More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry Magid

Larry Magid

Posted: November 14, 2010 07:03 PM

Flash Drives Speed up PC Start Times

What's Your Reaction:

2010-11-15-samsung.jpg
Samsung 470 Series Solid State Drives

You may have heard that Apple is shipping its new MacBook Air laptops with flash memory instead of a hard drive. Because it has no moving parts, memory has some big advantages over the spinning media used in hard drives. Reading and writing is much faster and it is more reliable. Because there are no moving parts, there is no danger of losing data because of a disk "crash" when the read/write head crashes against the media. It's also more energy efficient because there is no need for a motor to spin the drive.

Apple isn't the only PC vendor to offer flash drives. I've been using a Lenovo ThinkPad X300 with a 64GB flash drive for past two years and have enjoyed how quickly it boots up and having less anxiety about the drive breaking if the laptop is jostled or dropped (which has happened a few of times with so far no ill effects).

Adding an SSD Flash Drive to a Desktop or Laptop PC or Mac

But you don't necessarily have to get a new laptop to take advantage of these drives. Samsung is now selling after-market solid state drives for both laptop and desktop PCs and Macs.

I installed a Samsung 470 Series drive in my desktop machine. The drive Samsung loaned me stores 256 gigabytes and sells online for $549, but they also offer a 64GB drive for $139 and a 128GB for $279. 64GB is very little storage for a desktop PC but it's enough for the operating system and -- for most people -- all of your software and some data files. Fortunately, if you add it to your existing desktop PC, you can still keep the original drive to store your data and software programs that don't fit on the flash drive. That way you have the performance and reliability of flash and the larger storage from your hard drive.

For example, I'm using my old 1 terabyte Western Digital drive for most of my data, music files, video and photographs and the new Samsung flash drive for the Windows operating system, my software and my work in progress data files. I'm also using the old hard drive to back up the data stored on the flash drive though the chances of losing data on a flash drive are pretty slim.

Samsung publishes all sorts of performance data to brag about how fast their drives are but, for me, the test is what it feels like to start up the machine, load software, install software and copy files.

Until I installed this drive, it would take me about five minutes between the time I turned on the PC and the time I could actually start to use it by running programs. And even then it would be a little slow at first. Now it takes about 30 seconds from a cold start to loading Mozilla Firefox and some of that time is taken up by the Intel hardware going through its initial boot process.

In addition to the faster start-up, the machine wakes about much faster from sleep mode. Before, from the time I touched the keyboard or moved the mouse while the machine was sleeping, I had to wait 30 seconds or more for the hard drive to spin up. Now it it usable a few seconds after I start waking it up. It's also faster to shut down a machine because that often requires writing to the drive.

Your performance will of course vary depending on your hardware configuration and the software you're using. In my case, for example, I have a number of USB devices plugged into the machine which does delay startup times.

When you connect a new start-up drive you have to install the operating system and re-install all of your programs. That used to be a major pain but most of the programs I use can be downloaded so it didn't take me that long. To be fair, a new installation of Windows will always run a bit faster than an older machine because after awhile the Windows registry gets cluttered which causes slower boot times, a condition known as "Windows crud." But even SSD drives installed a long time ago boot faster because they churn through the crud more quickly.

Hybrid Drives Give You More Storage for Less Money

Although an SSD drive is the fastest way to load programs and data, a close second is a hybrid drive which is a traditional hard drive that's also equipped with flash memory and software to intelligently store frequently accessed data from the memory instead of the spinning media. For example the Seagate Momentus XT drives have 4GB of flash memory in additional to the spinning storage. Using software they call "Adaptive Memory Technology," Seagate claims that they are "80% faster than traditional 7200 RPM drives. On its web site, the company has a video that compares the Momentus XT to flash memory and a traditional hard drive with a test that shows that the hybrid drive is faster than traditional drives but not quite as fast as flash.

Though not quite as fast as pure SSD drives, the big advantage of hybrid drives is that you can get a lot more storage for a lot less money. For example, Amazon sells a 500GB Momentus for $129 and a 256GB drive for $99 which is less than a fifth of the price of a Samsung 256GB flash drive.

