iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leonce Gaiter

GET UPDATES FROM Leonce Gaiter
 

Rufus Buck's Anti-Black History Month History Lesson

Posted: 02/20/2012 9:28 am

For Black History Month, I present to you a very young man who had a dream -- and to achieve it, he murdered and marauded. Half-black and half-Indian Rufus Buck and his gang of four black and Native American teens killed both black and white men, and terrified blacks, whites and Indians alike in the Indian Territory during the summer of 1895.

What? How dare I? Not the "first black this," or the "first black that?" Not some civil rights-era saint, all-forgiving and all-forgetting? Not an entertainer whose struggles and pain are miraculously disappeared?

No. None of the above. He was a young man who, near the turn of the century, formed a multi-racial teenaged gang in Indian Territories to wrest the land back from encroaching whites. His dream was impossible; and he used the same violence to achieve it that he saw all around him. The Rufus Buck gang were childish and vicious, innocent in their naivete and brutal in their outlook. Their 13-day reign of terror is historically fascinating in that it marked the end of the Indian Territory, soon swallowed whole by the land-hungry United States. Their execution marked the end of the judicial tyranny of Judge Isaac Parker, the "hanging judge" of legend. They marked the end of the era of the great western outlaws, like Cherokee Bill, half-black and half-Indian himself. They also shed a rare light on the multiracial old west of the Indian Territories. No... the Rufus Buck gang were neither saints, nor victims. But they are part of our history -- the part we foolishly agree to ignore because it does not fit the normative view of who we ought to be.

I use the opportunity of 'Black History Month' while remaining generally repelled by its execution. Watching a multinational corporation hoist a commercial about some "good Negro" to feed the mainstream public's vision of us as saints or willing victims -- the two states that absolves America of her sins... it nauseates. It's been said that American slavery bred modern racism, not vice versa. A very young country whose people consider themselves anointed by God can't afford to remember the vicious crimes they've committed in brutalizing a people, so they revile those who remind them. In modern America, our black faces have been reminders of America's crimes -- crimes in which she shamelessly reveled for the majority of her history, crimes she must forget in order to perpetuate the myth of her perfection in the eyes of an adoring God.

So Black History Month becomes a paean to revisionist forgetfulness. It's just a concentrated mirror of our skewed historical presence throughout all 12 months of the year. For we have allowed ourselves to be historically gutted. Our historical passions and fury have been neutered for mass consumption. Historically, we are only pieces of men. Accordingly, slavery, Jim Crow and American apartheid left no bitter taste, for we are all-forgiving, white-Jesus-loving saints subject to no natural human reaction akin to anger. Rosa Parks felt no rage, but was in fact thinking only of bettering white people when she refused to leave her seat on that bus. Martin Luther King channeled no fury, but only sought to cleanse white America as any good servant seeks to serve his masters. Ossie Davis, like Harry Belafonte and many other entertainers, is hailed as 'prominent in the civil rights movement.' But you'd never hear that he said of Malcolm X, "[he] knew that for a black leader to be effective, you had to frighten the white man." Let's not even mention MLK; we have allowed the majority to sanitize him into a parody of himself.

Black history for white Americans is destined to be a lie. It has to be, for too many Americans will accept nothing less. Their national self-image demands that our black history disappear because the truth of it puts the lie to the fantasy of white American cleanliness and perfection. That's why black history month grates on me so. It's American kabuki: mainstream media and organizations pretending to honor a history many find repugnant due to the pockmarked reflection it flashes back at them.

So I offer a piece of real history for Black History Month -- warts and all. A young, half-black, half-Indian renegade determined to do the impossible and willing to be as vicious as any white man to reach his goal. His story is prototypically American. It's a story of violence and innocence, butchery and grace. His is part of the history that dare not rear its head, for it treads perilously close to the truths that, during Black History Month as in all others, we tirelessly ignore.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akhet
Is kind of like 2Pac+Doctor Who
09:03 PM on 02/24/2012
Great article. Rufus Buck story would make a great movie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:47 PM on 02/22/2012
Wow. Wish more would read this piece. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rwin Hopkins
09:20 AM on 02/22/2012
well said! i always ask people what of peonage and our judicial system. we are still slaves. the 13th amendment to the us constitution always slavery if it's in punishment for a crime. for 80 years after the civil war the convict leasing system of the south but documneted as well in the north was and is slavery by another name. we all need to learn all our history. christianity was forced on the slaves as a way of control. if u are constantly waiting for this great after life you never work to change the world your in now. we must free our minds to free ourselves. blacks for books. i'm black and proud. but i have to question the native american part of the story as from everything i've read the natives didn't care for africans and they owned slaves as well. also altho 10% of the black population was free-what exactly do you consider being free? these people lead restricted lives and were very much confined by their blackness. i know we all can agree on that- our complexion can be limiting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akhet
Is kind of like 2Pac+Doctor Who
09:07 PM on 02/24/2012
exactly...well except the natives part. Some didnt like us, some didnt like anyone. But during slavery many took in runaways.
02:03 AM on 02/21/2012
I'm sure there a lot more excluded historical facts we'll never hear about . How about the New York riots just before the civil war . when the newly arrived europeans thought freed blacks would enter the job market as equals they went crazy .
11:07 AM on 02/20/2012
Yopu will see the same Kabuki in all history as it tries to uplift us with good examples and tries to ignore the bad in an effort to inspire the present. You never hear about the African tribes that sold their enemies to European slavers or kept slaves themselves.
photo
robXdion
Because someone has to say it.
01:03 PM on 02/20/2012
The race-based dehumanizing brutality that was European slavery was far different than African slavery. The present-day insinuations of superiority and inferiority for certain groups based in that past is more than enough to debunk your notions. But thank you for furthering the author's point with this attempt at justification.
01:37 PM on 02/20/2012
So the slavery practiced in Africa was good slavery......thanks for clearing that up for me....And look you still have a bogey man to blame for all your percieved problems,,,,,Bravo. Your shrink will be so happy you figured that out all by yourself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rwin Hopkins
09:25 AM on 02/22/2012
actually chattel slavery was started here in the us. you are correct though that it was and to this day is the worst known form of slavery where generations were born and breed as cattle to never be free. where as in africa and europe and even in roman history slaves could work off or purchase their freedom. in fact the first slaves brought to virginia were both black and white and the irish were enslaved in the virgin islands. america was formed on our backs and yet were are the only race that has not recieved some form of compensation. and let's not even talk about the 13th amendment and the convict leasing system. america is a lie that we have all bought. history is a weapon read it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:03 PM on 02/20/2012
Fundamental false equivalence.
photo
robXdion
Because someone has to say it.
10:13 AM on 02/20/2012
Thank you! I've felt the same way for so long. But I've been reticent to even get involved in the discussion anymore because these days even blacks will make supporting arguments for whites (see Viola Davis comments defending "The Help"). Most don't have the gumption to stand up for anything more than their creature comforts and validation among whites. Maybe Rufus Buck saw this. As a part-Cherokee, part-Black man, I know I do.
09:44 AM on 02/20/2012
Slavery may be many things, but it was no crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:04 PM on 02/20/2012
Huh?
photo
ProCynic
Those that govern intend to be our masters.
03:31 PM on 02/20/2012
Technically correct. It abided the laws of its time. However, it doesn't mean it was moral, something Wilburforce was instrumental in pointing out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:42 PM on 02/20/2012
Except that the law came after the act.