iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry Magid

GET UPDATES FROM Larry Magid
 

Facebook's Real Value Unrelated to its Stock Price

Posted: 06/01/2012 2:42 pm

All of the pre-IPO hype and post-IPO letdown completely misses the point when it comes to Facebook. Although Wall Street may see it differently, Facebook's main task is not about making a quick buck. It's about slowly and methodically building a sustainable business that's both financially profitable and socially useful, long into the future.

That's of little solace to the investors who paid as much as $45 a share for Facebook on opening day, which, for a few moments at least, valued the company at more than $133 billion. On paper those folks lost money by the end of the day and even more as the stock sank on Monday and Tuesday of the following week before rising a bit on Wednesday.

I don't know what Facebook is worth today, and I don't care. Because that type of short-term thinking has nothing to do with what it takes to build a great company. To me, Facebook's value can be measured in far different ways -- how well it's serving its members, how its treating and compensating its employees, its social impact on society as a whole and, of course, how well it's positioning itself for the future.

When I look at Facebook, I don't think about price-to-earnings ratio, but of how it's changed the world for both better and worse, and how nearly a billion Facebook users are using it to enhance their lives and the lives of those they care about.

I think of the activists in the Middle East who used Facebook as a tool to help bring down oppressive regimes. I think of how social activists in the United States are using it to improve the environment, protest inequalities and effect positive social change. I think of how students are using Facebook to form study groups and how creative teachers are using it to enhance and supplement what they do in their classrooms. I think about the grandfather who gets to see regular photos of family members, the soldiers who keep in touch with their families, and people dealing with illnesses who use it to get support and life-saving advice.

I also think about some of the darker sides of social networking, including people using Facebook to reveal too much personal information or post pictures or text that could get them into trouble now or in the future. I think of the vast database that Facebook is amassing that can be used not just to send us targeted ads, but also to track us online and predict our actions. In the wrong hands -- such as an oppressive government -- that much personal data could have devastating effects.

I worry about people who spend too much time on Facebook and not enough time doing productive things like hanging out with friends and family or getting enough exercise.

Like those who trade Facebook stock, I see a fluctuating valuation. But to me, Facebook's value goes up every time it enhances someone's life or when Facebook introduces a great new feature -- like encouraging people to sign up as organ donors. Its value diminishes when the company makes a privacy blunder and it will fall into a negative territory in my book if Facebook staff let the pressures of Wall Street suppress its "hacker mentality" that drives employees to work all night to implement cool new features. But value also requires a stable platform where changes are implemented thoughtfully and incrementally so as not to disrupt and confuse users.

Facebook faces challenges, but its real successes and failures can't be measured by a rise or drop in its stock price. Its real value comes as the company and its users try to figure out how to usher in new ways to communicate and interact.

We've just begun figuring out how to live and thrive in a digital age and all of us -- not just the folks who run companies like Facebook -- have a lot to learn and a lot to contribute.

Sure, it's about learning to protect our privacy in an age where anything we say can be permanent and seen by millions and, yes, it's about learning to be "safe" in an environment we share with people we can't necessarily see and don't necessarily know. But it's also about learning to thrive in a connected world. Forget about Facebook's initial public offering. The IPO I care about is the Incredible Potential Opportunity that awaits us all in this brave new world of social media.

This article first appeared in the Monday, May 28, 2012 San Jose Mercury News and also on Forbes.com.

Disclosure: Larry Magid is co-director of ConnectSafely.org, a non-profit Internet safety organization that receives support from Facebook

 

Follow Larry Magid on Twitter: www.twitter.com/larrymagid

FOLLOW TECH
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:58 PM on 06/16/2012
Actually the author may not be far off-the-mark. Facebook is a growing and emerging technology. The Facebook of tomorrow is not the Facebook of today. Depending on management decisions going forward, in particular, how Facebook develops or acquires services that appeal to its stakeholders, Facebook's business model will evolve and have a a better than average shot a sustainable profiatability. Facebook Bears are being distracted by the legal-drama surrounding the IPO and the departure of Brett Taylor. Both are temporary issues that will resolve favorably. First it is clear that the company did not violate any disclosure rules, secondly NASDAQ has identified a programming glitch that may have accounted for the stock price volatility. Lastly, Brett Taylor was acquired by Facebook when it purchased FriendFeed the startup that Taylor worked for
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
01:57 AM on 06/04/2012
Does the author really fully grasp that Zuckerberg's a multi-billionaire? He could probably sustain like, 3, maybe even 4 private armies, and with a massive global intelligence network thinly disguised as a social networking website, wow, the implications are just amazing. Little bit of social engineering, little bit of this, little bit of that, you could work all KINDS of magic. Just play the games. I'm your friend. No, really I am! LOL
08:58 PM on 06/02/2012
What a silly article-it's the equivalent of a sports writer penning a column saying "The Jacksonville Jaguars(or insert other terrible team) won loss record is unrelated to how good of a football team they are"
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
05:40 PM on 06/02/2012
Mr. Magid has missed the purpose of investment, in his drive to outline a concept.

Investors are not concerned with the specifics. They are not interested in paradigm shifts, or if an idea changes the zeitgeist. They don't need to know how to make the product. They are interested in the business. They want a return.

