More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lama Surya Das

GET UPDATES FROM Lama Surya Das
 

Who and What Is Buddha, Really?

Posted: 04/12/10 05:50 PM ET

Last night PBS aired The Buddha, a new TV special about the sage's life, impact, and particular relevance to our own bewildering times of violent change and spiritual confusion. By filmmaker David Grubin, the documentary features the work of some of the world's greatest artists and sculptors, who across two millennia have depicted the Buddha's life through art rich in beauty and complexity. Moreover, this film points out how we may integrate enlightening wisdom and mindfulness into our daily lives today, which is the main point of Buddhism in practice, for the Buddha himself exhorted us not to worship Buddha but to become more Buddha-like and to be a Buddha.

But who and what is Buddha, really? The stone Buddha outside in the garden is not the real Buddha, obviously, any more than a Jesus statue is the deathless Christos. The Buddha is actually an archetype representing enlightenment, an icon symbolizing inner wisdom, a pointer towards the possibility of a level of spiritual awakening embodying the fullest actualized potential of human beings.

"Nowness-awareness is the authentic, unfabricated Buddha," said my late Dzogchen master Kyabje Dudjom Rinpoche.

Putting aside for a moment the mystical content of this statement, let's examine the fact that the late, great Tibetan lama equates "Buddha" with an awakened state of consciousness instead of a person. There was a historical person, Siddhartha Gotama, who was born in northern India (now Nepal) about 2500 years ago, became spiritually awakened at the age of 35 sitting beneath a tree in Bodh Gaya, and taught for 45 years before dying at the age of 80 in Kushinagar. After his enlightenment -- what he described simply as "waking up" -- he became known as the Buddha, or the Awakened One.

As the religious historian Karen Armstrong has pointed out explicitly, and as the Rinpoche's statement implies, in addition to being an influential historical person and world-changing leader, the Buddha is also an archetype. The historical Buddha, in a sense, is an example of the archetype of Buddha, or the personification and iconic embodiment of the enlightened state of mind.

As an archetype, Buddha represents what is actually possible for each of us -- our full flowering. It's helpful to think of the message of this archetype on three different levels. On the external level of form, Buddha is the historical teacher. On the internal level, Buddha is innate and ever-present awareness -- which is typically obscured by discursive and repetitive thoughts. On the innermost or secret level, Buddha is our deepest nature: radiant Being or Nowness-awareness, beyond gender, nationality, religious affiliation, or other local distinctions. This is what the historical Buddha meant when he said, "I am awake": awake to the radiant Buddhaness within himself and every sentient being.

Buddhism is an inside job. Therefore, during his long and active lifetime, Gotama Buddha himself forbade the making of his image in polytheistic India; yet within a single generation after his passing, human nature and its attachment to forms and images prevailed, creative images arose, and a religion whose primary goal was enlightenment arose around the memory of his teachings, instructions, and personal example. As a longtime meditator and student of Buddhism, when I myself see a Buddha statue, I intuitively sense that I'm looking in a mirror at my highest, deepest, truest, and most authentic best self. It is not merely something to imitate -- in dress, shape, or hairstyle -- but something to emulate in terms of seeking what the Buddha himself sought and found, in order to find it in myself along with recognizing that in others, and then acting accordingly.

Buddha means the Enlightened Sage or the Awakened Wise One. For Buddhists, wisdom is not merely a form of belief or a particular truth or historical attribute but a living, breathing, functioning quality inherent in the mind of each of us, waiting to be explored, exploited and developed and in the pursuit of liberation, healing, and happiness. Anyone can become a Buddha, and not just his single historical son. (Yes, Buddha had been married at an early age, and had a son named Rahula who later became enlightened himself and took Buddhism to Sri Lanka.) Anyone can develop oneself through practicing the two Buddhist wings of wisdom and compassion and be transformed by mindfulness and other loving practices, regardless of religious persuasion -- even agnostics and atheists.

