iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Laurel Schwartz

GET UPDATES FROM Laurel Schwartz
 

Why Can't We All Just Get Along?

Posted: 06/28/2012 9:52 am

When I first became a teacher, a veteran teacher advised me that good teachers borrow from others and great teachers steal. Then he gave me his entire social studies curriculum. Teaching and learning can be isolating, both at the classroom and school levels. It's easy to stay in our own room, your own building, your own district, and not venture into someone else's space. And it's humbling to learn from others' successes, even if you're in the business of teaching and learning.

In the name of discovering the panacea that will close the achievement gap, we Americans have created charter, district, screened, unscreened, pilot, magnet, in-district charter, and empowerment schools. The labels we give our public schools seem to be never ending. We're trying to be innovative. Education Secretary Arne Duncan played a large role in this by creating the Race to the Top grant program that motivated states to compete for jumbo federal education grants in return for passing large reforms in state legislatures. For those Americans who were lucky enough to receive a high quality education and don't work in the education sector, the alphabet soup of school choice may be foreign to you. And for those Americans who are simply trying to get the best education for their children, so many options can be overwhelming.

With all of these new types of schools we are willing to try, we're forgetting how important it is to learn from each other's successes. In some cities, notably New York, charter and district schools have acrimonious relationships with each other, which is, in part, a product of schools competing over scarce space.

When the late Dr. Ray Budde, a former education professor at University of Michigan first coined the term "charter school" in the 1970s, he envisioned spaces where teachers would be able to innovative with their pedagogy and share their findings with colleagues in traditional public schools. Last week, the American Federation of Teachers took a step towards inspiring collaboration by launching sharemylesson.com, a website modeled off of the Times Education Supplement, a British teacher collaboration website.

The concept of sharemylesson.com is far from revolutionary. Teach for America created TFANet, a website that its teachers use to share anything from lesson plans to job leads. The International Baccalaureate, a college-preparatory program that schools around the world use as an alternative to Advanced Placement Exams, heavily relies on its Online Curriculum Centre, allowing teachers to collaborate around the world. At the school level, schools build internal servers that their teachers use to collaborate with their lesson planning. A recent article in the Atlantic Monthly praised Finland's schools for outperforming the rest of the developed world, and also for being consistently high quality. Why? Because they collaborate.

So as a nation that is so committed to innovating, why are our schools so hesitant to collaborate and share best practices? Americans are raised from infancy to be competitive. We rank our teachers, our schools, and our students. In our quest to become and remain the best, we're forgetting the importance of teamwork. As we build new types of schools for our children and reform those that already exist, we must share what works and remember that while an excellent education can take many different forms, it is the right of every American child.

 
FOLLOW EDUCATION
When I first became a teacher, a veteran teacher advised me that good teachers borrow from others and great teachers steal. Then he gave me his entire social studies curriculum. Teaching and learning ...
When I first became a teacher, a veteran teacher advised me that good teachers borrow from others and great teachers steal. Then he gave me his entire social studies curriculum. Teaching and learning ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:51 PM on 07/01/2012
Finland also does not emphasize testing. You need to include this fact in your analysis. Teachers can collaborate until they are blue in the face. But, until you rid the schools of the drill/kill approach, nothing will change!
12:04 PM on 06/30/2012
I agree with those of you question the merit of Arne Duncan's misguided plan. On collaboration: Real collaboration requires time, which is amply provided to Finnish teachers though minimally to public school teachers on our country. As a former private school teacher and a current public school teacher, I don't buy the "many options" argument for a minute. While I've heard of some excellent charter schools, their biggest advantage is that they don't have to jump through the same hoops as public schools. This is, in essence, just another way to divert funds from schools and students who need the most support and place them in the hands of those who need them the least.
03:59 PM on 07/01/2012
I know very few teachers who like charter schools. Contrary to popular belief, charters demand much more from their teachers, and make them jump threw many more hoops. Furthermore, the charters in Los Angeles do not do as well on the state tests as the public schools. And have not for years. Stressing teachers out, and taking away their rights does not improve instruction.
09:12 AM on 06/29/2012
This is a joke! I read this post and the Adam Stich post and have never seen any two people swing and miss so terribly. Collaboration is one small piece in this system and I find that the way both bloggers try to simpify this issue of school performance as being collaboration, insulting. In Finland there is no high stakes testing. Finland does testing to measure what students have learned. If they find students aren't learning something then they use it to support the educator to be a better educator. In American the opposite exists. Here we find a huge disconnect between learning and achievement. The idea that students are learning for these standardized tests is so far from the truth. Students in todays classrooms are learning how to take a test. State standardized tests are a great measure for how well schools teach to a test. Test scores in this country are being used for pay, as a measure for letting teachers go, or student.This is your RTTT grant! Rather than going back and providing the necessary professional development to improve instruction and school environment they use these tests to punish schools and teachers for standardized scores not making AYP. The only way you are going to do anything meaningful in education is if you change societies perception of eduation, place value on getting an education, and let educators get down to the job of teaching...
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Laurel Schwartz
08:43 AM on 06/29/2012
Check out my friend and colleague AJ Stich's blog in response to this post: http://teacherexperiment.blogspot.com/.

Thanks to AJ for insightful comments about what we can learn from the Finnish school system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
08:15 AM on 06/29/2012
Sharing lesson plans is a waste of time. The valuable thing about lessons plans is creating them and ingesting the information so you can disseminate it competently. Simply taking another person's hard work and trying to parrot it misses the pint.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceydouglas
outside the box
11:25 PM on 06/28/2012
Race to the Top is nothing more than a bribery scheme. Arne Duncan has done nothing to help schools at a time when school districts are facing unprecedented budget cuts. As class sizes grow and programs are cut, Arne would rather award precious dollars to states that have met his RTTT demands to implement expensive management programs instead of putting the money in the classroom. It is a tragedy that such an unqualified individual is our Secretary of Education. That you seem to imply that RTTT is a great reform, I question your understanding of what it means to educate children, especially those in our poorest neighborhoods. But then, again, I see that you are a former Teach For Awhile employee who has already left the classroom. Teaching evidently isn't really your thing. BTW: Public school teachers are not allowed to be innovative. We have to follow the script, so please don't talk about sharing best practices. We're not allowed to use them.
04:02 PM on 06/28/2012
I have always collaborated with my teaching colleagues and most of them with me. This is one very big difference between the "educational culture" and the "business culture." Successful teaching is built upon strong collaboration among educators, within and across schools.

However, the strong push to run schools like businesses is undermining these efforts. If my pay is going to be determined based upon comparing my test scores with the teacher down the hall, or in another school, how likely am I to share my best lessons and support ALL students? If I am going to be in competition to keep my job with that new teacher who just came on board, how willing am I going to be to take them under my wing and help them become the best they can be in the classroom?

When I consider my personal goals, they include doing all I can to educate ALL children, not just the ones in MY classroom - but this is something the business community DOES NOT GET! They see the world in competitive terms and in some ways, are blind to the benefits of cooperation.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Laurel Schwartz
03:53 PM on 06/28/2012
Check out my friend and colleague AJ Stich's blog in response to this post: http://teacherexperiment.blogspot.com/2012/06/why-does-finland-have-better-schools.html.

Thanks to AJ for insightful comments about what we can learn from the Finnish school system.
05:58 PM on 06/28/2012
FYI. Your link is not working. It says the page does not exist. ;)