More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

GET UPDATES FROM Lennard Davis
 

Breaking News: Romney Is Poor! (At Least According to the IRS)

Posted: 01/18/12 03:15 PM ET

Did you know that Mitt Romney is poor? Well, he is at least from the point of view of the IRS. Romney guesses his rate is "probably closer to the 15 per cent rate than anything else." Well, the poorest income earners, those who make between $8,000 and $34,000 annually, are the only other people in the 15 per cent tax bracket. http://www.moneychimp.com/features/tax_brackets.htm That's right; only people at or near the poverty line get a tax rate like Romney's. So what's a high flying one-percenter doing paying bargain-basement taxes?

Romney makes so much money that he thinks the $374,000 he makes annually for giving speeches is "not very much." Let's see -- every time Romney bloviates for half an hour he gets $40,000 per speech. That's the top end of what the poorer citizens paying the 15 per cent taxes make in a year.

We can and should be outraged about Romney, but we should be angrier at a system that allows those at the very top to pay very little to the government. Years of lobbying on behalf of "job creators" have affected tax policy profoundly.

Let's get this straight: if you, like most Americans, make your money by working from 9 to 5 and getting a paycheck you'll be charged at a much higher rate than if your money comes from investments, rents, and royalties. If you work by the sweat of your brow, you'll pay top taxes. But f you kick back and watch your stock portfolio perform, you'll pay poverty-level taxes. Make sense?

It's a sad state of affairs that most citizens are so bamboozled that they don't even know what capital gains taxes are. Worse is that many are duped into believing the Republican refrain that capital gains taxes are "too damn high" and should be lowered further. Further? So they can pay rates below poverty level?

But it's even sadder that the top one percent are so used to being rich and getting preferential treatment on taxes that someone like Romney can be so blasé. Forget the politics of envy -- what about the politics of shame?


 
 
 

Follow Lennard Davis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/lendavis

Did you know that Mitt Romney is poor? Well, he is at least from the point of view of the IRS. Romney guesses his rate is "probably closer to the 15 per cent rate than anything else." Well, the poo...
Did you know that Mitt Romney is poor? Well, he is at least from the point of view of the IRS. Romney guesses his rate is "probably closer to the 15 per cent rate than anything else." Well, the poo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
themodernleader
03:46 PM on 01/22/2012
Oligarchs by right of inheritance are not required to pay but minimal taxes. The tax burden is thrown on the helpless, defenseless citizens who receive wages.
11:58 AM on 01/20/2012
Not only do the top 10 percent get a low tax rate, a lot of their income is not counted as income for taxation. You know, those tax breaks for hiring overseas.

Recently all businesses have been offered tax breaks for hiring here. Sometimes they are good, but most of the time they are not.
05:39 PM on 01/18/2012
Close the AMT-Altern­ative Minimum Tax Loop Hole! The Middle Class Salary Man has to pay AMT but, the Lobbyist have rigged it for the 1%. As a loyal American, I gladly pay AMT and so, should the 1%. The Vulture Capitalist have no shame, only twisted reasoning that you are anti-Capitalist for pointing out their rapacious behavior.
05:14 PM on 01/18/2012
Taxation should be based on "assets and net worth". Then everyone pays the same rate.
04:45 PM on 01/18/2012
I am a college student from a very poor family, the first to go to college. I received a full scholarship to a top tier school, which I am extremely grateful for. However, I am required by the current tax code to count part of my scholarship as income.With my scholarship "income" and wages I've earned working 50 hours a week during the summer back home, I land in the 15% tax bracket. Mr. Romney, who is worth at least 170 million dollars thinks he falls in the same 15% tax bracket. How is this just? How can somebody emerge from poverty with the tax code working against them? How is it even possible to sustain a middle class when we are taxed at a higher rate than those in the top 1%? I will be leaving college with $15,000 in debt, while my classmates, who've had their education paid for by their families and can still expect financial support from their parents, will leave debt free.
12:48 AM on 01/19/2012
You will probably pay 3% or less of your net income in income taxes. Romney does not think he is in the 15% tax bracket, the author of the article think he is. Romney said he thinks he paid about 15% of his net income in as income tax. The whole premise of the article is incorrect. You would think a distinguished professor from the University of Illinois at Chicago would know the difference.
12:04 PM on 01/20/2012
I bet Romney is paying low taxes. It is that first million that is hard to get. After that you can invest, buy bonds, businesses and land. Money makes money.

The rich don't panic and sell out of the market because they have so much money it isn'scary to them like it is to the middle class. So far that has made them richer.

It is a shame that our leaders get richer and richer instead of spending some of their money trying to build a better world for everyone, not just them and their rich friends.
03:57 PM on 01/18/2012
Romney paid 15% of his net income to the federal government as income tax. This does not mean he is in the 15% tax bracket.

What I want to know is the 15% to low for Newt and he intends to raise taxes on the rich or does this confirm taxes are too high for the rich and need to be cut further as the tax plan he has been pushing does. Talking about Romney’s 15% taxes and vulture capitalism sounds more like a Democrat candidate then a bunch of Republicans.
03:41 PM on 01/18/2012
to me, the worst part of this is that by taking advantage of tax loopholes, money that Romney earns for doing work, which is clearly "income," and should be taxed at higher rates, can be taxed as "investment profits", which qualify for the 15% tax rate.

while this may be "legal", it sure isn't "right," and is likely the major reason that Romney has resisted making his tax returns and other financial data available. its time to pay the piper, Mitt--and its gonna be more than 15%. . .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Kilbourne
06:02 PM on 01/18/2012
Maybe but if so then Soros needs to answer for it to. His rate is the same as Romney's What is good for one side is good for the other.Agree
photo
Roelvdwegen
Reality has a liberal bias.
12:36 PM on 01/20/2012
This is not about left or right this is about a system which favors the rich.
03:19 PM on 01/18/2012
Romney is following the law. No shame in that. Not sure why it's such a bad thing. I don't understand why liberals are so against capital gains taxes. Income from investing in other people and in other companies and outright risking your own capital is not evil and need not be discouraged. It's an essential part of business and economic growth. To slow or discourage that pipeline is to slow the economy.

I realize that liberals will mock anything Romney does but this is a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lennard Davis
11:05 PM on 01/18/2012
So people who go to work in factories risk nothing? There is no harm to life, limb, and sanity in working in a low-paying risk nothing? And if you invest your money in stocks, you do not "invest in other people or other companies"...you are just playing with odds. Anyone can tell you that investing in the stock market is a form of gambling. Who profits from any one's investment in the stock market? Certainly not "other people." Why should gambling in the stock market be rewarded with a lower tax than going to work?
02:49 PM on 01/18/2012
It's funny how the candidates wealth and income did not come up when John Kerry was running.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lennard Davis
11:56 AM on 01/19/2012
It sure did. Google "Kerry" and "wealth." But the reality it is that the money was his wife's. Romney is probably the richest man to run for President. My point is that the tax structure is unfair. For a really good article on this in Forbes, see: http://www.forbes.com/sites/leonardburman/2012/01/18/mitt-romneys-teachable-moment-on-capital-gains/
12:09 PM on 01/20/2012
It isn't the money they have, it is the attitude they have toward the rest of us.

FDR was very wealthy and so was JFK. They both tried to build a better country. They were not perfect but they did well toward the people here.