iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry Yang

GET UPDATES FROM Larry Yang
 

Toward Freedom and Enlightenment Queerly: LGBTQ and Dharma

Posted: 01/ 8/2012 2:00 pm

Our stressful and often oppressive world gives frequent messages, both insidiously subtle and explicitly harsh, for us to be someone who we are not, to do things to which we do not feel aligned, to think and feel in ways that do not make sense to us--in ways that even harm ourselves and others. This is especially true of communities outside the mainstream culture, such as LGBTQ folks, whose different life experiences sometimes evoke passive indifference, dismissal, or stereotyping of our lives, our relationships, and our needs--and at worst, can spark the vitriolic shadow of aggressive hostility and homophobic violence that still is present from the bullying in our school yards to the hateful rhetoric of our political playgrounds.

This is the personal and collective unconsciousness that we transform every moment that we, as LGBTQ-identified folks, live with authenticity and a deep knowing of who we truly are. Each moment that we are mindful and openly accepting of who we are--we live a life different than that is proclaimed by the false prophetic messages which seek to portray a unequal, unjust society as a wise and beneficial one. This is what is called in the teachings of the Buddha, 'going upstream'--living our lives fully and totally, in spite of the unconsciousness that surrounds us.

The transformative power of the teachings of the Buddha, along with many other worthy and profound spiritual lineages, guides us to live in this present moment--meeting this very moment of our lives with kindness, compassion and openness. This gentle acceptance is a complete acceptance--not just of this present moment, but also of who we are in this moment. Meeting the present moment as it is with loving attention, is one and the same as meeting the person whom we are with that same kindness. Our direct life experience is an integral part of this present moment of Life. We are indivisible from Life. We are the very expression of Life. And we are an integral part of this web of Life, even if we are told otherwise by others who would judge us or by judgments of ourselves that deny an aspect of our true nature.

What is 'true nature?' Sometimes this term is invoked to point to the experiences of emptiness (shunyata) or non-attachment to a sense of self (anatta) as the goal of spiritual practice. However, I have found that experiencing our 'true nature' is not so much a marker of our spiritual progress, or an answer that we are expected to have in order to achieve Freedom or Enlightenment. Rather, the insight of our 'true nature' emerges from the gentle yet persistent exploration of the questions "Who am I?" and "Who are we?" in this current life experience. And there is nothing outside of this exploration including our sexualities, our gender identities, and our orientations. The path towards freedom is not going around the experience of identity or transcending the experience of identity, but through the experience of identity--however that identity manifests for us.

Of what benefit is this practice of completely accepting who we are? The benefit is the deeper and deeper knowing that regardless of what other people think, do, or say to us--we are fully human, we are fully entitled to all of our human rights, and we are fully entitled to all of our humanity. As this becomes unshakable in our direct experience, there is a Freedom in knowing who we are and how connected we are to this Life and all of our lives. This Freedom is independent of any external circumstances--politically, socially, or culturally.

This is the Freedom that the Buddha himself experienced in the archetypical story of his Enlightenment. After years of searching for a spiritual path, Prince Siddartha, the Buddha-to-be, decided with unwavering resolve to sit in meditation and not rise until he experienced the wisdom of the true nature of his existence. Before his achievement, Mara--the supreme foe who tempts all beings into unconsciousness--was determined to prevent Siddhartha's liberation from occurring. Mara amassed all of his power and armies to force Siddhartha out of his contemplative state. It is said that Mara caused unimaginable forces of destruction to arise and attack the future Buddha.

Mara called upon maelstroms of tornadoes and torrential downpours to wash away and drown the meditating prince, but the floods did not dampen him so much as a dew drop nor the edge of his robes even ruffled. There were showers of rocks the size of mountain peaks, of hot coals, and of every conceivable destructive weapon that assailed Siddhartha--yet, they all were transformed into celestial flowers, cascading at his feet. After nine unsuccessful attempts to unseat the future Buddha from his path towards liberation, an enraged Mara gathered his army of hundreds of thousands. With the roar of their screams in the background, Mara demanded to the Buddha-to-be: "Get out of that seat! You are nothing and nobody! That seat belongs to me! These are my witnesses to this truth!" And there arose a deafening roar from his armies extending in all directions--"Yes, we are his witnesses! You do not belong here!" And Mara continued, "You, Prince, sit alone. Who is your witness?"

