iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leda Huta

GET UPDATES FROM Leda Huta
 

Keystone Pipeline Could Push Endangered Whooping Crane Into Extinction

Posted: 09/06/11 05:43 PM ET

If you were to choose a route through which to move toxic, highly corrosive, sludgy crude oil, would you place it on the same narrow corridor used by one of the world's most endangered birds? The Canadian energy company TransCanada did and the Obama administration is on the verge of approving that absurd proposal.

2011-09-06-image001.png
Migration Pathway -- From the US Fish & Wildlife Service

If approved by the administration, the Keystone XL tar-sands pipeline will move a half million+ barrels daily of Canadian crude 1,700 miles from Alberta, Canada to the Texas coast as soon as 2013. TransCanada would like the world to believe that their pipeline is relatively safe, claiming just one predicted spill in the first 7 years. Yet, TransCanada's existing Keystone Pipeline has experienced 12 spills -- in just 12 months of operation.

Despite assurances by pipeline operators, spills continue. The July spill of a much smaller pipeline under the Yellowstone River in Montana released 1,000 gallons of oil into the Yellowstone. The Keystone XL would be 3 times as large, carrying 600,000 of oil per day. There have been five major pipeline spills in the United States in the last 24 months. Adding nearly 2,000 miles of high-pressure pipeline carrying one of the most corrosive and dirty fuels known to man is a disaster in the making.

That doesn't sound safe, particularly not for the one of the most highly endangered birds in the world -- the Whooping crane. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) calls the Whooping crane one of the most famous symbols of America's dedication to saving its wild national heritage. Unfortunately for the crane, however, it uses the same 1,700-mile route as the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline.

2011-09-06-image002.png
Proposed Keystone Expansion Route -- From the U.S. Department of State

Whooping cranes follow the proposed path of the pipeline annually each spring, as they migrate from Texas to their breeding grounds in Canada. Along the way, they depend on the rivers, marshes, wetlands and streams for stopover and feeding habitat. Since the pipeline's proposed route crosses many of these habitats -- including the Platte River in Nebraska, one of the most important feeding and resting locations -- miles of these critical stopping points would be at risk of being fouled with sludgy, toxic tar-sands oil every day of the year.
Scientists are deeply concerned about the potential harm to Whooping Cranes. The Society for Conservation Biology -- the world's largest international conservation science society -- has recently released a press release sounding the alarm about the cranes. For instance, a recent report found that a major spill on the Platte River could result in 5.9 million gallons of toxic, corrosive tar-sands oil being dumped into the Platte.

A worst-case scenario per their research would result in nearly 8 million gallons of oil being spilled. A catastrophe of this magnitude would almost certainly decimate wildlife and potentially all that remains of this population of whooping cranes -- just 74 breeding pairs.
Deepwater Horizon mercilessly demonstrated the near impossible task of cleaning oil from a marsh or wetland. And this oil -- tar-sands oil -- is much more corrosive, toxic and difficult to clean up. Once coated with sticky oil, the birds would be unable to insulate and regulate their temperatures and could slowly die from hypothermia or acute toxicity. Imagine the brown pelicans in the Gulf but with much thicker oil (and much more endangered birds).

In addition to the grave risk of catastrophic spill, whooping cranes would be put at still further risk by the installation of aerial power lines that would be constructed to power pumping stations on the proposed pipeline route. Collisions with power lines are already the largest known cause of death for migrating Whooping cranes. This proposal would result in hundreds more miles of aerial lines throughout the birds' migrating path, compounding the likelihood of disaster. These aerial lines won't be built without the pipeline and the pipeline won't be built without them.

This pipeline simply cannot be built without putting the whooping crane and as many as 10 other endangered species at great and unnecessary peril. Despite that, the State department recently published its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) asserting that there would be no significant impacts along the proposed corridor. Alarmingly, the State Department declined to include any analysis from the soon to be completed USFWS biological opinion regarding the Keystone XL Pipeline. In doing so, the State Department has completely ignored the impacts of the proposed pipeline on the highly endangered Whooping crane and in so doing, ignored the requirements of the Endangered Species Act.

The Obama administration could announce its decision whether to block this remarkably flawed proposal at any time. The White House needs to hear from you. Please go to www.stopextinction.org to tell the President to block the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Photo Credits:
Migration Pathway -- From the US Fish & Wildlife Service
Proposed Keystone Expansion Route -- From the U.S. Department of State

 

Follow Leda Huta on Twitter: www.twitter.com/savespecies

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:23 PM on 09/08/2011
Keystone XL is mostly an American project. This is infrastructure that will move oil from a landlocked hub (Cushing) to the refineries and pipeline and ports that already exist on the Gulf.