Enlightenment means to awaken out of illusion's dream and the snares of conceptual thought, and into a directly lived moment-by-moment experience. Being awake is paradoxically to live both as a particle -- as the ever-changing world of our day-to-day life -- and as a wave -- the (potentially) uninterrupted experience of Nowness-awareness through which the particles continuously pass. This is known as the illusory dance of forms and emptiness, or the inseparability of awareness and the shining void. It is we ourselves as dancer and the dance, beyond the ego-world's divisions of subject, object, and interaction.

According to Buddhism, attaining enlightenment is possible in this lifetime and has been achieved by millions of individuals over the millennia. How then can we fully flower and become what Buddha-as-archetype represents for us and within us? We assiduously cultivate mindfulness, or moment-to-moment lucid attention. And once our mindfulness yields to brief experiences of simply Being or Nowness-awareness, we practice resting in this cognizant, peaceful, and clear state. Eventually, we come to realize that although the world -- in all of its splendor and pain -- surely exists, there is, again paradoxically, nothing other than the luminous awareness of Being. In other words, we understand that life itself is an expression of Being. And once this realization occurs within us, we too awaken, and our actions in this world are Buddha's actions: altruistic Buddha-activity.

As an historical figure, the Buddha-as-a-living-breathing-Buddha embodied and acted on profound principles with which we are already familiar in some sense: non-violence, equality of all beings, interconnectedness, and respect for the earth. Until we each awaken fully from confusion and delusion -- and especially important for these frenzied, twittering times -- let us cultivate the sacred transformative virtues such as patience, generosity, loving kindness, respect for others, and the discipline of living according to our deeper truths. Let us do so for our own benefit, and for the benefit of all. This is how our lives can become examples of the archetype of Buddha.

Who then is Buddha for us here and now? He/she/it is the one who practices resting in, as, and eventually realizes that all is luminous awareness and nothing else. This can be called meditation practice, and includes the cultivation of mindfulness, a lucid moment-to-moment vigilant state of intentional attention. What is mindfulness, really? It is simply an alert presence of mind, the opposite of and antidote to mindlessness. Mindfulness is the key ingredient in Buddha's recipe for wisdom's development and conscious evolution. Through actually practicing this methodology as a path, millions have undertaken the journey of awakening and become enlightened over the centuries. Why should I practice in this way? Because, among other things, it's good for both mental and physical health, and ultimately includes the spiritual well-being of one and all.

The innate Buddha-nature or Buddha-ness within each and every single sentient being is genderless, unborn, and undying -- more akin to clear light than to our personalities -- and is timeless, untarnished, and incorruptible. All beings are endowed with this inner lamp of pure spirit, along with the potential for its divine unfolding. The equality of us all is the natural implication of this recognition of universally innate Buddha-nature or Buddha-ness, the primordially pure and untrammeled inner light. Thus, one of the principle tenets of Buddhism has always been nonviolence, the protection and cherishing of all forms of life, and the interwoven interdependence of all things, including all creatures great and small.

The historical Buddha Sakyamuni was a radical social reformer who freed people from ancient India's hide-bound caste system and was the first leader in history to educate women en masse. He exhorted each of his committed disciples to plant at least one tree each year in order to replenish the earth for resources used. He brokered peace agreements and was a reformer as well as a spiritual teacher, community elder, and servant leader. This Bodhisattva career is a good role model for us today.

Practice makes perfect and is perfect, ultimately; we just have to do it and experience the benefits for ourselves. Buddha is as Buddha does. When we act like Buddhas, the Buddha-principle flows through us into the world. I believe that it is incumbent upon us, especially in these frenzied and volatile times, to cultivate the sacred transformative virtues of generosity and non-attachment, virtuous self-discipline, concentrated mindfulness, and so forth; awaken from the sleep of illusion and delusion; and thus re-enact the joyous pageant of enlightened awakening ourselves, for the benefit of one and all. This is the life story of living Buddhas today.

Far better to be a Buddha than a mere Buddhist today. Shall we be awakened living Buddhas rather than sleeping Buddhas? Can we awaken from our collective somnolence, ignorance and enervating distractaholism? This is and can be the joy of collective spiritual awakening.

