More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lamar Vest

Lamar Vest

GET UPDATES FROM Lamar Vest
 

The Two Commandments of Super Bowl Advertising

Posted: 02/ 1/11 02:29 PM ET

Super Bowl XLV is quickly approaching. And as people predict whether the Steelers or the Packers will secure the victory, many are asking another, some might say equally, interesting question: What commercial will come out on top?

Buzz about Super Bowl commercials has been around almost as long as the game has been played. At about $3 million for a 30-second spot, advertisers are spending huge dollars to try to capture the attention of a huge viewing audience.

But this year, the ads that won't be seen on Super Bowl Sunday may be getting the most attention.

Within the last week, two companies have made a considerable amount of news by having their ads rejected by FOX based on the network's standards and practices review. While I have no desire to shine any more light on these two reprehensible ads, I don't think the moment should pass without comment on what these ads say about the state of American values.

The first rejected ad was for a site that promoted adultery. And before you ask, no, this wasn't a joke. As incomprehensible as it seems, there is a company in America that exists to encourage people to cheat on their spouses. And they wanted to make sure you knew all about it by broadcasting their ad during America's biggest game.

The second ad was admittedly meant to be a joke. Using a couple of bobble head figures, a company promoted its merchandise insulting the president of the United States -- and using the Son of God to do it. Not funny. And certainly not civil.

But if you were asked to defend FOX's decision not to air either ad, to what would you turn? On what do we base a belief that cheating in marriage is just plain wrong? That mocking both Jesus and the president is unacceptable? Based on what?

For many, there is a good place to look: the Bible's Ten Commandments (laid out for us in Scripture in the book of Exodus).

A couple of these 10 come into play here: "Thou shalt not commit adultery" and "Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain." These are words that have helped shape more than our legal and judicial codes. They have shaped civilization as we know it. They uncover a way of living together, rightly relating to both our creator and neighbor, holding to honesty, respect and integrity.

And each pulls no punches. That's probably why David Letterman once described them as "those things that Moses brought down from the mountain were not in fact the ten suggestions."

These commandments have helped steer individuals and shape culture for thousands of years. I think they can still provide solid moral footing, even when the field of life gets slippery.

Ironically, this week FOX rejected a third ad for causing a very different kind of "offense." The ad in question was from the Fixed Point Foundation. Its offense? It encouraged viewers to look up the Bible verse John 3:16. The verse, ubiquitous at sporting events like the Super Bowl, refers to God's love for humankind and the lengths He went to demonstrate that love. Apparently, FOX Sports nixed the ad "on the basis that it contained 'religious doctrine.'"

The logic for rejecting this third ad left me scratching my head. FOX may want to pull out its advertising guidelines and rethink a system that would lump a message of God's love in with the promotion of adultery and disrespect.

On Super Bowl Sunday, referees will be asked to make some pretty tough calls. But they'll have a rules book to guide them. Fortunately, we have one available to us too.

Good thing, because this is a game our nation can't afford to lose.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
michelesda
My micro-bio is empty.
03:52 AM on 02/03/2011
"FOX may want to pull out its advertising guidelines and rethink a system that would lump a message of God's love in with the promotion of adultery and disrespect."

I think not. Fox is at least showing some respect for its audience in not laying Bible trips on them in the middle of a football game. All three ads are cut of the same cloth and equally offensive.
02:50 PM on 02/02/2011
It's estimated that around 130-155 million pounds of food will be consumed on Super Bowl Sunday. Wings dominate, with chips and dip in second... http://foo­diegossip.­blogspot.c­om/2011/02­/super-bow­l-food-sta­tistics-ar­e-you.html
Just some fun food facts. Can't wait for Super Bowl Sunday!
11:33 AM on 02/02/2011
Ooops.

Typo.

pro ifelytize = proselytize
11:32 AM on 02/02/2011
Cry me a river...
Why is it that you guys can't stop playing the victim card whenever you're told not to shove your religious beliefs down everyones throats? The typical response to this is usually that "you can always turn to another channel if it offends you" or "Well, you don't HAVE to watch it". But really, who do think you're fooling? You want to pro ifelytize. And you want everyone to let you.
Now if some other religious organisation, with a different belief than yours, wanted to do the same, and the network allowed them to do so, you would be up in arms as would a ton of christian organisation.
Stop feeling sorry for yourself, it doesn't become you very well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:44 PM on 02/01/2011
"those things that Moses brought down from the mountain were not in fact the ten suggestions"

Ummm ... except for the one that says "remember the sabbath, and keep it holy"?

Are the Superbowl **Sunday** people concerned about that one?

Aren't Xians being hypocrites if they celebrate the Superbowl ... and claim to revere the big 10?
04:59 PM on 02/01/2011
I must point out that both of those commandments begin "Thou...", they do not command believers to force non believers to abide by God's covenant. The owners and customers of the adultery website do not choose to follow God's rules, what compels you or the Fox corporation to force them to do so?
04:48 PM on 02/01/2011
If you object to their rejecting an ad promoting reading the Christian Bible, would you object to their rejecting an ad from a Muslim organization urging people to read the Koran? If not, what is the difference?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
Show me some evidence.
04:18 PM on 02/02/2011
Do you think there are a significant number of people who would defend promoting the Koran but not the Bible? Personally, I'm glad there are corporate standards that apparently say something like "Let's leave religious advertising out of our commercials". But it seems to me it would have to be all or none and if you promote one you better be ready to promote the other.