NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Leonce Gaiter

GET UPDATES FROM Leonce Gaiter
 

With Traditional Publishing Dies the Passive Writer-Victim

Posted: 07/08/11 01:44 PM ET

It had been a longtime dream; I had thought about it and wanted it since childhood. But then, with my dream in hand, my only response was a small nod and a sotto, "oh, alright." Akin to a tepid "how nice." My book was to be published by a well-regarded NY publishing house, and I couldn't even muster a facade of enthusiasm. I assumed I was numb; that it hadn't sunk in yet. So I went about my business and I waited for the thrill to fill me up.

It never did. The process had been long -- a cryptic agent who condescended to take my once-a-month call, a fake chuckle to hide her irritation as she complained about having to hold clients' hands. It was on one of my monthly calls that she told me that I had sold a book. I wonder if she would have bothered to mention it if I hadn't phoned. I guess I'll never know.

The production process was -- subliminal. I spoke with the book's ostensible editor for a grand total of about 5 minutes -- in my entire life. A proof showed up with a picture of a flirty, naked black woman on the cover -- when the only black female character died before the beginning of the book and she wasn't the flirty type. It was a nice cover, but it had little to do with the book beneath it.

The publicist sent the requisite press release to the usual suspects, who probably gave it the attention it deserved (they ignored it). Gamely, I stepped into the breach, purchasing some cheap online ads, hawking the book to reviewers, etc., all to middling success, but infinitely greater satisfaction than I got from any other stage of the process save the writing. Finally, I had some control, and I began to suspect that I was a sophomoric cliché of the passive writer-victim -- passively awaiting my agent's actions; passively awaiting publisher response; passively awaiting for someone to design my book, passively awaiting critical and commercial reaction. Yes, I began to suspect... but I was still to programmed and scared to do anything about it.

As the next novel hit editors' desks (from a new, and altogether more suitable agent) and I passively awaited reaction, my agent received notes like these:

"It's an impressively gripping story, and a fascinating story about a time and topic I knew little about."

"I can see what you mean about the strong pacing of Gaiter's narrative, and the novel's strong sense of place, which seems to stem from deep research into and thorough knowledge..."

"I thought this was a really well-written and fascinating story. I loved the historical details and enjoyed the book on a personal level."

Each of these statements preceded a "pass." One editor told my agent that "the market" was telling her that only frothy, "feel good" books have a chance at sales success today. This was an odd statement, considering that it presupposes that the publishing industry has a good idea of what "the market" wants. I quote author and business writer Michael Levin from Forbes Magazine:

...the books that publishers choose are almost entirely of zero interest to actual book-buyers. After 9/11, there were a ton of books about 9/11, which nobody bought. Same thing with the Iraq War, the rise of Obama, the economic meltdown... Or the books are rehashed business lessons, religious truths, sports clichés, motivational babble, exercise fads, weight loss techniques, or pandering to the political left or the right. Who wants these books? Almost no one.

Most of the major publishers today are owned by international conglomerates who, at some point, will awaken to the realization that English majors in their employ are spending millions of dollars on books that no one wants to read.

Levin further points out the antediluvian hilarity of the publishing "business model," in which "the publisher bears the entire risk of buying, editing, printing, and shipping copies of the book to bookstores all over the country on a 100% returnable basis. If your local Barnes & Noble doesn't sell a particular book, it goes right back to the publisher, at the publisher's shipping cost, for a full refund. Especially in the Internet era, you can't make money putting books on trucks and hoping someone buys them."

After my first book was released, I was scheduled for a radio appearance. The day prior, I was informed that Amazon was out of my book. Publicity can generate sales. It's bad form to generate publicity for a product, and then inform prospective buyers at a primary outlet that the product is unavailable. When I screamed loudly about this to my agent and editor, the editor said, and I quote, "If they want the book badly enough, they'll wait for it or find it." My jaw dropped. Apple Computer can afford to be that lazy and arrogant. James Patterson can. Leonce Gaiter and Carroll & Graf Publishers could not. This man was so clueless to business realities, he expected people to seek out or wait for a product about which they knew little or nothing from someone they had never heard of. To him, the reader had to do all the work. Our job was to look pretty while we sat back and waited for them to do it.

I read reports from one of the large book conferences in which a major editor insisted that the "intrinsic value" of a book justified their exorbitant price tags. ($12.99 for an ebook? Fuck you! Even Amazon wanted to sell them for $9.99.) Again, the ignorance is blinding. In a market economy, no product qua product has "intrinsic value." Suggesting that it does stinks of the arrogance of decay drenched in decadence. See also this shamefully smug op-ed.

With respect to my own work, I had to realize that some NY Editors are sufficiently egotistical to believe that they are so advanced in their educations and outlook that a book they find "fascinating" could not possibly engage a more general audience (unless it includes vampires or comes with pictures, of course). That, and the fact that their marketing sense and infrastructures are as outmoded and inefficient as the rest of their business, so they only have the ability to sell books that run the gamut from A to C to audiences that are equally diverse.

Finally, I had to accept both the death of my romantic vision of publishing and the gross facts of the corporate publishing reality. With my agent's help and blessing, I found the tools and mustered the will to do things differently.