Then, the Prince, close to his liberation, undisturbed by any obstacle created by Mara, reached down with the simplest possible gesture, filled with the gentlest of ease, to touch the ground with the middle finger of his right hand. This is the moment represented by so many sculpted images of the Buddha. This is the moment that the Buddha called upon the Earth Mother to witness his inalienable right to his dharma seat--to his place in the world, and to his belonging to this Life. So brilliant was the power of the Mother Goddess when she appeared that Mara and all his armies were dispelled into all corners of the Universe.

When we feel assailed in whom we are, we each can invoke the strength of the Buddha and the courage of all peoples who have lived through experiences of suffering and oppression. And as the Buddha did, anchor in the deep knowledge that we have a choice to stay exactly where we are, as we are. In the choice to stay in that place, is an act of Freedom. Just like Prince Siddhartha, we all have a dharma seat--a place in this Life--that cannot be taken from us. There may be distractions or painful experiences that try to knock us off that seat, but no one can take our seat away. Regardless of how Mara tempts or tortures us, we do not have to relinquish our seat; we don't have to move from a place to which we always belong. And even if we leave that seat, it will be there whenever we choose to return. It is as James Baldwin wrote: "Freedom is not something that anybody can be given. Freedom is something people take, and people are as free as they want to be."

That Freedom is what our spiritual practice can bring to our experience as LGBTQ communities in the larger world. In this New Year, there will likely be escalating polarities in an already combative electoral discourse. There are already challenging portents with the political and sanctimonious rants that are equating the LGBTQ experience to Satan and the Ku Klux Klan. Taking the time and space to remember who we really are (a quality of mindfulness), regardless of the messages that are thrown at us, will assist and support our communities going against the torrential stream of any form of oppression.

All LGBTQ-identified folks are invited to practice in spiritual community to renew and support all aspects of our lives at a LGBTQ weekend meditation retreat at the Garrison Institute in New York, April 13-15, 2012. More information can be found at:
http://www.garrisoninstitute.org/cominghome2012 or http://cominghome2012.wordpress.com/

2011-12-29-gaybuddha500w.jpg

 
FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
05:00 PM on 01/10/2012
I am aware there are many differing schools of thought in buddhism as in any other widely practiced religious or quasi religious tradition, but comments on the Dalai Lama's thoughts on the wrongness of gay sexual relations might be in order here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirk Job-Sluder
02:26 PM on 01/09/2012
Interesting article, thank you.
10:35 AM on 01/09/2012
Hi, Larry,
Thanks so much for this great piece. I enjoyed reading it. I wanted to share with you a piece I wrote a while back about being gay and an environmentalist. Here's the link:

http://jillschneiderman.wordpress.com/?s=gay&searchbutton=go%21

Perhaps I'll see you at the retreat. I love the Garrison Institute.
Once again, many thanks,
Jill
11:00 PM on 01/08/2012
The largely modern concept of self-acceptance seems antithetical to the buddhist concepts of not-self (anatta) or emptiness (shunyata). In many places, buddhism seems to make the claim that there is no "true self" to be found much less a "true self" to be accepted. I'm not sure why a religion that encourages non-attachment to all things, including one's sense of self, is being used to promote the idea of self-acceptance.

Given the buddhist view that all things are impermanent (anicca) including one's sense of self, wouldn't the quest for self-acceptance simply become one more source of suffering (dukkha). I'm not saying that self-acceptance is bad. Personally, I have no problem with it. I'm just not sure where the buddhism fits in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OtayPanky
You're welcome
10:59 AM on 01/09/2012
Your view of Buddhism is skewed (and so is the blogger's).

