iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Larry_Cohen

GET UPDATES FROM Larry_Cohen
 

Soda: Size Does Matter

Posted: 06/03/2012 4:42 pm

"New York City is not about wringing your hands; it's about doing something."

That's what Mayor Michael Bloomberg said last Wednesday while introducing the city's plan to cap serving sizes of sugary drinks at 16 ounces. My first thought was, "That's true, and I am so proud to have grown up as a New Yorker. This regulation is a vital step in improving health for our families and communities."

The regulation would prohibit restaurants and takeout establishments from selling more than 16 ounces of sugar sweetened beverages in a single serving and limit container size to 16 ounces. Predictably, the food and beverage industry is up in arms, throwing around the usual terms ("health cops," "nanny state," etc.). As someone who has spent decades fighting for policies that keep people healthy and safe in the first place, I've heard it all before. We heard the same complaints when we took the lead out of paint and gasoline and when we took smoking out of the workplace. Changing norms can feel jarring, but it saves lives. When was the last time you heard someone musing out loud about how they miss lead paint or smoking in the office?

The food and beverage industry is right to be worried about these developments. It is no longer a secret that their interests lie in profits over health. As Director of an organization that has examined how intensively food is marketed to children and how foods the industry claims are "better for you" are frequently junk food in disguise, I have a hard time taking seriously the industry's claims that they care about health. That's why I named our two minute video that exposes deceptive food and beverage marketing to children We're Not Buying It. The fact is, we need to change norms around food and beverages, and efforts like the one taken by New York City are a step in the right direction. Growing up in Brooklyn, when my brother wanted to buy a soda from the candy store, it came in a small 6 ½ ounce bottle. Today, those bottles hold 20 ounces or more and contain more than three times as many calories. The average American 12-year-old would have to run four miles just to burn off that one soda.

But just as norms have changed for the worst over the past decades, this is the generation that is going to turn back the clock towards health. As I learned from my talks with the tobacco industry as I helped develop the nation's first multi-city tobacco laws, creating healthier norms happens one step at a time--and after each step the next comes ever faster. New York City is far from alone in trying to improve the food environment, and that is exactly what industry is afraid of. The tide has turned against soda. Study after study is coming out showing the harm that overconsumption of these products causes to both our health and the fiscal stability of our healthcare systems. Cities like Richmond, CA are exploring how taxing soda can help counter the powerful marketing of the beverage industry. And the Center for Science in the Public Interest is convening a National Soda Summit in Washington, D.C. on June 7 to build further momentum on these issues.

This is a battle over who gets to shape our food environment and the health of our children. New York City's leadership will inspire hope -- and future action -- in places where the political will to make these sorts of common sense changes does not yet exist. It protects the health of New Yorkers and builds momentum for the rest of us.

 
 
 

Follow Larry_Cohen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/preventioninst

FOLLOW FOOD
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:56 AM on 06/07/2012
If a picture is worth a thousand words, than this one speaks volumes. How much sugar are you putting in your body if you drink just one 12-ounce soda per day? Take a look ... http://bit.ly/awEpYV

This visual should be in the waiting room of every doctor/dentist office. Unfortunately, it is not.
03:30 PM on 06/04/2012
Full disclosure, I'm an outsider looking in. I love visiting NYC but I don't live there. I don't stay current with all the local politics there nor do I particularly care.

That being said. When I go to visit Manhattan I usually walk everywhere I go (I've walked from my sister's apartment in SoHo to Battery Park, up to the upper West side, to the East side and back to SoHo) visiting several touristy spots on the way. I'm in shape, married to a marathon runner who I run with to help her when she's training and yet I drink drinks filled with sugar. It's a conscious choice that I make and my doctors seem to be fine with since it's in moderation and in addition to a healthy diet.

Why should I be punished because of some obese epidemic I don't have anything to do with? What am I supposed to go do now? Every now and then I want to buy a 20 oz soda or maybe one that's a little larger. Am I supposed to go to a grocery store now, buy a warm 2 liter and walk with it thru the streets of Manhattan? Really? What happened to personal responsibility? Teaching people responsible living isn't working so we punish everyone? All that'll convince me to do is buy 2 smaller drinks instead of 1 larger one.. Geniuses. Yay Bloomberg (sarcasm)!! If people want to be fat, let them, it's their butt, not mine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:50 AM on 06/07/2012
You seriously believe you're being punished because sodas come in sizes no larger than 16 oz (half the capacity of your stomach)? Really?

The problem is not that we have a nanny state (we don't). Rather, it's the fact that Americans have become a bunch of crybabies who think life is over because they can't pour 32 ounces of soda down their gullets from a single cup.

Buying a super-sized soda in a single cup is not a right. Get over it.
02:06 PM on 06/04/2012
So you all want smaller size beverages etc. Well folks, this isn't gong to stop the overload of sugary drinks or health issues. Unless someone wants to cut back on sugar, carbs., tobacco, booze, etc., this isn't going to work. I would like to be a size 4, but if I don't work at it, it isn't going to happen. Regulations on size of drinks will just cause someone who wants a Big Gulp to buy two or more of the smaller drinks. It doesn't take a mathematical wizard to figure that one out. If someone wants to be healthy or eat and drink healthy, it is up to them not the government or state to issue the order. Stop blaming restaurants and manufacturing companies for our poor choices. People will consume what they want and as much as they want regardless of the size of the product.
02:03 PM on 06/04/2012
Those 16 oz cups are still going to be available t 7-11 and other similar chains, so this ban in effect if fail because all it will do now is harm small business. thanks nanny staters!
DrinkerOfTheRye
Eschew obfuscation
11:37 AM on 06/04/2012
Like Larry said, "this is a battle over who gets to shape our food environment and the health of our children." We seen the results of the failure of individual responsibility in resisting the un-health food industry - the growing epidemic of obesity. We have also begun codifying that society has a responsibility to provide health care to all individuals (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). One of the Acts primary goals is to prevent people from becoming so sick that they require emergency room care, which is more expensive than preventative care. Given that society does have a responsibility to provide health care to individuals, and individuals are proving inept at taking care of themselves, society (thru Government) must step in. NYC is proposing only a small, but important first step in protecting the health of citizens. Re-elect our President and he can build on this momentum take further actions to save us from our own un-health life styles. FORWARD to better health and a better tomorrow.
02:01 PM on 06/04/2012
Failure at personal responsibility? Speak for yourself mate. I mean, I don't drink 16 oz sodas because I CHOOSE NOT TOO, not because somebody else told me it wasn't good for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JD Salinger
My micro-bio is invisible to the naked eye.
09:04 AM on 06/04/2012
I think Jon Stewart summed it up best with
"It combines the draconian government overreach people love with the probable lack of results they expect!"

