More

Les Leopold

Les Leopold

Posted: September 10, 2009 08:29 PM

Obama's Missed Moment


Add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over ten years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few."
President Barak Obama, September 9, 2009


At that moment President Obama had us in his hands. The lousy war. The giveaways to the rich. That was were we had squandered our nation's wealth. He had the golden opportunity to solve two problems at once: paying for universal health care, and not looking like a Wall Street lackey.

All he had to do was to address, and then focus, the anger felt all over America about the incredible rip-off that is called Wall Street. Here's what he might have added to his case:

"My fellow Americans, it is time for those who nearly gambled our economy into the abyss to pay us back for our bailouts and for the harm they have caused us all. Everyone knows that Wall Street spends far too much time and money gambling and speculating. Everyone knows that our economic crash was caused by their fantasy finance casinos. Everyone knows we had to pump in trillions of dollars in cash, loans and asset guarantees to get credit flowing again. And everyone knows our financial wizards are overpaid by any standard. Now is the time to end this irresponsible activity. Now is the time to set our nation on a far sounder course.

"To slow down speculative activity and to help finance health care, I propose a small fee on each and every financial transaction -- like the buying and selling of derivatives, the speculation on oil markets, the betting on currencies. A fee of just one tenth of one percent will generate more than $500 billion over ten years. And 99.9 percent of it will be paid by those "too big to fail" banks, investment companies and hedge funds that still engage in rapid-fire trading around the clock. The time has come for this idea, first put forth by the late James Tobin, the Nobel laureate economist.

"In addition, we need to do something about our obscene distribution of wealth. If you look over the 2007 tax summaries, you'll see that the top 400,000 returns reported as much taxable income as the bottom 65 million! That's the worst distribution of income since the great crash of 1929. That is the money that fuels the Wall Street casino, and we need to redirect it right now to where it is most needed. A 10 percent surcharge on just those with adjustable gross incomes of over $1 million will generate another $400 billion over 10 years.

"Not only will universal health care be fully funded, but we will have stabilized our economy by reducing the size of the speculative casino on Wall Street, and we will have put downward pressure on its outrageous salary structure.

"Yes, Wall Street and the wealthy will certainly object. They might even use their cash to undermine such legislation. But the American people are smarter than that. They will tell their legislators to do the people's business and not Wall Street's. The will demand justice. They know the difference between the pampering of multi-millionaire financial speculators, and what it is like for the millions who have lost their jobs because the casino crashed.

"I say to all of you who are upset with our economic woes, who are angry about the bailouts, and who can't stomach the outrageous financial salaries -- I say to you that these tax proposals are just, fair and economically sound. If you join with me, we can have good health care and a stronger economy for generations to come.

Yes We Can!"

Les Leopold is the author of The Looting of America: How Wall Street's Game of Fantasy Finance destroyed our Jobs, Pensions and Prosperity, and What We Can Do About It, Chelsea Green Publishing, June 2009.


Follow Les Leopold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/les_leopold

Add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over ten years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few." ...
Add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over ten years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few." ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jannsmoor
01:57 PM on 09/11/2009
I have yet to disagree with one single thing you write. You are doing a great service to carry this banner. We need serious financial reform, not the watered down version being advanced by this Administration.

