spiders crawling on my Enumerator Questionnaires.

Now, before Harvard women get mad about the calculus comment, let me be frank: poor driving and navigation skills do not a woman make. Amelia Earhart made aviatrix a necessary term, and since most men in Washington can't to do fuzzy math either, we know that the stereotypes are silly. But despite growing up with a "Don't marry it. Be it!" poster, I'm playing perfectly into the stereotypical female box.

Working for the Census Bureau is giving me a lot of downtime to overanalyze things. Things like my name, age, race, and sex. For me, the sex question has become a complicated chicken or egg question: was I this "womanly" before I became an enumerator and just unaware of my reckless disregard for other drivers on the road? Or did becoming an enumerator make me crave chocolate by the hour?

I originally thought the Census was just giving me a new sense of self-awareness. But upon further over-analysis, this little ten-question form gives everyone I encounter a moment to stop and reflect on the basics, too.

Believe it or not, the questions often spark a thoughtful, serious pause from your average Census interviewee. Are you male or female? Do you rent or own? These questions, as obvious as they may sound, can take a full ten seconds of awkward, painful silence for some people to answer. You'd think I was asking about solutions to the Greek debt crisis or the pronunciation of Mt. Eyjafjallajökul, but the response given after a long, ponderous pause is "Yep, I'm male."

At first, it was shocking that so many people require time to think deeply about what age, sex and race they are. It's rare that I find someone who doesn't have to look at the twenty boxes provided before choosing a race or becoming intensely offended by the question.

But ironically, I didn't anticipate the repercussions of checking the female box until watching others contemplate them. My friend Pat warned me at Enumerator training: "You're a young woman. Are you sure you're going to feel safe knocking on random doors?"

"Of course, I'll be fine!"

Only a few neighborhoods later, I changed my mind.

When walking through a low-income apartment complex, a young woman began shaking and screaming after spotting a snake on the same patio where I was standing. "I'll come back!" I shrieked before running away.

In another neighborhood filled with white picket fences and minivans, a mother of five informed me that it wasn't safe to be there at 4:00 in the afternoon; "There were two drug busts down the street this week. You shouldn't be doing this alone."

If drug busts and snakes weren't enough to scare me, knocking on a door to find a man in his mid-thirties, stark naked, who was ready and willing to conduct an interview made it impossible for me to ignore my female intuition. "I'll come back at a better time" was all I could say before shielding my eyes. The "you're obviously a male" question would have been hard to ask.

The question of safety should have entered my mind before witnessing an old-fashioned brawl between rival neighborhoods. But for the millions of women on the other side of the doors I knock at, safety should be a priority, especially for the sweet old ladies who live alone with cats like Betty White. Thankfully, for many it already is. Male census workers know that women often refuse to open the door unless a female Census worker is present.

As thousands of men and women descend on houses to ask the simple questions, it's the harder "sex questions" we try to ignore that really beg a response. Even if I could navigate the North Sea with only a compass and the constellations, I'd still be a woman walking up to strange doors, hoping the man inside is clothed.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
WryAwry
Hating haters since '55
11:15 AM on 05/17/2010
The lady in my life was an enumerator, and I was able to witness first-hand the unimaginable ineptitude that is the founding principle of the Census. The entire apparatus should be dismantled and re-organized. Modern technology in the hands of Big Brother -- or the pimply-faced teenager next door -- renders this entire tax dollar vacuum moot.

Oh, yea -- one more observation: people are really phoaquine stoooopud. These "gob'mint conspiracy" nut-jobs will be reborn in their next lifetimes in North Korea; such are the machinations of karma .....
09:29 PM on 05/15/2010
sorry, know you are doing a job. know it is illegal not do the census...

but I've got a really big problem with the government forcing us to answer questions it is supposedly illegal for anyone else to ask. Illegal for everyone or no one.

One human lives here. Name of X. Has (or has not) X minor humans. Names of: X, Y, Z. Now have a nice day. The ancient Romans didn't need all that info, why should the modern empire unless to divide and conquer by keeping our various shadings ever forefront? (i.e. race, gender, orientation, occupation, economic holding).

As long as we allow the government to label our little pens, we will keep herding into them like cows to their own milk station. Arguments about records of ethnicity are moot in this country of mixed blood. Since the president gets to be the first African American president (is there still a mulatto option?)...by all relevant blood quantum laws, I'm Native American. And you should see the census worker's face...

People using the census to trace ancestry usually can do so with the name, just fine--as long as we are counting all humans in the same book. Those in separate books are usually culled by those self same questions. Or, in other words, the tool has become the master.
09:39 PM on 05/27/2010
Have you had the opportunity to look at an old census from the late 1800's or early 1900's? They are fascinating to read. While searching for my family I learned that my grandfather spoke German in his home as a kid. This information would not have been known if the census only asked how many people live at this address. The ten questions we are being asked to answer in the 2010 census will not be made public for 72 years. These are the kinds of questions asked in the census of 1910>> "The 1910 census schedules record each person’s name and relationship to the head of household; sex; color or race; age at last birthday; marital status; length of present marriage; if a mother, number of children and number of living children; birthplace and parents’ birthplaces; if foreign born, year of immigration and citizenship status; language spoken; occupation; type of industry employed in; whether employer, employee, or self-employed; number of weeks unemployed in 1909 if applicable; ability to read and write; if attended daytime school since 1 September 1909; if home was rented or owned; if owned, whether free or mortgaged; if home was a house or a farm; if a veteran of the Union or Confederate army or navy; if blind in both eyes, and if deaf and dumb. The Indian schedule also recorded the tribe and/or band." http://www.familyhistory.com/censusyear.asp?y=1910
Nahhhhh..the 2010 census is a breeze!
02:24 PM on 05/28/2010
well, it's cool that the info will not be "published" for a reasonable lifetime--I didn't know that--but in response to the interesting amount of information on the 1910 census, there is reason to believe the government found it more necessary in that day of singular, paper (and fire hazard) records...no DMV, cohesive criminal, income tax, cohesive marriage licensing (common law still acceptable and listing oneself as married on a census constituted marriage in and of itself), etc. etc.

So I repeat. Why does the government STILL need to label me as a specific race of human? I am human. Period. You want to know who I married? Ask the state I am recorded in. Want to know how many kids I have? Birth records. Location? Property records, phone records, electricity records, bank records (which are now legal for the government to peruse for "standard" information).

And besides that, how come Caucasians are the only "color" left? My partner answered Caucasian and was told there was no such race. Yeah, accurate and unbiased (come on now, we all know white people aren't allowed to be hurt by racism).

In this day and age, it simply is not necessary as anything other than an ethnicity labeling device.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lara Janson
07:05 PM on 05/12/2010
KT faces her fears and her bizarre encounters while on the Census Trail with a great sense of humor, but make no mistake, the danger is real for many Census workers: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/05/_the_incidents_follow_the.html. Thanks for bringing attention to the issue of safety that faces many workers, KT. It makes one realize why the Census Bureau takes itself so seriously on emphasizing the "personal safety always comes first" line throughout training...