iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leonce Gaiter

Leonce Gaiter

Posted: January 18, 2010 11:28 AM

On MLK and What Obama Is Not

What's Your Reaction:

Progressives bemoan Obama's failure to fulfill his perceived promise to challenge the status quo. During the historic 2008 presidential campaign, Americans both black and white read his book, saw his skin, heard his occasionally preacherly speech cadences married to an academically trained intellect, and the bargain was sealed. They saw, they heard, they made assumptions, and progressives swooned.

Their assumptions were wrong. During the campaign, there was a major kerfluffle when some black commentators suggested that Barack Obama was not 'black like them.' It was a statement of truth, but unfortunately it was perverted and condemned because it was presented in language warped by centuries of ignorance, race hatred, and self-loathing. Barack Obama's appeal as a progressive game-changer, a candidate to inflict blunt-force trauma on the status quo was largely predicated on his skin color. Extensive evidence that his domestic policies sat to the right of some of his primary opponents and articles like Larissa MacFarquhar's "The Conciliator," clearly indicated that he was not the man to wage war against existing power structures. But we looked at his skin, heard the words "African-American," and assumed he had the heart of an outsider, someone born and raised to be suspicious of the status quo, born of a people willing to subvert it. None of this was true.

In fact, Barack Obama is not "black like me." Of course, he is as black as any other black man. He is as African-American as any other man or woman of African ancestry. What he is NOT is raised in the culture of the American descendants of African slaves. He is not culturally "Afro-American." This is what most Americans very imprecisely mean when we say "black" or "African-American." We are talking about the culture, not the color. We are talking about drinking in generations of lessons learned, cultural touchstones, habits of being, speech, worship and communication that have bubbled up on American soil over the past 400 years. When most of us say "black," we mean culturally Afro-American -- the culture born of the American descendants of African slaves. This Barack Obama is not. He has no association with it save accepting it in young adulthood. It is not endemic to him. For Obama, the cultural Afro-Americanism that so many voters assumed is an academic add-on, not a cultural foundation.

Color is not culture. Obama was raised by white Kansans, not the American descendants of African slaves. No Kenyan father and no stint in Malaysia, regardless of how exotic they sound to most Americans, trump the lessons he imbibed from the people who raised him. Why would we assume that white Kansans taught anything but tolerance of the American status quo and its centers of power? Yet, we saw dark skin and assumed the political iconoclasm associated with deep cultural Afro-Americanism where neither existed. And now we whine that we have been betrayed.

We let Obama's late adoption of (as opposed to nurturing within) an Afro-American cultural mantel blind us to his actual cultural foundations. We heard some sing-songy, grade B speechifying and anointed him another MLK -- another black man come to wash America's dirty moral linen. We called it a "movement" and thus made it the first "movement" in history in which nobody actually moved. It was a virtual "movement," an ersatz "movement" by proxy because its members weren't committing to any kind of long-term struggle. They were simply appointing a servant to do another MLK -- but this time we didn't ask him to wash the sins of segregation away. This time we wanted him to scrub out the Bush years.

Afro-America should have sounded the alarm. We tried. But we have allowed the majority to dictate our self-image for so long, we were unable to articulate the relevant cultural aspect of our very American being. Which is not surprising because we don't even credit ourselves with that aspect. The majority conflates color with culture, so we follow suit. The majority historically told us that "a nigger's a nigger," so we believe accordingly. We have always been told that we are culturally valueless, little more than color and a political "issue," and so we ignore our own culture; we fail to codify, painstakingly record it or teach it to our young. So a dark-skinned man raised by white Kansans is assumed to have the same cultural innards as I, and when he behaves like what he has been all along -- a typical politician who promises what must be promised to gain office and then waffles on achieving it once there, we complain that he doesn't behave in accordance with our ignorant assumptions about him.

Obama's election was a step forward for America, but his mixed-race and white cultural antecedents wrapped in dark skin and glazed with an intellectual acceptance of Afro-American culture exposed America's deep confusion about race matters. His election testified to his brilliant manipulation of that confusion.

On the negative, though, his election also highlights Afro-America's gross failure to culturally define, and therefore value itself.



 
 
 
Progressives bemoan Obama's failure to fulfill his perceived promise to challenge the status quo. During the historic 2008 presidential campaign, Americans both black and white read his book, saw his...
Progressives bemoan Obama's failure to fulfill his perceived promise to challenge the status quo. During the historic 2008 presidential campaign, Americans both black and white read his book, saw his...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:42 PM on 01/19/2010
What are you people doing! The man is the President of the United States period end of discussion.
If you haven't noticed, the ship of state is sinking. Your sitting here discussing what exactly?

Start bailing. Both the Left and the Right side of the ship is going to the BOTTOM. Misery does not have
an ethnic or color preference!

