iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Laura Bornfreund

GET UPDATES FROM Laura Bornfreund
 

Why Suspension Makes No Sense in the Early Grades

Posted: 03/22/2012 12:36 pm

Picture this situation: Two six-year-old boys, Jason and Michael, get into a food fight at lunch. Globs of macaroni and cheese fly across the room. The lunchroom supervisor sends them both to the principal's office. The principal suspends the boys from school for two days.

Will the suspension correct the behavior? Not in the long-term. Research tells us that consequences for acting out must fit the misbehavior. Unless discipline focuses on teaching children how to act appropriately, they won't learn anything from it. For young children in the early grades, especially, this means that suspension, or worse expulsion or arrest, is never a good solution.

Unfortunately, many schools aren't paying attention to the research.

Suspension in the early grades is becoming a disturbing trend: Elementary schools are suspending children who are still learning to read, control their bodies and manage their emotions to deal with their behavior problems. In the past few weeks, reports surfaced in the Washington, DC metro area about young children who have been suspended or expelled for fighting, throwing tantrums and disrupting the class. Recently, a school in California suspended a 6-year-old for brushing against his friend's groin while playing. In Florida, an 8-year-old with special needs was arrested last February and charged with aggravated-assault for throwing a piece of a pipe at his teachers. Also last year, a school in New York City suspended a 9-year-old boy for two days for putting a "kick me" sign on another student.

A suspension won't make that 9-year-old think twice about making another sign. Many students in this age group, especially in kindergarten and the early grades, may not even understand why they've been told not to get on the school bus for one or two days in row. The "lesson" of their punishment is likely lost on them. According to a paper from the Civil Rights Project at UCLA and The Equity Project at Indiana University, suspension can actually harm students in the long-term. Suspended students are more likely to struggle academically and drop out of school because often they are the same students who need the most support from school. Missing multiple days or being suspended multiple times only drags students further behind.

Children learn to act appropriately through their interactions with parents, teachers and peers. But not every child develops the social-emotional skills that help them control their behavior -- such as understanding their feelings, managing emotions, regulating behavior and developing empathy -- at the same time. And not every child has had the benefit of an early education and stable home situation that gives them a chance to practice these skills.

One study from Child Trends reported that kindergarten teachers rate 20 percent of their students lacking these skills. Many children learn to manage their emotions or control their impulses in kindergarten and first grade. But for others it sometimes takes much longer. That's why elementary schools should use discipline as teaching tool instead of as punishment.

Better disciplining options exist. In the food fight between Jason and Michael, for example, the principal could have instructed the boys to clean the tables in the cafeteria instead of leaving for recess. For other more serious infractions, schools could call a parent conference or ask parents to come to school with the student to help manage their behavior. In many cases, students with troubling behavior should meet with the guidance counselor whose job is to build a relationship with the student, uncover the roots of the behavior problems and help parents and teachers decide how to address them. Some innovative schools and preschools are also starting to use mental health specialists to give teachers tips on preventing children's outbursts and handling challenging behavior.

"There is actually a lot teachers can do to prevent problem behavior," says Walter Gilliam, director of the Edward Zigler Center in Child Development and Social Policy at the Yale Child Study Center. By sticking to routines and smoothing transitions from one activity to the next, he says, chaotic behavior problems can be curtailed.

Alternatives to suspension take more thought, time and in some cases investment -- like making counselors available. But those investments are worth it to help children learn from their mistakes, and develop the skills that will ultimately keep bad behavior from repeating. In the early grades, discipline should be a teaching tool. Suspension does not teach. All too often, it is the canned response. When it comes to young children, even one suspension is too many.

 

Follow Laura Bornfreund on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lbornfreund

 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Laura Bornfreund
11:30 AM on 03/23/2012
I'm glad to see my post has generated so much discussion.

As a former 4th grade teacher for several years, I do understand the type of behaviors that occur in schools.

It's not only the well-behaved children that deserve and need a chance to learn, it is all children. This means that schools (teachers and staff) play an important role in handling behavior challenges.

Parents definitely play a significant role in teaching their children how to behave appropriately, but they do not play the only role. Teachers of young children especially, preK-3rd grade, have a responsibility to teach social-emotional skills, including self-regulation. These skills are just as important as cognitive skills.