Whether you go with a true flash drive or a Hybrid drive, the result is faster startup, faster loading of programs and faster loading and saving of data. And to gamers, that extra speed can mean a competitive edge, especially with games that are storage intense.

 

Follow Larry Magid on Twitter: www.twitter.com/larrymagid

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GunnyJ
I do my best every time.
11:32 AM on 11/16/2010
Lots of smart here! Thanks for all the views and information!
photo
deepintheheartoftejas
Middle o/t Road = Yellow stripes & dead armadillos
12:37 PM on 11/15/2010
"And to gamers, that extra speed can mean a competitive edge, especially with games that are storage intense."

Of course, storage intense applications means you'll hit your write/erase cycle limits much sooner than you would for normal application use.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mikel Moore
My microbio is empty, by choice...
09:48 AM on 11/15/2010
Please provide sources for the assertion that Flash drives are more reliable than hard drives. That goes against everything I understand about them, including forcing writes to different locations to prevent early failure by caused repeated writing to the same location.
03:38 PM on 11/15/2010
That article has a HUGE caveat.

"SSD reliability shouldn't be an issue anymore, especially if you are using enterprise-class memory."

Good luck finding out which devices use "enterprise-class memory." And they STILL talk about "cell wear", but don't talk at all about what that rate of wear is. How long do they last? I have not seen anyone yet state that any class of flash drive can support as many read/write cycles as a traditional hard drive.
photo
john frodo
armchair expert
09:20 AM on 11/15/2010
Great info thanks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:12 AM on 11/15/2010
Well, aside from the article reading like an advertisement, it was ok.
Last I heard, there was still an issue with mtf and some minor issues with emi. The industry is close to changing over to ssd's, but not quite there yet. Maybe 2-3 more years.
As far as having "...to install the operating system and re-install all of your programs" nobody but techies would find that acceptable. Most users prefer the comfort of warm oatmeal (ie. " I just want it to work!").
03:30 PM on 11/15/2010
Some drives now come with software that clones your old drive. I bought a new drive, ran the software, and was up and running with no other changes.

Of course, it is good to "reset" every once and a while, and start with a clean OS install.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bfcg
12:48 AM on 11/15/2010
My latest build has a pair of OCZ ssd's stripped in R.A.I.D.
I could not be happier.
12:24 AM on 11/15/2010
Intel just reduced the prize of its SSD drives considerably.
and Intel drives are much faster and secure than another in the market. they are blazingly fast compared to the power they consume.
11:52 PM on 11/14/2010
ONLY Speedier load-up times?

Solid-state memory is not a mere fact of the future of computing, It is the inevitability.

Regularly,now, in my servicing of infected machines and machines with failing hard drives, I turn to a cd or a flash drive with puppy linux or the like to repair disks or recover data. They load directly into the RAM and require no hard disk at all to work If they become infected, so what? Restart the machine fresh, with a brand new, uninfected copy of puppy linux in the RAM.

My dream system would be one that loads exclusively in the RAM so that data damage may be limited, one that is user friendly, one that speedily adapts to the user's need, Recent versions of Linux move ever closer to that goal, while closed-software architecture systems like those offered by Microsoft and Apple exhaust themselves on embedding their systems to the point of incompatibility.

I'd like to hope the smart money is on systems that liberate our potential, not enslave it to monolithic corporations that do not care for us.

Weak, I know. But I must hope.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lawrence of america
01:27 AM on 11/15/2010
keep hoping
photo
dubbleplusgood
turned off CNN, turned on CurrentTV
11:01 PM on 11/14/2010
did they solve the finite number of R/W issues? regular usb flash sticks usually have a limited number of writes before they stop working. what will happen to people who use their laptops and drives often?
12:25 AM on 11/15/2010
where are you, wake up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TooLooze
Someone should do something about all the problems
08:46 AM on 11/15/2010
A simple answer (if you have one) would have sufficed. Be nice.