Ingram, the major book distributor, owns Lightning Source, which gives authors access to distribution channels similar to those the publishing houses get, and at reasonable prices; your book can be available for print-on-demand from any bookstore, online or off. That takes care of the physical books. Ebooks, of course, are also within any author's grasp; between Smashwords and Amazon's Kindle Direct Publishing, you can pretty much cover the territory. This time, I chose my own physical book's format, dimensions, and I laid out the text within the appropriate template myself. A wonderful designer I know provided the marvelous cover art. The novel is mine, soup to nuts. I feel an ownership and pride that never even teased me with my traditionally published book. From an economic standpoint, if the book sells as well as my largely-ignored traditionally published novel, I will make three times the money from it. Carroll & Graf put a $24 price tag on my first book. Consumers will be able to buy this one for less than $10.

How can you not recommend this option to authors? With today's tools, the idea of waiting for approval from the minions of a multinational sounds as lazy and self-defeating as a band that won't burn CDs until they get a major label record deal. Just as musicians have to know their way around a sound board, writers need facility with the layout and design software used to create books, the ins and outs of formatting for ebooks; they need design sense enough to guarantee that their book looks good inside and out.

We used to wait passively for the pearly gates to open and then gratefully pass our manuscripts through to hallowed ground. In music and in books, those days are gone forever. And good riddance.


 
 
 
It had been a longtime dream; I had thought about it and wanted it since childhood. But then, with my dream in hand, my only response was a small nod and a sotto, "oh, alright." Akin to a tepid "how...
It had been a longtime dream; I had thought about it and wanted it since childhood. But then, with my dream in hand, my only response was a small nod and a sotto, "oh, alright." Akin to a tepid "how...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:11 AM on 08/17/2011
I've self-published three books. I'm not banging on publishers’ doors and they're not banging on mine. I'm okay with that.

Writers need editors but good editors are involved and engaged. Editing is a collaborative process, not one forced on the work as a prep-for-market process.

Book covers should be designed by people who have read the book, or at least discussed it with the author.

My nonfiction book was written for a target market, but I don't need a New York publisher to find and hit that target. Writers often have deeper insights into how to access their readers than publishers ever will.

Bestseller lists are hype - many authors buy their way onto the lists. Allowing big publishers and the quasi-journalists who pander to them to define and manipulate the gold standard is a travesty.

Big publishers print in large quantities. Small type and thin margins cut costs but result in books that are less comfortable to read. Using print-on-demand (POD), I produce clothbound, foil-stamped, gorgeously-typeset hardcover books with a dust jacket for $20.

Bookstores are dying. Borders is gone. People will shop at B&N until they receive an eReader for Christmas, at which point they have no cause to enter the store again. Cheap and available used books hold more allure than the prospect of buying them new and converting them to used books myself.

Dave Bricker, author
The One-Hour Guide to Self-Publishing
http://www.oneHourSelfPub.com
photo
aalbc
President, AALBC dot com
09:36 AM on 07/26/2011
Interesting comments Leonce I'm about to Blog about this myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AnaM
11:56 PM on 07/20/2011
Very few things can convince me that self-publishing is the way to go. At present the flaws outweigh the positives. It is usually a more expensive process. Authors really need to get a handle on the business end of things. Perhaps working as an intern in a publishing company, to see how it works from the ground up, may help. As for the internet. There are too may traps on the Internet for writers, trying to lure them to make financial decisions. There are too many shysters out there who promise royalties and so forth, but deliver little.
Having a major publisher backing a book isn't a terrible deal. It's not so much about validation, sure this is part of it, but more about representation and the professional support of editors and publishers rather than some faceless internet identity on a website, as well as in-house legal representation.
Self publishing is not always cheap. To really be successful, a writer needs to have had that manuscript edited professionally. Then if they choose to print and distribute, there are printing costs. Even if you decide on e-book format only, you still need to purchase an ISBN and it goes on.
If something does go wrong, take plagiarism, a publishing company can address that through their legal team. What do you do if you self publish and cannot afford an attorney?
05:58 PM on 07/19/2011
I feel you have written my story - and I'm sure your words have resonated with thousands more of us. What a breath of fresh air this last decade has been! I'm so glad to be part of this extraordinary revolutionary/pioneer/visionary/entrepreneurish Brave New World of publishing.
12:03 PM on 07/19/2011
Great Article! I have been thinking the exact thing and am so glad to see someone that at least in theory knows what they are talking about express the same thing. We are seeing a revolution in power shifting from the large "New York" firms into the hands of the millions of unwashed. And I think it is a great thing.

Now I have to get off my butt and get my book of short stories out there.
01:22 PM on 07/18/2011
First of all, you had a horrible experience with your first agent. My first agent wasn't very responsive and that was so stressful. Your agent sounds even worse. My second agent, as well as my current agent, are very responsive.