"Since everything is like an 'apparition,'
Perfect in just being 'What It Is' -- as it is.
Having nothing to do with 'good' or 'bad,'
'acceptance' or 'rejection' --
You might as well just burst out laughing!"
-- Tibetan master Longchenpa, fourteenth century Tibet
 
 
 

Follow Lama Surya Das on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LamaSuryaDas

Last night PBS aired The Buddha, a new TV special about the sage's life, impact, and particular relevance to our own bewildering times of violent change and spiritual confusion. By filmmaker David Gru...
Last night PBS aired The Buddha, a new TV special about the sage's life, impact, and particular relevance to our own bewildering times of violent change and spiritual confusion. By filmmaker David Gru...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 193
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Lumbini-Kapilvastu Day Movement
03:07 PM on 05/03/2010
Buddha Dhamma is not a religion, it does not give credence to a god or philosophy, but is the Law of Nature about how we should handle spirit, soul and body to bring them together in harmony and to begin to annul the ego and to stop any sorrow or affliction in our life! This way we can learn to cultivate true happiness and not create a dependent happiness that is just for a fleeting moment eventually taking us back to the root of our problems. It takes a lot of insight and deep reflection about us to see this reality.

Buddha taught that the world must be thought of in procedural terms and not in terms of things or substances.This is the understanding that any phenomenon exists only because of the existence of other phenomena in an incredibly complex web of cause and effect. Stated in another way, everything depends on everything else and this seems to be the basic of Newton’s law of Motion, ”To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction”. A human being’s existence in any given moment is dependent on the condition of everything else in the world at that moment, and in an equally significant way, the condition of everything in the world in that moment depends conversely on the character and condition of that human being. Everything in the universe is interconnected through the web of cause and effect; such that the whole and the parts are mutually interdependent.
01:00 PM on 06/05/2010
While I like your connection of science with the BuddhaDharma, I do disagree about your statement that Buddhism is not a religion. It most certainly is a religion to hundreds of thousands of us. "Religion" is not a dirty word. I enjoy going to our temple every week, attending festivals and special ceremonies, and attending retreats meant to help us deepen our understanding. Remember the refuge vows - I take refuge in the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha (the community that practices together). Reducing Buddhism to merely philosophy misses an important component of what the Buddha taught. Reducing Buddhism to a forensic or merely scientific analysis misses an important component as well. I know lots of people who understand the science of non-self very well, but have not moved that head knowledge to their hearts to understanding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tim303
02:50 PM on 04/20/2010
Longchenpa in HP--you made my day...thank you.
03:38 AM on 04/20/2010
Though "this" can't be taught, you figure you can wing it. The education hasn't brought it to you, so you lash-out at those who "know" -- you see them as a threat to your legitmacy. That's funny and sad.
03:21 AM on 04/20/2010
Jealousy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Piper
03:00 PM on 04/18/2010
I guess I am a Buddhist with Taoist and non-dual leanings. But I am also an atheist. I do not believe in a personified God or creator/source. I would not even care if the Buddha was proven to never have existed, because Buddhism is about discovery and the teachings and the practice are all that is necessary. The founder is not.
04:27 PM on 04/19/2010
You are then, seeing as a Bodhisattva.
03:05 AM on 04/20/2010
I learned/saw/became/realized "IT" through a mental, Zental mind-smack. The moment I saw IT was the moment I became an atheist: No "Creator" -- or -- Creator and Creation are the exact same thing: Now. Actually EVERYBODY is a Buddhist but they just don't know it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonderwheel
01:53 PM on 04/17/2010
" The historical Buddha, in a sense, is an example of the archetype of Buddha, or the personification and iconic embodiment of the enlightened state of mind."

In Mahayana Budhism, this dimensionality of Buddha is called the Trikaya, or Three-bodies of Buddha. This Buddhist Trinity is the essence of the Great Vehicle of the Buddha Dharma. The Three Bodies are the Dharma Body (Dharmakaya), the Reward Body (Sambhogakaya) and the Transformation Body (Nirmanakaya). When we speak of the historical Buddha we are speaking of one of the inifinite number of the Transformation Bodies of Buddha. When we are speaking of the archetypal Buddha we are speaking of the Reward Body of the Buddha, and when we speak of the enlightened Mind we are speaking of the Dharma Body of Buddha.