How is this any of the government's business?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pjohns
Let nature be a teacher
08:14 AM on 06/04/2012
I first hear "our children" coming out of a congressman's mouth when I was knee-deep in the work of managing a home, taking care of four small children, and changing diapers. My immediate, somewhat emotional reaction on hearing that was simply "If you want to wade in here, change some diapers, do some laundry, help with homework, help with housework and shopping and paying the bills and making sure they get a college education then, by all means, while no one's possession, not even America's possession, you have a right to use "our ".......and since they are now grown, have their college degrees, good jobs and are decent human beings....and have intelligence to decide what they do on a daily basis............do not use "our"in the possessive.. Macro and micro managing of someone else's parental role and deciding that as parents, we haven't got the sense to take care of our own is truly demeaning. My children didn't and don't belong to a collective "state". Grrrr.
08:05 AM on 06/04/2012
"Study after study is coming out showing the harm that overconsumption of these products causes to both our health and the fiscal stability of our healthcare systems." How about some personal responsibility? The more government regulates our choices the less people think about the consequences of their personal actions. Let me make the choice for myself and my children.
07:40 AM on 06/04/2012
We shouldn't be robbing people of the ability to choose. We, instead, should be educating them about the risks associated with having too much sugar in their diets.
07:07 AM on 06/04/2012
While shopping I came upon the remarkable discovery that most people who drink soda are in fact not obese
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:51 AM on 06/07/2012
But those who drink 32 ounce sodas in a sitting probably are.
01:25 AM on 06/04/2012
When does it stop? Soon the little mayor will outlaw your every move and thought. Does anyone ever laugh in his face when he comes up with these loony ideas???? obviously not but someone should do so soon and often.. Enough is enough. Thie little dictactor should move to China or Russia, he would love their gov intrusions into every aspect of a citizen's life. We have no need for this kind of dictator.EVER.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tendril
imperfect at best and proud of it
07:07 AM on 06/04/2012
F and F. Couldn't agree more. We are not sheeple.
01:12 AM on 06/04/2012
This may be the best contribution of Bloomberg.
11:11 PM on 06/03/2012
Good news! Our national health is an embarrassment. Food and health really needs to be regulated more in America. Heck, in some places in Europe they don't even serve some of the garbage Americans eat.

Next stop, fast food. Kick those suckers out of town and the national IQ and age expectancy will skyrocket.
01:15 AM on 06/04/2012
And what gives you or anyone out there the right to regulate what food and beverages I put in my body? That's up to every individual to make that choice on their own. Last time I checked , this was the USA, not the USSR or the EU. People who think this is a good idea must have very crappy, unfulfilling lives to go around and worry about what everyone is eating/drinking and in what proportions. You want to improve IQ? Read a book. Put down the video games and go to a museum. Participate in some activity that improves the mind. In other words, get a life of your own.
03:38 PM on 06/04/2012
And why not also put questionable ingredients in foods? Let the people decide if they'll eat it! Why not allow known carcinogens to be put in candy? Let the people decide if they'll eat it!

You see, we've seen the results of having no control over the junk that's put out before us to eat: obesity, heart disease, diabetes.

I've seen more obese children than I ever remember growing up. It is an embarrassment.

And if your only argument is "I want to have the choice to eat garbage and get fat and die at 40 if I want!", that's simply not a rational response to a serious issue.
01:30 AM on 06/04/2012
YES THEY SERVE A NOTHING BUT SPUDS, CABBAGE AND VODKA. tHEY DO NOT HAVE FREE ENTERPRIZE TO INVENT THING LIKE SODA AND HOW TO RAISE MORE CROPS PER ACRES THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. THE SCOUR THE GARBAGE BINS FOR SCRAPS, WHILE EAT THE FINEST VARIETY OF FOOD EVER GROWN IN HISTORY. YOU DON'T HAVE TO BUY THE SODA IN LARGE CONTAINERS BUT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO STOP ME OR ANYONE ELSE FROM DOING SO. THAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH DEMS AND THEIR BIG BROTHER GOV, THEY NEVER KNOW WHEN TO QUIT AND LEAVE TH INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN TO THEIR OWN CHOICES.
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
09:47 AM on 06/04/2012
sorry but your Bloomie is a switch hitter.. he was a republican that turned Dem in name only... he is always putting his view of what folks should be doing with their bodies just like the GOP religious right conservative anti abortionists and no contraception folk...

he switched parties in 2007 then got the rules changed on term limits like a true republican would, to run again in 2009
10:38 PM on 06/03/2012
For our health, maybe we should limit articles like this to no more than 50 words.
09:33 PM on 06/03/2012
Children rarely if any make any of there own money so it is Parent's who ultimately have control over what they drink, NOT beverage companies.