More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Linda R. Monk, J.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Linda R. Monk, J.D.
 

Cool Hand Barack

Posted: 07/07/11 09:31 AM ET

The president and the first lady looked so happy at the White House's Fourth of July celebration with military families. Happier than they've both looked in a long while. The president had his sparkling, Cheshire-cat grin full-on for the cameras. Like he knew something we didn't know. Like he looked at the White House Correspondents Dinner in April, after he slam-dunked Donald Trump and the next day took out Osama bin Laden.

I wondered then if perhaps polling numbers indicated President Obama had already won the standoff with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling to cover money Congress has already spent. Yep, you guessed it. Obama won the second battle of Fort Sumter without a single shot fired. Pulled the rug right out from under the neo-secessionists like Ron and Rand Paul and Rick Perry.

On July 4, 1861, President Abraham Lincoln called Congress into special session to appropriate millions of dollars and thousands of lives to preserve the Union. On July 4, 2011, President Barack Obama head-faked the Republican plutocrats into a last stand over protecting the rich while the rest of the country is suffering.

Turns out voters in the swing states of Ohio, Missouri, Montana, and Minnesota don't like that idea -- by a margin of almost 80 percent.

Where Americans are hurting most, they most believe in sharing the economic pain across the board. Not just bailing out the rich to have them impose "austerity" on the rest of the country. Next thing you know, we might just have Athens on the Potomac.

Few folks thought the president had any cards left to play in the debt ceiling game with "Red" Boehner and "Baby Face" Cantor. But nobody knows how to hold his political cards better than Cool Hand Barack. As Paul Newman said, "Sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

Read 'em and weep, Mr. Speaker.

 
 
 

Follow Linda R. Monk, J.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/LindaRMonkJD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 127
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
10:50 AM on 07/19/2011
Looks like things have died down here; but I wondered if you saw this latest news regarding Obama's War on Terror?
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/7/13/jeremy_scahill_reveals_cia_facility_prison

Linda, you mentioned that Obama turned out not to govern as a progressive; but did you ever think he would continue secret prisons and rendition, and expand drone attacks to a far greater extent than Bush?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
04:07 PM on 07/12/2011
Depends on the school. If white males are underrepresented at certain schools, it can be a factor in increasing diversity of students' experiences. In the past, emphasis on legacies or sports was a way to increase certain demographics. Until Title IX, though, women did not have very many athletic opportunities.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
06:20 PM on 07/12/2011
Since males are now under represented at most universities, thanks in part to Title IX;
should AA be applied to all?
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
06:25 PM on 07/12/2011
I still believe we should judge a person by the content of their character, and not the color of their skin; AA further aggravates race consciousness, by making race such an important issue.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
01:47 PM on 07/12/2011
Is Obama playing poker at a chess match?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBull
Come And Take It is a dare, not a request
09:21 PM on 07/08/2011
Comaring Obama to Lincoln is kind of a stretch. Ya think?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
03:31 PM on 07/10/2011
Wait 'til you read my next post, which REALLY compares them!

I was hoping Haley Barbour would run in '12; he'd have played Jeff Davis to Obama's Lincoln. And then we'd have had a real 150th reenactment of the election of 1850.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
03:38 PM on 07/10/2011
Oops, election of 1860!
05:23 PM on 07/07/2011
oh dear. look, on this one he's already blown it. he's way, way off the course, totally captivated by the GOP talking points. he should be talking jobs every day (the most efficient way, along with tax cuts for the rich being allowed to expire, to reduce the deficit) and instead he's talking about taking money out of the hands of the poor, forever, just so a routine vote can happen that would never, ever be an issue at any other time in American political history.