It is also absolutely correct that the other children should not have to worry about being threatened or punched! Suspending the child from school, however, won't keep that behavior from happening again. There are options that can recognize and address that hitting is not acceptable and teach the child what is appropriate behavior. I mention some suggestions in my post. The consequence must fit the misbehavior, otherwise the lesson will be lost on the child.

Some behaviors problems are the result of deeper problems and in my post I discuss the important role of guidance counselors. I also say "Some innovative schools and preschools are also starting to use mental health specialists to give teachers tips on preventing children's outbursts and handling challenging behavior."
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
12:41 AM on 03/23/2012
The real purpose of suspension is to give the well-behaved children a chance to learn! Come up with a better solution, and teachers will be happy to use it, but no one wants to sacrifice the education of twenty-some students for the misbehavior of a few.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:23 AM on 03/23/2012
What a load of hooey! I'm not at all surprised that an "analyst" wrote this article. It's obviously not written by someone who works in a school regularly or has any idea of the unsafe behaviors common in schools today.

If a child doesn't understand why he or she can't go on the bus for a few days, then that can be explained to them. They can understand why a toy is taken away if they misuse it, they can understand being grounded from going outside to play if being punished, but they can't understand why they can't go to school if they misbehave? Please! They're not that dumb.

For some reason, we seem to accept that restraining orders are appropriate for people who can't behave and prison is appropriate for people who can't behave, but somehow suspensions are not acceptable? And yet restraining orders and prison could definitely be in the future of children who live without stern consequences.

This isn't about harming a child's psyche or education, this is about how too many ivory tower type people have bought into the thinking that everyone is responsible for children's behavior except their parents. If they don't have a stable home, the social workers better get to work and teach the parents how to make a stable home. Schools do not exist to fill every gap in dysfunctional families or in dyfunctional societies no matter what the ivory tower types prefer to believe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
09:41 PM on 03/22/2012
Suspensions means the kid stays at home and perhaps plays video games. Better to have an in-school suspension: principal's office all day with a plethora of work to accomplish throughout the day, no recess with friends, having to write and read an apology to the teacher in front of the class.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:56 PM on 03/22/2012
A principal doesn't have time to supervise a student all day in detention and most other schools don't have staff to do that either. If a child has been so disruptive to be sent home, then it's up to the parents to change the child's behavior. If they need help, they can contact a counselor or behavior specialist or doctor or whomever they want, but they are responsible for teaching their child right from wrong. This is not the job of those at the school.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
see-ellen2001
12:37 AM on 03/23/2012
Hlynn: Yes, it is the parent's responsibility but the reality is some parents are either not equipped to do it, do not care, or feel the school is persecuting them and/or their child. In Ontario, school boards provide access to behaviouralists, social workers etc. to work with a student who has extremely difficult issues. For a student without an identified disability, who just is 'not making good choices', schools do take responsibility for correcting a childs behavior while at school. Where I work, the kids do sit in the principals office. Even if the principal is not in the room, the student is in eyeshot of the secretary. There is also a resource room or another teachers room. This of course is for non-violent, relatively minor infractions. if only all kids had parents who can give the attention to any issues but they don't.
08:59 PM on 03/22/2012
Amen! Excellent article on an issue that is coming up more and more frequently. I would go a step further and say that suspension is not the best solution even for older children/teens. If the goal is to teach kids better emotional and behavioral regulation, then sending them out of school does nothing to teach those skills. As a child psychologist I am seeing children suspended at younger ages, without regard for how to actually help them overcome the challenges they are facing. I'm glad you spotlighted the fact that schools aren't paying attention to the research on this issue (and I would argue many other issues as well!). It's time to implement strategies that actually work to address the problem behavior!
-Nicole Beurkens, PhD
Licensed Psychologist
www.HorizonsDRC.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 PM on 03/22/2012
Children are supposed to learn emotional and behavioral regulation from their parents, at home. If you're saying that "sending them out of school does nothing to teach those skills", then you're saying the parents are incompetent at parenting. And if they are truly that incompetent, then they should get some outside help. It is not the job of the school staff to teach them how to be effective parents.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
12:44 AM on 03/23/2012
It may not be best for the misbehaving child, but what about the damage the trouble-makers inflict on my ADD child, who can barely hold her focus? Do her rights to a manageable classroom mean nothing? Is it okay to toss her education for a child that acts up?
Ultimately, I wound up home schooling because behavior issues, not hers, but other students, made school such torture I had not the heart to keep her in it.
07:49 PM on 03/22/2012
This article helped increase my knowledge for how to handle extremely out of control students who have no idea how to handle themselves by exactly this much: 0%.