The share price at which to buy in is CRITICALLY IMPORTANT. So is the disposal price. If you want to invest like a moneymaking investor, ignore the narrative when it comes to determining those numbers, and focus on the fundamentals. If you want a good story, buy a Dickens novel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
livingbettertherapy
Counselor, Therapist, Strategic Intervention
03:21 PM on 06/02/2012
No one is denying how Facebook has been used as a tool to enhance lives. The problem was going public years before it was prudent to do so and Facebook was making the profits to justify an IPO. The inconvenient truth is that too many want to get rich quick and so they buy into overvalued companies wanting to get rich quick. The smart money invests in the solid, undervalued companies. If you get rich quick, it's easy to lose that wealth quickly. Look at how much FB's major shareholders have lost already.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:34 PM on 06/02/2012
Then, why did they offer shares to the public ... let alone at that price?
photo
hattrick752
Regulate Wall St; Stop socializing losses
11:08 AM on 06/02/2012
" Facebook as a tool to help bring down oppressive regimes"
the operative word here is "tool". it is like saying that without my fork i woulda starved.
08:11 AM on 06/02/2012
Getting back to the stock itself it may still turn out to be a good bet I wrote a piece about it here http://tinyurl.com/6ujwyxu and I haven't read anybody else seeing what I see as the reason this stock could skyrocket in the future. It has to do with their advertising fees being so low right now. The prob is the company isnt a startup but their fees are like they are. When they raise their fees a little bit what will that do for their quarterly reports? And what happens to a stock that consistently beats whisper numbers? Anyway this coment is gettin too long
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
07:38 AM on 06/02/2012
"Facebook's Real Value Unrelated to its Stock Price" Yeah, because who really wants to pay for "air" right? It has no real value in any sense. It does one thing, it disconnects you from people. You never have to interact with anyone again except in a world that has no anything, emoticons, pics, electronic nothingness.
the pariah
Author of "The Lean Pocket Diet"
07:27 AM on 06/02/2012
Other than a few examples of Facebook used as a communcations mechanism for some social uprisings what has it done agin for us socially? Oh yeah, casued an immeasurable amount of lost worker productivity, made people even fatter, enabled people to indulge in their narcissism and cuased thousands of people to not get hired or lose their jobs becasue of their indescretions in posting on the site. Not too mention they are mining data like an anteater digs for a meal. Have fun with your 900 "friends"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:43 PM on 06/02/2012
How can you prove that it has made people less productive without controlling for solitaire?

;-)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MTY INDACHI
01:54 PM on 06/02/2012
lost worker productivity? in what universe? worker productivity has increased every year since 1970 with no signs of slowing down. corporate profits are at an all time high and have been breaking records year after year. that would not be possible with your claim of lost worker productivity.
the pariah
Author of "The Lean Pocket Diet"
11:32 AM on 06/03/2012
I am talking about people who spend huge amounts of time messing around with Facebook while they are at work. I worked for company who found a staggering amount of time was being spent by people on Facebook everyday. They banned it. There are plenty of stories about. Did you even bother to try and understand the context of my post? That is another reflection of the moden day social media user, reading comprehension has suffered.

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Productivity-Suffers-as-Employees-Waste-Time-on-Facebook-Twitter-During-Working-Hours-1299790.htm
06:38 AM on 06/02/2012
I'm pretty such even Zuckerberg would be ashamed of a plug this brazen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Huber
12:58 AM on 06/02/2012
When I look at Facebook, I'm just reminded of how much I hate it. How I'm constantly having to dig deep into the settings to find the privacy toggles. How, whenever I get slightly comfortable with how the screen looks, they completely change everything around. How people are always posting videos and news articles that won't let me read or view them unless I'm willing to sign up so that all my friends will be alerted that I've read / viewed them. Oh yay! I never sign up for such things, although sometimes I copy the name of the article / video and paste it into Google so that I can read or view it outside of Facebook.

I also occurs to me: Absolutely everyone I know feels exactly the same way about Facebook. I don't think I know a singe person who actually likes it! I liike Google. I like Youtube. I like some aspects of Yahoo. I don't like Facebook. If nobody likes it, what can it be worth, and what is its future likely to be?

To me, it's worth $0. I have nothing against the company or Zuckerberg. But I don't like Facebook and have no desire whatsoever to own the stock.
09:54 AM on 06/02/2012
If huffpo had a "like" button I would click it for your comment!
photo
EdCorner
Now what - more of the same...
01:20 PM on 06/02/2012
That's what the favorite button means
09:43 PM on 06/01/2012
If you bought Facebook for $100 billion dollars, where it was valued by crazy bankers, with $600 million in annual cashflow, its 2011 reported free cash flow, it would take you 167 years to get your money back. Not a great investment to me. But, that the real world, not world of wall street and financial brokers.
07:51 PM on 06/01/2012
LOL! This line of reasoning reminds me of the old quote about Richard Wagner's operas: "His music is much better than it sounds."
07:11 PM on 06/01/2012
"It's about slowly and methodically building a sustainable business that's both financially profitable and socially useful, long into the future."

Facebook doesn't have a revenue model yet.