- BIG NEWS:
- Health
- |
- Parenting
- |
- Grandparenting
- |
- Relationships
- |
The messy news about Natasha Richardson's skiing tragedy has been grotesque and rushed. So is last week's Enquirer headline, "The End," featuring a photo of a gaunt, bald Patrick Swayze. Rush Limbaugh recently assured his millions of listeners that Ted Kennedy won't make it to see health care reform.
The ghoulish, hasty public deathwatch by the media exploits and reflects our dark side, our urge to rubberneck at an accident site, to scan the tabloid headlines and talk about the terminally ill.
A public figure's life may offer privileges, but dying is democratic, arriving eventually for all, often too early. In fact, in many ways celebrities are worse off when dying; they have to endure rumor and innuendo along with their grief, along with photos and video and headlines of their imminent demise, or a demise that hasn't yet happened. We observed Tony Snow's hair and weight loss at his press briefings for Bush. We read speculation about Elizabeth Edwards' health problems forcing her to stay with her unfaithful husband. We will no doubt be closely following Ruth Bader Ginsberg's chemo schedule and energy level.
A few public figures manage to avoid it. Ed Bradley, the easygoing 60 Minutes journalist with the earring and the big laugh told few about his leukemia, and was spared the death watch. But when it comes to public scrutiny, most celebs are dead -- dying -- ducks.
I'm especially sensitive to this. Because of unfortunate timing my late husband Chaim Stern endured three months of this kind of thing in Miami as he was dying of a brain tumor. In July, 2001 the Miami Herald ran a happy photo essay about his coming to town to become rabbi of a temple there. Chaim was known as the liturgist of the reform movement of Judaism, and his move to Miami was welcomed. Just a month later, when we arrived, the paper's gossip column noted our arrival -- and Chaim's sudden brain surgery. From that point local media tracked his health and hinted about his imminent death.
All the while he was still trying to lead a temple, and I was trying to keep his hopes up that he had maybe two more years of life. Hope is a fragile and precious thing. But Chaim read the columns, and he heard the dire comments from those who read the columns. He kept his grace and composure. But the hounding and speculating made things more difficult for both of us. He died on a ventilator three months after the first news.
I once saw vultures waiting for an animal to die. Those wrongly reviled birds clean the environment and subsist on the remains. But media vultures? They mostly just play "gotcha," and get off on bad news and higher ratings.
And I guess the public is interested - it's human nature, after all. But the media should not rush, and should not exploit the dying. There should be a greater care and responsibility to report people's death with dignity, clarity and fact-checking. They should be given respite, when possible. The ill and their loved ones should not have to read false and exaggerated reports about their demise.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
So sorry to hear of your experience.
I think that when people are sick it is best for them to tell as few people as possible. Keep everything on a need to know basis. If everybody knows, they start treating you as if you are the illness and this can prevent recovery.
That is multiplied many times over if people are in the public eye.
As human beings we will always be fascinated by death. No one knows what death is like and this causes us to speculate and ask questions. We are afraid of dying and we are intruigued by the notion of it. This leads us to sometimes talk about it in an inappropriate way. Hopefully the family will now be allowed to grieve quietly and privately.
One of the problems with the Richardson case was that friends of family and at least one person from transport team who brought her back to New York made what turned out to be accurate comments about the case which led others to declare her death over a day before she actually died. In a tragic case like this, particularly where her children were involved, it was a shame it became such a media circus.
I think, Lea, that most people are completely divorced from the notion that they are mortal. We don't see many commercials for coffins with racing stripes, but we are expected to consider race car driving at 90. We live forever in America! So death is always something that happens to someone else.
It's hard not to get sucked into rubber-necking the death of a famous person ... it's presented as something that is actually expected to be done by the press. Every maudlin phrase written or spoken in the media is meant to make it seem like the death of a famous stranger is personally meaningful to all of us ... not just a craven form of entertainment.
We are all susceptible to being sucked into an unseemly deathwatch, but we should also ask ourselves:
"Would I want the last days I have on this earth, with my friends, and family to be reduced to some stranger's petty source of entertainment?"
appreciate your thoughtful post.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with