Democrat here! Old, Far left, white, (lily white) of french canadien descent, with secessionist tendencies inherted from my Texas father"s side, SO WHAT?

While were talking stupid, Most white people spend long hours and risk skin cancer to look more
what?? ans: Non-white?? Who cares?
11:53 PM on 01/18/2010
Hey, everybody! Forget all these labels. Obama is a human being, first, and foremost. Once one starts focusing on every color in the spectrum, it's easy to forget that they all belong to the singularity of "white light"! (No racial inference here)

I wouldn't care if Obama had the same parents as Romulus and Remus; as long as he intends to serve the people in the best way he sees fit. He said, right up front, that he would make decisions that not everyone would agree with. He is not an ideologue! But if everyone else is, then, no one can follow his lead, nor understand the logic of his actions or his limitations. Let's forget about "left", "right", and all of the rest of these "linguistic fences", which by their very design (in Nature) keep us stuck on stupid!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 PM on 01/18/2010
Most of us do not get to choose our culture, it has always seemed to me, that Mr.Obama, at some point, chose his. Chameleon-like he slides back and forth between the cultures. To my eye, he has always exhibited the demeanor of his midwestern heritage. Harry Reid may have chosen his words poorly, but his opinion was accurate.
08:19 PM on 01/18/2010
I am was born in DC the son of West African parents, Does that mean i can never be considered African-American because i wasn't a direct decendant of African slaves in America?? To me, this defination of African-Americanism exludes many first and second generation Americans and younger African Americans who never really experienced or were taught by their parents the pains of segregation and slavery. I read about bloody sunday and see the images of the struggle and feel a connection. Obama may not have been as liberal as most progressives expected but i dont see how that equates to him not being African-American enough. What box should we check??
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
06:29 PM on 01/18/2010
Obama is an MLK imposter who used every trick in the book to get AA's to vote for him. The only thing he has in common with MLK is his paternal roots....that's it! His speeches pale in comparison to MLK's inspirational speeches. Obama is not even a Progressive and has betrayed Progressives in more ways than one. The majority of AA's are Progressive.

Invoking the memory of MLK and Gandhi to justify War=Peace was Obama's lowest moment and that Nobel speech will go down in history as the worst speech ever!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MIVOTE
Adds wisdom to knowledge
11:04 PM on 01/18/2010
Obama is not trying to be MLKing...He's the President of the United States. What has happened, especially to white Americans, is that MLK is your only barometer of what you think he should be. He is who he is in 2010, not a civil rights leader of 1950-60.

It's your loss that you can't see the two men separate because they are not one in the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miamorphos
05:47 PM on 01/18/2010
I think there is also a misuse of evidence problem in this essay: If Obama was elected because black Americans are so inherently electable, then why wasn't there an antecedent to his election? If voters were truly hankering for a black candidate, why didn't they vote for other black candidates? I'm rereading for a third time, but other than seeing that this article is a rejection of Obama because of his birth and his racial status, I'm not sure what this article contributes to the political debate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
miamorphos
05:43 PM on 01/18/2010
Obama's first year has exposed how fragile the coalition between moderates and progressives was. In 2008, I had no idea how deep the divisions were, or what scorn the progressives would have for anyone who did not belong to the activist faction. It was only a matter of weeks before the progressives went after Obama on several fronts, and today I can guarantee that the Republicans will be able to take the White House in 2012 and learn from their painful defeat. Sadly, the teabaggers, the birthers, and the anti-Obama Left will group together to push America into the arms of the Republican insiders who have since Vietnam run American (and who have run it into the ground). Sad! Sadness! Sorrow.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
confuseddemocrat
07:23 PM on 01/18/2010
I agree that the left demanded too much of their agenda be passed in a matter of a few weeks. But I believe what destroyed the coalition between moderates and liberals was healthcare reform

Yes both libs and mods want more affordable health care however.........the first priority for voters was the state of the economy.........

But Obama is untenable position because he went too far to the left by pursuing health care reform first while running way too far to the right in his dealings with Wallstreet and financial regulations
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cydRN
04:41 PM on 01/18/2010
Shame on you for perpetuating the idea that there is or ought to be a litmus test for "blackness".

Will you find the recent war refugees "black enough" to suit you? Will you allow them into your "African-American" category? I realize they have not suffered the grave oppresion of American blacks, merely genocide and horror.

