Here's an interesting tidbit about Sarah Palin's home state of Alaska: it's socialist.
When pundits refer to Alaska as the 'reddest of red states,' they could as easily be referring to its oligopolistic resource extraction-based economy and its redistributionist state taxation regime as to its electoral tendencies. Eighty percent of Alaska's state government revenues come from just one source, oil. That's just ten percent less than in Saudi Arabia and thirty percent more than in Venezuela. Because of this enormous oil wealth, Alaskans don't pay state-levied income or sales taxes, and have the lowest tax obligations in the country. In fact, Alaska residents are paid out directly from the industry, in the form of annual checks of up to $2,000 from the oil industry-financed "Alaska Permanent Fund."
When the Alaskan state government needs more money, legislators don't have to resort to jacking up taxes on working Alaskans, or scrapping social programs, or turning to 'market-based solutions.' They can just raise taxes on the profits of Big Oil, as Sarah Palin did last year (not as bold a move as one might assume, given that record profit-making oil companies in Alaska had just been exposed for bribing legislators) in an effort to attain for the Alaskan people "an equitable share for our resources," and like President Hugo Chavez did in his country a few months ago for much the same reason. In fact, just last week, Palin cut checks of $1,200 to every Alaska resident to offset the burden of rising fuel prices, paid for by taxes on the oil industry. That beats the hell out of McCain's 'gas tax holiday' for making a real difference in the pocketbooks of working Alaskans. No wonder she's so popular.
If Palin's approach to taxation of the oil industry reflected a governing philosophy that drove her vision for the country at large, I might just be tempted to revise my opinion of the McCain ticket. If such were the case, under a President Palin (a distinct possibility should the McCain campaign prevail, given the candidate's age and health), we might see Countrywide Financial taxed as never before, with the proceeds going to assist foreclosure victims in buying new homes. We might see the thirty cents on the dollar that the insurance industry takes from your premium payments and directs toward corporate profits and overhead reduced to twenty cents, with the other dime going to relieve patients saddled with impossibly high medical debt payments, or to creating a Medicare-for-All system of national universal healthcare coverage. Or we might see the defense industry taxed to pay for MRE's and flack jackets for our troops in Iraq. Such would be the dividends of an "equitable share for our resources" that we might expect from a socialist government such as the one Sarah Palin runs in Alaska. Forget about the New Deal-style big bureaucratic government programs so detested by the GOP; if Palinomics implied the kind of aggressive, direct redistribution of wealth from capital to labor that was responsible for generating those $1,200 checks, I'd be happy to give myself over to this re-tooled, pinkified marketplace.
Of course, that's just so much wishful thinking, childish fantasizing of a world in which Republican politicians believed what they said, and governed as they believed. Palin may run a quasi-socialist state government, but only because it's convenient in Alaska. No such easy solutions to budget shortfalls and rising energy prices will come in Washington DC, where the absence of an economic Everlasting Gobstopper like the Alaskan oil fields requires actual choices with actual political consequences, and where ideologies count in policy making. There, you can expect from Palin what you can expect from McCain: a government controlled by corporate lobbyists and committed to the interests they represent, and a near complete indifference to the struggles of working families.
But it's instructive to bear in mind, as conservative Republicans laud her record as governor, that much of Alaska's social welfare is based on what amounts to a socialist principle of taxing big corporations for their use of publicly owned resources and returning a portion of those profits back to regular working people trying to pay their heating bills. That Palin has been a champion of that principle is a fact that her Weekly Standard cheerleaders might just as soon forget, and that she, no doubt, will also forget as soon as she steps into the White House -- should she ever be so lucky.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Excellent post. Alaskan land and minerals are state-owned, and, according to Palin, "belong to the people." This is socialist, as defined by the Republicans themselves. Further, the state provides equal income to Alaskans for being... well, Alaskans. Again, socialist policy.
let's face it the republicans love a story, can spin any story, and don't really care about facts. palin in being a staunch creationist doesn't care about facts, even her own. a true republican -- sorry moderate republicans take back your party or leave if you don't want guilt by association.
Thanks for this interesting post Leighton. This points is yet one more reminder that the McCain folks just didn't adequately vet this woman.
She differs from McCain on issues like taxing windfall propfits, as well as the real motivation for The War in Iraq. I bet the WEEKLY STANDARD cheerleaders like Bill Kristol either didn't know, or didn't do the necessary research to see if McCain and Palin would even mesh together - politically and otherwise. All they knew was, she is a woman, and we can poach some of the disgruntled, older white woman who are furious that Obama beat Hillary during the primaries.
Now this entire matter with Palin and Alaska politics is about to blow up in their face.
Aside from the implications of what you've analyzed, your post was unquestionably insightful. Who knew Alaska would be apart of the national spotlight.
But then again: who knew that the 49th state (Hawaii) and the 50th state (Alaska) would both be represented on the two major party tickets.
After its bonus payments ignited a firestorm of...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
How would you like to live in the White House? Take the HuffPost Poll of World Leaders' Residences...
UPDATE: Paris Jackson also spoke. Watch her moving...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
Below are photos from Michael Jackson's memorial, with Mariah Carey, Lionel Richie, Smokey Robinson,...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
It's been a rocky year for Letterman and Palin. He joked...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
I get many letters like this from readers...
Posted September 2, 2008 | 03:11 AM (EST)