just like when he caved on the Bush tax cuts this past winter in exchange for a completely routine extension of unemployment benefits. he gives away the farm, and in return gets things that were already going to happen. I have no idea how you can watch this guy operate and have so much faith in his competence. and he's about to put Social Security, which doesn't affect the federal deficit at all, on the table here again for no reason at all. cut Social Security - the deficit stays the same. he's just not being honest about what is going on.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
03:33 PM on 07/10/2011
The point of the article is that poker players bluff. Looks like Boehner is the one who folded.
04:31 PM on 07/11/2011
unfortunately, no. Boehner doesn't have any obligation to accept this stupid deal, and Obama shouldn't be trying to make it in the first place either. we are in a depression, and they're both talking about taking money out of the economy! they should both be slapped and told to go home and tell their families that they have failed at life. we need jobs and a strengthening of the safety net, not more money being funneled to the already rich. the point of the article is silly worship of a personality cult, not anything about poker or chess or whatever. what Obama is doing here is just plain straight-up stupid. he knows better too, which is what makes me so mad about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:18 PM on 07/07/2011
"It isn't easy being a liberal [in the South] " -- an example of Flannery Oconnor's brilliant dry humor.

The charm of Southern liberals--no matter how piqued they get, it is always a family quarrel.
Gingrich the strategist won. He "lost" his attempt to shut down the Clinton government then shut it down Clinton's administration with a spurious impeachment proceeding. Good laws in place for 60 years were rescinded under the last two years of Clinton, laws that prevented insurance and banking from running amok, gave "teeth" to regulators, and may have prevented the last financial crisis. -Republicans affronted popular opinion back then. Did it matter?

This is simply is Southern power politics -- propose the catastrophic, settle (temporarily) for the unthinkable (no cuts in military spending, no new taxes, and eventual "privatization" of entitlements which still won't fore fend bankruptcy), call it compromise instead of a disaster.

I think Clinton had far more character than Obama. The disaster is not Gingrich et al, it is the milquetoast Northern liberal response.

Obama has replaced McCain's 100 years war in Iraq with unending police actions in 100 countries, institutionalized formerly illegal wiretapping, torture, "emergency" police state powers that evidently will never end, a massive unregulated giveaway to Big Insurance in Obamacare, massive giveaways to banks and private industry while jobs still bleed away oversees. What is to admire?

Decent thoughtful people evidently fill an empty glass with assumptions of their own decency and substance, not his.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
06:23 PM on 07/07/2011
OK, Leeskyblue, you know how much I love you, but this one just whiz-banged right past me. Loved the O'Connor quote but don't understand how it applies here. Like you, I wish the prez was more progressive on any number of issues. But I also can't resist seeing him outplay the Rs, even when he's not where I'd like him to be.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:10 PM on 07/08/2011
The charm of your blog is that you give and encourage intuitive and open ended comment. The O'Connor quote may not strictly fit a lawyer's standard for relevance, but still, I thought it relevant enough and worthy nonetheless.

What is a really generic and central "litmus test" that lawyer and layman alike can share?
I am not a lawyer, but allegedly by his own standard, a certain constitutional law professor said the so-called FISA or telecom immunity bill was so egregious that he emphatically was going to filibuster. Three days after he irreversibly secured the nomination for president, without batting an eye he brazenly reversed himself.

So, lawyers can change their minds?
There seems no other "argument". Can good sense and reason allow without explaining that he has no soul to sell? Can he have ever been a law professor with professional standards and a professional souI and done the thing he did? Did law ever mean anything to him or was it just a thing to do until he found another plaything?

I suspect that Hillary would have voted for the bill had she not been furious at the trick an inexperienced and therefore necessarily incompetent upstart had played upon her and the public. She seems to be happier at her present job than I think she would have been as president. Both Clintons' evident expedience is less offensive than Obama's.