The crazy thing is that the biggest beneficiares of this project probably won't be the Canadiens at all. It will be the American oil producers in North Dakota (who currently don't have a pipeline to transport the booming Bakken oil) and the American consumer (who mostly lives far from Cushing, and thus pays the Brent spot price and not the depressed Cushing price).

But hey, let's not try to think rationally. We're protestors and environemtalists! We don't need facts! We need to "feel good about ourselves".
01:14 PM on 09/08/2011
It's no wonder environmentalists can't gain any traction when they make up circumstances to support their position. This is a fake problem again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 AM on 09/07/2011
The United States has 55000 miles of major crude oil pipeline, plus far more pipeline for natural gas, gasoline, ethylene, and so on. And some of these pipelines taker roughly the same route as the Keystone pipeline:

www.theodora.com/pipelines/united_states_pipelines_map.jpg

Yet somehow the whooping crane is with us still. Pipelines are not threat Huta would have us believe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blarneydude
I can handle the truth. Now let's talk about you.
10:39 AM on 09/07/2011
"TransCanada would like the world to believe that their pipeline is relatively safe, claiming just one predicted spill in the first 7 years."

Excellent! Only one catastrophic, we'll-forget-BP-and-the-Gulf-when-this-one-happens spill, and otherwise we're home free. I'm down!

Given the world that the politico-corporate complex is creating for our children, all the fuss the right makes about fetuses is utterly inexplicable. Were I a fetus, I'd pass, thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
11:04 PM on 09/06/2011
I understand being a good neighbor.

Is this the price we have to pay to be a good neighbor?

The next time we send troops into combat the Canadians better be there!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:08 AM on 09/07/2011
The Keystone pipeline should not be approved as a favour to Canadians. It should be approved because it's best for America.

And it might just cut down on the number wars abroad.
02:12 PM on 09/09/2011
yeah it might instead start a whole bunch of wars at home and between Canada & the US. and the US citizens and its government.
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
09:16 PM on 09/06/2011
From the article:

"State Department has completely ignored the impacts of the proposed pipeline on the highly endangered Whooping crane and in so doing, ignored the requirements of the Endangered Species Act.'

Thank you for this informative article. If the State Dept ignored the rquirements of the Endangered Species Act, that is one more of a multitude of reasons to oppose the Keystone XL pipeline. There is a comment period open until 10/9/11 at the State Dept. Here is the link:

http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/clientsite/keystonexl.nsf/CommentFset?OpenFrameSet
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
06:19 PM on 09/06/2011
"Could" is such an excellent word for creating an image and driving emotion. The sun "could" have a major eruption and kill most life on earth. A nearby star could go supernova and kill earth from radiation and that could happen tomorrow. You can't prove they could not happen.

With pipelines being the safest form of oil transport, the probability of her "Could Push Endangered Whooping Crane Into Extinction" being true is vanishingly small and probably below my supernova hypothesis. It is clear that she has an agenda that has nothing to do with truth or significance.

There is a certain irony when the citizens don't believe the environmentalists on real issues like global CO2 emissions after being bombarded with thousands of "could" type FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) claims in areas that turn out to be irrelevant nonsense. The environmental activist need to relearn the story about the boy who cried "wolf". There are real issues.
photo
girldog
I support Elizabeth Warren
09:12 PM on 09/06/2011
There is *nothing* safe about the Keystone XL pipeline.
FreeHat
Really?
06:16 PM on 09/06/2011
Is the Whooping Crane attracted to oil? How can a meter wide, or so, pipeline be of danger to a bird that flies through the air?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blarneydude
I can handle the truth. Now let's talk about you.
10:45 AM on 09/07/2011
I'm hoping this won't come as a shock, but it might.

Whooping cranes DON'T FLY ALL THE TIME.

Other than that, you might read up. But I'll summarize: resting areas and feeding areas on both ends of the migration route, kaput.

Take a trip to France. In a rowboat. No food or water. You might start getting it about, oh, twenty miles off Cape Cod.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blarneydude
I can handle the truth. Now let's talk about you.
10:47 AM on 09/07/2011
Sorry. I meant resting areas and feeding areas ALL ALONG the migration route.

They're testing tar balls found on Alabama beaches as I type. Do you remember why those tar balls happened?

I think we've identified the problem.