Speculative trading by financial firms that are too big to fail needs to be taxed. It's like FDIC insurance. They need to carry insurance for their gambling, just like we carry auto insurance in the event we get in a wreck. When they wreck the economy, they need to pay for it. Not only that, they need to pay for their past sins. They should be paying the taxpayers insurance premiums right now for the trillions we have guaranteed in order to keep them solvent. I'm sorry the right wing nut jobs can't get their arms around this simple proposition. It's actually capitalism 101, which they claim to champion.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Les Leopold
author, "The Looting of America"
03:10 PM on 09/11/2009
Thank you for your encouragement. It's interesting that you should use the concept of insurance. That's the main point I make in Chapter 10 of "The Looting of America." As a society we should be insured against the speculative excesses of high finance, given that historical fact that regulations seem to fail sooner or later. I've adopted the Tobin Tax to serve just that purpose. We should think of it as insurance and not a tax. But regardless what we call it, it's the best way, I think, to slow down speculative excesses. I mean Lord Turner, Great Britain's chief regulator, is supporting this same idea and for the same reasons. It's not that radical.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:13 PM on 09/11/2009
wait wait wait. in the article you call for the money taken under the Tobin tax to be used to fund govt sponsored healthcare and now you are calling for those same dollars to be saved as insurance should we find ourselves in the same situation again. These dollars can only be spent once.
I believe that history will show that our elected reps are unable to keep their hands off our money in the treasury regardless of any "lockbox" we put it in. The risk of keeping this money as insurance is too great.
05:16 AM on 09/11/2009
Well-written and spot-on. It's high time to introduce the Tobin Tax, not merely to put mild breaks on the capitalist money generator to prevent it from regularly overheating at the expense of the majority, but in order to actually siphon its powers and reap the benefits.

All those decades, the vast majority of the populace invested into Wall Street in a very real way with their blood, sweat and tears -- and saw no more of the profits than some occasional crumbs.

As much as I appreciate President Obama, sometimes, it pains me to see the difference to what he could be and do if he only listened to advice like the one put forward in this piece.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Mark Olmsted
essayist, blogger, activist
02:05 AM on 09/11/2009
400 million over 10 years? Is that supposed to read $400 billion?
Otherwise, as usual, thank you for continually bringing the issue of skewed distribution of wealth to the fore.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Les Leopold
author, "The Looting of America"
07:28 AM on 09/11/2009
Right you are. It's $400 billion. thanks
09:21 PM on 09/10/2009
You must be under the mistaken idea that we have a Democratic president and Congress.

Howard Dean 2012. Out with corporate / centrist / sellout Democrats.
photo
Hiphopcrates
Kicking the money lenders out of the Temple
09:49 PM on 09/10/2009
Great idea! Obama/Emanuel will prove to be a disaster!
09:12 PM on 09/10/2009
Oh, excellent idea. Tax financial transactions so the rich will have to pay for healthcare. Oh, wait, just one thing to consider. How will you separate out the transactions of the rich and those made on behalf of the middle class and their 401Ks? Oops. Didn't think of that?

Since the pension and retirement funds account for such a huge percentage of the transactions, perhaps you could create a caste system of investors. Individual investors must pay 2 tenths of 1% on all transactions and the institutional (oops, I mean retirement funds...yep, the very same traders who brought on the crash with their risky positions) investors can skip the tax.

So now we're back to sticking it to the rich individual investors. Hmm... Sounds great to the retirement fund managers cuz fewer individuals will go it alone and opt for the slight edge with a fund.

Yep, you really socked it to those greedy people. Way to go!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Les Leopold
author, "The Looting of America"
09:36 PM on 09/10/2009
Wow. I really did sock it to grandma? I don't think so. Unless she's flipping her 401k everyday, she won't feel this fee. Nor will the pension funds unless they are churning to rack up management fees. Unless you have data to the contrary, almost all of the action comes from high speed trading not pension funds. This fee will hit big hedge funds large banks and highly profitable investment funds. Thanks for your comment.
11:21 PM on 09/10/2009
Well played, Les! I wish Obama had given your speech rather than the one he did.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 PM on 09/11/2009
you may want to read a book about finance and one about economics before you pontificate about how to save our country. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and guess that when you state you want to put an additional tax on every financial transaction what you mean is a tax on every transaction that involves buying and selling financial instruments and not the financial transaction that occurs when someone purchases gasoline.
Something you apparently don't understand about 401(k)s is there is a financial transaction for most people at least twice a month. Money is deducted from their paycheck and used to purchase funds in the plan. You also demonstrate your lack of understanding of dollar cost averaging, the time value of money and even the basic idea of buy low, sell high.