It was written in true educrat-speak: here's the problem, here's what teachers do wrong in how they currently address that problem, teachers you're doing it wrong and it's all your fault. The end.

Here is what teachers *wish* educrats would say: here's the problem, we know where the problem starts (*cough* in the home before and leading up to the age of 5 when children start school *cough*), teachers this isn't your fault but here is exactly what we want you to do to deal with it--try this, if that doesn't work, do this, if that doesn't help, do this instead.

Yes, we have actually researched and hands-on documented these steps and that's how and why we know they'll work with your students. We are highly trained experts with many years' experience working with out of control, poorly parented children. We do not blame you at all; we know your teacher education programs never prepared you to deal with the fundamental lack of home support American society is plagued with. Yes, we are addressing the poor parenting in this country also, with these awesome programs run by trained experts with many years of experience helping parents who were never truly prepared to be parents.

I mean, a girl can dream, right?
09:07 PM on 03/22/2012
As a former general and special education teacher I take issue with many of the comments you made here. If you are unaware of how to handle problem behaviors in your classroom, there are many sources of information to access the strategies you need (start with the following if you'd like: http://www.livesinthebalance.org/; http://www.loveandlogic.com/; http://www.crisisprevention.com/home.aspx; http://www.pbis.org/).

While it may be convenient to think that all child issues begin in the home prior to them entering school, this is not the case. Clearly parents play a critical role in the development of their children and helping them be ready for school. However, some children have developmental challenges that persist beyond the start of formal schooling despite the best parenting efforts. I would encourage you to be very careful about throwing around absolutes blaming parents exclusively and "educrats" (as you call them) for pointing out flaws in our school systems.

I hope you are able to find more ways to feel competent with challenging students.
-Nicole Beurkens, PhD
Licensed Psychologist
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:42 AM on 03/23/2012
Dr. Beurkens, when was the last time you taught full time in a classroom? Was it before or after IDEA? Was it before or after NCLB? Was it before or after children started bringing guns to school to kill students and teachers? Was it before or after schools having lawsuits brought against them for bullying? Was it before or after all the media-loving teacher bashing, publishing educator "ratings" in newspapers, "Parent Trigger", and union busting? Was it before or after all the budget cuts which means more students in a classroom--often containing "inclusion" students without aides--and fewer counselors and fewer school staff in general? Was it before or after the large increase of students with FAS/FAE and drug-affected children coming to school? How long ago were you a general education teacher and special ed teacher, and how long did you teach?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:30 AM on 03/23/2012
You can dream, but don't hold your breath, sun in her belly.

The people who don't work in schools have plenty of advice for those who do, but they're "hit and run" people who don't actually do the day-to-day work in schools or understand (or care) how a few children with severe behaviors can disrupt a class so no learning gets done. They're content to throw out comments and criticisms, but they wouldn't last a week doing what a teacher is required to do. It's the arrogance and disdain of their statements that let teachers know they don't know what they're talking about and they don't actually have long term classroom experience, so their unsolicited advice is worthless.
01:30 PM on 03/23/2012
What a shame that this has been your experience.
01:39 PM on 03/22/2012
Sorry, but when a sadistic little seven year old has two friends hold other kids while he punches them during recess (as happened in my kids' schools), then suspension is in order. I don't care what it does for the bully, but the other kids should not have to put up with that behavior.
03:29 PM on 03/22/2012
You are absolutely right that the other children should not have to worry about being threatened or punched! Suspending the child from school, however, won't keep that behavior from happening again. There are other, better, options that can recognize and address that hitting is not acceptable and teach the child what is appropriate behavior.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:03 AM on 03/23/2012
It will keep the behavior from happening again if the parents--as they should--take responsibility for their own children. If children are that out of control, it is up to the parents--not the school staff--to get them the help they need. Our principal suspends children precisely because it inconveniences the parents and forces them to get involved in solving the problem. Sometimes suspension is the only thing parents will respond to--as pathetic as that fact is.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
12:46 AM on 03/23/2012
Name one better option that is both legal and effective. All I hear is crickets!