What is Obama? I think he has been very consistent in a very bad way.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JonathanLA
02:50 PM on 07/07/2011
I also think Obama has something up his sleeve! By raising the stakes and making the discussion more about a general realignment of income and expenses, he may be calling the GOP's bluf and pushing them to the more systemic reforms including Social Security and Medicare, that we have known for years are needed but there was no political will to deal with (sort of like Clinton highjacking the discussion about welfare reform back in the late 90's and turning it into a high point of his administration.) After all, if they claim to want deficit reduction, let's go for it and then see if they really can stomach what they say they want! I don't have a problem with a responsible readjustment of Social Security and Medicare to reflect changing demographics and long-term funding needs, so if this process helps get those programs back on sound financial footing, maybe that will be a benefit from all this theater.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:46 PM on 07/07/2011
Yeah, I wrote this before I found out my SS benefits are on the table. Gulp.
photo
OutAtFirst
Believe it! You don't know how to text and drive
02:32 PM on 07/07/2011
I'm not sure it was such a good reference, as I recall, things didn't end too well for Cool Hand Luke.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:48 PM on 07/07/2011
Didn't end so well for the folks who were suckered by him, either.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
05:04 PM on 07/08/2011
What we have here is a failure to comunicate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBull
Come And Take It is a dare, not a request
09:19 PM on 07/08/2011
Luke turned out to be a fraud too.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
03:45 PM on 07/10/2011
Luke was a WWII veteran. What's fraudulent about that?
jhNY
Mercy.
02:13 PM on 07/07/2011
We'll see. I usually don't start cheering, myself, until the game is over.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gurukalehuru
cwtc7
01:59 PM on 07/07/2011
Good movie reference. I agree that the big O is an excellent card player. I'm just not sure we're on the same side.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:49 PM on 07/07/2011
Yeah, as mentioned above, I wrote this before I found out my SS benefits were on the table.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
05:07 PM on 07/08/2011
Actually, in one respect; it's a good reference.
Just like Cool Hand Luke, Obama plays the game for himself.
01:30 PM on 07/07/2011
End the wars completely and the budget becomes far easier to deal with.

Out of Iraq, not ten thousand targets left behind.
Out of Afghanistan, not ninety thousand stuck as fodder.

Occupation should be left to the Israelis. Even if we are stuck paying for that too.
12:53 PM on 07/07/2011
I get frustrated with Obama because he does play everything very close to his chest. It always seems like he is giving a mile, but then he comes out on top because he just isn't two moves ahead, he seems to be 50 moves ahead!
It's a real life Ocean's 11!
Dispite my frustrations of the lack of progressive initiatives being moved to the forefront, he does deal with the reality of politics better than many I have seen.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:50 PM on 07/07/2011
There was an article written about how good a poker player he became as an Illinois state legislator. And there's no poker like Illinois poker.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
05:08 PM on 07/08/2011
Especially, when you can vote "present".
photo
Daphydd
Lets play some music
12:44 PM on 07/07/2011
I would love to think that the deal which comes out will be a win for the President, but its very hard to tell right now. I really hope you are right.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:52 PM on 07/07/2011
May be a win for the president with Independents, now that he's putting SS on the table. But a loss for progressive Democrats.
PC Contrarian
Political Correctnes­s is the opiate of the left.
12:06 PM on 07/11/2011
How many loses have there been for progressive Dems since Obama became president? I've lost count.
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
12:38 PM on 07/07/2011
I find I admire President Obama more after each of these political showdowns.
No Drama Obama is a great nickname for him.
After the disaster that was W, "If you ain't with us, you're aginn us", I appreciate the thoughtful, reasoned response President Obama offers. Even when I would have liked a more aggressive play.
photo
morefromLA
A fighting liberal and proud of it
01:11 PM on 07/07/2011
You are so right. Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Constitutional Scholar
05:54 PM on 07/07/2011
I want more of a fighter, myself, but you have to give him props at playing DC Hold'Em.
12:20 PM on 07/07/2011
Didn't progressives do the freak out in December/January when you thought Obama had conceded too much to the Republicans, and it turned out that he beat the pants off them? I'll just wait and see what shakes out in the end. Progressives have been walking around with their hair on fire ever since this president took office. Is it impossible for us to wait and see the results before we scream?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MyNameIsJames
What should a person say in their micro-bio
04:57 PM on 07/07/2011
Yeah and what did the United States get in return for Obama's negotiation - A larger Budget deficit - that is about it.