More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Lee Camp

Lee Camp

Posted: May 7, 2010 11:22 AM

LEAKED: BP Memo About the Positives of the Gulf Oil Spill

What's Your Reaction:

2010-05-07-memo_final.jpg

 
 
 

Follow Lee Camp on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LeeCamp

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LastAngryWoman
waiting for godot
08:07 AM on 05/17/2010
"Lubed up hurricanes hurt less". Hahahhaha.
10:10 PM on 05/15/2010
BP is afflicted with chronic bladder infections which may cause urinary urgency & leakage.
10:43 PM on 05/09/2010
It looks like notes for David Letterman's top ten.
08:46 PM on 05/09/2010
Sadly, I wouldn't be shocked if something like this was actually sent.

They are that desperate to look good in all of this
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Snwbnny9
All I can say is that my life is pretty plain
04:56 PM on 05/07/2010
Fiery oil moat FTW
01:49 PM on 05/07/2010
im not ready to laugh about this.

A piece yesterday in the Washington Post reveals that the Obama administration gave BP an exemption from any detailed analysis of the company’s environmental impact. Indeed, BP’s lease at Deeper Horizen received a “categorical exclusion” from the National Enviromental Policy Act:

BP’s exploration plan for Lease 206, which calls the prospect of an oil spill “unlikely,” stated that “no mitigation measures other than those required by regulation and BP policy will be employed to avoid, diminish or eliminate potential impacts on environmental resources.”

While the plan included a 13-page environmental impact analysis, it minimized the prospect of any serious damage associated with a spill, saying there would be only “sub-lethal” effects on fish and marine mammals, and “birds could become oiled. However it is unlikely that an accidental oil spill would occur from the proposed activities.”

Kierán Suckling, executive director of the environmental group Center for Biological Diversity, said the administration’s waiver “put BP entirely in control” of the way it conducted its drilling.

“The agency’s oversight role has devolved to little more than rubber-stamping British Petroleum’s self-serving drilling plans,” Suckling said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
groucho
03:29 PM on 05/11/2010
Humor is what gets people through their darkest hours. I can barely read about this disaster, I've sobbed more than once. But I need a break from time to time.
01:22 PM on 05/07/2010
Oil spills happen, both naturally and otherwise. We know this, and we have known this for many years. But we still need to drive our cars to work, and make plastic, and heat our homes. No one is willing to give that up, no matter how many dead manatees make it onto the news. And so any reactionary measures are likely to cause more harm than good. The best we can do is minimize oil spills by imposing rigorous standards of procedure, multiple layers of oversight, and trying to reduce overall consumption of oil as much as possible.

Here's what we have to gain from getting out of oil (Middle Eastern or otherwise): (1) no more dependence on decadent dictatorships - we can't really go around preaching peace and freedom when we're forced to publicly make out with crime lords, opium barons, and people who consider themselves living gods; (2) significantly reduced greenhouse gas pollution; (3) we can stop getting ripped off by OPEC; (4) we can avoid coming tensions with Russia, Canada, and Greenland over access to Arctic oil deposits; (5) the exorbitant prices our citizens pay to meet their daily energy needs will no longer line the pockets of speculators, currency manipulators, and day-traders; (6) we will have incentives to develop new energy technologies, which we can then market to the rest of the world.

Read more: http://www.theinductive.com/blog/2010/5/7/our-visceral-energy-policy.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:37 PM on 05/07/2010
Kudos for trying to conserve!
Domestic oil could supply about 2% of the US consumption (at full "drill, baby, drill" bore), so it's great that you think we can reduce consumption by 98%.
How?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:01 PM on 05/07/2010
I would rather rely on middle east, than have a gulf of oil. Perhaps how we feel about middle east dommence in oil, is how others feel about our's in technology. Not nice to be at the needing end, but we are, it's a fact. We can't have it all. If this keeps leaking for months, or years, what do we tell our poor caribbean neighbors who's fishing water's and tourist beaches we just destroyed? Sorry, but we were paying 3 cents a gallon too much, so we drilled in a place where mistakes can never be fixed? Bad enough we pump water into the land wells to replace the oil, and then complain we have no drinking water. How much did this well cost? how about the law suits, and clean up, that's just for BP, and then the cost to the rest of us, unemployment for resturants and tourism, increased sickness, etc. Wow, what if those billions had gone into wind, and solar resources.
03:44 AM on 05/12/2010
If those billions had gone to wind and solar we wouldn't need much oil! And we wouldn't have a disaster that will take a lifetime to clean up.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MamaBird62
01:10 PM on 05/07/2010
Love Lee Camp.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitney Kyle
12:21 PM on 05/07/2010
It should be bottled. Add vinegar, poor on salad.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mowgli2071
08:25 PM on 05/12/2010
We should put the BP executives in prison until ALL of the oil that leaked is gone from the gulf ecosystem --and every, and I mean EVERY meal that the BP executives eat, should be covered in salad oil, while they're there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
megster002
11:45 AM on 05/07/2010
Oh my God. This is AWESOME.