The Three Bodies of Buddha are seen in every attempt to fathom the nature of reality They appear in Christianity as the Trinity of the Father (Dharmakaya), the Holy Spirit (Sambhogakaya) and the Son (Nirmanakaya) and in modern physics as the formula E=mc2 with Energy (Dharmakaya), the constant of the speed of light (Sambhogakaya) and mass (Nirmanakaya.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Piper
02:54 PM on 04/18/2010
Your explanation is why I tend to dislike Mahayana Buddhism in general. It adds things the Buddha never really taught. All this "bodies" of the Buddha turns people away from the REAL message of the Four Nobel Truths

1. The existence of suffering (dukkha)
2. The causes of suffering
3. The end of suffering
4. The way to the end of suffering (Nobel Eightfold Path)

Buddhism is a very simple methodology that is being made more difficult for the average person by things like the Bodhisattva concept, the bodies of Buddha concept and over-emphasis on social matters. It is about the end of suffering, the rest is un-necessary baggage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brooklyn73
02:18 PM on 04/27/2010
Buddhism is far from a simple methodology. First off, you required to pull yourself up by your own moral bootstraps. And secondly, there are more rules and principles to Buddhism than any other religion: The 8 fold Noble Paths, the 3 Jewels, The 4 Noble Truths, the Pali Cannon, the unending Sutras, Tibetan Book of the Dead. Buddhism is packaged as a simple religion but is far from it.
07:09 PM on 04/15/2010
Wisdom, compassion, kindness; the Holy Trinity of Buddhism.
Should we not all live our lives as though they were a gift unto the world?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wonderwheel
02:24 PM on 04/17/2010
In this context, the Buddhist trinity is manifested as wisdom, compassion, and samadhi-in-action. Wisdom is personified by the Bodhisattva Manjusri. ,Compassion is personified by the Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara (Kwan-yin, Kannon). Samadhi-in-action is personified by the Bodhisattva Samantabhradra. In our Western imagination they appear in fairytales such as the Wizard of Oz where the Scarecrow is Manjusri personifying the transformation of wisdom, the Tin Man is Avalokiteshvara with the transformation of the heart, and the Lion is Samantabhradra with the transformation of courage to act. These aspects of our own mind are the Bodhisattvas who help us (as each of us is a Dorothy) on our journey to find our true home. "There's no place like home" means that now matter where we go we are not somewhere else other than home.
06:01 PM on 04/15/2010
This blog is worth bookmarking; just a few words of truth & food for thought for us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
american-dolt
Truther since 2004
04:21 PM on 04/15/2010
Oh come on, I sit behind the Buddha at work
01:37 PM on 04/15/2010
An inspiring book on the life of Buddha is Old Path, White Clouds by Thich Nhat Hahn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Klarsonent
Semi-retired landlady, small business entrepreneur
11:35 AM on 04/15/2010
Good article. I agree that, "Nowness-awareness is the authentic, unfabricated Buddha," said my late Dzogchen master Kyabje Dudjom Rinpoche.

The same concept for reaching "enlightenment or Christ Consciousness" was also taught by Jesus, who said, "Lo, do not look here or there, for the kingdom of God is within you." He also said, "He who saves his life [ego] will lose it and he who loses his life [ego] will save it."

I do not believe Jesus had any intention of starting an organization or church anymore than the Buddha did. But human nature being what it is would rather elevate their great Spiritual teachers to a diety and worship them. It leaves them off the hook. That way, they don't have to take responsibility for their own salvation [which is an inside job].
07:22 PM on 04/15/2010
Indeed Jesus did say that the "kingdom of heaven is within (and "amongst") "you" (in other translations), but he also declared to Peter that upon him he would found his "church (and "the gates of hell would not prevail against it"). So, I have to disagree with you, as to his divine intention, which he made quite clear. Unlike the Buddha who never claimed divinity, the Christ did, and righteously taught: "Repent, for the kindgom of heaven is at hand," as the means to divine enlightement, and simply consenting to His Divine Presence.
Peace.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Waltfl
ἡ ἀλήθεια ἐλευθερώ ὑμᾶς
08:28 PM on 04/15/2010
That "in your midst-thing" is a misake. Darby's (mis-)translation. Jesus did say "within you" in Luke 17:21.