11 weeks ago, I self-published my "sweet" historical Western Romances. Since then, I've sold over 7500 books, without much marketing. Neither of my first two agents could sell these books, even though the first one was a Romance of America Golden Heart winner, because they were sweet, not sexy. The experience has been wonderful. I have a renewed sense of excitement about writing. I just published a blog detailing my sales and the money I've made. http://drdebraholland.blogspot.com

Yes, write a good book. Yes, have a good cover. And yes, have it professionally edited!
08:40 AM on 07/18/2011
Absolutely spot on! I blinked when I read the bit about editors saying you needed vampires or pictures because that's the line I got and that's the line that convinced me to go on an extended haitus from writing. I'm back again *because* of places like Smashwords and Amazon Direct Publishing. Any new books I write, and I have three suddenly buzzing around in my head, will go straight to ebook. The publishers have to wake up. The archaic distribution system, the archaic royalty system (what other profession pays their employees twice a year, an unknown amount?), and agents who don't see the writing on the wall...they all have to change. Great post. Thank you.
11:13 AM on 07/15/2011
Things have definitely changed in the publishing world. I see it evolving to a blended situation where an author might have some books published traditionally and others self-published. There are pros and cons on both sides of the fence and it is a real plus for the author to be able to decide which model works for them. However one important word of caution to aspiring authors: Make sure your work is the best it can be before putting it into print. SF TKF refers to their editor, below. There are many freelance editors and your work SHOULD BE professionally edited and prepared. MORGAN ST. JAMES www.morganstjames-author.com
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
04:35 PM on 07/14/2011
Since you had what sounds like the worst, do-nothing publisher on the planet, there's no reason not to self-publish. For those of us with more traditional relationships with our editors/publishers, however, there are serious considerations to weigh. I personally wouldn’t want to go it alone without my brilliant editor. Her insights into the story and her ability to spot holes are something I really value.
08:44 AM on 07/18/2011
The thing is, those of us who have gone the traditional route, know the value and importance of a good editor. None of us trust our work that much that we'd send it out into the world without professional eyes looking at it. But editors have gone freelance now too. They've seen the wave coming and hopped on. I've been published in print for 25 years and I wouldn't dream of putting a book out without an editor's eye going over it first. Don't be too quick to assume we don't look on this new avenue without the old values thumped into us *s*
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:56 PM on 07/09/2011
So rather than convince a bindery that they should pay me to publish my stuff I should instead pay them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn de Montaigne
http://thepiertoforever.webs.com
04:03 PM on 07/09/2011
Superb post. Thank you for this.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Bryan Young
I'm a filmmaker and author
11:09 AM on 07/09/2011
You hit the nail on the head. You should check out my piece from the other day: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bryan-young/combatting-the-stigma-of-_b_890000.html
01:10 AM on 07/09/2011
Dear Mr. Gaiter,

You have certainly made the case that convention­al publishing is not working out for you, but it remains to be seen whether the self-publi­shing streets will be paved with gold. Oddly enough, I am looking at the New York Times bestseller list for 7/3/11, and I don't believe that a single self-publi­shed title--in any format or at any price--mad­e the cut. So it may be a tiny bit premature to proclaim the triumph of the wise author/ent­repreneur over the antediluvi­an idiocy of the traditiona­l houses. And it may be slightly trickier to get rich and famous than you imagine.

But time will tell, and you clearly have nothing to lose. I hope things work out as you envision.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Leonce Gaiter
11:33 AM on 07/09/2011
Correct. However, for most writers, the traditional publishing route is barely paved at all--much less with gold. Most writers make practically nothing in the current scheme. If we can do much better financially while offering consumers more diverse (and hopefully better) product at lower prices, then more power to us and we should all leave the fantasy of immense riches from trad. publishing behind.
photo
SF TKF
Cthulhu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich.
04:36 PM on 07/14/2011
Really? Most of the NY published writers I know are making fairly decent money (but then we all write genre fiction).
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
05:58 PM on 07/09/2011
The only thing the self-published have to lose is the money they shell out of their own pocket for the process.  And the more frills they want for the unit, the more money they have to shell out and thus more units they have to shift just to break even.
10:03 PM on 07/08/2011
With every right comes responsibilities. While many will cherish the right to, oh, choose their own font, many more will find it, much less anything more complex, daunting to a point of paralyzing them.

Thus there will always be a place for traditional publishers. Some may gravitate toward providing ebook services the same way they traditionally provided services regarding getting books into print as hard copies.

What we have going now is perhaps a little like the record industry's problems, which they also handled poorly, for a long time insisting on putting out only albums charging their main customers, who were largely people who had options to get those albums in illegitimate ways for free, premium prices. Despite the insistence of so many customers that most albums were simply not worth that much money nor delivered more than one or two or three good songs worth buying, the record companies stuck to their guns. Today record stores are all but gone.

Publishers, too, can insist on all they like. The market, in the meantime, whether they like it or not, will decide for them. They might as well fully incorporate ebook publishing at reasonable prices, and become one-stop shops for ebook authors. If not, they will face competition from authors making more from selling ebooks by themselves, and face a horde of customers so used to great prices on books that the idea of selling books for high prices will finally come to be seen as absurd.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ignacio sanabria
Mirror synapses at work
04:44 PM on 07/08/2011
Regardless of the e-book format we use, we the writers still need to advertise our work.