I work with this population every day in a medical capacity. I see there machete and bullet scars. I deliver their babies born of assault. To a man and to woman they are proud to be American. And I love them for their capacity to be generous when they have little. To be kind when they have not been kind to. To welcome these babies concieved in hate. These are Americans MLK would have been proud to embrace as I do.
04:35 PM on 01/18/2010
Huh?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mario Almonte
04:23 PM on 01/18/2010
Sorry, good try, but your logic is flawed across the board, and even a bit disturbing. Birthers want to prove Obama isn’t an American citizen, now (if I'm reading you right) you want to prove he isn’t even worthy of being called African-American because he doesn’t come from the right cultural background? Does that mean every Black person has to show us their social and academic record to see if they will be allowed to call themselves that? It’s flawed and dangerous logic to insist that only someone who has suffered as the black man has suffered can truly help the black race. By that logic, neither yourself, nor any Black American alive today, should be accept as a legitimate voice for the African American race, since none ever experienced slavery or suffered like their ancestors did.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:50 PM on 01/18/2010
You missed the point entirely, Mario. You are drawing conclusions that Gaither did not present. He quite clearly places the weight on African Americans for our failures. He never once said or implied that "someone who has suffered as the black man has suffered can truly help the black race". Please read it again, particularly the third and penultimate paragraphs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cydRN
05:03 PM on 01/18/2010
This is part of what I find troubling and offensive:

"He is not culturally "Afro-American."

'"When most of us say "black," we mean culturally Afro-American -- the culture born of the American descendants of African slaves."

These remarks disenfranchise a great many black Americans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cydRN
05:07 PM on 01/18/2010
This is part of what I find troubling, to quote:

"He is not culturally "Afro-American." This is what most Americans very imprecisely mean when we say "black" or "African-American."

"When most of us say "black," we mean culturally Afro-American -- the culture born of the American descendants of African slaves."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrBadger
04:01 PM on 01/18/2010
Ouch! The truth hurts.
03:54 PM on 01/18/2010
"A sheep in wolf's clothing">
03:25 PM on 01/18/2010
First, a far left liberal will never be elected President of the United States. It is probably true that liberals saw Obama's blackness and assumed he was something he is not, and never professed to be.
Second, Obama falls right in line with what African American culture is, as defined by me and my family. That is a strong believe in education, a strong self reliance, and a rejection of the victim hood attitude.
As an African American all I ask of the President is too pursue policies which benefit ALL Americans. I do not want or expect any special considerations.
And finally, it matters not whether Obama was raised by descendants of slaves or white Kansans to many white Americans. It matters not what education level he has been able to achieve through hard work and dedication. What matters is that his skin is black, just like yours and mine.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:49 PM on 01/18/2010
"First, a far left liberal will never be elected President of the United States."

FDR, Teddy Roosevelt and Thomas Jefferson were all way left of center.
04:57 AM on 01/19/2010
FDR was not left of center. Frankly, he saved capitalism from its excesses and failures. He wasn't trying to dismantle it. Teddy Roosevelt was definitely not way left of center. Jefferson was not left of center either. But put it a different way. Why is seeking universal health coverage a "left of center" idea? It needn't be. Why would federal investment in the infrastructure for a green economy that lessens our dependence on foreign oil, reduces environmental degradation and anticipates the competitive advantage points in the coming global economy be a "left of center" idea? (Eisenhower pushed federal investment in interstate highways, which had far reaching economic and social impact) Why would using federal power to protect wilderness and nature (like Teddy Roosevelt did) be a "left of center" idea. (By the way, G.W. Bush did the same in protecting the Hawaiian archipelago) Rather, than point to other Presidents who were forward looking as "far left liberal" to rebut the rationalization than Obama has to be "moderate" to be elected and govern, why not ask what policies should be enacted and check out the landscape for what can be enacted. I don't think Obama said he'd be a liberal, nor do I think he's trying to be a moderate. I think he's trying to get something done. He's not a monarch.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:29 PM on 01/18/2010
I don't know that there is any gross failure here. No more or less, at any rate, than any in the past. The working realization is that were he of the culture, he'd have no more chance to be elected to that office than Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton did. Since we're dropping names, I'll throw in Dr. King, even as we both acknowledge that he would have had no interest in any such silliness.

If any thing, we have failed in creating institutions to sustain and honor our greats. We have perhaps foolishly expected that this nation would do so, but it would be even more foolish to have such expectation in light of the fact that every effort has been generated to write us out of this nation's history.

Remember, on this day if at no other time, that Dr. King was murdered, even as he only preached compassion. Remember that the FBI hounded him from pillar to post but could or would not prevent his assassination. Ask yourself if you think that President Obama is unaware of that fact. This nation is not now nor will it ever likely be "ready" for any sort of Black man in that office.
01:05 PM on 01/18/2010
Black is our race
AA is our cultural heritage

Obama is not African-American heritage wise but he is culturally. He would have to he considering he did marry into an African-American family. African-American is the term used for descendents of American slaves... If were talking about his black ancestry, then Obama is KENYAN-American. That is an American of Kenyan ancestry..Im not sure why Americans are so hesitant to call him what he is..There are many African-Americans who do not accept him as an AA, and cringe when that word is used to identify him..