That this insanity actually became an issue with the liberal blogosphere is terrifying for our democracy...
I love Stephen Colbert because he brilliantly blurs the lines between reality and unreality in ways that illuminate both.
I'm not sure if I should chuckle or shake with fear when I have observed normal people wonder what he really believes.
But shaking with fear is exactly what I do when Colbert's act breaks the "fourth wall" between the play and the people watching the play.
When he comes down off the murder mystery stage and actually murders audience members, the humor fades fast for me.
Aside from the real-world meddling in a possibly razor-thin South Carolina primary battle, Colbert's adventure in electoral "truthiness" is a spine-chilling harbinger of the political consequences of unreality in our post-digital age (the digital one being the one in which you could reliably tell the difference between digital and not.)
Some have characterized the efforts of sane people to stop this looming carnage of reality - which could have included the atomization of real votes - as an interference with the "democratic process" and the "Democratic (primary) Process."
In the blood-tinged light of the last two real presidential elections in the U.S., this attitude is deeply, deeply creepy.
And for those who gleefully see the Colbert election gambit as an anarchic morality play, the star of which is the truthy, toothy commentator railing at the battlements of a discredited election process... think again.
This crack-in-the-cosmic-egg campaign would only have replaced one procedural orthodoxy - the voting process and, you know, democracy - with another - the infotainment complex, in which "Dumbo" and "dumb war" are amusingly interchangable.
Not funny at all...





Loading comments…

Posted November 7, 2007 | 12:44 PM (EST)