I hate to nit-pick, but is it possible that Martha Coakley lost her bid to become Senator of Massachusetts not because people knew her too little but because they just might have known her too well?
I didn't follow the race super closely and I certainly haven't studied the exit polls, but I have heard an awful lot about Coakley's failure to define herself. It's certainly possible that the entire debacle turned only on national politics, Democratic arrogance, Massachusetts sexism, and Tea Party backlash, but just on the off chance it swayed some of those 100,000 voters who made the difference, is Coakley's actual record worth a peek?
Described as a traditional liberal, Coakley was hardly a Ted Kennedy, especially in her chosen field of criminal justice. Here's a state Attorney General who despite forensic mistakes, lies and evidence of crime lab incompetence, argued personally at the Supreme Court that it was too much of a burden on prosecutors to require crime lab technicians to submit to questioning by defense attorneys in court. That was too much for the Supremes-- even Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia disagreed with Coakley on that one (and decided in favor of the defense.)
Maybe some voters remembered the "Aqua Teen Hunger Force" hoax in which Boston police wildly overreacted to a stupid promotional stunt and Coakley defended the cops.
And let's not forget, Coakley might never have built the profile to run for Attorney General if it hadn't been for her prosecution of Louise Woodward, a young British nanny convicted of shaking an infant to death. As soon as legally possible, a judge reduced that conviction from murder to manslaughter but not before Woodward had been separated from her family and vilified around the globe.
As AG, Coakley defended bogus sex abuse charges against day care workers. On the Fells Acres Day Care convictions Wall Street Journal reporter Dorothy Rabinowitz, who won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage, told The Boston Globe, "Martha Coakley was a very, very good soldier who showed she would do anything to preserve this horrendous assault on justice." Apparently learning nothing, she opposed a state innocence commission to review shaky convictions. The list goes on...
Sexism certainly played a part in the way Coakley was treated in the senate race, and in the media. Her cold-fish personal style came in for no end of abuse, but it's sexist, too, to downplay her (barracuda) professional record. Before the President and the Dems take another dive to the right, it's at least worth asking: If the Dems had backed a real live, living-and-breathing progressive in the primaries, might things have turned out differently?
The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.
How will Trump’s administration impact you? Learn more