Yes, ἐντὸς ὑμῶν can indeed mean within you or in your middle in Greek, but there cannot be any doubt in the Vulgata: "enim regnum Dei intra vos est", because the kingom of heaven is within you.

Luther in 1545 correctly translates: "inwendig in euch." i.e inside of you.

The original Bohairic and Sahidic texts say all C.IM.πETIN.JOYN` The noun kingdom is female in Coptic (it derrives from a female Ancient Egyptian Word). So the personal pronoun C is being used. What it says is: "the kingdom of heaven, SHE is of you innerst". There is no room for doubt.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taijiredlion
sic itur ad astra
08:37 AM on 04/16/2010
PhilRann, ever consider that later editors might have put their own words in Jesus's mouth for their own purposes? Like about founding churches? Or claiming divinity? That's the trouble with worshipping a book. You never know who really wrote or said what, and for what reason, unless you assume that everything in the book, unlike every other book ever written in human history, is somehow literally true. That position, of course, is the end of critical thinking, and the beginning of blind fundamentalism. The end of open-mindedness and the beginning of self-righteousness. The end of tolerance and the beginning of intolerance. The end of fellowship and the beginning of enmity. Peace.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Waltfl
ἡ ἀλήθεια ἐλευθερώ ὑμᾶς
07:53 PM on 04/15/2010
I wanted to thank you for this post this morning, but somehow my message fell through the roost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Klarsonent
Semi-retired landlady, small business entrepreneur
12:42 PM on 04/16/2010
Thank you.
10:16 AM on 04/15/2010
I'm a little distrustful of paeans to the Buddha. It tends to lead to:

a) Unquestioning faith in the existence of enlightenment. I think unquestioning faith in anything is a bad idea.
b) treating Buddhism like a project with a goal, which is detrimental.

two cents.
11:49 AM on 04/15/2010
Largely agree with this. The Buddha himself said, "Don't believe anything I say just because I said it."

That said, though, it's taught that there are many gateways into the Dharma because there are many "styles of confusion" (84,000, it's traditionally taught). So faith, if it arises spontaneously and without any coercion, can be one of those gateways for some people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:20 PM on 04/15/2010
Throw away the "faith" and the "goal"and just do the very simple practice of sitting meditation, find out for yourself that's the way it works.
05:53 AM on 04/15/2010
April 12, 2010

Welcome to Post-Christian America

America, that "Christian nation," is rapidly becoming post-Christian.

When I share this with my normal friends, they shake their heads and disagree. "Naah, Christianity is still dominant." And while it may still be more dominant than secularism (and other religions), I regularly see signs that its cultural power is waning.
http://www.blogoneanother.com/2010/04/welcome-to-post-christian-america.html

United States Treaty (1796-1797)

"[T]he government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;"

( "Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli of Barbary," 1796-97; from Hunter Miller, Treaties and Other International Acts of the U.S. [1776-1818], Vol. II, Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1931, p. 365. )

John Adams (1735-1826)

"Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

( John Adams, in his "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" [1787-1788]; The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American Experiment and a Free Society, New York, 1965, p. 258. )
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/quotes_founders.html
researcher
researcher
03:40 AM on 04/15/2010
the dalai lama nailed it when he stated what the buddha realized the origin of suffering was.

the origin of suffering is ignorance and many if not most buddha monks fail to see this was the realization of what most refer to as the buddha.

I have noticed most of world confuses symptoms with origins or root causes.

it was nice to see that the dalai lama nailed it.

reincarnation but no soul

most people are interested in if they have a soul that is eternal.

fear thing.
06:12 PM on 04/15/2010
I'm intrigued and somewhat mystified by your statement that many if not most Buddhist monks do not understand or realize that the root of all suffering is ignorance? What part of the world are you referring to?

Most monks I've even know are familiar with the most basic of Buddha's teachings, The Four Noble Truths. The origin of suffering, the root cause of suffering (and our inability to get off the wheel of samsara), is ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Piper
02:56 PM on 04/18/2010
Technically, the Buddha said many times the cause of suffering is "craving."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rumblingspire
light all the fires
09:54 PM on 04/14/2010
NOW! WOW!