The no-self idea has been misunderstood by Buddhists since the very beginning. The Buddha actually corrected this misunderstanding on his deathbed. You can read the details in the Parinirvana Sutra, but I'll summarize briefly.

Essentially, from the Buddha's perspective we have a transient sense of identity (the "no-self"). Part of true awakening is coming to the realization that we are not that identity (which is where the blogger is wrong in his teaching). All those qualities which we typically think of as our "self", including our sex and our gender attraction, are temporary, and thus not our true self at all.

The blogger may be a gay man in this life. But in a prior life, he might have been a straight woman. In a subsequent life, he might be a straight man.

But, the Buddha said, we also have a true self - our Buddha nature - which persists over the course of countless rebirths. So (he said to his disciples as he lay dying) it is wrong to say that there is no self.

Of course, whether or not the Buddha was correct and knew what he was talking about is another question entirely. Everyone gets to make up his own mind about that. But regardless of what we believe about the Buddha, or Jesus, or any other teacher, we should represent what they say accurately if we're going to have a meaningful discussion about their teaching.
photo
TXanimal
Somewhere between Occam's Razor & Murphy's Law
12:50 PM on 01/09/2012
Excellent. Thanks for clarifying.
09:37 PM on 01/09/2012
Which parinirvan­a sutra? As I understand it, there are two of them. One is part of the Pali canon, the other is used in mahayana buddhism. Since you refer to the idea of a buddha nature, I assume you mean the second one. However, doesn't this sutra also represent a later development of buddhist thought, and doctrines that are specific to mahayana buddhism?

Of course, I'm certainly no scholar of buddhism, and it's very likely that my views on the matter are skewed by what little I know. In addition, I was not looking to start a debate on buddhist doctrine. I commented because the article seemed to be mixing modern ideas about self acceptance with completely different buddhist ideas in a way that doesn't really fit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:53 PM on 01/08/2012
New Yorkers can also check out queerdharma.org
08:28 PM on 01/08/2012
This message comes to me at a particularly valuable time - thank you, Larry!

And I found it interesting that on my laptop, Cardinal George's apology for his KKK comparison appeared in the sidebar alongside your reference to it! And the story appeared in the options at the bottom of your post! I love it!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrHomerS
Mmmmm...purple
02:04 PM on 01/10/2012
Do you mean to say that Buddhism is somehow accepting of homosexuality whereas Catholicism is not? That's certainly what this article implies. However, the Dalai Lama is as far right as the pope on sex/sexuality.
03:11 PM on 01/10/2012
I mean to say that the Catholic Church, under the direction of Cardinal Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict, has waged a decades-long campaign against glbt people, not only within the church, but in the political sphere, seeking or opposing laws consistent with Catholic doctrine (even though Jesus said nothing about this).

OTOH, Buddhism has not engaged in such hostile political activity, nor made it a major theme of its teachings. Yes, various Buddhist traditions do not support homosexuality, mostly consistent with the cultures they come from. However, my teacher, Thich Nhat Hanh, as well as many other teachers, focus on the Buddhist view of non-dualism, non-discrimination. This has led to reassessments of anti-gay traditions and teachings, and now accept that glbt people are one and equal with all others.
07:36 PM on 01/08/2012
"Meeting the present moment as it is with loving attention, is one and the same as meeting the person whom we are with that same kindness."

But meeting the person opens one to the heart. It is through the encounter with other human beings that one opens to prema (love).

"Not so Ananda! Not so Ananda! This is the entire spiritual life, Ananda, that is, good friendship, good companionship, good comradeship."

Ed. Bodhi, Bhikkhu. In the Buddhas's words: an anthology of discourse from the Pali Canon, p.240. Wisdom Publication. Boston. 2005.

"[t]he insight of our 'true nature' emerges from the gentle yet persistent exploration of the questions "Who am I?"".

And the question eventually falls away leaving one speechless. One asks in silence and without words feeling the passion for an answer.